Pretend news channel MSNBC released some pretend analysis tonight. (Let’s be honest. No article citing Media Matters as a source is remotely credible.)  It’s so clever to suggest that Bergdahl is the GOP’s new thing rather than just Obama’s latest screw up.

Not surprisingly, their nonsense triggered a minor snarkalanche.

If MSNBC actually covered news, they might have saved dear leader some headaches.

Bowe Bergdahl isn’t a new anything.

 

  • Dirty Dutch

    PMSNBC and all it’s minions can go to he11.

  • globalcrap

    Who is in charge, O Bogus, Hillary ,and the O Bogus regime , when these “4” Americans , who were murdered on their watch.

  • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    “Is Bowe Bergdahl the GOP’s new Benghazi?
    “The GOP appears determined to turn what seemed like a big win for the White House into a major thorn in the commander-in-chief’s side…”

    Leave it to MSNBC to garble this one to a fare-thee-well–that ol’ debbil 140 characters making the headline and the lede not necessarily correctly juxtaposed. If L’Affaire Bergdahl looked like it could have been a win for Barry, and it’s the new “Benghazi,” are they saying that Benghazi was a win for the President?

    Of course they’re not– not even THEY could claim such– but what it seems they ARE saying is, “Drat those darn Repubs, do they ALWAYS have to question EVERYTHING? Why can’t they simply take the Administration at its word– on EVERYTHING– as WE do? Why is that so hard (said the actress to the Bishop)?”

    If there were no MSNBC to crank out self-unaware laughs from the Left, it would need to be invented– there’s just too much of it to keep it off TV.

    • soxfan4evah

      It’s sad that Americans take the Taliban’s word over our own government, and yes Obama you built that.

      • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

        Not the Taliban’s word… just everybody who served with that filthy traitor in theater. His owd words passed around, his own emails..

        the Taliban just confirmed what Michelle Malkin had already covered.. I remember reading about him last year..

        but your point is taken, obama has lowered the bar THAT much… that a homeless drug addict on the street has more cred at this point, should cause the ignorant, blind left MSNBCrazy to tone it done.. just out of shame..

        but they won’t… they’ll make his legacy a success even if the have to steal the Clock Work Orange chair and reprogram every American, one at a time…

    • carmenta

      ‘If it wasn’t for those pesky kids and their dog, I’d have got away with it!’

      No, Mean Spiteful Nasty B&tches Club, Bergdahl is NOT the GOPs new Bengazi – he is obama’s latest Bengazi! Another failure, another lie told to cover up a lie, another example of how obama despises America, another nail in the coffin of progressive liberalism.

      I wonder how these people can look at themselves in the mirror.

      • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        “I wonder how these people can look at themselves in the mirror.”

        Saying “Who is fairest of them all?”, I guess?

      • bobinfwb

        “I wonder how these people can look at themselves in the mirror.” I’m not sure they can see their reflection.

    • Donny Zunker

      Must invent? Probably right… Consider this… NBC’s prime time ratings are very low… it is possible they could develop MSNBC into a sitcom?
      One other thought… IF Obama wants to shut up all Republicans, Obama should resign…

    • Thale Taxurfeet

      I can’t get over the accomplished marksmanship of the Left and their PR outfit, the MSM.

      Since Teh Won Administration assumed the position, every shot they fire is into their own foot. Every. Single. One.

      We are living though the F-Troop’s Administration.

      • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        And those who aren’t the crooks like O’Rourke and Agarn are the “by-the-book” oblivious Parmenters– “There HAS to be something in the Army Manual that covers this! And when I find out what that is, I’ll get back to you– dismissed, trooper!”

  • Red Fred

    When the WH appeals to Feinstein, saying it was an oversight, well, they OWN it.

    • Jack Deth

      How can Republicans be blamed for this embarrassing mess, when Congress was never notified?

      • Russ

        MSNBC and this administration never let pesky little things like facts get in the way of bogus accusations. They’d say the sky is green with straight faces if it were something they wanted people to believe.

        • Jack Deth

          The sky is NOT green. Though it is the exactly wrong shade of Fuschia!

          *Apologies to “Hitchhiker’s Guide…”*

      • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

        We both, all… know.. the truth was never a factor in anything MSNBCrazy has ever said..

        it’s about rigging the game for team blue.. cheating to them, is just another kind of play.. as is lying, false evidence, fake witnesses.. election fraud, false racism charges.. naming every corrhpt republican by party first.. every corrupt democrat as just a politician,, with the word democrat never mentioned..

        if Nazi Germany taught the world about pure evil.. it taught MSNBCrazy a different lesson… lying works, if you repeat it endlessly.

      • journogal

        Democrats could have a supermajority, like they did from 2008 until the election of Senator Scott Brown, and MSNBC would still be blaming everything on Republicans. It’s just their way/the liberal-progressive way.

      • Donny Zunker

        It happened when you blinked?
        It happened during a commercial?
        It happened while you were in the bathroom?
        It happened when somebody at MSNBC loaded the default lib talking points into the teleprompter…
        It happened because there was no way they could blame Bush for this one?
        It happened because there is no way this is Obama’s mistake/fault/whatever… it just has to be somebody else’s fault, cuz Obama doesn’t make mistakes

        • Thale Taxurfeet

          Just because…

  • Matthew Koch

    It never fails to get old.

    When someone who can be connected with Christianity in the slightest way does something immoral, liberals tar the lot of them.

    When someone who can be connected with Islam in the slightest way does something bad, leftists fall all over themselves trying absolve all Muslims of blame and accuse anyone who insinuates that there may be a larger issue of racism. Even if no one has tried to make such a connection.

    Don’t you just love the hypocrisy?

  • silverburstgorilla

  • agentm0m

    Yeah because five released terrorists of the kind that murdered four Americans at Benghazi isn’t another scandal right?? That’s all phony, suuuuuure it is!

  • silverburstgorilla

    Give “The Taliban Dream Team” the same resources bin Laden had and see how stupid THEY are.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/02/look-at-five-taliban-commanders-set-free-in-prisoner-exchange/

  • Josephine

    Obama helping a member of the military was our first clue that this was a bad deal.

  • Sharkteeth

    Don’t let you head explode prog…

  • Mary Mommy Happy 2016!

    MSNBC can and will spin every scandal criticism that Obama involve in, into liberal rants that Republicans hate the black man in the white house and only want to investigate his criminal actions because the Gop are racist and will do anything to make him fail. Even though Obama does all his illegal activities to benefit his political agenda.

    MSNBC refuse to accepted reality that Obama is a very bad president.

  • Richard Jefferies

    You must have been looking in a mirror when you asked that question.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/05/31/us-pays-high-price-for-last-pow-in-afghanistan.html

  • Earl Sullivan

    That isn’t a news channel it is a propaganda channel for this current administration….I am surprised it is still operating with such low ratings they get what less then 50k people watch that channel?

    • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

      I’m sure someone is making it well worth their while to keep functioning as Obama’s Pravda. I doubt they’d do it for the warm feeling alone.

      • Earl Sullivan

        I wonder if they get a thrill up their leg like Chis Mathews does…..roflmbo

  • Kingofthehill

    This is like the TV show “Homeland” coming true.

  • gregl311

    Obama and his entire administration needs to be impeached and imprisoned.

  • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

    Don’t let the pesky details get in the way of a victory celebration.
    He deserted of his own free will.
    Left behind and anti-America note
    He and Daddy seem to be on the opposing team-as does the president.
    Five for one exchange? Really? Obama’s some mean negotiator. I hope I get the opportunity to sell him a used car someday-lease at $500/mo for 10 years, then $20k balloon payment.
    Details, details.
    “Are you people NEVER happy?”

    • Wootpool the Yuge

      You forgot the most important two things. 1. Obama ADMITTED to breaking the law with this “trade”. 2. Obama has committed treason as per the Constitution.

      This is waaay bigger than all the other scandals. This is hanging territory

  • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

    Well, dear
    What do YOU think they are?
    They’re not Boy Scouts.

  • LegalizeShemp

    Are the Communists who’ve infiltrated the US government and media still trying to hide who they are? You betcha !

  • LegalizeShemp

    OK, 5 guys who smell just as bad as Bin Laden.

    • Donny Zunker

      Not until they are dead and fish food…

  • craigzimmerman12

    Read the biographies of the men that Obama set free. These weren’t foot soldiers, they were in high leadership positions.

    • Calvinius

      Yes, and? None of them are Al-Qaeda members.

      • silverburstgorilla

        They didn’t wear the same dress size as bin Laden either, so that means they’re not as malevolent as bin Laden, right? Nope.

        When they leave Qatar, they’ll get enough backing, money, military resources, etc. to help bring their twisted dreams to life, unless someone stops them first.

        Why do you think the Taliban kept pushing for these same 5 to be released over and over? Because they were the dumbest guys in Gitmo? Because they’re no threat to the US? Because they’re the most peace-loving guys they could think of? Nope.

        http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2013/06/taliban_want_release.php

        • Calvinius

          Who cares? When they leave Qatar we’ll have already left Afghanistan. That puts it in the category of “not our problem”.

          • silverburstgorilla

            People with common sense care. And no, we won’t be out of Afghanistan when “The Taliban Dream Team” leave Qatar. Besides that, terrorism isn’t stopped by border lines!

            “Obama’s plan to reduce U.S. forces in Afghanistan would leave 9,800 U.S. troops there for one year after combat operations end in December. The residual force would be cut in half by the end of 2015 and a full withdrawal would be complete in 2016.”

            http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2014/05/28/does-obamas-us-troop-withdrawal-plan-in-afghanistan-make-sense

            “President Obama’s claim Tuesday that the U.S. would ‘be keeping eyes’ on five hardened Taliban leaders traded for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s freedom was immediately challenged by a Middle East official quoted as saying they’d actually be allowed to move freely — and even ‘go back to Afghanistan if they want to.’

            The source, identified as a senior Gulf official, reportedly told Reuters that the five Taliban members would not be treated like prisoners while staying in Qatar, where they were released. Rather, they’d be allowed to ‘move around freely’ in the country and then be allowed to travel outside Qatar AFTER ONE YEAR.

            The official, seemingly contrary to Obama’s claims, also said U.S. officials would not be involved in monitoring their movements.”

            http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/03/traded-taliban-leaders-free-to-roam-in-middle-east-claim-undercuts-obama/

          • Calvinius

            An anonymous so-called “senior Gulf official”. Really convincing.

          • tops116 ✓Quipper

            It’s amazing how you act like you have moral superiority here and then you wrote that comment.

            You’re faced with something you can’t refute and you respond with “Who cares?” Truly the sign of a great debater, folks. Bravo, Calvin. Bravo. You do a credit to liberal bootlickers everywhere. Has MSNBC offered you a job yet?

          • carmenta

            Are you feckin’ serious??? Have you recently emerged from a cave? ‘not our problem’ has a nasty habit of becoming ‘our problem’! 5 terrorist who have sworn a commitment to the destruction of America and Israel, are going to go back to peacefully to raising goats???

            Its people like you who have put the US in the position of weakness it currently holds.

          • Calvinius

            I don’t care if they’re peaceful when they go back to Afghanistan. That’s Afghanistan’s problem.

          • carmenta

            They dont stay in Afghanistan, genius!!!. How much clearer does it need to be before you get it????

          • Calvinius

            Given that the Taliban has never been active outside of Afghanistan…

          • carmenta

            so YOU are willing to bet that terrorists dont all hate America more than they hate each other?? Tell you what, when its your azz on the line, when YOU are in a foxhole keeping the barbarians from the door, then you get to tell the rest of us that its no biggie to send these murdering scum free to wander the Earth. Until then, you’d be well advised to keep quiet your small-minded, uninformed opinions.

          • Jack Deth

            “What difference, at this point does it make?!!!”

            FIFY.

            And yes. You really are that deliberately ignorant and stupid

          • mrspinky85

            I think the Soldiers’ families who died cared. I think the ones who lives were sacrificed/or their varies injuries for the capture of these terrorist care.
            If we didn’t care, why did Obama promise to help Afghanistan after 2014. Oh, you thought we would be totally gone. lol.

          • TCDave

            Are you Preezy Obamma? Your grasp of foreign policy is the same.

          • Malcolm Reynolds

            So, when your failed president completely shuts down ops in Afghanistan you think Al Qaeda and terrorist attacks on the US are gonna go *poof*?

          • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty

            The stuff between their ears went *poof*. . .They have not a clue that their beloved boyfriend is bringing the battle home for all of us.

          • Calvinius

            These five prisoners weren’t Al-Qaeda. And there are no Al-Qaeda left in Afghanistan. The ones we haven’t killed already have fled to other countries.

          • Malcolm Reynolds

            Except that link you were provided above (and ignored) says your wrong. Some pretty good ties and then there’s the whole war crimes mass murder stuff.
            We know what assuming does, so what was ignoring make you? an ignoramous….

            and then the whole, ‘no Al Qaeda in Afghanistan’ just makes you an idiot. You’re gonna wanna seek out what asymmetrical warfare is what that usually entails.

          • QueenB

            Moron – these are the guys that invited binLaden and his buddies to come and train in Afghanistan. Now, as you are obviously an idiot, and quite possibly born last night, this is what allowed binLaden to plan the 9/11 attacks and train those who carried it out. Now, here’s your proggie gold star for the day. Your mom says it’s time for you to give her a pedicure.

          • alanstorm

            A textbook example of liberal “logic” in action.

          • Orwellian_Dilemma

            We’re going to be out of Afghanistan by the end of the week?

          • Calvinius

            These prisoners will be in Afghanistan by the end of the week?

          • Orwellian_Dilemma

            Of course. Was there ever any doubt?

          • Calvinius

            No doubt that you’re a fool if you believe that.

          • Orwellian_Dilemma

            Sure. Um OK. Qatar is so well known for its strict adherence to treaties and agreements and its keeping close tabs on terrorists.

            All I can say is that when these guys attack America again, I hope it’s your town not mine.

          • Calvinius

            Uh-huh. Because the Taliban totally has a history of attacking American towns.

          • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty

            From the Villagers. . .Calvin….

            Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com

            Afghan Villagers recall when Bergdahl stumbled into their midst

            http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/06/04/exclusive-afghan-villagers-recall-when-bergdahl-stumbled-into-their-midst/

            Last two paragraphs of the above mentioned article reads:

            Residents still remember the massive search effort that followed Bergdahl’s disappearance. But the village eventually returned to normal – albeit still with grave problems from Taliban fighters – and few locals thought about the American soldier until this past week, when his face flashed across Afghan news programs.

            “I had forgotten about that abducted American,” said Manikhel. “I hope the U.S. can re-arrest the Talibs that they released.”

          • Calvinius

            And this relates in any way to my post, how?

          • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

            And when they cause the deaths of Americans when Qatar lets them go, you’ll be blaming Republicans because you are too gutless to blame your POS hero Barack Obama for aiding terrorism.

          • Calvinius

            How will the cause the deaths of Americans in Afghanistan when there no longer are Americans in Afghanistan?

      • tops116 ✓Quipper

        Yeah, since when has the Taliban ever had anything to do with al-Qaeda? And it’s not like the Taliban have ever tried to kill American soldiers or engaged in terrorist activities, right? Right?

        To borrow a quote I just read: How f**king stupid are you? No need to answer, though, Calvin. You’ve already done that.

        • Calvinius

          Nazi Germans killed American soldiers too, yet we released them. So what the f**k is your point, idiot?

      • Jack Deth

        These five are the equivalent of Supreme Allied Commander Dwight Eisenhower, Bernard Law Montgomery, Generals Patton and Bradley and Captain David Sterling during WWII in regard to command and overall authority.

        And all fanatical mass murderers in the name of their antiquated, messed up “religion”.

      • QueenB

        As you obviously see no connection between the two, I guess all that can be said is how nice of you to slither out from the rock you’ve been living under. Lol. You know, there are days when I wish was stupid as people like you. I wouldn’t know the difference, as you obviously don’t, and stupid people wouldn’t annoy me.

      • Malcolm Reynolds

        Except that they all seem be linked to Al-Qaeda and/or are wanted by the UN for war crimes like mass murder.
        Instead of ignoring the linked information given to you, why don’t you actually read it mouth breather.

      • alanstorm

        Oh, right. These are GOOD terrorists.

        What the f#%^& difference does it make which team they play for?

        Just when I thought liberals couldn’t get any dumber…

      • craigzimmerman12

        The Taliban and Al Qaeda are allies. The reason we invaded Afghanistan after 9-11 was because The Taliban had provided bases to Al Qaeda.

      • http://www.algoreisabidfatidiot.com/ “Rev Jim Jones”

        Oops, the administration associated the 5 with Al-Qaeda. Keep searching for an alibi patriot.

      • Corey Dennison

        You see…for libtards, all terrorism begins and ends with AQ.

  • castlemonster

    Well, if nothing else, MSNBC is consistent.

  • AZWarrior

    If MSNBC actually had any actual viewers, they might be liable for aiding and abetting a felony.

  • http://www.algoreisabidfatidiot.com/ “Rev Jim Jones”

    So liberal media actually thinks matters of treason and bargaining with terrorists is something bad enough to pin on an adversary?

    I think not. They’re still running the liberal damage control factory line from the last half dozen presidential debacles.

  • theal

    Despite the fact that three years ago when this same trade was offered, Congress UNANIMOUSLY said it was a bad trade, it’s conservatives who have an issue because they think this trade was a mistake.

    • Calvinius

      Congress most certainly did not “UNANIMOUSLY say it was a bad trade.”

      • Corey Dennison

        You’re right. Dingy Harry Reid is still swinging from Obama’s n*t-sack on this one…

  • Dirty Dutch

    You want some cheese with that whine?

  • Jack Deth

    For an administration whose motto is “Don’t do stupid $hit!”. They do seem to do a LOT of “Stupid $hit”!

    • Russ

      It’s all they do.

  • Wag_a_muffin

    My take on this. . .

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    4 people died as a result of Benghazi, 6 people a result of Bergdahl. MSNBC really doesn’t have a problem with people getting killed, do they? But I know what they do have a problem with. Obama got himself into this mess. He bypassed Congress and repeatedly ignored those in the military and intelligence community. He has no one outside his administration to shift the blame to. He personally made a show of it in the Rose Garden. His only way out is to say he’s an idiot.

    Incidentally, according to the Washington Post’s latest poll, 51% support the new Benghazi committee. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/06/03/republicans-have-a-mandate-for-their-benghazi-probe/

    That percentage is about on par with Obama’s re-election percentage, so per the liberal rhetoric, that means the Republicans have a mandate.

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    I find it hilarious that you are defending that deserter Bergdahl and this swap. Liberals really are pathetic lemmings, aren’t they?

    Don’t be mad at us just because Obama (once again) demonstrated how damned stupid he is, that Bergdahl is a cowardly deserter, or that Obama went ahead with a swap that virtually every player in the military and intelligence communities opposed.

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    “You seem to have no evidence whatsoever to substantiate those claims.”

    Projecting again, are we, Calvin? Tsk, tsk. Nothing you said changes the fact that this was a bad swap or that the people who severed with Bergdahl have called him a deserter. I think they might know more about the situation than you do, but to be fair, who wouldn’t know more than you?

    And bringing Israel into it? That’s right. Deflect, Calvin. That’ll help your position. And to compare Gilad Shalit to that little deserter demonstrates so completely that you have no idea what you’re talking about. Gilad was actually abducted; he didn’t desert his post and go running to his enemies. That’s kind of an important distinction.

    • journogal

      Liberals don’t understand distinction. All they can do is copy, paste and regurgitate. No wonder why they love Common Core.

    • Calvinius

      Your claim that it was a “bad swap” is not a fact at all.

  • RSnyder

    And doesn’t this ‘trade’ put an unwanted spotlight on closing GITMO? The problem all along is what to do with these koran toting homicidal moppets. Free them all in exchange for a meaningless ‘truce’ after a round of negotiations? Are they terrorists or enemy combatants? If they kill Americans on American soil will it be an act of ‘workplace violence’? Lock them all in a cell with a couple of Claymores and let allah sort it out.

    • Jack Deth

      If all the inmates are “traded”. There is no need for Gitmo.

      Though I do like the Claymore touch.

      • carmenta

        If all the inmates are dead, there is no need for Gitmo. Im okay with that – its what they want anyway, right? Martyrdom? Let ’em have it!!

        • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

          Although the idea of simply opening the gate and saying, “OK, Cuba, they’re YOUR problem– payback for all the ‘marielitos’ who were criminals!” appeals.

  • carmenta

    deflect, divert, distract.

    You have NO evidence for the sheer nonsense you are spouting.

    Admit it, you’re hacking for a job shining Barry’s butt before he sits down, right?

  • mrspinky85

    Last, I checked there are many Army troops that are infuriated over this situation. And, the whole military isn’t all Republican. Bergadahls own platoon mates make this an issue. So how is this just a Republican thing which the left wants it to be so badly. If it was, more leftist would be out in droves to take bullets for Obama once again. There are many liberals who think this situation is messed up also. But, to expect MSNBC to report the story objectively is stupid.

    This link article’s title “Bergdahl’s Release Spurs Blacklash Among Soldiers”
    http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/06/03/bergdahls-release-spurs-backlash-among-soldiers.html?comp=7000023317828&rank=1

  • I_KICK_HIPPIES

    Protect the precious, again.

    • mrspinky85

      Yea, instead of them worrying about 5 dangerous Taliban leaders that can cause us harm in the future. It took a decade just to find one.

  • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty

    How come, MSNBC are you attempting to pin another one of 0bama’s fiasco on Republicans? Why, MSNBC? Answer the questions. When, MM has reported on this years ago and you sit and eat the fumes of 0’s piles of crap everyday, any day, day after day…

  • TCDave

    O’Bobblehead on his TV show actually said something worth repeating: ‘This is like trading Omar Bradley for Sgt. Shultz.’

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHY_xOj2M_g PistolsForPandas

    I’m honestly at the point where I wish the networks would just straight up admit their political bias and not try to pass themselves off as objective sources of news. It’s what they do in the UK, and I fail to see why that wouldn’t work here.

    • TCDave

      When you can get away with fraud for decades, why be honest? I am at the point where I wish they would be arrested.

    • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

      You mean they haven’t? I thought everyone knew their political bias since 1980.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHY_xOj2M_g PistolsForPandas

        I’d say that it’s one thing for everyone to know that the networks are, by and large, biased in favor of the Left as a kind of open secret, but it’d be another thing entirely for the networks to explicitly admit it. Everyone who’d watch, say, MSNBC, would know exactly what they’re watching (DNC talking points), and wouldn’t get to fool themselves into thinking that it is anything like an objective source of information.

        • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

          I quit watching NBC News when I was 12, after Tom Brokaw lied about President Reagan’s State of the Union speech. I figured if a 12 year old knew he was lying, all the adults had to know as well. Stopped watching the other network news shows shortly thereafter.

        • sinz54

          The head of MSNBC admitted that that channel targets a left-leaning audience.

  • QueenB

    Another terrible deal. Your point? Oh that’s right, you don’t have one. You just type whatever you have to in order to protect President Boyfriend. You do realize he’s really not that into you, right?

    • journogal

      Don’t burst the poster’s bubble!

  • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty

    Really MSNBC, when are you going to REPORT how many, just how many of our Service Members died to put the 5 Terrorists/Enemy Combatants behind bars in GITMO, only to be released, so they can celebrate the mere fact that they aren’t Americans and that they stop at NOTHING to take anyone of us out???

    You aren’t able, just like your dear Lying Leader are unable to declare Victory, because he’s NOT able to declare the War on Terror is over, it’s to keep us all under the control of his Marxist Communist Fascist Regime.

    Why MSNBC haven’t you reported on the horrendous things that 0bama released ILLEGALLY without notifying Congress, Terrorist/Enemy Combatants did to their own people, Hmm? You have some mighty fine CRICKET *SSES, MSNBC.

  • alanstorm

    Benjamin Netanyahu is Prime Minister of Israel.

    Obama is – unfortunately for us, and the world – president of the US.

    DO try to keep up.

  • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty
  • The Marathon Man

    Still spiking the football from the awesome “prisoner swap” for that American “hero” Bowe Bergdahl there, Calvinius?

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHY_xOj2M_g PistolsForPandas

    Yes, because Netanyahu has absolutely perfect judgement, and he doesn’t ever make mistakes.

    *eyeroll*

    I bet you thought Obama almost getting us militarily involved in the Syrian Civil War last year was an awesome idea.

  • Hotlanta Mike
  • Hotlanta Mike
  • Baba Ghanoush

    Circle the wagons

  • Hotlanta Mike
  • Hotlanta Mike

    ‘Matthews, guest have heated exchange over danger of freed Taliban’

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pzrzg4lA3u0

  • Hotlanta Mike

    For a former community organizer swapping 5 Taliban detainees for 1 American deserter might have seemed like a good idea at the time.

    But then to have invited his Taliban sympathizing parents to the White House to give a prayer to Allah and speak in a foreign language to the American people. Brilliant!

  • Dan13

    If the rate of exchange for a traitorous deserter is five to one, what is the rate of exchange for a CIA station chief?

  • Marvin Nelson

    I haven’t watched network “news” for a number of years, except for Fox. The rest of them are a bunch of sniveling Obummer lapdogs who will do anything to protect the Anointed One.

  • OLLPOH ~ OurLifeLiberty

    Have fun with this one Calvin……..

    Source: Baltimore.cbslocal.com

    Congressman Ruppersberger (D) call Taliban prisoner exchange a dangerous precedent

    http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2014/06/03/ruppersberger-call-taliban-prisoner-exchange-a-dangerous-precedent/

  • GirlRaisedInTheSouth

    Well let’s see. MSNBC may be right. If we’re talking about the administration violating their own foreign policy of “don’t do stupid sh*t”, dissing / abandoning our military (and CIA) and their efforts, having Rice come out on the Sunday shows with some ridiculous talking points, and counting on the journalists to give them cover because it’s an election year, MSNBC may have nailed it! Oh, but in this case, the administration also violated a law that the President himself signed.

  • Bustin Cheeto’s Everywhere!

    MSNBC and their group of Marxists never cease to amaze with their stupidity.

  • http://www.nleomf.org/officers/ FlatFoot

    We’re not the place for news. We’re not the place for that. Our brand is not that.” –MSNBC President Phil Griffin [June 02, 2013]

    We’re The Place For
    M oonbats
    S pewing
    N othing
    B ut
    C rap

    • Thale Taxurfeet

      And thus was their quota of Honest Candor exhausted…

  • brock2118

    This is already three days old dude.

  • Hotlanta Mike
  • paperpushermj

    MSNBC is the Pravda for Democrats…We all know that …Right !

  • Memegalt2012

    You mean try to get to the TRUTH instead of covering up for this administrations vast mistakes

  • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

    No, Bergdahl was Obama’s ticket to free Taliban leaders. That’s what this is all about, Obama wanted to help his Taliban friends by trading them for a traitor who deserted his post like a coward, and then wanted to renounce his citizenship.

    The liberals are in attack mode because they are upset that the country isn’t praising Obama for aiding terrorism

  • old motorcycle enthusiast

    MSNBC & Team Obama are 5th Columnists

    Democrats that supported them are their dupes.

    But will Voters make this the end of story or a new start?

    • Shubi

      The Democratic Party’s unofficial mission statement: “Through the undermining of patriotism, morality and spiritual life, we will bring about the collapse of America.”

  • jdog

    Not sure. Is there a Muslim hating video somewhere to blame this on?

  • yourmamatoo

    It would almost be sad if it wasn’t so comical, and desperate.
    Poor things over at MSDNC.

  • Tagg Heurer

    Some claim that particular forms of collectivism, such as “democratic socialism” will eliminate the problem of who decides for whom.