Diane Warren is the prolific, award-winning songwriter behind Aerosmith’s “I Don’t Want to Miss a Thing,” Toni Braxton’s “Un-break My Heart” and dozens of other hits. She’s also a PETA-pusher who appointed herself the voice of all gays, minorities and ducks in a message to “Duck Dynasty” and A&E.

Her latest “F**k U” goes to Ted Cruz, the GOP senator who sent haters into apoplectic fits when he and Sen. Mike posed for a photo with what appeared to be a tiger skin rug. “Did a little shopping for the office,” he joked. On Thursday, Warren joined the online freakout with her wish that the “beautiful murdered animal” could trade places with Cruz and smile over his body.

So, she’s about as sane and balanced as her followers:

https://twitter.com/BarbDestefano/status/459475526122745856

Not that the death-wishing, PETA-promoting crowd will care, but The Washington Post reported that Cruz “was kidding, and had no intention of bringing the tiger pelt back to Washington,” according to his spokeswoman. She told WaPo, “It’s unfortunate the same outrage isn’t displayed by the left when it comes to defending the lives of hundreds of thousands of unborn babies aborted every year.”

[Update]

Warren deleted her tweet. Reminder, Ms. Warren: Twitchy is forever.

  • BoscoBolt

    Just one more reason why America needs …. TED CRUZ 2016!

    Run-Ted-Run!

    • Vennoye

      If you want to know who controls you, just look at the people who can push your buttons!! Ted Cruz can push a lot of people’s buttons!!

      • http://www.freedomreconnection.com/ FreedomRecon

        Well said.

      • rogleecam

        Their buttons are in the permanent push mode. They are like a gun slinger itcying for a fight.

        • 3seven77

          Except that they don’t carry guns. I guess they’d have to have a b!tchslap war.

          • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

            Louis Vuitton purses at 20 paces.

          • JGHB

            LOL good one!

          • DeeDee

            Or a hashtag war. Lol

  • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

    The stupid burns.

    • Republicanvet

      …and tweets.

    • Maxx

      One ponders if Gosnell had aborted the tiger, would that rug would be ok with the hypocrites?

      • Al’s Annoyed Grandpa

        They would not have a problem if that had been the case. Remember…it’s only wrong when a conservative does it.

      • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

        Things that make you go hmmmm…

      • tops116 ✓Quipper

        Are you kidding? Remember, these are the same kind of people who flipped out over Romney putting a dog carrier on the roof of his car but made excuses for Obama eating a dog.

      • DeeDee

        Only if it still had scissors sticking out of it’s skull.

      • Gary D. Alexander

        Viva Maxx…. great come back.

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    Where was PETA while the BLM was “murdering” cattle in the Nevada desert?

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHY_xOj2M_g PistolsForPandas

      At their headquarters euthanizing animals by the truckload.

      PETA, considered by many to be the highest-profile animal rights group in the country, kills an average of about 2,000 dogs and cats each year at its animal shelter here.

      And the shelter does few adoptions — 19 cats and dogs in 2012 and 24 in 2011, according to state records.

      At a time when the major animal protection groups have moved to a “no kill” shelter model, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals remains a holdout, confounding some and incensing others who know the organization as a very vocal advocacy group that does not believe animals should be killed for food, fur coats or leather goods.

      This is an organization that on Thanksgiving urges Americans not to eat turkey.

      • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

        Are they suggesting that we eat cats and dogs? Are they really just aiming to become a major supplier?

        • Nightvalzin

          Perhaps they send them to the White House?

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHY_xOj2M_g PistolsForPandas

          Did someone say “supplier”?

          • Frustrated Teacher

            Now THAT right there is funny…my laugh for a Friday! Thank you!

          • Gary D. Alexander

            Man bites dog… and this man found it “tough”.

      • 😈Pj4🎭🎶

        Sounds like PETA and Planned Parenthood are run by the same exact people.

        • Frustrated Teacher

          Winner, winner!

      • Republicanvet

        I asked the question of where PETA was when the BLM were killing Bundy’s cattle, and expressed surprise they could take enough time from killing over two thousand dogs and cats per year to write a press release in the WaPo article.

        I’m sure any responses will be very calm and well-thought out…like the one who believes because Cruz’ spokesman is a woman, she should have enough sense to keep silent on the abortion issue.

        • 3seven77

          Are you kidding me? I was told by a leftie on Twitter that unless I HAD a vagina I couldn’t discuss abortion.

          • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

            Tell them bull!

            Every baby has 2 parents, and the woman can’t get pregnant by herself.

            Here’s some backup:

            http://clinicquotes.com/category/personal-stories/men-and-abortion/

          • Republicanvet

            …but you’re free to pay for it right?

            If you read the comments at that WaPo article, there are many whining that they just can’t understand the analogy…or what abortion has to do with it.

          • QueenB

            If you makes you feel better, even with a vagina, because I do not agree with them, they tell him I can’t discuss it either.

          • PNN

            LMAO. Unbelievable.

      • PNN

        PETA and the HSUS are BAD NEWS. Whenever I learn someone donates to them I encourage them NOT to because they euthanize more pets than any kill shelter.

      • Bruce

        PETA’s reply to those sorts of things is that the animals are better off dead than “slaves.” Please. All PETA is, is a bunch of militant vegetarians who want to shove veganism down everyone’s throat. While I do believe that the fur industry is outdated, humans are omnivores. We are supposed to eat meat.

    • Humanary Stew

      How dare you insist on consistency from leftists. Don’t you understand you are placing unfair demands on them? /s off

      • alanstorm

        Be fair, now! – Obama, for one, has shown clear consistency: Being wrong on every subject, and lying non-stop.

    • Amedicinewoman

      Killing animals in their over crowded facilities…opps, that’s a secret.

    • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

      Cattle aren’t animals, people aren’t animals . . . only cute fuzzy creatures are animals worthy of PETA’s protection . . . and nekkid college chicks body-painted to look like animals in cages.

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        The nekkid college chicks never protest near here. We only have the hippie, burnouts. I keep welder’s goggles handy just in case.

        • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

          Sensible precaution…

          hippies are toxic to brain cells….

    • LegalizeShemp

      Please do not ask liberals to follow the same rules and laws they set up for you little people. They are arrogant, self-appointed elites who are on a mission to create a Utopia by regulating everyone else into perfection, while doing whatever the hell they want in the process.

      • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

        And like every Utopia, it will never exist.

      • David Johnson

        Sort of like that other Socialist Loving group the Khmer Rouge.

        • Jay Stevens

          Hey If people weren’t such problems, that Khymer Rouge thing could have worked.

    • 364NKL

      I said the same thing yesterday. HYPOCRITES!!!!!!!

    • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

      Good question. Why wasn’t PETA boycotting the BLM after that?

      • Jay Stevens

        1. The cattle were going to be killed and eaten anyway.
        2. It would have generated the wrong kind of (anti-government) publicity.

        Logic says #1. Liberal ideology says #2.

  • QueenB

    Should pro-aborts really hope for karma?

    • http://www.freedomreconnection.com/ FreedomRecon

      That’s what I’m thinkin…..Plus, I’ve always found it amusing that most don’t believe in a “mystical made up fantasy creature” such as God, but they do believe in karma? That makes total sense.

  • Right Wired ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    I thought that picture of Ted was Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

    • IfYouHaveToAsk

      Are you saying he is a cereal killer?

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        I see what you did there!

      • Nightvalzin

        No, I’m sure that honor belongs to Al Gore

        • http://www.FunDMental.com TheRealJackpineSavage

          He’s Super Cereal!

      • Right Wired ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        All I will say is that a job just opened up at Kellog’s. Must be willing to point a lot.

        • Mark81150 Never/Trump/Hillary

          Snuffles the Peanut Butter Crunch spokesman reputedly in hiding,….

  • gotroy22

    It’s easier for libs like Diane Warren to care about a tiger than an unborn human being.

    • MrSnuggles2k2

      The tiger isn’t an inconvenience.

      • Jay Stevens

        Unless you are one of the natives the tiger dines on.

    • SQL DBA

      Yeah she is not human

  • alanstorm

    Another example of why we need weapons – to protect us from the “non-violent”.

  • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

    Mr. Cruz standing over the corpse of a murdered animal makes her want to have sex with him? Or am I misinterpreting the first words of her tweet?

    • Jay Stevens

      I am pretty sure that you are misinterpreting her. But I could be mistaken.

  • waterytart

    Ted Cruz is the Master of Trolling, methinks.

  • notenoughtime

    If she follows the pattern of most vocal liberal women, the elimination of human life does not get this much outrage from her and the same mindset.

    • MrSnuggles2k2

      I started watching WWII in HD the other day, and seeing the Nazis line people against a wall and shoot them gave me chills. I know these sick leftists would have no problem, nay, they would love to line conservative people up and mow us down.

      • 3seven77

        Who Goes Nazi? One of the best articles ever written. I think everyone should read this article once a year:

        http://harpers.org/archive/1941/08/who-goes-nazi/

        • DeeDee

          Thanks for the link. Excellent article.

        • MrSnuggles2k2

          Thank you that was an excellent read.

  • mrspinky85

    I’m grateful for Jesus. Because of him we don’t have to get what we all “deserve”.
    Who is she to determine what someone deserves?

    • SQL DBA

      She deserves not to wear or use leather shoes, leather jackets, down coats, down bed comforters, drink milk, use butter, eat any meat that also includes, fish and eggs

  • Republicanvet

    “It’s unfortunate the same outrage isn’t displayed by the left when it comes to defending the lives of hundreds of thousands of unborn babies aborted every year.”

    BOOM!

    Leftists. Going batsh!t crazy over a picture of two guys and a rug while Oregon burns babies for electricity.

  • http://www.freedomreconnection.com/ FreedomRecon

    The civil and tolerant left wishing death on another human….pardon me while I dig out my shocked face.

  • Republicanvet

    We saw the tweets in response to the picture, yet in the WaPo article comments, lefty’s are now saying Cruz is just a huge drama queen manufacturing a controversy because he hasn’t been in the media enough.

    Those tweets to Cruz were not from drama queens?

    • QueenB

      Translation: We were so trolled so let’s blame the guy who trolled for us freaking out.

  • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    “Have a cow” about THIS if you dare, Lefties (oh, I forgot– that would be “hegemonic cultural imperialism” over an indigenous population!):
    http://twitchy.com/2014/03/28/pro-hunting-canadian-inuit-post-sealfies-in-response-to-ellen-degeneres-oscar-selfie/

  • nickdqwk
    • QueenB

      All white males, not “endangered”. Duh.

      • nickdqwk

        Yeah, my bad!

    • Jake Bradford

      To leftists, white males rank below rats on the scale of animals deserving protection.

      • tops116 ✓Quipper

        Unless they tow the liberal line, anyway.

  • SQL DBA

    her song writing sucks too

  • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    “I wish It could trade places w U and smile over ur body.” — Diane Warren

    “Bring it on– I’m ready for it. I even have myself all inked up, if it’s big and bad enough to take MY hide!”– Ted Cruz
    http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/thumbs/natural/picture/2246447/83950585.jpg

  • SQL DBA

    I bet she had a porterhouse steak at Peter Luger’s last night

  • Jake Bradford

    She, like all leftists, feels she is perfectly justified to wish for the death of any conservative.
    Leftism is mental derangement.

  • JudyinNC

    The Capital Police frown on death threats to sitting Senators. Has she been reported?

    • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

      Accidentally replied to the wrong person above.

      Technically, wishing someone were dead is not a threat to effect that outcome.

      • tops116 ✓Quipper

        True, but you can bet that if a right-winger wished a Democrat were dead, the Lefties would flip their s*** and demand legal action.

      • Ruth

        Remember how the left including the politicians came unglued when Palin had range-finder targets on a web page? There were no threats or even wishes for death but they acted as if there were. So I say, let’s meet hyperbole with hyperbole. We’ve been silent and accommodating for too long.

  • Sua Sponte

    Someone who most people don’t know or care about and will do and say anything to try and stay relevant said something….So in essence, a typical prog….mEH…

    • Jake Bradford

      There seems to be a special kind of derangement among older leftist females that makes them threaten death or make outrageous inciting comments on twitter: Cher, Diane Warren, Joan Walsh, Nancy Pelosi. Each and every one would fit perfectly in the opening scene of Macbeth.

      • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        Hillary as MacBeth’s wife. Plenty of blood on HER hands that won’t wash off.

  • Richard Nightwood

    She tweeted this while wearing alligator-skin boots.

  • LegalizeShemp

    Must be that calm, rational, kind, caring “new tone” that the Democrats called for after the Giffords shooting.

  • takwita

    Just another unhinged Libtard,

  • Stuck_in_Ca

    She’s the one who wrote the new crappy songs for the new crappy Aerosmith thereby destroying my childhood memories of one of the best bands to ever exist? I want her to die!

  • LegalizeShemp

    Meanwhile, when a drunk, high celebrity stumbles out of a limo on Sunset Blvd dressed head to toe in shiny leather made from animal skin, the liberal dunces all swoon and dream about having sex with the celebrity, hopefully with lots of other liberals watching and commenting on their sexual prowess and huge genitalia.

  • Nahalban

    Hmm let’s see death threat against sitting U.S. Senator law enforcement reaction? nada.

    • lazypadawan

      Right. Had a country singer said the same thing about Harry Reid, that guy would be in some federal jail by now.

  • ErikandKathy Muller

    Beyond comprehension that they are upset that some states ban late term abortions..babies, who in utero, cry and suck their thumb..move to mama’s voice. Killing a baby is OK with them. It surely is the land of evil.

  • Hannibal

    Award winning songwriter Diane Warren wrote the “Mmmm,mmmm.mmmm Obama” song.

    • Jay Stevens

      You mean lyrically challenged, award winning songwriter, don’t you?

  • © Sponge

    If karma has a way of sorting these things out, LOTS of Democrats have lived WAY too long.

  • RSnyder

    It was dumb of Cruz to post that shot and PETA did go after Moochel for using REAL eggs at the big Easter Roll, so everyone is fair game today. And would someone just make John Boehner go away? Just send him home. He and McCain are an embarrassment anymore to the GOP.

    • Ruth

      Dumb to post the shot because someone might take offense? We need to get over that idea and punch back twice as hard. Every time I see a story about PETA, I remind everyone of the dogs and cats they killed. That’s the only way to win is to not cower but go after them like they go after us.

      • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

        And how PETA had no issue with the cattle that the BLM killed.

  • lazypadawan

    Do her lyrics come out that nonsensical when she writes those sappy ballads?

  • Susan Michelle Kirkland

    I just sent her a Tweet – DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS!

  • ernst1776

    How many abortions did Diane Warren have?

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmSIOoy6MlE&app=desktop Booker

    I love the way this guy can push these guys buttons. Hilarious!!

  • Ed McDowell

    And just what proof do you have Ms. Warren, that the animal didn’t die of natural causes. Maybe it choked on a bone. Murdered….what are you a CSI ME or something?

    • Ms. Abigail van Beagle

      Or was forced to listen to “Unbreak my heart” and committed suicide.

      • Ed McDowell

        Quite possibly

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    So, “in the cross hairs” qualified as violent rhetoric, but wishing death on someone doesn’t?

    I know, I know. Expecting consistency from a far left lunatic is like expecting Obamacare to succeed–it’s just not gonna happen. 😀

  • Matt Proctor

    considering the millions of animals that PETA has killed and then taken the money I am not surprised that they are hypocrites

  • Yeah I Said It

    If you traded places with him in the photo you would just be posing with the tiger rug…

    Also, how exactly is it murder to kill an animal but not murder to kill a fetus which is in fact a human species.

  • $29520529

    Such a sweet “lady” too! I can only imagine what she says to her grandchildren when they spill milk. “Why you little @&)!?#%£¥€ I hope you die like the cows whose blood you drink!” Or something like that. :-)

  • $1014973

    That there is a true lady.

  • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

    So the life of an animal is more valuable to this lady than a human being? Not surprised.

    A liberal will say this, but then pretend we’re the hateful side.

  • Ruth

    And I guess she didn’t care about all the dogs and cats that PETA killed.

  • Hey, That’s Pretty Good

    That second tweet said that “Karma will get him.”

    Does that mean Karma will get all of the baby killers, too?

  • Antisocial_ism

    If she traded places with Cruz she would just be looking over the same animal’s body. These liberals really express themselves well.
    BTW, Bitch! ‘I don”t wanna miss a thing’ is possibly Aerosmith’s worst song. Way to go.

  • PNN

    While I don’t condone what she did there’s plenty of hypocrisy on both sides. Speaking as a DVM AND a pro-choice, Libertarian-leaning Republican, I found the photo in very poor taste even though it was in jest. There’s the liberals and their knee jerk, blind and unbridled hate who stayed silent over Benghazi and there’s the hypocrisy of the ultra conservative right with their abortion outrage while they espouse their joy of hunting. Moreover, the manner in which many in the south euthanize old and/or ill pets is nothing of which to be proud. I’ve yet to get a straight answer from those who decry abortion but somehow, in their own eschewed way, justify hunting.

    • Republicanvet

      What pablum. So hunting to feed ones family is the same as abortion?

      I grew up where hunting was needed to put food on the table, but somehow that is as bad as injecting poison into a baby to kill it, then sucking out the remains because it may be considered a mistake? Or it may inconvenience someone?

      What kind of straight answer would be acceptable to justify your efed up values or priorities?

      Edited to add: Why not provide your straight answer on why hunting needs to be justifiable to you but your choice to kill a baby needs no justification.

      • PNN

        FACT: Do NOT put words in my mouth unless you do NOT want to keep this civil. Hunting for food is NOT the same as hunting for sport. There IS a world of difference and it’s the latter is what I find troubling. Moreover, being pro-choice does not mean one is anti-life. Early in the first trimester, it’s FETAL TISSUE, NOT a fetus. I suggest you go to veterinary or medical school and take a fine needle aspirate of the tissue. Fetal tissue looks exactly like a cluster of blood clots. That’s tissue, not a human being. A straight answer is one guided by logic, NOT emotion as your response CLEARLY was. Leave your effed up values, morals and lack of logic out of this dialogue. Try explaining WHY these radical pro-lifers bomb abortion clinics and end up killing the doctor and/or staff during the commission of the crime. Bombing these facilities requires planning; pro-life murderers decry the killing of unborn babies but then take the lives of others who are performing services at the behest of the woman. The hypocrisy and ignorance of people like you is staggering. What’s even more egregious is the fact that these murderers get off with manslaughter because religion is used as an excuse. A woman has a right to choose, an individual does not have the right to take one life for another or permanently maim that person, I’m playing devil’s advocate and despise the hypocrisy of the radical left and the radical right. Call me an equal opportunity despiser of BOTH. And both sides are guided by hate and rage, they’re just manifested in different ways SANS any logic. By the way, my conservative values and morals are just fine. My sister and I were fortunate to have had a father who was a Lt Col in the USMC and a mother who was an educator who taught us to think outside the box.

        • Republicanvet

          Put words in your mouth? Perhaps if you posted a clear comment. What words did I put in your mouth? You simply said hunting in your first comment.
          Oh, and speaking of putting words in someone’s mouth, because I oppose abortion, I am equivalent to someone who would bomb a clinic?
          You, like other leftists, resort to descriptions of pregnancies in the very early stages since it is easier to describe simply as fetal tissue. It makes it much easier to ignore the many later term abortions that are carried out in this country, often simply because the pregnancy is an inconvenience.
          It’s easier to think of as fetal tissue when excusing the horrors of people like Kermit Gosnell sticking a scissors into the neck of an almost full term baby and snipping the spinal cord.
          As for emotion, you seem to go off the deep end suggesting that abortion clinics are blown up every other day, and nobody is held accountable, and that anyone opposed to abortion on demand is as extreme as the bomber…someone you say has no right to take the life of another or permanently maim another…while defending a woman’s right to take the life of another whenever she chooses…or permanently maim another because the abortion was botched.
          If you think someone who would bomb a clinic is a radical extremist, you really should do some research on Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, and what she thought of minorities and the disabled.
          I would suggest the deaths of abortion doctors are vastly less than the abortions carried out at a single clinic for one year. Is that acceptable? No. But neither are the numbers of abortions in this country carried out daily, and government using my tax dollars to pay for it. Where is my choice to refuse to pay for that?
          You claim a woman has a right to choose, while ranting against someone’s right to hunt…that’s certainly outside the box.

          • PNN

            My comment was abundantly clear in my response to you regarding the TYPE of hunting. It’s your choice to remain obtuse. As for your opposing abortion, that’s your choice. Speaking as a female, I firmly believe in a woman’s right to choose. Who are you or anyone else to tell a woman what she can do with her body? I’m not defending abortion, I’m defending her right to choose. You are not inside her heart and mind nor do you know what brought her to that fateful decision. I understand you’re against abortion but by the same token, practice what you preach. Enter into a legal contract with a woman to adopt that child right out of the womb and take care of that child until he or she comes of legal age or until such time that child is financially independent. In furtherance of all this, I’m a die-hard Republican, born and raised, AND a doctor. I despise liberals and progressives as much as I detest oppressive neocons and far right radicals. EARLY in the first trimester it is NOT a child, it’s fetal tissue. There is NO major organ development in the first eight weeks, it’s FETAL TISSUE until AFTER such time. Those are medical FACTS, they are NOT OPINIONS and it is NOT a partisan issue. Furthermore, I do NOT believe in late term abortions nor do I believe in using abortion as a method of birth control. I find both completely reprehensible. I’m guided by science and medicine, not by emotion, as you so clearly are. You are nothing more than a leftist hiding under the guise of a conservative moniker, what the rest of us call a RINO. I know all about Kermit Gosnell and his misdeeds. FETAL TISSUE IS NOT a late term baby. If your grey matter cannot wrap itself around those irrefutable medical facts, then I suggest you acquire a formal education or befriend a doctor who does neonatal research. And I know all about Margaret Sanger and the notorious Planned Parenthood and her opinions of the disabled inasmuch as I have a niece who’s handicapped. I did not go off the deep end at all, I was merely responding to your comments in a dispassionate manner. YOU are the one who insinuated himself into this dialogue and YOU are the one twisting and distorting what I’m saying. THAT is what liberals DO. You’re merely getting it thrown back at you. YOU are the one infusing comments with emotion and taking things out of context, not I. By all means, SHOW me where I suggested abortion clinics are bombed every other day. I said no such thing. You’re of the belief that bombing these clinics and abortions are to be somehow quantified and that the number of clinics bombed doesn’t come close to the number of abortions. Furthermore, I do not rant, I discuss. YOU are the one ranting, YOU are the one making it personal and YOU were the one who responded to me. And yes, a woman does have the right to choose, and for those who deride abortions yet have no problem with hunting for sport are hypocrites. THAT IS thinking outside the box and not adhering to cookie cutter values, contrary to the majority who are sheep sharing the same beliefs without question.

          • Republicanvet

            Your comment was clear only in your response to mine. In your original comment, you were not clear and denounced all hunters. For someone who keeps harping about how educated you are, one would think you would be more careful in stating clearly what you mean.
            So your being female automatically negates anyone else having an opinion? Last I heard, it took two to create a baby.
            You ask who am I to tell a woman what to do with her body? Who are you to judge whether someone hunts, for sport or food? You are not inside my heart and determining why I might hunt, but you denounced all hunters in your first comment.
            Oh, and as long as the left insists that I pay for her abortion with my tax dollars (a point you ignored) then I should have a say in being forced to pay for it….particularly that I am forced to pay for a woman’s birth control pills.
            Now, as to your legal contracting pap, you should also be careful about just recklessly throwing around accusations as to whether someone might do that or not. As an adoptive parent, your comment is offensive.
            You can keep repeating your comments on fetal tissue, but I suggest you go back and read your first comment again. You said nothing about being pro-choice in aborting fetal tissue or anything about a trimester. If you just say you are pro-choice, then you should be ready for anyone to understand you are pro-choice on abortion no matter when it might be.
            I insinuated myself into this dialogue? I saw your comment in which you said you were pro-choice, without any qualifiers, and that you were against hunting, also without any qualifiers, and I questioned you on how you could justify that irrational position, and you failed to do so choosing instead to go off on an emotional rant about abortion clinic bombers.

          • PNN

            First of all, it doesn’t matter whether I elaborated on the hunting comment in my original posting or in my response to you. You’re nitpicking for lack of anything else to say.
            Harping? You mean the way you continue to harp about abortion and your inability to discern between fetal
            tissue and an actual human being? I’m hardly harping about my education, but some things bear repeating for those of your ilk who continue to box others into a compartment in spite of being informed as to the reasons and WHY some of us take the position that we do. I’ve been abundantly and unfailingly clear through all these responses, it’s you who’s obtuse and continues to put his own spin on things. “So your being female automatically negates anyone else having an opinion?” You’re entitled to your opinions steeped in emotion, I’m entitled to put forth the facts based on medicine, science and logic. SHOW me where I alluded to my gender negating anyone else having an opinion. It’s none of yours or anyone else’s business to tell a woman whether or not she should abort a fetus. Moreover, I’m not judging hunters, I’m
            calling out the hypocrisy of those who hunt for sport while deriding abortion. I needn’t be inside your heart and mind if the aforementioned is what you do in spite of your claims of hunting for food. Hypocrisy and double standards don’t sit well with me. Furthermore, I did not ignore your point about being forced to pay for an abortion. I was putting together other thoughts and
            that simply fell by the wayside. I don’t want to pay for an abortion or birth control pills with my tax dollars, either,
            just as I don’t want my tax dollars going toward those who are able bodied enough to work yet get welfare, spit out kids and continue to scam and abuse the system. There were no reckless accusations and there was nothing
            offensive in my comment, you simply didn’t like what I said. I have zero tolerance for those who are so
            quick to judge a woman considering abortion.
            If these people feel THAT strongly, then they should adopt that child right out of the womb. What’s offensive and
            egregious is how the religious right feels it’s within their discretion to act as judge, jury and executioner and take retaliatory action and then attempt to justify it with religion. As you continue with your ad nauseam emotional rant on abortion/hunting, I will continue to reiterate my comments. Yes, you insinuated yourself into this dialogue and then complain and criticize when others say things which do not parallel your views. All of my comments had qualifiers, yours did not. Please continue to regale us with
            your emotive rant about not wanting to pay for abortions and I’ll keep pointing out those who kill in retaliation. There’s nothing like stomach churning religious hypocrisy. Emotional I’m not, dispassionate I am. Typical.
            A man has a discussion, a woman has an emotional rant. *sarcastic smirk*

          • Republicanvet

            If it doesn’t matter when you make clear remarks, then you shouldn’t get so excited when people call you out for your generalized statements.
            Yes, you were harping about how educated you are, like a typical leftist that suggests whoever disagrees with them MUST be uneducated. You might think it is boxing you into a compartment, I would call it trying to clarify remarks you made, which you think don’t seem to matter when you make them or how clear you are.
            Do you give only half the instructions on caring for an animal and just expect customers to read your mind for the rest?
            Show you where you alluded to your gender?

            “Speaking as a female, I firmly believe in a woman’s right to choose.”

            Does that give you special knowledge?

            If it is none of my business to tell a woman whether she should abort, why are leftists forcing me to pay for it? I should just shut up and not offer an opinion on what my taxes are used for?
            Hypocrisy and double standards may not sit well with you, but they are on display throughout your comments.
            If you don’t want to pay taxes for welfare people who “spit out kids”, why don’t you adopt them then as you say I should? Hypocrisy?
            You may have zero tolerance over someone voicing an opinion on abortion, but I have as much zero tolerance on people who react emotionally to anyone who hunts as you did.
            All your comments had qualifiers? Seriously, before you continue your delusions, go back and read your first comment as I suggested. Again, if you don’t want to get called out on your inconsistencies, then perhaps you shouldn’t make such general statements.
            You have mentioned religion several times. Where have I mentioned religion at all? You whine about people judging, yet ignore your own open judgments while jumping to conclusions without fact.

        • Elizabeth

          You had me up until you said “A woman has a right to choose, an individual does not have the right to take one life for another or permanently maim that person”…. Abortion is taking a life. I’m sick to death of the disclaimer “it’s a woman’s right to choose”. That’s justification for absolving women of any guilt associated with the act of murdering her baby.

          • PNN

            A late term abortion, yes, because there’s major organ development and by that time it’s a human being. It’s still an issue of personal choice and not for anyone to judge. The religious pro-lifer who kills a doctor and his staff out of retaliation because one of his patients has an abortion isn’t absolved of any guilt.

          • Republicanvet

            …yet you so self righteously are quick to judge hunters, whether for food or sport.

          • PNN

            Yes, just as you so self-righteously and quickly judged me as a leftist when I’m a Republican.

          • Republicanvet

            Given your inconsistent comments, avoidance of points made, quick judgments without fact and jumping to conclusions, you are a leftist. You just refuse to face up to it.

          • PNN

            Wrong. I responded to you and justified my position. I avoided nothing. This is just YOU disliking what I have to say. Moreover, I’m a lifelong Republican with Libertarian tendencies, that of being pro-choice. My comments have been consistent all along and I backed up my position, it’s you who’s offered weak and flimsy counter arguments because my comments are not what you wish to hear. You’re what the rest of us call a RINO and a self-loathing leftist who has yet to come out of the closet.

          • Elizabeth

            Right. Because you don’t like what he said, he’s automatically a “leftist”….LOL. Project much?

          • PNN

            Absolutely, just as he didn’t like what I said and he automatically labeled me a “leftist” in earlier comments. Project much? *sarcastic smirk*

          • Elizabeth

            Let me just say this. It’s beyond hypocritical for you to be pro-choice and anti-hunting. See how your words can be thrown right back into your face?

          • PNN

            And I’ll say this: it’s not hypocritical. Being pro-choice does NOT mean one is anti-life. Being pro-life and hunting for sport is the height of hypocrisy. See how YOUR words ARE thrown right back into your face?

          • Elizabeth

            I never said I was pro hunting for sport. You are the one who said you were pro-choice, anti-hunting.

            Edit: Hunting is legal as is abortion.

          • PNN

            I never said YOU were pro-hunting for sport.

          • Republicanvet

            You have avoided several times explaining how you believe you can make judgments about hunting and abortion, yet refuse to say why others can’t do the same.
            You immediately jump to the conclusion that anyone expressing an opposing opinion must be uneducated, a religious nut and a bomber.
            Your comments have not been consistent when you initially make generalized statements, follow up with all kinds of qualifiers which you should have made in your first comment, then say it doesn’t matter when you made the qualifiers that somehow people should just have known.
            As for hypocrisy, “first, do no harm”, yet you advocate for abortion? Or is there some other meaning to “first, do no harm” unless I personally feel like it?

          • PNN

            I avoided nothing. I explained time and time again. It’s YOU who refuses to accept my position and it’s YOU who’s passing judgment. This ALL centers around my comment of those who deride abortion will advocate hunting for sport in the same breath. I welcome dissenting opinions, it’s the heart of cogent debate and discussion. The contentious issue on this end is twofold: a woman’s right to choose and at what point does fetal tissue become a viable fetus. My comments have been consistent, they just haven’t been what you want to hear. I elaborated in my second comment and if that’s not sufficient, too bad. There’s NO hypocrisy here, I advocate for a woman’s right to choose and it’s no one’s concern the reasons for her decision.

          • Elizabeth

            And if someone hunts it’s not your concern the reason why they hunt.

          • PNN

            I don’t give a damn if they hunt for sport but if they cry about abortion they’re hypocrites.

          • Elizabeth

            Geez you’re thick!

          • PNN

            Then I have that in common with YOU!

          • Elizabeth

            LOL! Maybe. Can we agree to disagree?

          • PNN

            Of course we can. I’m not here to argue and don’t appreciate being attacked. And I’m NOT saying you’re attacking me. LOL

          • Elizabeth

            I’ll look forward to the next debate. Have a good night!

          • PNN

            You as well. I’m going to respond to your other comments even though we now have a truce. LOL

          • Republicanvet

            …but defending abortion in which a life ends is not hypocritical?

          • PNN

            Talk about thick. You just can’t see it from my perspective and without repeating myself I believe you know what I mean.

          • Republicanvet

            HA! I’m the thick one but you don’t even know who you are responding to.

            Did I say you were thick? Since you brought it up…

            I can see your perspective, but you are too thick to allow others to have a different perspective.

          • PNN

            I see your perspective just fine, I just don’t like how you go about it by criticizing others with whom you don’t agree.

          • Republicanvet

            …and I don’t like someone making generalized statements lumping everyone together like you did.

            You may want to think of it as an attack, I think of it as a vigorous defense after being attacked for years by leftists.

          • PNN

            And I equally despise those who make generalizations about others and berating those same people and accusing them of being leftists. I’ve been attacked and called a murdered by far right wing lunatics for my pro-choice position and equally attacked by leftists over gay marriage and some other issues. Right from the gate you accused me of having “efed up values.” You can whitewash it all you want, if it looks like an attack and penned like an attack, then its an attack.

          • Republicanvet

            …and you said:

            “I’ve yet to get a straight answer from those who decry abortion but somehow, in their own eschewed way, justify hunting.”

            after stating you were pro-choice, without qualification, which any reasonable person would take to mean as ALL abortions.

            I offered justification for hunting and said what I said about your values because of your original comments.

          • sez-who

            I don’t really want to get in between you and Elizabeth while you’re both having such fun, but I am perturbed by what appears to be your contention that humans and animals are on the same level. Not sure if that is what you mean to convey?

          • PNN

            Sez, that’s not my contention at all nor did I even remotely allude to it. Have a good day.

          • Republicanvet

            You have yet to respond with why you should be able to judge hunters and defend your position on abortion, yet others cannot defend hunting or say anything about abortion.
            You refuse to acknowledge that you made a generalized statement about hunting and never specified “for sport” until you were called out.
            I advocate for a persons right to feed their families, and when I made that point, you added your clarification of being against hunting.
            Cogent debate and discussion are easy when clear comments are made.

          • PNN

            I responded to you long ago. Oh please, you didn’t call me out, you went on an over the top emotional rant and I elaborated on hunting of my own volition in my response.

            Your emotionally charged rant:

            “I grew up where hunting was needed to put food on the table, but somehow that is as bad as injecting poison into a baby to kill it, then sucking out the remains because it may be considered a mistake? Or it may inconvenience someone?

            What kind of straight answer would be acceptable to justify your efed up values or priorities?”

          • Republicanvet

            You never responded to why you can offer opinions, while refusing to allow others to have opposing opinions.

            …and when I called you out for your hypocritical position on abortion and hunting, you went on a hysterical rant about bombers.

            You must believe a child is a rat is a pig is a toad right?

          • PNN

            I responded to you regarding this as much as I’m going to respond. You can have all the opinions you want, no one is taking that away from you. But I will continue to call out hypocrites when I see them. My position on abortion and hunting is not hypocritical. Pro-lifers whine and cry over abortion yet have no problem killing an animal for sport. Furthermore, I did not go on an hysterical rant about bombers. I was reinforcing the hypocrisy of those vehemently opposed to abortion yet among them are those who have NO qualms about bombing a clinic. I find it oddly ironic how you call my responses to you “emotional and hysterical rants” yet your initial reply to me calling my values and morals “efed up was very emotive and reactive, especially over your description of aborting a baby.

          • Republicanvet

            It might surprise you after all this, but I agree with you about bombing clinics, nothing justifies that.

            I also agree about hunting for sport, there is no sense to it if someone is going to kill an animal for the sake of killing it.

            If your original comments would have been much clearer without the insinuation that hunters are worse than an abortion, then you wouldn’t have gotten the reaction you did.

          • PNN

            Thanks. I’m shocked by your response, but thank you. I love animals and killing them for the sake of it pains me to no end. For food, it’s a matter of survival. I’ve got to tell you, you really misread me. I went back and read my comments and didn’t insinuate that hunters are worse than an abortion. I’m appalled that that’s what you read into my comments. And as much as you want to say it’s about being clear, I was. I elaborated in my next response and didn’t see it as a big deal. That’s all there’s to it.

          • Republicanvet

            I appreciate your response.

            Growing up with 7 brothers and sisters, it was a matter of survival. I cannot contemplate taking that right from another family.

          • PNN

            I understand. I have just one sister. She’s married with adult children and it’s me and my two Black Labs, two Black Lab mixes and 4 cats here at home. Not quite Noah’s Ark! Goodnight, I’m sure I’ll see you on the flipside. By the way, I may respond to the comments I missed as a matter of record. LOL

          • Republicanvet

            You too have a good night.

          • Elizabeth

            What’s the cutoff date in your mind then? One day after it’s no longer “fetal tissue”? And please tell me the last time a pro-lifer has murdered an abortionist and tell me how often it has happened?

          • PNN

            In the same breath, what is a woman to do if she ends up pregnant after a violent rape? This discussion is NOT about the last time a pro-lifer murdered an abortionist, it’s the fact that there ARE people out there who believe justice for an aborted fetus is murder.

          • Elizabeth

            No maam. You are the one who brought that issue up. No one else did. Somehow you managed to tie that in with hunting and abortion. The percentage of pro-lifers who have murdered abortionists is miniscule and you know that is true. You started your posting with rants against the hypocrisy on both sides of the aisle which I tend to agree with you about. You’ve strayed far off from your original post and I suspect that your point wasn’t at all about hypocrisy and I also suspect that your semi pro-choice stance is complete and utter BS.

    • Nahalban

      so your formula then is hunting=/> abortion. I suppose that is logical somewhere not with me but I am sure it makes sense where you come from.

      • PNN

        It appears you’re missing the point. Decrying abortion and then hunting for sport is hypocritical. We can agree to disagree.

        • Corey Dennison

          Yeah, because an animal’s life is equal to a human’s. That is what you’re saying.

          o.O

          • PNN

            No, that IS what YOU are saying. And your words are reminiscint of one who doesn’t care for animals.

          • Maryland_Malcontent

            Feelings over logic :(

          • PNN

            And those who picket in front of abortion clinics are guided by emotion in the absence of logic. From my end, it’s feelings AND logic. I don’t sacrifice one for the other.

          • Corey Dennison

            Let me quote some words back to you: “Decrying abortion and then hunting for sport is hypocritical.

            One has NOTHING to do with the other, unless you are saying their lives are equal.

            And don’t assume you know what I think about animals.

          • PNN

            I never alluded to their lives being equal, I was drawing on what I see as obvious hypocrisy. Dispense with putting words in my mouth and the distortion of my rhetoric. And don’t assume you know what’s in my mind and heart.

        • Richard Jefferies

          No, no we cannot agree to disagree. You can disagree, and I most assuredly disagree, but I will not agree to disagree. I will agree that you are wrong however. First, not all hunting is for sport, some of us actually eat what we hunt. If no one hunted then the deer population would explode, along with the predator population. Now, if you think abortion is legitimate because humans need to be culled to prevent overpopulation, well I can at least applaud your honesty.

          • PNN

            Let’s be clear: in YOUR mind you needn’t agree to disagree. And I will agree that your high handedness in stating how my feelings are wrong is merely your opinion, but it does not mean your words trump that of others. I made clear in ALL my comments that hunting for sport is the bone of contention for me, NOT hunting for food. Odd how you didn’t take issue with Republicanvet when he agreed with me about hunting for sport and killing the animal for the sake of it. Moreover, I understand more than you know about the exploding deer population and the rise of the predator population. Where did I even allude to abortion as being legitimate to cull human overpopulation? I CLEARLY stated I’m pro-choice, but that does not mean I’m anti-life. I also stated in one of my previous comments that abortion used as a method of birth control is egregious and reprehensible. Although I’m a lifelong Republican, I don’t adhere to the typical conservative cookie cutter mold. My position on this may be unpopular, but I’m not going to abandon it because others take issue with it. I’m sure you understand. Take care.

  • jaded

    it was fake Diane… but glad that knee of yours jerks so mightily. oh… and don’t wear leather or parade in your new boots, or show off your Chinese-made sunglasses… you may drown in your own indignation.

  • Zathras11 @B5

    “Fuck U Texas senator ted cruz U for smiling over that beautiful murdered animal. I wish It could trade places w U and smile over ur body.

    Diane Warren (@Diane_Warren) April 24, 2014

    Do you eat meat or wear leather, Miss Warren? Hypocrite!

    • Dan13

      Even worse, she kills life forms that don’t even have legs to run away on.

  • rambler

    I think that the libs should have to experience first whatever they wish would happen to others.

  • rockanne

    crappy music

  • FIRE THEM ALL- 2014

    Who is Diane Warren, and why should I care what she thinks? Really who died and made her so damned special. So sick of these elitist snobs and their attitudes on everything.

    • PNN

      Agreed, Fire. Have you seen Cher’s latest hateful tweets? They rival Warren’s comments.

  • Hand of Doom

    I never heard of this Diane Warren until this post.

  • Jake Bradford

    If her most enduring claim to fame is writing that crap Aerosmith song from Armageddon, I would hardly call her a great songwriter.

  • RobertMorgan1964

    A picture worth the proverbial 1000 words.

    • neoface

      Is that a turkey neck or lack of jaw line??? Not a pretty woman.

    • Corey Dennison

      Yeesh! I’ve seen prettier heads on boils!

    • Richard Jefferies

      This is why she writes songs for other people. Does that vegan lifestyle wreck your teeth? Maybe you should eat a hamburger, Diane.

    • Cärlös Dängër ✓certifiable

      It burns…

    • jaun456

      I thought at first glance it was Nikki Sixx (sorry Nikki) :)

  • James Perley

    Dianne is a pitiful person who apparently has lost the ability to recognize or laugh at a joke.

  • stellatruman

    The hypocrisy from the left is staggering. I don’t get why Cruz posted the provocative pic, but wishing death upon anyone is wrong..I have such disdain for so many in the party of dems…I don’t understand why all the hate for Cruz either since he is most known for the filibuster that proved that what he fought for was right all along

  • neoface

    Of course this person would be arrested had she put Obama’s name in place of Cruz. Is there a double standard or what???

  • http://www.vatican.va/ Rulz

    Who?

  • nickynicole

    She appears to have lost it. What is her problem. Her hate exudes from every one of her pores. Better watch out she may totally go over the edge. She is hanging by a thread.

  • gus

    How do libs decide which animal is beautiful and which one isn’t. Also, if the LIBS love Darwin, then they must recognize that WE are at the top of the food chain, and our actions are no different than any other animals. Right libbies???

    • CountMahdrof

      Squirrels are beautiful and rats are evil. It’s all in the amount of fur on the tail. Libs still have much to teach us about ‘isms.

      • Dan13

        How big the eyes are factors into it as well.

  • EDUCATEDPATRIOT

    Another member of PETA and people who wish death on humans.

    Makes complete sense, from a leftist perspective, doesn’t it?

  • Danny Wheeler

    Yep, Ms. Warren has joined the list of many libtards who learned the hard way–Twitchy is forever!

  • Cärlös Dängër ✓certifiable

    As I recall, she is the writer of the worst Star Trek Theme Ever, that of the last series “Enterprise”. It was a terrible choice. Just a bit of pointless trivia.

  • praymorenow1

    1. Diane Warren is still alive? Wow. 70’s/80’s flashbacks……
    2. Al Gore & John Kerry HUNTED in their campaigns to look more ‘manly’ – did she give them the ‘f’ treatment as well? Of course not.
    3. Jimmy Carter attacked a killer bunny w/ an oar……..back in the day.
    4. Cruz did not kill the animal, it was already dead & a carpet.
    5. Until just a few years ago, Hollywood stars clamored for leather bags, shoes, coats….along w/ fur…….
    6. OK cheer on & to do a D&E or D&C procedure on a baby….but, not pose w/ a dead animal made into a carpet…………..uh, got it.

  • Manny Bartow

    Given civilization’s incalculable amount of knowledge, the amount that a single mind can make use of is but a tiny fraction of the total.

  • http://FREE-BUSINESSES.com/ FREE-STREAM-TV.com

    Hate from these idiots has to be spread, and thanks to twitchy, deleting these posts live on forever. Last time I will every buy anything this hateful song writer does for others, so boycott the haters of the world and we can all make a difference.

  • nelly0042

    I went to Warren’s Facebook page and called her a moron – a term somewhat less inflammatory than her death wish to Cruz. The response back was “You’ve been blocked and reported!”
    This seems to illustrate the typical response of the left. They think their hateful speech is somehow righteous and that anyone opposing them should be silenced.