So about those revisions of the Benghazi talking points that the White House claimed “were put together almost entirely by the intelligence community”:
Caught. Out. There.
ABC’s Jonathan Karl reports that the Benghazi talking points underwent 12 revisions with “extensive input from the State Department.” Terror reference? Scrubbed. And in unsurprising news, the White House was involved:
White House emails reviewed by ABC News suggest the edits were made with extensive input from the State Department. The edits included requests from the State Department that references to the Al Qaeda-affiliated group Ansar al-Sharia be deleted as well references to CIA warnings about terrorist threats in Benghazi in the months preceding the attack.
That would appear to directly contradict what White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said about the talking points in November.
People died, Jay Carney lied.
Cover-up? What cover-up?
In an email to officials at the White House and the intelligence agencies, State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland took issue with including that information [on al Qaida-linked extremists] because it “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings, so why would we want to feed that either? Concerned …”
The paragraph was entirely deleted.
What say you, Jay Carney?
How do they keep their jobs? Spin, lapdogs, spin!
Media Matters’ Oliver Willis is still trying to play the pitiful and disgraceful “Benghazi truther” card.
Evidently Media Matters’ Eric Boehlert didn’t read his talking points for today.
The tweet was swiftly deleted.
But most good little lapdogs appear to be sticking to this spin:
Because, hey, what difference does it make, right?
Media talking point for today:
Oh, that’s not the only remaining angle: