Heh. Once again, comedian and Fox News contributor Steven Crowder took over a hashtag in order to teach a lesson. He also did last month, when he used Biden’s own words to expose the Left. He did it again yesterday with the #SaysomethingniceaboutObama hashtag, this time throwing Harry Reid into the mix.

We’ll let the hilarious cries of raaaaacist, and Crowder’s responses, speak for themselves. Mostly because we are too busy gasping with giggles. So, just read them and weep: With tears of laughter!

https://twitter.com/Addisababy/status/264783091103592448

https://twitter.com/_ashMem/status/264780351283556352

And the teachable moment?

Bingo. Scratch a leftist and find a racist.

Well done, Mr. Crowder! Keep the lessons coming. Happy warriors make the best teachers.

  • http://twitter.com/GearyMarks Geary Marks

    Wow! What can you say to this? Where do these people get their information? The media needs a serious
    overhaul!!!

    • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

      They don’t know that those were Democrat quotes because they only get their news from “real” reporters. In this case, “real” = Obama Rump Sniffers in the LSM.

    • Mike H.

      The media needs a serious
      overhaul?

      !!!

    • $18224393

      If only the sentence between your HTML formatting were actually a question and not a statement. As it is, I’m not sure how much you know about rhetoric…

  • afvet4america

    There you go again Joe: So silly they don’t even know their own are the ones that said that racist bigoted stuff. @@ Another reason to vote Romney – Ryan

  • $29520529

    Love it!

  • tomtom1983

    Liberals are just that dumb, period. I remember when Reid, a Mormon (cher), spoke those racist saturated words and being that liberals are racist bigots, they skip his remarks and countless liberal racist since, to search for “secret code words” in conservative speech like “angry” and ” self reliance”.

    Let’s see, Biden labels a man “Indian”, after repeated corrections that he was “American”. DOJ Eric Holder said blacks were “incapable of both mentally and physically to acquire an ID. ”

    Holder has repeatedly denied justice to white victims of racism and two ministers of the “One” have deep racist hatred against whites even as the majority of white voters were mislead by the Democratic party to who Obama really is and voted for that prick.

    They have been inciting racial hatred since that hypocrite has been in office.

    Its impossible for anyone to be as dumb as those voting Democrat, it can’t be done. As their saviors enslave them mentally they’re only going to be increasingly ignorant and violent towards an obvious herding of mindless sheep.

    That’s a liberal for you. Dumb, ignorant, violent anf racist hypocrites.

    • tomtom1983

      Anf should have been the word and. Sorry.

      • AmandaJeff Day

        tomtom, I believe you added an extra “m” to what you were calling Reid.

        Also, you don’t have to capitalize it….it’s “moron.” with a lower case “m”

        • $18224393

          Interesting idea, to suggest that someone might think Mormons and morons are the same, when Mr. Romney himself is also a Mormon. Unfortunate implications.

      • $18224393

        Liberals are stupid! Whoops, I spelled a three-letter word wrong and couldn’t find the “edit” button…

    • michael s

      Yet your candidate not his pastors, Mitt himself the Guy you’re voting for had no problem being A BISHOP in a religion founded on racism. Denied blacks priesthood and other functions until 1978. He was with the Mormon religion while this was going on.

      • http://twitter.com/hamybear Michael Hampton

        Actually, black people were banned from Mormonism until 1978. Not just being a priest.

        • http://twitter.com/MattMouritsen Matthew Mouritsen

          African Americans were allowed in the church through baptism. Men just could not hold the priesthood until 1978.

          • michael s

            That is my point . Romney lapdogs want to complain about Rev Wright and Lowery and Sharpton. Yet are totally fine with a CANDIDATE that was a BISHOP not an usher, altar boy,deacon observer even priest. A Bishop in a racist based religion.

        • http://twitter.com/MattMouritsen Matthew Mouritsen

          African Americans were allowed in the church through baptism. Men just could not hold the priesthood until 1978.

  • nc

    More comic genius from Crowder. Thank you!

    • Guest

      Later!

      • DeeDeeTX

        And it’s attitudes like this that have helped the right lose the culture war.

        • nickshaw

          I’m afraid AU won’t understand what you mean, Dee.

      • Conservatarian Texan

        The hatred was in them long before Crowder exposed it just like an MRI doesn’t cause cancer – it exposes it. Hatred is a disease.

        • Guest

          And yes… I agree that hatred is like a terminal disease.

          • nickshaw

            I don’t think you understand. Crowder was using lib leader’s own words to mock. Mocking is not hate. Hate is what the libs came back with, calling Crowder a racist. Well, hate with a healthy dose of ignorance.

        • Guest

          I personally wish….

          • elijahzabmom

            Crowder isn’t a journalist. He is a comedian and commentator as far as I know.

          • nickshaw

            Crowder would be the last person to take on the mantle of “journalist”. What he does is way more fun!
            You can find lots of journalists on Fox. Baier, Hume, Kelly, Herradge…the list goes on.

      • Owen007

        Confusion over who is saying what? Those quotes were pretty widely circulated. If someone doesn’t know that Reid and Biden said those things, that says more about them than it does about Crowder.

        • Guest

          Inexplicable logic.

          • nickshaw

            Well okay, I guess it is really poor sportsmanship to bait idiots.
            NOT!

      • soJa

        Deleting your post is childish. You believed it enough to type it out. Own it.

        • Guest

          I say what I want where I want. I’m not deleting only that post… but all posts I have made because the majority of them were supporting Romney. The rest were issues such as NJ Hurricane Insurance. So if I delete one post, I will delete them all. And yes, I believe that this string that Crowder started is definitely not funny. You want childish and irresponsible? Talk to the comedian.

          • soJa

            Cool story bro. Makes lots of sense….Buh bye. I hope you get help with controlling those temper tantrums kid.

          • Guest

            Wait…you aren’t the yahoo that’s been posting on all the other stories on Twitchy about your IQ being so high, etc., etc., are you? You sound just like him.

          • Guest

            I have no idea what my IQ is nor do I care what it is. Yes, I have posted a lot in defense of Romney but never mention IQ. I posted a lot more than I thought until I started deleting them. I’m actually feeling better now that I could care less about liberals or conservatives. I think I will like being Independent. Pennsylvania can use a few more..

          • soJa

            And now your tantrum is over and you just can’t stay away from twitchy so you’re gracing us with your presence again. Too soon miss independent, too soon. You’re kinda weird.

          • Guest

            Oh yeah, I can stay away. Just thought you had something to say while I’m here rather than make remarks later. I see you don’t have anything worth while so..

          • Calcat36

            Obama phone running out of free minutes?

          • ENDTHEFED

            Romney did well in the debates…even surprised many (including myself). Nonetheless, the true frontrunner, Ron Paul was terminally undermined (screwed) by the LIEberal media AND Fox news (itself, owned by one of the most notorious foreign socialists in the world). I haven’t heard a peep out of Romney about ending the fed and the IRS. And nobody seems interested in bringing charges under the RICOH Laws against the LIEberal media for the criminal cartel it obviously is. Taxes will rise even if Romney gets elected. The fed will print and inflate, even if Romney is elected. The average US citizen’s standard of living will decline no matter which NWO puppet holds the reigns of power. Still, the LIEberals are clearly the most evil and morally degraded clowns in this circus. And Obamao is the most evil POS I’ve ever seen…eclipsing Clinton, LBJ, and his demonic cadre of elitist cronies.

        • Guest

          @G Barra…exactly…and also using ‘guest’ is pretty chicken as well.

          • Guest

            LOL….. you guys have nothing to say worthwhile. Why is it chicken? Would you like to discuss something? Then bring it up rather than sit there and act like I’ve done something wrong by saying this crowder retweeting is lame. As to guest… that happens automatically after you delete certain posts. But you don’t know that? The only reason I am deleting everything from Twitchy is because I don’t want to be associated with the Romney group here anymore. If you want to talk… do it in a hurry because i have a football game to watch. Otherwise, make more remarks when I’m gone. Doesn’t matter to me.

  • http://www.twitter.com/Blogshevik Barracuda Bob

    Watched the whole episode as it transpired..incredible. It’s as if Mr. Crowder is the ‘bug zapper’ of the right….buzz zaaaap!, buzz zaaaap! Bloody hilarious.

  • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

    liberal “logic”: Biden & Reid are NOT racists for saying these things, but Crowder IS a racist for quoting them.

    • radishthegreat

      That’s what got Mark Steyn brought on “human rights” charges in Canada–quoting an imam who said something perverse about Muslims. Not long until we see that here.

      • michael s

        Steyn deserved it,same with Weiner(I mean) Savage. These 2 violated those countries laws and were deemed threatening. No sympathy here.

    • $18224393

      I’m so smart, I can make generalizations for vast numbers of people and then use those generalizations to create strawman arguments!

      • http://extremesplash.wordpress.com/ Ben Bollman

        Is this a guessing game? Um, are you Barack Obama?

        • $18224393

          No, genius, I’m the commenter I replied to. Durrr.

          • http://extremesplash.wordpress.com/ Ben Bollman

            No, you are the guy who didn’t get the joke.

          • $18224393

            I understood your Obama-bash perfectly well. I responded as I did because it wasn’t very funny. Insulting Democrats is hilarious, when executed properly! Your comment was… not.

          • http://extremesplash.wordpress.com/ Ben Bollman

            Naturally, the butt of the joke does not usually find the joke funny. I am not surprised.

          • $18224393

            Man, what’s with you people? Your comment is the second time on this post alone that someone has assumed that because I point out strawman arguments, unsupported claims and bad logic when I see them, I must be a liberal. I’m not!

            Though, now that I think about it, it’s kind of a funny association. Why, I wonder, would multiple members of a group assume that anyone who points out obviously flawed logic must be a member of the opposition? …Interesting implications, no?

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            Actually, I’m the one who pointed out flawed logic (liberal “logic”). You have made no point at all.

          • $18224393

            My point was that not all liberals actually think what you’re saying. Do you assume that all liberals think the same, or that you can speak for them? Of course they don’t, and of course you can’t. It’s called a strawman argument, and you’re an idiot for making it.

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            Project much, idiot? In the term “liberal logic”, logic is the noun and liberal is the adjective which qualifies the noun (e.g., pretzel logic). In your response to me, you are the one who used liberal as a noun – person(s). You transformed my adjective into a noun, and then went on to make statements (“It’s called a strawman argument…”) which have nothing to do with what I said. So you never actually addressed the example of liberal logic that I gave: how is Crowder a racist for quoting Reid/Biden, but they are not racist for making the original statements? And isn’t there something wrong with people who call him a racist for quoting Reid/Biden while not calling Reid/Biden racists for speaking this way? Yes, there is something wrong with them….liberal logic, or pretzel logic.

          • $18224393

            “You say what you are” is a comeback most of us outgrew at around age 7. Grow up.

            “Liberal” is indeed an adjective, which in the colloquial sense adopted by most people who discuss politics means “supported by liberals”. If you were using liberal to mean what it actually means as an adjective, i.e. “supporting freedom or equality”, your argument makes no sense. Liberal logic would be arguments in favor of ending slavery. You know what you meant, and what you meant was “logic supported by liberals”… unless, of course, your argument is even more nonsensical than I’d thought. You said it, own it.

            Yes, there is indeed something wrong with those people. They are woefully underinformed. It’s a pity. It’s not an excuse for you to refer to their weak logic as “liberal”, since you cannot prove that all or even most liberals think that way. Please stop using generalizations. A “straw man” argument, by the way, creates the illusion of having refuted a statement by creating a superficially similar statement and then refuting that. The logic that you proposed is indeed stupid, but I imagine few liberals propose it.

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            My statement is not illusory but is based upon facts. What are the facts? The tweets & videos of Biden/Reid and people who gave them a pass. Again, I made no generalizations about all liberals. You’re making stuff up & most of the people here see right through it. My original statement is specifically in response to the tweets. And yes, their weak logic is liberal…loose.

          • $18224393

            “Liberal” means “in support of progress or reform” or “in support of freedom or equality”. “Loose” is one heckuva stretch, as definitions go. Are you seriously trying to retcon your statement into meaning that you meant “liberal” to be interpreted as “free and unrestricted” rather than “from or associated with political liberals”? What a joke.

            And yes, you ARE attempting to disprove an illusory argument… “liberal logic” does not argue that Crowley’s statements were racist but Biden’s and Reid’s weren’t. In fact, I don’t think anyone is arguing that–hence the illusion. So while it’s a stupid argument, is anyone actually making it? How can you use it to indict anyone if no one is saying it? Have you actually seen a tweet saying that Crowley is racist but Biden and Reid are not as a result of this incident? If so, do you actually think that that particular person’s (admittedly foolish) views are supported by the entire liberal movement? I mean, I’m sure I can find a Southerner who opposes civil rights, but that doesn’t mean they all do, right?

            And don’t give me “I used liberal to mean loose and free, not to make a generalization”. That’s a weird way to use the word even outside of a political context, and in the political context it means the political movement almost 100% of the time. Have some integrity. Own up to what you meant. It’s OK to make mistakes, as long as you can admit to them afterwards.

            Like, for example, me posting in this thread. Trying to argue with the other posters here is a waste of time for all of us: none of you are willing to admit the possibility that you might have used fallacious logic, even though I’m not actively questioning your conclusions, and none of you are good enough at arguing to actually score a point against my complaints about your rhetoric beyond name-calling and retroactive twisting of your own words. Have some free advice: generalize less, and don’t try to twist your way out of what you say.

            With that I leave you.

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            Do you make it a habit of writing long, boring, pointless speeches? You must be a riot at parties.

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            Project much, idiot? In the term “liberal logic”, logic is the noun and liberal is the adjective which qualifies the noun (e.g., pretzel logic). In your response to me, you are the one who used liberal as a noun – person(s). You transformed my adjective into a noun, and then went on to make statements (“It’s called a strawman argument…”) which have nothing to do with what I said. So you never actually addressed the example of liberal logic that I gave: how is Crowder a racist for quoting Reid/Biden, but they are not racist for making the original statements? And isn’t there something wrong with people who call him a racist for quoting Reid/Biden while not calling Reid/Biden racists for speaking this way? Yes, there is something wrong with them….liberal logic, or pretzel logic.

          • creeper

            You poor baby. I don’t think there a cure for your level of cluelessness.

          • $18224393

            Literally all I did was point out a fallacious generalization. It was hilariously easy, because almost all moral and ethical generalizations are false, since the “always” case is incredibly difficult to prove. I didn’t even make any political statements. What exactly was “clueless” about my level of conduct?

          • BeautifulAmerica

            Just go away, dolt.

          • http://twitter.com/gu1tar gu1tar

            Spelling it out for you. Biden and Reid actually made the racist comments that Crowder SATIRICALLY repeated (and you took offense at) to point out the racism of prominent Liberal Democrats. If you don’t know who Biden and Reid are, Google them along with key words of their racist comments, which you mistakenly think were Crowder’s own opinions. He was trying to show you the racism of Liberals you vote for. The hope is that you would make better choices once you found out. Now, everything clear?

          • $18224393

            Everything was clear before your unnecessarily pandering explanation. Just because I know rhetoric and logic better than the masses here on twitchy doesn’t mean I can’t read–in fact, that’s a very unusual conclusion to draw, suggesting that you’re not too great at logic yourself.

          • Jedd McHead

            I think it’s your general “snarkiness” and apparent thin skin that make you seem like a liberal.

            You may or may not be liberal but, having read all of your comments, I think it’s safe to say the general consensus (based on your negative ratings) is that you ARE, in fact, a douche bag.

            Btw, a “straw man” argument is where you start with a false assumption about your opponent then use that as the basis of your argument (e.g. the Dems “war on women”). Cpt. America’s Wife was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of those on the Left who employ a double standard where language or behavior is concerned. Where’s the “straw man”, OMGDouche?

            Should she have said “most liberals”? Perhaps. But only a liberal (or a thin-skinned douche bag like yourself) would take umbrage with something like that.

          • $18224393

            Is that what passes for wit around these parts? “OMGDouche”? Seriously, you took part of my username and arbitrarily replaced it with “douche”? That’s like me calling you “JeddMcDouche”… It’s not even an insult, it’s just third grade name-calling. Actually, I know nine-year-olds better at dropping insults than that. (In before “yeah, because you’re nine, lololol”.)

            I’m glad that I’ve finally found a user here who thinks he knows what a strawman argument is. Unfortunately, his definition is a little off. A straw man argument is a rhetorical tactic whereby one speaker creates a position superficially similar to the position that speaker’s opponent holds and then refutes that position without ever actually addressing the original statement. As Ms. America’s statement introduces her idea of “liberal logic” without ever proving that there are actually any people who believe in that idea of logic, it is indeed a straw man argument.

            It is also an argument founded on an incorrect generalization. Should she have said “most liberals”? No. Because unless she’s got evidence that more than 50% of liberals think that way, she can’t prove “most liberals”. She should have said “some liberals”–and even then, I’d like a source. But sources seem to be in short supply ’round these parts.

            It’s not worth my time to be called names by people who don’t understand why generalizations are fallacious or why they deserve scorn. Good-bye. (In before “good riddance”).

          • http://twitter.com/GracieBeauClips Jennifer Luginbuhl

            It seems that there are some people here who are very nit-picky. Do we really need exact percentages while making comments about stupid Tweets???? Holy cow!!!!! You (of course this is the “general” you–not you in particular) don’t have to agree with everything people post, but do you (again, not anyone in particular) have to go around picking the tiniest details about their statements? Some people (again, not pointing fingers) need to get a life. I am sorry if I don’t have the exact figures and quotes to prove my point here.

      • rbtpowell

        What exactly was/ or is this “straw-man” argument?

  • Stop Lying Dave!

    If eligibility to vote was restricted to people with an IQ of at least 100 & non-citizens & dead people were denied voting rights, Obama would have no chance.

  • http://Twitter.com/jkerrysforehead John Kerry’s Forehead

    I bow to the master…@scrowder, master of the Troll-i-verse. Nice job, Steve.

  • Midnight Cow

    Brilliant work by Crowder. But a large chunk of the left would fall for this time after time. So many low-information voters, many with political opinions shaped only by the lies and inaccurate stereotypes pushed by the MSM and Comedy Central.

    MSNBC in a nutshell: “No need to flip over to the other channel, it’s all just bigoted old white men who hate women and minorities and want to get rich at your expense. And if you accidentally hear them say something you agree with, it’s because they are lying. Trust us.”

    Maybe Republicans should issue an apology for all their past sins……

    From the desk of the GOP:

    Dear Oppressed Peoples: We’re sorry that the GOP freed the slaves, passed civil rights laws in the face of Democrat opposition, and established the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday. We also apologize for all of the good work George and Laura Bush have done fighting AIDS in Africa over the years. Et cetera, et cetera, so on and so forth.

    Like Crowder said above, “Educate yourself on the people for whom you vote.”

    • http://twitter.com/yahneverknowCB yahneverknow

      LOL @ collective apology.

      About mainstream media: I’m trying to even out my news viewing sources. I flip to all the cable news channels, Fox, CNN, MSNBC, C-SPAN, etc. to see how they’re covering things. For the most part, it’s kind of ridiculous on the non-Fox channels, but I give them a chance and sometimes it’s not dripping with snark.

      But MSNBC is getting silly. Today, I tried to watch them 6 different times, staggered throughout the day. Every time I switched to them, I either broke in on a “racist” Republican/election discussion or within 2 minutes, the topic was changed to racism. How do people not see the ludicrous-ness of this?

      (Note: I have noticed that Erin Burnett, on CNN, at least attempts to ask hard questions and sometimes tries to push for a real answer. There are a few others that seem like they are trying to be actual journalists, but I don’t know their names yet.)

    • $18224393

      Dear Impressionable Voters: We’re sorry that we keep saying we’re the same GOP that passed civil rights laws given that we’re now actively trying to block civil rights laws like legalization of gay marriage! Also, our voter bases and political ideology have completely shifted since the Lincoln era and we refuse to acknowledge this!

      • James McLarey

        Is getting married because you are gay a “right”? Like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Democrats are clearly not in favor of those three as rights.

        • $18224393

          Who said anything about Democrats? Just because I think Republicans are hypocrites about their party’s history doesn’t mean I like Democrats. Stop changing the subject.

          Though I must admit your jab is pretty funny. I can see the campaign slogans now: “Obama 2012: Death, Slavery, and Sorrow for all!” It’s like you think Democrats are a party consisting entirely of Bond villains.

        • http://twitter.com/hamybear Michael Hampton

          Um…life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is exactly why marriage should be equal. By denying it, you are saying that you get to decide my life for me. I don’t have the liberty to pursue my happiness because you think that your religion should apply to me. So, even though marriage my not be an exactly named right, the government associates over 1,300 rights with the word marriage. I should be able to get those rights for my spouse. Denying me them is against our Constitution.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PQDNS53K3Y4AWJCTIO5ND7QL3I Fire in Indy

            My turn.

            Personally, I could care less whether a gay couple exchanges rings and nuptuals. I’m legally allowed to buy porn, smoke cigarettes, drink alchohol and vote for a white supremacist for President. I choose to do none of those things. Being legally allowed to marry another man would be just one more thing I COULD do, but choose NOT to do.

            Here’s the problem… should anyone either introduce a Constitutional ban of gay marriage or a Constitutional amendment affirming gay marraige… either is unconstitutional. The right to be married is NOT in the US Constitution. Therefore, it can neither be expanded or limited.

            Now… here’s my last issue… many states already offer gay civil unions. There are already a number of religious institutions that will ‘marry’ a gay couple, even if it isn’t officially recognized by the state. The only arguement I’m hearing about ‘gay marriage’ is because they want equal access to insurance for their spouse. If that truly is the case, the fight isn’t with the Constitution, it’s with the insurance companies.

          • http://twitter.com/hamybear Michael Hampton

            I never said that there is a fight with the constitution. The fight is DOMA. That law is against the Constitution. Once it is overturned, the rights that married couples get will finally be available to gay couples throughout the country. We will finally be able to file our taxes jointly. Even where marriage is allowed, you still can’t file federal income taxes as a married couple.

      • michael s

        Gay marriage isn’t a civil rights issue. The fight against racism is the genuine and ONLY civil rights issue.

  • Aaron1960

    Dems are ignorant of what their politicians say.

    • nickshaw

      Do you think they actually listen to the words, Aaron, or just look at the pretty pictures of Zero with a halo?

  • teapartydoc

    If it didn’t happen today or yesterday, it never happened–in the mind of the liberal.

    • Owen007

      Hey, sometimes it still didn’t happen – as evidenced by Biden’s “I’ve never been proud to be VP” episode. “I don’t care what the video says! He didn’t say that!”

      • nickshaw

        Waterstain-Sh!tz has the same affliction apparently, Terry.

  • Owen007

    Quick, composite translation: “How dare Steven Crowder accurately quote Harry Reid and Joe Biden’s racist words?! That makes him a bigger racist! The nerve! I’m outrageously outraged!”

    • $18224393

      Quick, repeat something else that literally no one has ever said before!

  • BorderLine Guy

    Not a single one of those idiots that Crowder tweeted back will look it up to realize they are fools. They will just stare at the screen and think that Crowder is a racist and they are cool because he tweeted them back.

    • $18224393

      and you know this how

      • $18224393

        Oh no, I got downvoted for asking someone to cite a source for a claim that I thought was dubious, whatever will I do

      • BorderLine Guy

        Ever check back on twitter feeds troll?

        • $18224393

          Yes. Did you check back on literally every single feed to confirm your statement? Did you call the owners of every twitter feed that contained no additional comments to ensure that they didn’t just look up the results and nod thoughtfully and just not Tweet about it? Or did you see one person make an angry denial and assume everyone was doing it?

          It’s almost like you don’t understand how science works.

  • Purple State

    Mitt Romney has not been truthful to the American public about his record.

    • nickshaw

      Go ahead, Helen. Give us some links to Mitt not being truthful about his record.
      We’ll wait.

      • Purple State

        Well, that statement above is a direct quote of Rick Santorum’s, so you’ll have to ask him for the link.

        • nickshaw

          If Rick were here, I would ask him for links too.

        • Michael Rice

          So, can we call you a racist hate monger for repeating it?

    • Dusty Thompson

      Liberalism is a mental disorder, thanks for pointing it out for the World to see.

      • Purple State

        Rick Santorum is a liberal now? Does he know this happened?

    • Calcat36

      Barry still has his record hidden under seal. Why is that? Have you accused the one of the same thing?

  • Purple State

    Somebody who will lie to you to get to be president will lie to you when they are president.

    • nickshaw

      You mean like the magic negro, Helen?

      • Purple State

        No, in this direct quote of Newt Gingrich, he’s talking about Mitt.

        • nickshaw

          Actually, it’s a true statement of all politicians, is it not?
          We can quibble about lies or just being mis-informed.
          Besides, I think you have missed the point of Crowder’s exercise.
          I come back and ask for clarification. That’s not what libs do. They come back and accuse.

          • Purple State

            Your statement “You mean like the magic negro, Helen?” is not an accusation?

          • nickshaw

            Accusation of what, Helen?

          • Purple State

            Aren’t you accusing Obama of lying in that statement?

          • nickshaw

            Who, the magic negro? You’re saying he doesn’t?
            LMAO!

          • Purple State

            I’m saying you said “libs” accuse instead of what conservatives do, which is ask for clarification. So you must be a lib, I guess.

            Not to mention your attempt at insults with “magic negro”… Is that something else that only “libs” do?

          • nickshaw

            I’m insulting by using the “magic negro” phrase?
            Google is your friend.
            That was the LA Times I was quoting.
            I was hoping you would blame it on Rush, as most libs do, Helen.

          • http://www.cosmicgirl.net/ Cosmic Girl

            libs always say insulting, racists things. Then when you quote them, they think YOU’RE the one who’s racist. My God, it must be mentally painful being a lib.

        • galit

          OK, so politicians make accusations at each other. The point of the Reid and Biden quotes is that they exemplify racist attitudes which would not be glossed over if made by a conservative. There is nothing about either the Santorum or the Gingrich quotes which is racist, sexist, or in any other way outside of acceptable political discourse.

          And yes, nickshaw did take your bait. Congratulations!

          • nickshaw

            In truth, I was trying to get him to call me a racist, Dan. I have no doubt he did not know the source of the “magic negro” quote. Apparently he proved it further down the thread.

          • Guest

            redheadgrl, just for kicks, let me throw this in…what do liberals say about Hillary Clinton’s quote that Obama didn’t have enough experience to be president during the primaries? She’s now a part of his cabinet! It proves your point.

          • nickshaw

            Hell, they don’t even know Pantsuit is the original birther, Doc! (I just assume you’re a doc. 😉

          • Guest

            Yes sir, I am :-)

          • redheadgrl

            Thing is, the quotes Purple was throwing out came from the primaries, where all the candidates are naturally “fighting” for the candidate role. They point out the flaws in other candidates, then eventually throw their support behind the party winner. The quotes from Reid, Biden, and the LA Times, however, were spoken/written as statements of praise of Mr. Obama, not in any primary race. But, the liberal “purple” logic cannot differentiate between the two.

    • Michael Rice

      Obama is proof of that.

    • WVS

      You’re absolutely right, Purple State. It started with “I’ll cut the deficit in half,” and God willing, it ENDS with Benghazi.

      • Calcat36

        He also said it would be 1 term for him if he failed to cut the deficit yet he ran again!

    • Jake_Was_Here

      As Barack Obama has ably demonstrated.

  • Peyton

    Steven Crowder is my hero.

  • richray

    Isn’t 0bama our first half white president? Remember Biden always means what he says and said of 0bama “He’s the first mainstream African – American who is articulate and bright and clean”.. How many Congressman and Leaders in the African – American Community does Biden think aren’t clean or bright or articulate?

    • nickshaw

      I guess Joe “Stand Up and Let Us See You” Biden never noticed the Black Caucus in congress. In a way, it just shows how much respect he has for Waters, Cummings, Jackass-Lee and all the rest of them.
      About as much as I do, I guess, Rich.

    • Grumpa Grumpus

      @richray:
      On “half-white” I’ll not comment because I care not at all…

      But “half-wit” or “nit-wit” is accurate and covers it all.

  • Dusty Thompson

    I think the LA Times has a writer you can quote next time Steven. Magic some or other…

    Liberalism is a dangerous Mental Disorder.

    • nickshaw

      Yeah, the “magic negro” line, Dusty.
      Or Bubba’s, ” that guy would be getting us coffee two months ago!” is another good one. Or Jackson’s hilarious quip about cutting Zero’s nuts off!
      Yep, the left is a seething cauldron of something!

      • Calcat36

        Liberals reacted the same way to Rush too. Not knowing who originally wrote the article!

  • EastValleyConservative

    This is another example of how ignorant the left is, they don’t recognize the quotes from 2008 from leftists. Attention Democratic voters: This is how they keep you where they want you. Dumb and under control.

    • $18224393

      I’m sorry, who are they and how are they doing what?

  • Jim Denney

    Oh to have a recording of the top Dems during their private conversations. They must really laugh about their ignorant supporters spewing illiterate gibberish while the teachers union campaign kickbacks continue to roll in.

  • RaggedyAnn46

    ROFL..Lov’n me some Steven Crowder!

  • Carmen Kates

    I remember both of these statements, maybe they don’t pay attention the way they say they do.

  • golftilidrop

    Just always remember, the liberal tolerates everything except that they disagree with, and the only thing a liberal HATES more then a conservative, is a Black conservative.
    Comrade liberal, your stereotype thanks you.

  • mkreider

    This was really funny. Very refreshing to know that Obama supporters know so very little about what their own party members have said about their exalted leader…

  • IBXNJ

    Politicians should be read the Miranda Warning:”Anything you say CAN and WILL be used against you.”

  • Conrad2010

    lib·er·al / adj.

    a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.

    b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

    • marcellucci

      Liberal : Someone that was breast fed until 12 years old and never broke the habit….

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_H54YRU4IGXQ2OZBA264ZVXPQ2A Paul

    that is some funny shit, but yet also sad to realize that those ignorant morons have a vote that counts just the same as mine.

  • YeahWeWill

    That is hilarious and oh such a statement!!! Good job Steven Crowder!

  • Oh Noes!

    Haha, tears running down my face.

  • http://www.dailykenn.com/ Daily Kenn

    If liberals were logical they wouldn’t be liberals

  • marcellucci

    Biden: The gift that keeps on giving…….

  • Mr. Fever Head

    Funny Indeed. Concerning Obama, a few years ago this guy would have been carrying our bags.

    • Calcat36

      And slick willy, the first black president, also called him the amateur.

  • Calcat36

    Taisha lewis up there got herself TWICE. Reid is a Mormon too and HE made the racist remark!

  • dimart

    Funny, but these people really don’t get it – and sadly never will. Their ig norance is astounding.

  • creeper

    Masterful.

  • Sterling Crowe

    So, all you folks who are guffawing over this apparently aren’t aware that the joke is dead in the water because both Reid and Biden experienced a crapload of blowback from the Left and were called racists by them until each personally apologized to Obama and Obama graciously accepted their apologies, right? I mean, bear in mind that the joke is a non starter anyway since this guy doesn’t bother to establish that any of these people actually like Biden or Reid in the first place.

    For a joke, you have someone spouting racist things that were properly identified as racist at the time Biden and Reid first uttered them and then, when people react to him the same way they reacted to Biden and Reid saying them, he calls them “dumb.” So, congratulations, you proved that random people on Twitter aren’t particularly fond of racism.

    Hilarious!

    • Don8r

      You’ll have to bear with conservatives. They aren’t sophisticated enough to realize dressing up in binders or as big bird is high comedy.

      It IS funny, because it shows how ignorant your side is. None of those people knew that their Apparatchiks generated those quotes, but they hard-charged anyways. Own it, buddy.

      • Sterling Crowe

        And Biden and Reid were “hard-charged” when they said those things. And apparently most of the people here are too “ignorant” to know that, believing wholeheartedly that Biden and Reid were simply excused outright and nobody called them racists. Shall I guffaw over that?

        Honestly, the more I see of this Crowder guy, the more I wonder if he’s a Stephen Colbert type trolling you all to make you look stupid. His other big hit around here appears to be when he went to a church’s “trunk or treat” event to make children cry by showing them that sharing is wrong and feels bad, no matter what that hippy Jesus said. http://twitchy.com/2012/10/31/hilarious-video-steven-crowder-redistributes-halloween-teaches-kids-about-obamanomics/

        It’s especially hilarious because he’s taking away handouts these kids received regardless of any merit or real work on their part!

        • http://www.facebook.com/matt.robinson.75 Matt Robinson

          oh my, you’re right…one person called them out on it, and because of that public humiliation, there sins were absolved. are you kidding? if a republican said those things his career would be OVER, he wouldnt be speaker of the senate. disgusting
          sharing is VOLUNTARY. not imposed by the government. he was there to show redistribution is wrong. and il quote you on this one “It’s especially hilarious because he’s taking away handouts these kids received regardless of any merit or real work on their part!”. Exactly, he is showing what government does, take away what we worked hard to earn, and give it it to those who did not. once again, language is not here for you to manipulate to your narrative.

          • Sterling Crowe

            It wasn’t one person. It was many. And if a Republican said those things and his career was OVER it would be because Republicans ended it. And I think you’re full of it. Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter are very rich because Republicans call that kind of thing “brave” and “telling it like it is.” Kind of like a lot of the morons in this thread complimenting Crowder FOR SAYING RACIST THINGS. You guys love that behavior.

            As for the second part, yes, I did have a hearty guffaw, finally. I point out that he was taking from the kids who had received HANDOUTS that were NOT based on hard work or merit and you reply that he’s showing what the government does. Yes, when Republicans get control of government, they make sure to take away as many handouts as they can. Don’t know what that has to do with Obama. Face it, your guy is a troll, all right, but you idiots are his fish.

        • http://www.facebook.com/matt.robinson.75 Matt Robinson

          oh my, you’re right…one person called them out on it, and because of that public humiliation, there sins were absolved. are you kidding? if a republican said those things his career would be OVER, he wouldnt be speaker of the senate. disgusting
          sharing is VOLUNTARY. not imposed by the government. he was there to show redistribution is wrong. and il quote you on this one “It’s especially hilarious because he’s taking away handouts these kids received regardless of any merit or real work on their part!”. Exactly, he is showing what government does, take away what we worked hard to earn, and give it it to those who did not. once again, language is not here for you to manipulate to your narrative.

    • Don8r

      You’ll have to bear with conservatives. They aren’t sophisticated enough to realize dressing up in binders or as big bird is high comedy.

      It IS funny, because it shows how ignorant your side is. None of those people knew that their Apparatchiks generated those quotes, but they hard-charged anyways. Own it, buddy.

    • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

      Do you honestly believe that if some Republican in Washington had said those things about Obama they’d still have their job right now even after apologizing?

      • Sterling Crowe

        Hard to tell. Romney’s joke about how “nobody ever asked to see my birth certificate” was widely regarded on the left as racist but the right said it wasn’t. He certainly hasn’t stepped down over the furor. The fact that he’s never been asked to produce one to the American people by the same people who felt it was so gosh darned important that Obama make that unprecedented gesture indicates a certain level of hypocrisy among Romney’s supporters that has racial undertones (those undertones being that none of the white guys before him had to do it and the white guy after him isn’t being asked).

        But all of that is irrelevant, anyway. I’m not here to get into some stupid pissing match about who is more racist or whether Democrats expect absolute perfection from their leaders or whatever (and don’t pretend that ALL of Romney’s votes tomorrow are going to come from people who 100% OK with the fact that he’s a Mormon. None of us get to vote for the perfect candidates for us). I’m just saying that the only way you can find this “joke” funny is if you believe that there were crickets chirping after Biden and Reid were revealed to have said those things AND you believe that every single one of the people who responded to the tweets was a supporter of Biden and Reid because Biden and Reid have never, ever said anything racist.

        The first assumption is flat wrong. The second assumption is completely unwarranted. Joke is lame and fails and can only be found funny if you hold certain prejudices, as evidenced by the many comments here talking about how “low information” and stupid liberals are.

        Without those assumptions firmly in place, it is a guy saying racist things that people get mad at (and which people got mad at in the past) and then calling them stupid.

        May I suggest that a funnier joke in the future would be to quote Das Kapital, attributing it to prominent Democrats, and then mock them for totally agreeing? “Oh, golly, did I say Pelosi said that? I meant Karl Marx!”

  • michael s

    1. This is so funny to conservatives, yet you will pretend to be upset over racism towards Stacey Dash. 2. Steven Crowder Harry Reid and Joe Biden are equal in practicing racism.

  • BeautifulAmerica

    Crowder should have initially stated “per Biden & Reid.” Twitteridiots don’t read real news.

    • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

      Kind of the point.

  • Bob Khan

    That was epic Steven! Thank you for the good laughs. :)

  • Mom2Ian03

    Oh how soon the LEFT forget and forgive the “gaffes” of their folks.

  • Mom2Ian03

    Oh how soon the LEFT forget and forgive the “gaffes” of their folks.

  • RebeccaH

    Steven Crowder: doing the job that, unfortunately, Andrew Breitbart can’t do now.

    • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

      I don’t know… If I believed in it, I’d say he was channeling Andrew.

  • http://www.shockandblog.com/ Jay McHue

    What’s beyond “epic?”

  • http://www.mysterious-romance.com nussquark

    how sadly funny the ignoramus stand on their rightous, ahh, err, leftous pedestal. The racist crying fools are the true racists. Didn’t their Mama say when they farted: You smelled it, you dealt it?