Something fundamental has to change? Like that pesky Constitution?

President Obama had a busy morning during an interview on “Meet the Press”: He blamed the death of four Americans in Benghazi on “sloppiness,” and called democracy “messy.” But that wasn’t all! He also did some ghoulish politicizing of the Newtown tragedy. Lapdog David Gregory provides the swoon-filled commentary.

But he’ll totally still politicize on the backs of the dead for an agenda! Shameful.

Nope, not tweaking. He’s making gun-grabbing a priority.

Twitter users give President Obama the business.

But, wait … maybe not.

Gutsy call! And this Twitter user isn’t worried about his Second Amendment rights at all.


It won’t be for lack of trying, though. Remember: Fundamental change.

Forward! Gird your loins, happy warriors.

  • FIRE THEM ALL- 2014

    If we allow one man, and one administration under him to tear up our constitution then we all deserve the country and government we will end up with. This man’s narcissistic behavior is going do more harm to our country than any before him, he has already turned your children and grand children into slaves by using and renewing a budget that was intended to get us through one year not four years of hard times. He is spending us into debt with those who will soon show us who our friends are not if we don’t stop him soon.

    • BlueGood

      “Civilization begins when the strong finally realize they have a duty to protect the weak. That duty is the foundation of civilization, the bedrock on which
      everything else rests”.

      For centuries we, the people, have abdicated our duty to a few strong
      men. Rule us we said, and do not steal too much. Do not be too corrupt,
      do not betray us too much, do not shame us beyond endurance. Protect
      the weak, the elderly, the helpless, the sick, and the very young,
      protect them from those who would prey upon them. And protect us. If you
      grant us protection, you may steal a little, enough to become filthy
      rich, as long as you do not rub our faces in it”.

      I wish I could lay claim to these words, but alas a man far more
      eloquent than I has wrote them in a book….his character, a man of God,
      was speaking of CUBA, but he was speaking of Tyranny!

      While the book is one of fiction, the words in the above passage, I
      feel are so apropo to what we are facing from our so-called
      democratically elected officials, the “stealing” and rubbing it in our
      faces has become to much to ignore, the TEA Party has recognized this
      and Sarah Palin recognized this, I had recognized this long ago as well,
      which is why I boldly faxed Sarah Palin from Ontario to her office in
      Alaska before she resigned….to offer my support and advice she ignore
      the Lame Stream media because they were deathly afraid of her….

      I believe we must make sure the TEA Party Patriots regain control of
      the house and the Senate and the White House to remove those that steal
      to much, those that “rub our faces in it”.

      I believe the Tea Party is, and always has been, the “Silent
      Majority” of decent folks who “Trusted” our elected…..kept their nose
      to the proverbial grindstone and did not make waves….paid their taxes,
      grumbled about the latest Leftoid outrage, were appalled at the
      cronyism, the “fixed” deals and court cases, but still remained stoic
      & silent.

      NO MORE!

      I feel we must continue to rally more and more TEA PARTY like people to ACTION!

      The RINO’s, the LEFT and the ESTABLISHMENT Republicans ARE deathly
      afraid of people like you and me and Stephen Coonts’ character….

      Why not show them WHY?…Why not take over by their rules, all they
      covet and have corrupted?….. It is the Civilized route and one of

      BTW….Any Author who publishes a book that refers to a “Crock of
      Schit” as a “Crock of Pelosi” IMHO is a CONSERVATIVE…..I will
      read..even if his is fiction….

      ‘Stephen Coonts’ does a very good conservative tale, but his above quote in “CUBA’, hit me as quite relevant…..

      Happy New Year My Conservative Twitchy Friends!


    • Vennoye

      Especially “one man” that so many have said is not eligible to be President in the first place due to the natural born citizen clause.

    • TundraThunder

      “If we allow one man, and one administration under him to tear up our
      constitution then we all deserve the country and government we will end
      up with.”

      And what would your suggestion be for us to stop Obama and his backers, Sandra? The Republican Party with all of its in-fighting, the Tea Party dividing the conservatives, and the left and its media lapdogs getting their base in an uproar with their lies about the NRA and us in general, just what would you propose to us to stop them? Write our congressmen/women?

      The left is just waiting to tear up the Constitution, and so far all we can do is wait and watch. Plus, if any of the conservative SCOTUS judges retire in the next few years, the left will have a definite majority, and the changes will be “fast and furious”.

      Why say “If we allow one man . . . “, if we don’t know how to stop them? We won’t deserve what we get if we didn’t vote for it! It will have to be crammed down our throats, and I for one will fight for my/our rights!

      We can only hope our Constitution doesn’t get scrapped, and the multitudes of gun owners make a peaceful stand to protect us all.

  • Sonya A. Willis

    We must think beyond Obama politicizing the Sandy Hook tragedy and think about what he’s really up to. “…more flexibility after the election”, “…never let a crisis go to waste…”

    What is he planning that he desperately needs our guns out of our hands? With this guy who HATES America so much, we must think the worst in order to protect ourselves.

    • Kate

      Agreed! His repeated statements that America needs “fundamental change” is what is the most terrifying. It sounds great to the low-info voters, but it goes right along with the rhetoric of the Hate America crowd.

      • PennyRobinsonFanClub

        “The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution.”
        Thomas Jefferson

  • HARP2

    England Warns America: Don’t let them take your guns

  • HARP2

    Obama 2008: “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True”

    “I believe in the Second Amendment. I will not take your shotgun away. I
    will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away… But I am
    not going to take your guns away. So if you want to find an excuse not
    to vote for me, don’t use that one because it just ain’t true. It ain’t

    • mickeyco

      Gee, you mean he lied? Wow.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation,
      that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the
      difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction
      and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be
      the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted
      with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”
      Patrick Henry

  • Everybodys All American

    What? Is he planning on putting everyone in jail? Eff him.

  • Jerry J Brown

    This is a distraction. Keep open eyes!

  • Marty Luther

    Oh the Fundamental Rights, how they are a changing.

  • Joe W.

    Love to see the Muzzie from Kenya try to disarm Americans. Just love to see it…He will have more blood on his hands than Sadaam Hussein ever did.

    • michael s

      Stop lying. When police in new Orleans were confiscating guns after hurricane Katrina, they gave em up without any resistance. Muzzie from Kenya, its false racist attitudes like yours that got an innocent man of Indian descent pushed onto subway tracks and killed in NYC

      • Joe W.

        Hey, Shitforbrains…Nothing “racist” about my post. Islam is NOT a race, nor is Kenyan. Grow up. As for New Orleans, they gave “em up because they were already demolished by the freakin’ hurricane, you idiot. They were in a dister area and dying. I’m safe at home and I dare ANYONE top come for my guns. They are legal. they are mine…and they will stay that way unless they kill me over them. Do NOT make the mistake of believing that I am alone in my defense of my 2nd Amendment, you liberal puss bucket. Go to hell, Princess.

      • Vennoye

        You are completely correct, Michael……..people have been buying guns like crazy for the last four and a half years, just to “give them up without any resistance”!!! Do your pigs and cows fly????? Or is ignorance just bliss?

        • PennyRobinsonFanClub

          “The constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is
          inherent in the people; that … it is their right and duty to be at all
          times armed; … ”
          Thomas Jefferson

      • Annie Willoughby

        The British eventually forgave us. The Nazis have been kind of quiet for a long time now. The Japanese suddenly came around to our way of thinking. Saddam and Osama don’t have an opinion. It’s never wise to attack our fundamental, Constitutional rights. It has nothing to do with rascism. Some were white, some brown, some yellow and black but they all got over it and our rights remain.

      • PennyRobinsonFanClub

        “The best we can help for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”
        Alexander Hamilton

      • PennyRobinsonFanClub

        “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the
        other hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and
        plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same
        balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for
        all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them
        aside … Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the
        use of them.”
        Thomas Paine

  • tredglx

    Something tells me that it may not be as hard as he thinks to disarm us: if We The People give his gun-grab the same importance that we gave electing someone else to take his place, it’ll be a cakewalk.
    Especially if the spineless Boehner lets Feinstein’s bill come up for a vote in the House.
    Believe me, I pray to Almighty God that it doesn’t come to that.

    • Troy Blanchard III

      There are a lot of people who simply will not go for it…

  • operanerd1986

    Given that the NRA’s approval rating is higher than Congress’, I predict the public support just isn’t there.

    • Vennoye

      Lots of Democrat Senators up for election in 2014………think they want to spend the political capital for this??

      • Zane Henry

        A lot of them were around in 1994. They don’t want to see a repeat of the turnover carnage they caused with AWB 1. I’m not TOO worried at this point. Just glad I’m not just now trying to buy my first couple of rifles. Pickins are SLIM out there.

    • mhojai

      By “public support,” he means, illegals, “occupy wall street” and his ministry of propaganda (msm)

  • Lamontyoubigdummy

    Depending upon “public opinion”, sir, your jack-booted ATF/ Homeland Moron Squad (hey, doesn’t that fella of yours, Holder, sign off on all their paychecks?) can have all my guns.

    Do you mind if I give them over bullets first?

    I’ll start from about 650yds out…It’ll be fun.

    I’m curious Mr. President. Cuz I’m sorta kinda thinking your version of “public opinion” equals David Gregory & Howard Kurtz’s definition of “public interest”.

    Molon Labe Barry. Molon Labe.

    • HARP2

      Barry will have to ask president Jarret what Molon Labe means.

      • WisconsinPatriot

        Val says to Barry; “it means open your mouth so there isn’t as much mess”

  • delroymonjo

    “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said at a
    Philadelphia fundraiser Friday night. “Because from what I understand folks in
    Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.” June, 2008
    Make up your damn mind, El Presidente’! Is it gonna’ be guns or not? If you bring yours, I’m bringin’ mine!

  • BeeKaaay

    Of course he wants fundamental change, he already came through on that. Tyrannicare is proof.

  • shimauma

    Thomas Jefferson said that the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. I’m sick of seeing patriot blood run, WHEN DO WE MAKE THE TYRANTS BLEED??!?!?

  • traffic_robot

    We all remember the overwhelming public support for Obamacare, right?

    Re-up your NRA memberships, donate to your local and state gun rights organizations, and put the pressure on. It’s coming.


    come try and take my guns, please try!!

  • Vennoye

    Are you aware of the Dick Act of 1902??

    DICK ACT of 1902 . . . CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) The Trump Card Enacted by the Congress Further

    Asserting the Second Amendment as Untouchable

    The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of
    Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control
    laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

    The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the
    organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State,
    Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular
    army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and
    45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and
    2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can
    afford to buy.

    The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so
    would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet
    another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The
    President of the United States has zero authority without violating the
    Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State

    The National Guard Militia can only be required by
    the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to
    uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion).
    These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the
    National Guard.

    Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft,
    “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive
    warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

    The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the
    House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in
    ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe
    was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been

    During the war with England an attempt was made by
    Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between
    the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated
    in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such
    power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft
    them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

    The fact is that the President has no constitutional
    right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside
    the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective
    states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for
    the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

    Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA)
    made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record,
    House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: “The militia, within
    the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army
    of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel
    Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that
    the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and
    thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution
    worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which
    grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”

    “This limitation upon the power to raise and support
    armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the
    Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to
    voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was
    intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to
    limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but
    they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the
    extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the
    country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia
    imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or
    limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such

    The Honorable William Gordon

    Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “I ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the
      people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”
      George Mason

      Co-author of the Second Amendment

  • lazypadawan

    Obama’s War On Bitter Clingers continues.

  • lcky9

    Here’s what I am curious about.. firstly .. those that have guns WILL NOT give them up.. oh I saw the PROPAGANDA show of weapons being collected.. if anyone reads police blogs (run by retired policemen) they know they are guns that they collected over time and a few others where the CROOKS are getting rid of them cause it’s a don’t ask type of policy which translates get rid of your weapons used in crimes to the gang bangers better than dumping them in the river..Second problem would be with the HUGE increase in people getting weapons at gun shows and stores that would equal into MORE American’s being armed.. third would be the problem that even his own supporters just got SHOCKED awake.. while Democrats are just misinformed they UNDERSTAND a DIRECT ATTACK on their FREEDOMS and MOST liberals even believe in the 2nd amendment,, I personally know of 10 people who voted for Obama who have been SHOCKED awake by this.. they have went and gotten guns.,. THEY now believe what has been being said about Obama.. As Beck said he took OFF his cover .. now even the DUMB can see what what he and his administration is.. and THEY don’t like it..(besides being proven wrong about OBAMA they see their stupidity.)

  • Rulz

    “After Newtown, POTUS says “all of us have to do some soul searching, including me as president””

    I agree. The realisation that gun control doesn’t work. Anywhere.

  • A Willful Boy

    Something fundamental does have to change. Obama-philes need to turn off the trash TV and pick up some history and economics books.

    • WisconsinPatriot

      Like Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto??

  • Garth Haycock

    Anyone who loves freedom should be alarmed when he says that if there isn’t the public support for taking our guns, he won’t do it. Remember Obamacare?

  • Divineconnection7

    Yes, obama is a tyrant.

  • Dimi

    I hope Obama has the balls to get real and get rid of your guns. For the sake of innocent people.

    • Penmar

      Are you saying we are all going around killing innocent people just because we exercise our rights under the 2nd Amendment?

      • Dimi

        No I’m not but the ability to kill a large number of people should not be in your hands sparky.

        • Penmar

          That is not your right to decide.

          • Dimi

            You must be very good at deciding who should die. Because you have a gun you get that choice. I hope your a good judge … You and everybody else carrying a loaded weapon.

          • Penmar

            So you think I should just let some one kill me, I shouldn’t have the right to protect myself from harm or worse? And you also think you are a better judge of whether or not I get to protect myself from someone trying to hurt or kill me?

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            “Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are
            the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence …
            from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences
            and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the
            rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of
            firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of
            honor with all that’s good.”
            George Washington

          • Michael Leuker

            If a democratic society decides to give a mandate to change the law, even the constitution, to their elected representative(s), then it is our right to decide just that.

          • Penmar

            First, we are a Republic, the founders specifically warned and were concerned about a “Democratic” majority inflicting it’s will on the rest of the country, hence we have the 2nd Amendment. Which the only way you will be able to change is by Amending the Constitution, so good luck. Add to that, the Supreme Court has already ruled the 2nd Amendment stands, you can not completely ban guns in this country. But as before, when the 1st gun ban went into effect, it didn’t do much good and was repealed, which brought crime down, not up. You ‘gun control’ advocates have no interest in actually finding out why or how to stop future Mass shootings all you want is to remove guns from the rest of the country because you don’t like them. Oh and btw, a ban on so called assault rifles would not have stopped the CT shooter as he used handguns. And the Aurora shooter had 12 or more handmade hand grenades he could have used, which would have resulted in much more damage and fatalities than we had by him just using guns.

          • Michael Leuker

            If there’s enough popular support for another amendment then it will happen eventually. We won’t know if better gun regulation can’t work unless we try and there’s good evidence (see below) that says it might just work.

            I’ve lived in Germany for most of my life and a few years in Japan, both countries that are enforcing extremely tough gun control regimes. You simply can’t go and buy a gun before you have been authorized to do so and even then, you won’t get any ammo for it unless you have a specific purpose (e.g, you’re a hunter). Gun violence in both countries is negligible compared to what is happening year after year in the US.

            Yes, you’ll stil have the occasional lunatic who, instead of shooting people, decides to stab them to death with a fork, but he’ll likely do a lot less damage. Also, fewer people will feel the need to arm themselves to the teeth in reaction to the next big mass shooting … or put armed guards into schools. Talk about a vicious cycle right there. Short of taking the weapons with which those crimes are committed away, there is no (sane) solution to the problem.

            And just a few more words to close: You’re right that I would rather see a general ban on _all_ kinds of firearms (for which there isn’t a specific purpose) because, as you have indicated, relatively few crimes are committed with assault weapons.

          • Penmar

            What part of “We tried it and it didn’t work” didn’t you understand? Bush also strengthened the background check laws, and that has done nothing either. I’ve lived in Germany too, if you like it there so much then move permanently. I do not want to be Germany, I am an American and extremely proud of being one. And you are wrong about people not wanting to arm themselves to protect themselves, Crime against people, violent crime increased both in the UK and Australia after they banned guns, Australia in particular is now dealing with home invasions, something they didn’t have before they banned guns. Your proposal doesn’t not remove guns from the violent offenders only punishes and removes them from legal owners of guns, leaving them with nothing to defend themselves with.

        • Dinobot

          Sorry, the ability to defend myself should not be decided by people who will be too late to protect me including you from people who want to kill or wound me.

          • Dimi

            Your really scared aren’t you? If I knew that every second person was carrying a gun I would be too.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            Project much?

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people
            always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to
            use them.”
            Richard Henry Lee

          • Dinobot

            Sorry, you are using a strawman argument which shows that your position against gun ownership is weak at best. Being brave or scared is irrelevant because that is not the point there. To be able to defend yourself is the point. The Second Amendment is clear on this matter.

            If you are damn afraid of law abiding gun owning owners more than criminals,you are not mentally and emotionally qualified to own any firearm period.

        • PennyRobinsonFanClub

          “The supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the
          other hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and
          plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same
          balance would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for
          all would be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them
          aside … Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the
          use of them.”
          Thomas Paine

    • MoxieLouise

      I will be perfectly ready to give up guns when the murderers, thieves, police, and soldiers worldwide give up theirs. Since Obama is running guns in Mexico, Libya, Syria, etc. etc. I don’t think he’s going to make that happen. For the sake of innocent people.

      • Dimi

        In December a man in beiging attacked 20 children with a knife outside of their school. None died. Gun control works don’t be so stuck in your own world. Put yourself in the position of those victims and their families. For the sake of innocent lives. If you think you can defend yourself because you have a gun you are DEAD wrong. By your argument we all have the right to a weapon of mass destruction. Your argument is dumb

        • Sherri Seiber

          I love the way people completely ignore the deaths of children in China from March of 2010 to Sept 2011 While I am certainly relieved no one was killed in the December rampage, I can’t help but wonder about the physical and emotional scars these children many sufffer.

          • Dimi

            I would rather my child be alive than die instantly from a gun wound.

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            “The best we can help for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”
            Alexander Hamilton

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            I love the way people who are fawningly in love with Chinese gun control ignore the 50 million men, women, & children that Mao Tse Tung murdered; a feat of mass murder unparalleled in world history, and possible only because the people had been disarmed.

        • Penmar

          That was after a man attacked 70 kids with a knife, killing 20 and wounding 50, which happened in China. You need to go find some real facts, Dimi, Timothy McVeigh didn’t use a gun neither did the terrorists on 9/11. And I stand a whole lot better chance of coming out alive if I have a gun to defend myself with than if I only have a knife against a 6 ft, 250-300 lb person. They tried gun control it didn’t do a thing, criminals did not suddenly turn in all their illegal weapons just because the law was passed. Gun ownership is up, crime is coming down, those are the facts. Try reading up on the 3/4 teens that saved themselves and/or their families in the last two months with a gun from intruders. Try reading up on how in the Clackamas, Or Mall shooting and concealed carry permit holder pointed a gun at the shooter who upon seeing the weapon pointed at him then turned the gun on himself. Or the off duty police officer with a CC stopped a Mass murderer in San Antonio, recently. Guns are not the problem.

          This is what happens when you ban guns:

          This is the truth about guns:
          Gun Control Critique

          • Dimi

            Unfortunately I couldn’t watch the YouTube video on Australia as it seems to have been taken off. But I live in Australia and gun control has been very effective here. We have very few gun related deaths – a couple of hundred and that’s mostly suicide. Not one mass shooting since they were banned in 1996- what was on the video?

          • Grandma HeadInjury

            “But I live in Australia” Great! We have another Piers Morgan wannabe on our hands. Worry about your own country, Dim, we’ll worry about ours.

          • Dimi

            Hahahahahaha!!!! Oh that’s right Americans never get involved in other countries issues. Your children are being killed at school!! You don’t seem capable of protecting them :-( maybe the world should get involved in your affairs!

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub


            “The homicide rate was 1.9 per 100,000 in 1996 (which includes the 35 victims of the Port Arthur massacre) and was at its highest in 1999, at 2.0 per 100,000. In 2007, the rate was 1.3 per 100,000, the lowest
            recorded (since 1996).”

            Sounds good, but without pre-’96 figures these numbers are meaningless. Also, just “homicide” is virtually meaningless without context. First degree murder? 2nd degree? Vehicular Manslaughter? Justifiable Homicide (in self-defense)? Meanwhile, violent crime of every other type is skyrocketing, because criminals know more people have no way to defend themselves, and the CRIMINALS HAVE GUNS.

          • Grandma HeadInjury

            Well, then, grab a gun and go stand guard at one of our schools then. I mean, if you are so adamant about protecting children half a world away. Let me know when you get to the US. Let me know which school you are protecting. I’ll be right here.

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            You have my sympathy. Australians used to be a free people.

        • Frederick Weaver

          One of the interesting characteristics of mass shootings is that they generally occur in places where firearms are banned: malls, schools, etc. That was the finding of a famous 1999 study by John Lott of the University of Maryland and William Landes of the University of Chicago, and it appears to have been borne out by experience since then as well.

          In a way, this is no surprise. If there’s someone present with a gun when a mass shooting begins, the shooter is likely to be shot himself. And, in fact, many mass shootings — from the high school shooting by Luke Woodham in Pearl, Miss., to the New Life Church shooting in Colorado Springs, Colo., where an armed volunteer shot the attacker — have been terminated when someone retrieved a gun from a car or elsewhere and confronted the shooter.

          Policies making areas “gun free” provide a sense of safety to those who engage in magical thinking, but in practice, of course, killers aren’t stopped by gun-free zones. As always, it’s the honest people — the very ones you want to be armed — who tend to obey the law.

          Glenn Reynolds, USA Today

          In short, gun free zones like Sandy Hook simply make law-abiding citizens easy prey for murderous lunatics. This reality explains why liberal reporter Chris Cuomo, nephew of Gov. Cuomo, said that he supports ARMED security at schools, which would be more effective at preventing massacre than the false security of gun control:

          Furthermore, Gallup notes that over half of Americans agree with Cuomo’s idea:

          Hence, Americans must pursue FRESH ideas to thwart spree killers instead of digging up the tired and frankly useless policy of gun control.

        • MoxieLouise

          Wow, you know everything, don’t you? It’s good to know that I can’t defend myself with a gun; I’ll tell that to the abused woman who pointed one at her ex who meant to kill her. She thinks she’s alive because of that gun. And you can tell the rape victim she’s not allowed to have a gun any more. Neither of those people are going on a crazed shooting spree, yet you would take guns from everyone. And I said nothing about WMDs. You tossed that in out of nowhere.

          • Dimi

            What you should understand is that the principle is the same. Do you think every country should have WMD? Or is it just for you Americans? I don’t know everything but I am blessed to live in a country where very few people die of gun violence because we have some of the strictest gun laws in the world.

          • MoxieLouise

            No, the principle is not the same. The words Mass Destruction should be a clue. The guns people have in their homes are designed for hunting and/or protection, not mass destruction. And last time I checked, the US was not the only country with WMDs. No matter what you ban, evil will find a way. The Hutus killed a million innocent people with machetes in just over a month, where’s the outrage over that? Are we banning machetes?

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            How many people were dying of “gun violence” before?

          • PennyRobinsonFanClub

            “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people
            always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to
            use them.”
            Richard Henry Lee

            American Statesman, 1788

        • mike_in_kosovo

          Using Brady Campaign state grades and CDC stats, the *WORSE* the state does re Brady, the less violent crime and murders they have – which puts the lie to your statement that “gun control works”.

          Unless you meant that ‘gun control works to ensure the murderer’s victims will be conveniently disarmed’, that is.

        • PennyRobinsonFanClub

          “The great object is that every man be armed.”
          Patrick Henry

    • JeannieJ

      Dimi, if you’re that concerned and supportive of Fearless Leader, then why not prove it? Offer to be the personal shield who goes door to door and stands in front of the minions trying to collect the guns? For the sake of innocent people, of course.

    • Frederick Weaver

      Please read the following (emphasis mine):

      Because of its historically racist basis, the right to bear arms has been either historically usurped by bigoted state-sanctioned controls or has been intellectually, morally and emotionally usurped by the so-called teachings and suspect leadership of purported self-appointed leaders. This is true, whether the leaders be self-appointed or allegedly anointed, because of their so-called religious positions or piety, or have been compromised politically, though elected by the people.

      Consequently, why would I or anyone, give back a right that black Americans have died for access to or have been lynched as a result of the inability to embrace and effectuate that right?

      Do you think that any of the lynched martyrs of the black American experience would be deceased if they had brandished a Beretta M9, semi-automatic, hand gun with two magazines filled with 15 rounds of 9 millimeter, hollow point ammunition to defend themselves from lynch mob bigots?

      I have often asked African-Americans what other express constitutional right they would like to see either abolished or repealed? I would have been taken aback had anyone answered the erosion or abolition of the 13th Amendment, which outlaws slavery and involuntary servitude.

      — Joseph Davis, legal counsel to Obama’s re-election campaign

      If Obama’s own LAWYER (a staunch liberal) argues that gun control is a stupid and even racist policy, why should conservative gun owners bother supporting it? The reality is that there are Democrat gun owners as well as Republican who would not look kindly to Obama wanting to take away their means of self-defense.
      Now you know why the NRA’s enjoys better public support than Congress and the anti-gun, anti-freedom mainstream media.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation,
      that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the
      difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction
      and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be
      the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted
      with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”
      Patrick Henry

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “… the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms”
      Philadelphia Federal Gazette

      June 18, 1789, Pg. 2, Col. 2
      Article on the Bill of Rights

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “And that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize
      Congress to infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of
      Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are
      peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms; …”
      Samuel Adams

      quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20, 1789

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      “The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion.”
      Edmund Burke

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      You say you want a revolution? Well . . .. you know . . .
      PS — I hope you choke on a bowlful of dicks.

  • MoxieLouise

    “Something fundamental needs to change”…I fear it already has. See 2012 electorate. Please wake up, while there’s still something left to save.

  • $35072932

    Obama Announces Plans to Pass New Restrictions on Gun Ownership in America

    Back in 2008 Barack Obama promised supporters:

    “I’m not going to take your guns away. That just ain’t true.”

    Fast forward to 2012…
    Today Barack Obama announced that he hopes to pass new restrictions on gun ownership in America.
    The Hill reported:

    President Obama on Sunday said he would make gun control a priority in his new term, pledging to put his “full weight” behind passing new restrictions on firearms in 2013.

    Rack up another from the Dear Liar.

    Obama 2008 – “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True”

  • Womak1990

    Americans never give up your guns

    These days, there are few few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bare arms and use deadly force to defend one’s self and possessions.

    Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

    For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position.

    In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack.

    The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

    No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

    So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

    Stanislav Mishin

  • JeannieJ

    Perhaps I’m being overly-simplistic–if I am, I’m sure you folks will correct that. This (Man I really hate calling him this) person took an oath of office that included the words “…preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

    When one starts openly gunning for “fundamental changes”, is that preserving? Protecting? Defending? And could it be actionable?

    • Penmar

      No you aren’t being overly simplistic, he doesn’t protect, preserve or defend the constitution nor our Laws, he just has his czars create regs or executive orders his way around the laws, but chances of having him impeached and thrown out, slim to none, I’d guess.

      • JeannieJ

        I’m not naive enough to think it would be easy, or even successful…on the first attempt. I guess I’ve been listening to my husband too much when he reminds me “You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take”. Sometimes, a very stern and clear warning is enough to make people toe the line. I guess I’d just like to see that others are willing to *try*.

    • JustLikeAnimals

      In my opinion dismantling the Constitution and undermining the very principles upon which this country was founded rises to the level of treason. Good luck getting any of the Congressional lapdogs to grow a pair and stand up to this scumbag.

      That includes the current crop of REPUBLICANTS, too!

  • Dimi

    It doesn’t sound like gun control is something people think will work. It’s very sad that there is so much violence that being gun free is not a possibility that your culture can accept.

    • mike_in_kosovo

      Actually, it’s *proven* that gun control doesn’t work. Insisting that it does and expecting *criminals* to obey those laws are the epitome of ‘magical thinking’.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      Did Australians need guns when committing genocide on the Abos?

  • Jon

    Please sign my petition to re-affirm the content of the second amendment!

  • Clayton B

    Now I lay me down to sleep…
    a full days work -my body weak…
    if while I rest -taking needed break…
    you enter my home and attempt to take…
    cherished items held under key and lock…
    no mercy shall be shown by the hand of Glock…

    • JustLikeAnimals


  • GaryTheBrave

    If it is “impossible” to deport 15-million plus illegal aliens then it will also be impossible to confiscate 350-million firearms.

    • BeeKaaay

      It is possible if you look at it from the “correct point of view”

      The first one does not advance Marxism so it won’t be done.
      The second one DOES advance Marxism so it WILL be done.

  • $129448

    what a narcissist, 4 years ago he told voters he would change the world making it all rainbows & sunshine, they still believe him?

  • BeeKaaay

    The fundamental change is to get 51% of the voters on some kind of government assistance by destroying the economy. Then they will forever vote democrat.

  • 24fan

    if i had a gun and knew how to use it, I’d still refuse. too often we’ve bent over for his whims and I’m fed up and ready to say NO!

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Here’s an idea for fundamental change:

    How about a competent Chief Executive and a Congress who has the balls to cut the over-bloated, vote-buying, irresponsible social spending that got this country into this mess into the first place?

    Just an idea.

  • TocksNedlog

    Y’all are Bitter Clingers.

  • TocksNedlog

    After a shooting spree they always want to take guns away from the people that DIDN’T do it.

  • TocksNedlog

    The worst part of this “fundamental change” business is the unspoken assertion such a statement makes: That the way we are doing things now — and, in the case of the 2nd Amendment, the way we have been doing things for the past 221 years — is TOTALLY wrong.

    Arrogant? Yeah, he’s arrogant.

    [FIRST time in her adult life that she was EVER.REALLY proud of her country.]

  • David Crosby

    “Any people that would give up liberty for a little temporary safety deserves neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin

  • MirrorKrys

    For the sake of honesty I hope Gregory pointed out at the start if his interview that both his and O’s kids go to the same school with 11 armed guards.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      For the sake of WHAT?!?!? LOL.

  • v1cious

    Politicizing…. I mean it’s not like he’s the president or anything.

    • BeeKaaay

      Yup, leftwingwackos never politicize everything /sarc

  • PennyRobinsonFanClub

    “Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are
    the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under independence …
    from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences
    and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the
    rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of
    firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of
    honor with all that’s good.”
    George Washington

  • Tommy

    Not without 2/3rds of both Congressional Houses and 3/4ths of all States you wont.

    You arent actually a party to this process, Obama. You get NO say in amending. Only the legislative branches and states have the power to amend the Constitution.