Catholics Who Cheer Exploding Pagers Need to Learn Their Faith and Repent
MSNBC - Kamala Being 'Product of a Mixed Marriage' Will Make Putin Know...
Survey: Seventeen Percent Say Trump Should Have Been Shot and Killed Sunday
Harris, Pelosi, Warren Spread Misinformation About 'Trump Abortion Ban'
If Terrorists Would Leave Israel Alone, Their Pagers Wouldn't Have Exploded
Is This Interference? The FBI Announces Iran Leaked Trump Campaign Materials to the...
Kamala Harris Explains Her Understanding of the Children of the Community
Frequent Feckless Failure Kamala Harris Wasted Billions Earmarked to Expand Internet Acces...
LET'S GO! Riley Gaines Introduces Her Stand With Women Scorecard to Hold Politicians...
'It's Like a Funeral at CNN' After Teamsters' Leadership Didn't Endorse Kamala Harris
NOOOOOOOOO! The Hill Wants Us All to Know What Hillary Calls Her 'Postmenopausal...
President Trump Stops by a 'Crypto Bar' and Buys Burgers with Bitcoin in...
NO ONE TRUSTS Director Wray As He Says 'Full Force' of FBI Is...
Dr. Jill Biden to Honor 25th Anniversary of 'The West Wing' TV Series
This Is a Fun Game! Lefty WI State Senator's Lame Attempt at Lecturing...

Johns Hopkins University: Where men are men and women are non-men!

Oh, we wish we were making things up with that headline, but it is literally true.

Advertisement

The first tweet is quoting a tweet from Arielle Scarcella. That tweet showed a screencap of the definitions of ‘gay man’ and ‘lesbian’ from the Johns Hopkins University website. If you don’t feel like enlarging the picture this is how it defines the term ‘lesbian:’

Lesbian [sexual orientation]: A non-man attracted to non-men. While past definitions refer to ‘lesbian’ as a woman who is emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually attracted to other women, this updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with the label.

And this is how it defines the term ‘gay men:’

Gay Man: A man who is emotionally, romantically, sexually, affectionately, or relationally attracted to other men, or who identifies as a member of the gay community. At times, ‘gay’ is used to refer to all people, regardless of gender, who have their primary sexual and or romantic attractions to people of the same gender. ‘Gay’ is an adjective (not a noun) as in ‘He is a gay man.’

In other words, we have independently checked and it is true. We have saved the relevant page as a PDF in case someone tries to memory hole it. But yes, it is real. The picture by Scarcella is only altered by shifting the elements around a bit. But the words are being accurately quoted.

Also: There is no entry for ‘gay woman.’ Nor is there one for ‘gay non-man.’ Because only men are gay, or something. But wouldn't that make the term "gay man" redundant?

You know, the other day, we talked about how a very dry discussion with Jordan Peterson mostly about transgender issues was banned on YouTube, and now is being allowed on Twitter. Somewhere deep in that two-hour discussion they made the point that there is a lot of misogyny in the transgender movement, and it is hard to think of a better example of it. It is simply impossible to defend such unequal treatment.

Advertisement

In the end, inequality is one of the major problems with the transgender movement. We often confront transgender activists with this hypothetical:

Three white, able-bodied men come into a room.

The first is wearing blackface makeup and says that he is transracial.

The second is in a wheelchair and says he is transabled.

The third is wearing a dress, make-up, etc. and says he is transgender.

Why should the first two be treated differently than the third?

Why would race be treated as an immutable characteristic, but not sex? There is less biological reality to race than sex. And most rational people would say that when it comes to non-disabled people seeking to become disabled, doctors should not remove a perfectly healthy appendage from a person. For most people, this is true even if he or she is a consenting adult. Unless of course, that appendage is a penis and the patient thinks he is actually a woman, then many people don’t seem to care if the patient is even an adult. If you compare how these different issues are treated, if you really interrogate the idea, you start to see how incoherent transgender ideology really is.

(And now and then, you run into people who are truly nuts, who will argue, for instance, that we should provide amputations to transabled people. The correct response is to let their own ridiculousness rebut itself.)

Indeed, if you want to see how incoherent it all can be, we all know that Johns Hopkins is very likely to fix their definitions after a sufficient amount of outcry so that men will be defined as ‘non-women’ and women will be defined as ‘non-men.’ So, basically, in their eyes, there would not only be no women, but there would be no men, either.

Advertisement

A response:

We don’t know if Justin is a fan of ‘So, I Married an Axe Murderer’ but this person responding to him definitely is:


Advertisement

Finally, one of our funnier follows has an observation:

*Stifles laughter*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement