Ya think? That’s a reasonable assumption to make after the news of a possible new Ebola case in Dallas broke. Even if we are supposed to totally trust the White House, according to this National Journal reporter.

Politico’s Ben White agrees.

Again, reasonable. But not according to Huffington Post’s Sam Stein.

But whatever guys. Do not ask questions!

What? Dude, you have ONE JOB. It’s your job to ask questions. What journalism!

Yep.

For crying out loud!

Not to lapdogs, apparently.

But at least National Journal’s Ron Fournier doesn’t agree with Stein’s lapdoggery.

Bingo.

Geez Louise.

Heh.

Yeah, OK buddy. The CDC is so trust-worthy and competent too, and never gives out conflicting info.

Panic? Reasonable questions do not fall under that category.

Ding, ding, ding!

Keep questioning, folks. Apparently we once again can’t rely on some on the lapdog media to do it.

Related:

Guess what John McCain wants Obama to do about Ebola (Hint: WTF?)

National Journal reporter Ron Fournier: Time for CDC to reconsider Ebola protocols — and talking points

If you still think Ebola isn’t highly contagious, Joe Scarborough has a reminder for you

Breaking: Texas health care worker who treated ‘patient zero’ tests positive for Ebola; Update: President Obama has been briefed; Update: Patient went into isolation within 90 minutes of feeling symptoms; Update: ‘Patient was wearing protective gear’: Update: Patient noticed fever on Friday?

The Obama admin, CDC won’t like this Ebola truth-snark from Sharyl Attkisson, but you will!

This journo is SHOCKED the WH can’t be trusted; This has to be the most unreal statement ever

Recommended Twitchy Video