Giggles! Gee, we wonder why they aren’t smiling? Why are Huma and Anthony so sad in New York Times Magazine cover photo?

Twitter has the answer: Junk pics are serious business

On the plus side, at least he kept his pants on for this photo.

But, wait!

Oh, the humanity.

Related:

Kirsten Powers says Anthony Weiner deserves a second chance

Heh: Reporter still waiting to hear why Anthony Weiner sent crotch pics to strangers

Anthony Weiner’s oh-so-perceptive brother: ‘There was definitely a douchiness about him’

TWSS-bait: Drudge scores giggles with headline on Anthony Weiner comeback

Heads up, everybody: NYT Magazine teases new Anthony Weiner story

Conservatives suggest bumper stickers for Anthony Weiner mayoral campaign

‘Are you kidding me?’: Actor Dean Cain responds to potential Anthony Weiner comeback

Uh oh: Anthony Weiner is tweeting strange stuff again

  • Diane Stephan

    Have you ever seen her smile…….she has bigger teeth and gums than Mr. Ed.

  • Elaine

    It’s not even that he did those perverted things, it’s the way he so easily lied about it. I would never want a that kind of liar representing anyone.

  • waltermitty2012

    We all deserve a second chance, maybe we’ll get a rise out Wiener the second time around.

  • 1SkepticalChick

    Easy answer regarding his pantless Tweets? He took off his pants because they were on fire. Take 2…roll ’em!

  • ICOYAR

    Dicks don’t smile.

  • Right Wired

    If i lived in the Socialist New York Republic, I’d be frowning too.

  • conservativemomma

    What is telling about liberals is the fact that a guy like Weiner actually thinks he is fit for political office. No shame or embarassment for his perversion.

    • Harry A

      so does that mean mark sanford, who in all likely hood is headed back to the house is telling about conservatives?

      • conservativemomma

        The difference is that conservatives don’t make excuses for perverts in our ranks. We drum them out. Liberals make excuses and act like showing you Johnson to young girls is “not a big deal”

      • http://www.vatican.va/ Rulz

        “all likely hood is headed back to the house”

        It’s going to be a close race.

        Don’t see him on any big city magazine covers. Guess it’s only cool to be
        adulterous if you are a liberal?

        Either way, I don’t condone such actions.

        Also, I think that conservativemomma has a point. Whenever republicans screw up, their base calls them out on it whereas the left circles the wagons—“two consenting adults” and all that nonsense.

      • http://www.vatican.va/ Rulz

        “all likely hood is headed back to the house”

        It’s going to be a close race.

        Don’t see him on any big city magazine covers. Guess it’s only cool to be
        adulterous if you are a liberal?

        Either way, I don’t condone such actions.

        Also, I think that conservativemomma has a point. Whenever republicans screw up, their base calls them out on it whereas the left circles the wagons—“two consenting adults” and all that nonsense.

  • arttie

    Cover should be “Huma and Horney Honey”

  • Axelgreaser

    WHY MUST NEW YORK SETTLE FOR SOMEONE WHO SHOULD BE ON A SEX OFFENDER LIST? Do New Yorkers really have such a short memory? What next? Wiener naming ‘Client #9’ Deputry Mayor? Will New York City continue to sell it’s Mayoral office to loon progressives for the highest bid? Wiener and his well connected to Islam wife Huma Abedine’s ‘Interview and purification act’ via the MSM and the New York ‘Liberal’ Times in particular (who gave us Barack Hussein Obama) should FAIL! No perversion is too low for the left, even arrogantly Tweeting your junk for the entire world to see, believeing nobody would discover it or that there would be recriminations because you’re protected under the mantle of progressive-Democrat sleeze allowances no Conservative would be extended and that aside from all else, it’s a vile, disgusting, putrid misuse of power and office and terrifice waste of time devoted to SEX rather than duty to constituents who in reaily simply do not matter to Democrats. Theirs is to obtain office first and ignore constituents wishes above all else, i.e., Barack Obama. A ‘Hot Dog’ Vendor should be able to defeat Wiener. He would certainly know his opponent well enough to size him up, plant him in a bun, smother him in mustard, ketchup, sauerkraut and top him off (or hopefully take him out) with a spicey Tweet for good ‘measure’. Anthony Wiener is one Red Hot no New Yorker should relish.

    If Wiener wins, it’ll be on promises to give more largesse to the ‘911’ constituency with more tax payer supported ‘freebies’ or perhaps something as innocuous as the promise to bring back the ‘Big Gulp.’ Or, perpaps he’ll tailor it more to his own circumstance and just bring back a ‘3.5-oz.Teeny Gulp.’

  • K-Dubya

    It’s a shame what has happened to this man. Screech was my favorite character on Saved By The Bell. I would have never thought he’d grow up to be like this.

  • stillinthe60s

    Apparently Ms Huma Weiner hasn’t been schooled by Ms Rodham to work the ole quid pro quo with Mr Seema Wiener. Smile = $ or running out for feminine needs etc.

  • Donna W

    Named after a hot dog, you poor man, you poor, poor man. Dr. Peter Venkman*~

  • Axelgreaser

    WHAT AN UNATTRACTIVE INDIVIDUAL. Is it physical? His cragginess? His ‘shifty’ eyes. In his case that is not just a cliche, they shift under the pressure of cross examination by press, just search for vids created during the ‘Wiener Troubles’. Or, is it the memories of his nastiness, his public shouting, scolding and berating of conservatives to the point that you’d swear he wants us all exterminated!? Is it his outright lies to the public when confronted with a perversion that lands most people on a sex offender registry? Is he on one? Or did he somehow get a pass? Is what makes Wiener completely repulsive as a candidate for high office in any way connected to his repeated lies in the light of a scandal he could not hope to supress and Democrats do as a matter of course? It was perjury, of course. Unpunished because he hadn’t YET sworn on the Bible that he was telling ‘the whole truth, nothng but the truth.’ He only came clean when that was becoming an inevitability. But, then, when does swearing on the Bible ever deter Democrats from lying as soon as their singed, blistered hand is safely lifted from the damning book?

  • G.

    It seems probable that a certain % of the public feels that public office is the right and only “profession” for them, regardless of the public humiliation they may endure after being exposed for what they truly are, whether it be pedophile, molester, rapist, murderer, philanderer, drunkard, or whatever. Their ego seems to be so great along with their need for adoration that it forces them back into the same arena for more of the same. Certainly, the belief that the American public is stupid with a short memory may reinforce these desires.