Gotta take a moment to thank The New York Times for giving us ENDLESS amounts of stupid to cover. Seriously, mucho gracias for the job security, crazy people at the NYT.
Case in point:
Opinion: And then they came for Robert Mueller https://t.co/H3WRjwTKse
— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 5, 2017
Do they know where that came from?!
From The New York Times:
There’s no bottom to the delusion on display. At this point, investigators could release videotapes of Vladimir Putin personally handing Mr. Trump a uranium-lined briefcase filled with stolen emails, and the right-wing armada would find a way to blame Mrs. Clinton. (This would be followed, of course, by a congressional investigation to identify who leaked the tapes.)
See, we saved you a click PLUS you don’t have to read the full stupid.
You’re welcome.
"and then they came for…" the Times uses same set up aimed at german intellectuals during the rise of Nazi power. https://t.co/vnHGjCew7A
— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) November 5, 2017
Recommended
And they keep insisting it’s the Right and Trump behaving like Nazis? Alrighty then, NYT.
https://twitter.com/JohnGaltReport/status/927026802480046082
That might actually be their new tagline.
Drama queens. #NYTimes
— D.G. ?? (@Daniel_G66) November 5, 2017
Ha! Fair point.
Not the "failing new york times", noooo
— Conservative Cajun (@jsavoie67) November 5, 2017
Because they’re usually the epitome of integrity in their reporting and story-writing.
Bingo.
Related:
‘Now, THAT is news’! Is Drudge TRYING to break the Internet with this tweet on Donna Brazile?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member