Can architecture be racist? Well, according to the Denver Post’s Ray Mark Rinaldi, YES IT CAN! Here’s his piece from October 19:
And his headline:
Did diversity miss the train in Union Station’s architecture?
The urban playground at Union Station isn’t drawing people of color and it may be the building’s fault
People of color don’t like the way the building is constructed so they’re avoiding it? That’s kind of a racist thing to say. And tweeters were quick to point out the inherent racism in Rinaldi’s claim:
Ah! So this piece was written in the course of calling other people racist, so that makes it OK. Got it?
More outrage and mockery at Rinald’s assertions:
But, hey … what do we know. Maybe African-Americans do avoid coming to Union Station. Just last week Hillary Clinton and Sen. Mark Udall were busy shaking hands and campaigning at the station, or as Rinaldi described it in his piece, “Denver in 1950” and we don’t see any African-Americans in the photo:
Vanilla ice cream, no doubt.
And here’s Udall from back in May at a ceremony for the opening of Denver’s finest example of, again in Rinaldi’s own words, “architecture of exclusivity”:
Kind of odd for two of the top politicians in Democratic circles — Sen. Mark Udall and Hillary Clinton — to be seen at such a monument to racism, no?
Come to think of it, President Obama has been noticeably absent from the campaign trail in Colorado. We’ve assumed that it’s because Sen. Udall didn’t want to be tied to the president’s failed policies, but could it bet that it’s actually President Obama who doesn’t want to be seen with Sen. Udall because of Udall’s love of a racist structure? We’re just asking questions…
Editor’s note: Two typos were corrected in this post. We apologize for the error.