In defiance of the members of progressive petition site Credo Mobilize and Forecast the Facts, the Washington Post published Charles Krauthammer’s column, “The myth of ‘settled science.'” The publishers also appear to have ignored the wishes of @climatebrad and his novelty giant red marker.
https://twitter.com/sf_ramblinz/status/436703663419957250
@climatebrad @krauthammer @ClimateDepot Exactly. How dare we have a discussion of science! All science involves blind acceptance.
— Dan Gainor (@dangainor) February 21, 2014
@climatebrad @washingtonpost @krauthammer @ClimateDepot Washington Politburo?
— Michael Wiley (@MinneMike) February 21, 2014
@climatebrad @krauthammer @ClimateDepot I even have a better idea. Why have science at all? Why not just let left tell us what to think?
— Dan Gainor (@dangainor) February 21, 2014
@dangainor @ClimateDepot @climatebrad @krauthammer the science is settled on settled science…
— Sheepherder (@chrismcm66) February 21, 2014
@climatebrad @ClimateDepot @washingtonpost @krauthammer It never fails to amuse me how warmists' serious tweets are met with derision.
— Brandon Olson (@bfolson18) February 21, 2014
Us too.
