The Heritage Foundation released its much-awaited study of the Gang of Ocho’s amnesty plan this morning. The Examiner’s Conn Carroll helpfully summarizes the study’s key points:

The study’s lead author, Robert Rector, says the costs of amnesty are backloaded:

Does that sound familiar? It should:

Does the Heritage Foundation study actually understate the costs of amnesty? Yes, probably:

And let’s not forget this:


Team Rubio claims ‘many’ illegal aliens currently here will be deported

Twitchy getting to you? Rubio’s Chief of Staff protects his Twitter account; Update: Claims he’s taking a Twitter break

Team Rubio’s ‘no welfare for illegal immigrants’ claim takes another hit

Rubio spokesman jokes about fictional jihadist’s Gang of Eight amnesty bill endorsement

Team Rubio says ‘no welfare,’ but its amnesty bill says otherwise

Marco Rubio’s press secretary likens non-citizen permanent residency to slavery

Marco Rubio spokesman says Border Commission is the real deal; Conn Carroll calls BS

Marco Rubio’s chief of staff has never seen positive comments in any comments thread anywhere

Marco Rubio chief of staff: Illegal immigrants would not immediately be granted legal status

Hours after Marco Rubio interview, Mark Levin slams ‘Gang of Eight’ immigration bill


Noted immigration researchers Haley Barbour, Jeff Flake, and Paul Ryan slam Heritage Foundation study