On Wednesday, #BridgeGhazi emerged as classless cretins’ hashtag of choice for tweets about the George Washington Bridge lane closure scandal tied to Gov. Chris Christie’s administration.

“Could you be any more insensitively vile? Chris Stevens. Ty Woods. Sean Smith. Glen Doherty,” was one of many spankings BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski received after calling #BridgeGhazi “the best hashtag on the Internet.”

So what did Politico do? It embraced the hashtag in this headline:

Here’s a tweet from the “real journalist” who authored the article.

New formula? Yeah, no.

Hey, hot tip, Politico: Critics leap on Politico for delighting in “repugnant” hashtag:

It’s beyond poor taste and the article neglects to even mention the smackdowns delivered to disrespectful tools using the hashtag.


What’s next?


(Hat tip: @gopfashionista)


Devastating truth-boom: Would Christie be a hero to Dems if he had done this instead?

Daniel Hannan tells Chris Christie ‘where you made your blunder’ on ‘Bridgegate’

Joan Walsh pronounces Chris Christie ‘toast’; Selective accountability diagnosed

‘Ouch’: Former Obama staffer issued reminder after mocking Chris Christie ‘Bridgegate’ response

‘I am outraged and deeply saddened’: Chris Christie issues Bridgegate statement; Lapdogs pounce

A ‘Bridgegate’ too far: Plouffe, MSM stoke outrage over Chris Christie, give Dems a free pass

‘More trouble than he’s worth’? Chris Christie postpones appearance in the wake of ‘Bridgegate’ scandal