Here we go: Another feminist freak-out over actress Candace Cameron Bure.
Earlier this week, Bure told HuffPost Live that, as her book explains, she intentionally takes a more “submissive” role in her marriage. “The definition that I’m using with submissive is the biblical definition,” she said.
HLN host Jane Velez-Mitchell apparently didn’t get the message that “submissive” doesn’t mean “weak” and “subservient” to Bure. (We’re told HLN is a cable network. Its viewer could not be reached for comment.)
— HLN Public Relations (@HLNPR) January 9, 2014
— CNN Video (@CNNVideo) January 10, 2014
Velez-Mitchell didn’t just criticize Bure. She shrieked her outrage to her panel. Over and over.
Once again, Bure took to Twitter to set the record straight.
— Candace Cameron Bure (@candacecbure) January 10, 2014
Indeed. But why should Velez-Mitchell do her homework when she can freak out about Bure dishonoring the suffragettes with her happy 17-year marriage? Ridiculous.
— #SeaGoalsCarrie2016 (@2teach2000) January 10, 2014
— Tyla (@TylaTholloway) January 10, 2014
— Talia (@taliasings) January 11, 2014
To change your comments display name, click here.