#SCOTUS, #Prop8, #marriageequality, DOMA, AND Supreme Court trended on Twitter this morning as the Supreme Court prepared to hear same-sex marriage arguments. Thousands of people gathered outside of the Supreme Court, and naturally, everyone was on their best behavior and completely respectful of others.

Nothing says “we’re taking this seriously” like Katy Perry songs.

http://twitter.com/MikeLevineFNC/statuses/316543058193817603

At least one physical altercation reportedly occurred.

  • http://www.facebook.com/138900508 Patrick Dennehy

    Bless us and save us. Both sides are nuts

  • CatHerder

    Jim Jones body lies a-mouldering in the grave, but his soul is marching on.

  • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

    Tip, Avoid people that think:
    “Hell is Fabulous”
    (Trust me on this one)

    • Adela Wagner

      Hell could NOT possibly be “FABULOUS”! Too full of politicians.

      • $5326605

        And lawyers. And lawyer politicians.

        • conservativechick

          I just want to know. IF we change the dictionary meaning of the word “marriage” what exactly do we change it to? That would be very tricky. Anyone???

          • Alex Furlong

            I suggest a compromise. We change the meaning of “fabulous” while we’re at it.

  • Maxx

    Why do people want to fight for what they believe to be a serious issue in some imbecilic costume? You see this all the time at these kind of protests. To me, it would seem counterproductive.

    A suggestion to those to whom it applies: You didn’t see Martin Luther King Jr dancing down the streets of Montgomery, Alabama dressed as a boa-carrying, tinsel-throwing pirate.

    • VerminMcCann

      Because, this isn’t about issues or freedom or anything like that. It’s about controlling what people think, and if they can use the government’s monopoly on violence to force others to take them seriously despite behaving in ways that don’t warrant being taken seriously, their victory is one step closer.

      For example, notice that the person in the devil outfit is referred to as a woman, despite obviously being a man? We’ve reached the point where progressives so thoroughly dominate the narrative that they’ve convinced people to deny reality.

      It’s time to be scared.

      Edit: Here’s an example of another costumed freak employing the same technique: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kmG7KXxShM

      • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

        LOL, well thanks for that edit, Cardassians torturing Jean Luc Picard is totally equivalent to some random tweeter calling someone dressed up in devil drag a “woman”. These “arguments” and jeremiads just get more and more ridiculous with each passing day. But thanks for reminding me about that episode of TNG, been a long time since I’ve seen it.

        • VerminMcCann

          I made no statement regarding the equivalence of the two. I pointed to the commentator’s description of a man as a woman as a manifestation of the success these lunatics have had in controlling how and what people think. I cited the TNG episode as a tongue-in-cheek example of someone attempting to control how someone else thought.

          Regardless, that tweet was hardly an isolated incident. A company I used to work for hired a “man” who was obviously a woman, then fired several of my colleagues for their failure to convincingly pretend they thought she was a man or to successfully ignore her absurd gesticulations. The military has been reduced to an impotent shell by the same lunacy. Society has, in fact, become so saturated with progressive nonsense that it has discarded the notion of truth and with it the possibility of rational thought or sound policy.

          Edit: colleagues, not colleges.

        • ceemack

          Y’know, at first glance, I thought you meant “Kardashians torturing Jean Luc Picard”.

          TNG was pretty forgettable, but I’m sure I would have remembered that episode.

          • VerminMcCann

            It had it’s highs and lows. That was a high.

    • $45065723

      Because MLK wasn’t a flaming homosexual?

      • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.dempsey.33 Matthew Dempsey

        today MLK would be called an uncle tom just like Ben Carson….sad

        • Larry G.

          MLK was hardly a conservative on most issues. please educate yourself.

          and his wife, who arguably knew him the best, came out in support of gay marriage way back in 2004. im not saying that this is a point for gay marriage, because i hardly think it is, but if youre going to reference the great Dr Martin Luther King you should do so correctly.

          • http://twitter.com/kaciegayle Kacie Brandes

            Just because your for gay marriage doesn’t mean your not conservative…

          • $45875941

            No, it would just mean you’re not a Christian.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

            Are civil unions considered anti Christian? Obviously, the newly elected Pope would disagree.

          • $45875941

            Yes, if they’re living in sin, practicing deviant sex acts. (See: abomination) And, if this Pope disagrees, he needs to open his Bible for the first time, or not be Pope. God’s word doesn’t change to keep up with our sick, so called progressive society.

          • $45065723

            My reading of the situation, which is surely less theologically informed, is that the Catholic Church’s only problem with homosexuality is the physical act of homosexuality itself (sodomy). Therefore, I don’t see an issue with civil unions as long as there is no sexual activity that is unnatural for procreation.

            With that in mind, you could also argue that Civil Unions encourage sodomy, which would be a no go for the Church.

          • $45875941

            Please see my post #56.

          • Sons Thunder

            You past DISQUS comments show you to be wholly unqualified as an authority on God’s word.

          • 2ifbyT

            It’s not an issue of anti-Christian. The Bible is the Bible. Society screws up – especially politics and legal proceedings – when they try to shoehorn their “civil rights issues” – like gay marriage, immigration amnesty, legalized drugs, etc. – into the Bible when it doesn’t fit.

          • http://twitter.com/kaciegayle Kacie Brandes

            Well having sex before your married also means your not a Christian so if that’s the case almost everyone who claims they’re “Christian” aren’t. Who we love doesn’t define us, our character and our decisions define us, being Christian is having acceptance and doing the right thing.

          • $45875941

            Kacie, I Don’t know what Christian Bible you’ve been reading, if at all but it’s not the one I’ve read all my life. First off let me educate you; God said, “show them the error of their ways.” Character, and acceptance will get you into heaven?! No good deeds will will get you into heaven. ALMOST EVERYONE is not a Christian?! You need to read some studies. ACCEPTANCE? Did Jesus “accept” the money changers?! Did God “accept” the sodomites?! The very sodomites you now say are accepted by God? They would be, if they did as he said; “go and sin no more.” But no, they keep practicing their deviant sex acts and the ones who claim to be Christians expect forgiveness. I’m really tired showing those liberal heathens like you “the error of their ways” today. It just amazes me that people like you have turned this country into a regular Sodom & Gomorrah, then attempt to rewrite the Bible to advance your perverted agenda. Then you call those who abide by the word of God and morality, “haters,” only for the selfish reason to justify your sins to yourself. I suggest you read the Bible in full before you you attempt to preach right and wrong, good and evil. Because you don’t know one from the other. See my post #56; I put it in simpler form in that one. You can’t debate a liberal. Good night. Jesus still loves you.

          • Sons Thunder

            That you think you get to judge who is a Christian and who isn’t demonstrates you are not a biblical scholar.

            To make matters even worse, you think one ceases to be a Christian if they accept Jim Nabors.

            It is people like you who are driving people away from Christianity.

          • $45875941

            So now, you’re going to sit in judgment of me? Nowhere did I claim to be a “biblical scholar,” did I? Nor did I claim to be a “moral authority” In my “past disqus comments” please show me where I broke any of the ten commandments. Exclamatory slang adjectives are only words to emphasize disgust in a highly charged point. Never, did I take the take the name of God in vain; or curse, swear, use witchcraft, or lie or deceive by his name. If I did say someone “ceases” to be a Christian, then I misspoke. I meant it as, they can’t justifiably “claim” to be a Christian and accept things that God sees as an abomination. This is pure hypocrisy. I don’t hate anyone, I hate the sin. God hates. And God wants us to hate what he hates; the sin, and he wants all Christians to bring the sinner back to Christ. If you think that my Marine Corps language disqualifies me from being a Christian, then you keep thinking that. You appear to be a Christian, but you are misinterpreting my entire point. You might want to read here:
            Proverbs 17:15 – “He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord.” People may want us to justify the wicked, but if we do, we are an abomination to the Lord. We must hate what God hates. And btw, I despise Westboro Baptist Church. I’m not one of
            “Them,” believe me!

          • $45875941

            So now, you’re going to sit in judgment of me? Nowhere did I claim to be a “biblical scholar,” did I? Nor did I claim to be a “moral authority” In my “past disqus comments” please show me where I broke any of the ten commandments. Exclamatory slang adjectives are only words to emphasize disgust in a highly charged point. Never, did I take the take the name of God in vain; or curse, swear, use witchcraft, or lie or deceive by his name. If I did say someone “ceases” to be a Christian, then I misspoke. I meant it as, they can’t justifiably “claim” to be a Christian and accept things that God sees as an abomination. This is pure hypocrisy. I don’t hate anyone, I hate the sin. God hates. And God wants us to hate what he hates; the sin, and he wants all Christians to bring the sinner back to Christ. If you think that my Marine Corps language disqualifies me from being a Christian, then you keep thinking that. You appear to be a Christian, but you are misinterpreting my entire point. You might want to read here:
            Proverbs 17:15 – “He who justifies the wicked, and he who condemns the just, both of them alike are an abomination to the Lord.” People may want us to justify the wicked, but if we do, we are an abomination to the Lord. We must hate what God hates. And btw, I despise Westboro Baptist Church. I’m not one of
            “Them,” believe me!

          • $45875941

            Also, speaking of acceptance and tolerance, and my previous posts, please go up to the newer Twitchy threads an go through the one titled: “Left spews hate……”. You can consider my comments harsh and crude if you like, but what these queers (you know, those demanding acceptance and tolerance) are tweeting about our esteemed Supreme Court justices is just indefensible. I never used the word fuck, derogatorily toward anyone. Btw this word was placed on the top of crosses used to crucify those convicted “For Use of Carnal Knowlege.” Nor did I threaten anyone with death. Also read the comments. I am far from alone on this issue. If they have the right to express their opinion in an obviously threatening manner, then shouldn’t I be able to express mine in a non threatening way. Or, are we experiencing that old liberal double standard again; OK for me, but not for thee?

          • Sons Thunder

            You said that if one supports gay marriage then one is not a Christian. That’s a pretty bold statement.

            In looking at your other comments, I saw a pattern of you using your faith as a weapon to hurt others and elevate yourself. You often reference your faith, quote scripture and tell other people to read their Bibles. In other words, you present yourself as a moral authority and a biblical scholar. You are obviously neither of those things. Neither am I but I don’t wear my faith on my sleeve and use it in place of actual arguments.

            I swear like a sailor and appreciate your service to our country. I don’t claim to know God’s mind but I find it hard to imagine He much cares about how many f-bombs we let fly. Likewise, I find it hard to believe He disapproves of love and desire between consenting adults. We disagree. No problem. It’s not up to me to judge your faith and determine whether you are worthy of the label ‘Christian.’ In a single sentence, you showed you thought yourself capable of granting or revoking the Christian identity of millions of people simply by knowing how they felt about Gomer Pyle’s recent wedding.

          • $45875941

            My apologies Sons Thunder. That thread is titled “Angry lefties spew bile……” at, I believe 5:03pm 3/26/13

          • JINNASH

            People frequently confuse forgiveness with license.

          • JINNASH

            People frequently confuse forgiveness with license.

          • Sons Thunder

            Anyone here who thinks armed_not_dangerous has the wisdom and moral authority necessary to judge your commitment to Christ’s teachings should click on his name above to see his DISQUS comment history.

          • Larry G.

            that wasnt the point of my post, it was really just a sidenote. my point was that Dr. Martin Luther King was not a conservative like Ben Carson is.
            — he called for redistribution “There must be a better distribution of wealth, and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism.”
            — he was an ardent supporter of unions “the union movement needs their membership to maintain its relative strength in the whole society”
            — he called for a living wage “minimum – and livable – income for every American family”

            –and he called for the expansion of welfare.

            theres obviously no way to know where Dr.King would stand today as tragically his life was cut short. its also very obvious that many of the things that he was calling for were probably very time necessary and worthy goals, and its possible many conservatives today would have agreed with them back then, but make no mistake these are very liberal positions.

            [and of course while it wasnt the main point of my post, i would agree that supporting gay marriage is not mutually exclusive for conservatism. however its also true that many conservative bloggers (im thinking Glenn Beck, Dana Loesch, Michelle Malkin, Eric Erickson) have tried to present it this way which i strongly disagree with.]

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

            To play devil’s advocate, wouldn’t it be possible for the opinions of the husband and wife to differ?

          • Larry G.

            this is very true

          • 2ifbyT

            Talk to his daughter.

          • Larry G.

            and i would guess his sons as well who all supported Obama? In fact his daughter Bernice and eldest son spoke at the democratic national convention in 2008.

          • Billie Slash

            Tsk, tsk, Larry. Dr. King was a registered Republican.

          • Larry G.

            and voted for JFK, and supported LBJ and was was no huge fan of capitalism and called for the expansion of welfare and was an ardent opposer of war. its very obvious that the republican party of 1960 is NOT the same as the republican party of today. just because he was registered as a republican does not make him a conservative (even though its debateable whether the republican party of 1960 was even conservative). Dr. King was undoubtedly a great man who did a lot for the expansion of civil rights, but Dr. King was also very much a liberal. think its quite obvious that the main onus in supporting the republican party was because the democratic party of 1960 in the south was the home of the KKK, not because he was conservative.

          • Billie Slash

            A man who once said, “…let us be know for the content of our character, not the color of our skin…” is NOT a liberal. The 1960 Democrat Party was not the same either. You’re equivocating the ideology of 1960 with today’s (absolutely no comparison)

          • Larry G.

            as a great of man as MLK was, he was not conservative in 1960. tragically we have no idea where he would be standing today but a man who called for a living wage, expanded welfare, stronger unions and redistribution of wealth is NOT a conservative.

            perhaps the closest we can get to possible knowing is the positions of his wife in later year (very liberal), and where those that where leaders in the SCLC/Civil Rights Movement have gone (the vast majority are democrats). again, no one to tell where MLK would be since his life was tragically cut short but evidence doesnt point to him being a Ben Carson styled conservative.

          • Billie Slash

            Respectfully, Larry, are we talking about the same “MLK”?? I only said he was a registered Republican. The “conservative” movement was in its infancy in the mid-60’s. It would be helpful for you to provide a link to support your point that MLK “…called for a living wage, expanded welfare, stronger unions, and redistribution of wealth…” this statement is news to me. And, btw, the original leaders of the Civil Rights/Voting Rights Movement were Republicans as well. The Dems. filibustered both these. It is easily verifiable…..

          • Larry G.

            well, martin luther king was (and still is) a hero of mine, so ive done quite a bit of research and reading on his life and beliefs. here are a few quick quotes for you (google them and you will find the full speeches)

            – he called for redistribution “There must be a better distribution of wealth, and maybe America must move toward a democratic socialism.”
            — he was an ardent supporter of unions “the union movement needs their membership to maintain its relative strength in the whole society”
            — he called for a living wage “minimum – and livable – income for every American family”

            in fact in his Where Do We Go From here Speech in i believe 1967(or ’66) he plainly said “there is something wrong with capitalism”.

            i am a conservative and so many of these things i dont fully agree with. like you said 1960 is very different from where we are today, and perhaps this is just datedness on his part. i will remind you that my original post was in reference to someone hinting a MLK being a conservative like Ben Carson and the evidence strongly points against that. i am well aware that MLK was registered as a republican, but its quite obvious that that was because the democratic party at the time was a strong hold of the KKK. King supported both JFK and LBJ (except he was VERY vehemently opposed to the war in Vietnam).

          • Billie Slash

            Tsk, tsk, Larry. Dr. King was a registered Republican.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

      There are thousands on both sides of the debate dressed and acting reasonably, based on this article (hardly a liberally biased source!) we have exactly one person prancing around in a devil costume on the pro-equality side, and some red-caped loons and Westboro baptist church on the anti-equality side. So I would say your advice applies more to those who are AGAINST marriage equality.

      • RightThinking1

        Ah…. there’s the spin, “…pro-equality side..”.
        A much, much better case can be made that it is the Anti-marriage side.

        • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

          You or anyone else has yet to make the case that it is anti-marriage. *yawn*

          • RightThinking1

            Luke,
            Uh, so you do not want to redefine marriage? Well, okay then…, we’re good.

          • http://twitter.com/kellynurge Kelly Nurge

            You don’t sell your preteen daughter to her suitor in exchange for some cows. Marriage has already been redefined since biblical times.

          • Murray

            Ummmm. What you just posted doesn’t equate to a redefinition of marriage. Daughter to suitor = 1 man 1 woman. You then refer to a dowry as if that was/is a definition of marriage. The two aren’t the same thing. And since you mention it (biblical times, i.e. the bible), The bible is very clear on what a marriage is. “it is for that reason, a man will leave his mother and father and cleave to his wife and the two shall become one flesh”. Sounds a lot like the definition of marriage that I know.

          • RightThinking1

            Kelly,
            While such may have happened (and perhaps still), marriage in our society has evolved, by natural experience to be a relationship between a man and a woman. That experience involves nearly all that we have learned about a stable and civil society. As we abandon (or worse, destroy) the wisdom of that experience, we chip at the foundations of civil society. Take a look around. But then, perhaps you believe that the state of society is improving…, we need only continue to give ourselves up to hedonistic self-indulgence, and it will truly bloom.

          • $45875941

            Very simple Luke; marriage is the sacred union of a man an woman in the eyes of God. Homo marriage is a perversion based solely on the practice of a deviant sex act. Tell me, with all your profound knowledge, would a man be a homosexual if he didn’t practice his favorite, disgusting, deviant sex act? I know it’s hard, for someone as thoroughly indoctrinated as yourself to do, but think about it. They are not a race, not an ethnicity, not a nationality, and not a gender. So, they have class status because their entire lie is based solely on the sex acts they practice. Yeah, there’s lib logic at it’s finest. Put down the “we can’t help it” kool aid and grow a brain.

      • Maxx

        My comment clearly addresses those to whom it references. If you’re not protesting as a leather chap-adorned construction worker wearing eye liner, disregard.

    • JoeMyGodNYC

      Uh…ever seen what some people wear to CPAC? To Tea Party rallies? Did you see the three people dressed like Jesus today? The woman in green body paint waving the Gadsen flag? The barefoot guy in tattered sockcloth dragging a cross on a wheel?

      • RightThinking1

        Joe,
        Yeah. Pretty durned embarrassing. It would have been a good deal less so had they been dressed up as vaginas, no?

        I confess to some surprise that male homosexuals have not adopted equivalent male dress…, but I expect that it is only a matter of time..

        • Catchance

          Oh. Ack.

      • Maxx

        Note I wrote “people” so my comment applies to all costumed people with the exception of Tea Party members who, when dressed as Patriots, honor our founding fathers, they’re not mocking them. Who is the clown pictured above honoring?

  • http://www.vatican.va/ Rulz

    It’s too bad we can’t just get all the crazies in one place. That way, they get a slim minority in the House, two Senators, and change for electoral votes.

  • Danno Mann

    What the… 0bama’s devil buddy?

  • Danno Mann

    Peter Ames Carlin needs glasses. That was no woman!

  • Marcy Cook

    The pink devil is “cray, cray”…..nice legs though.

    • http://www.facebook.com/138900508 Patrick Dennehy

      Nice quads, I bet he does a lot of…squats…. uhh ty ty; I’ll be here all week

      • http://www.facebook.com/joseph.a.white.16 Joseph A White

        “And try the veal….”

      • RightThinking1

        Pat,
        Now you’ve stepped in it…., oops…, bad image there.

      • therantinggeek

        MINDBLEACH!!!

  • Bklynnygirl

    These are Al Gore’s friends and fellow Democrats.

  • $45875941

    How’s that song go?…..don we now our gay apparel..fa la la la la…la

  • http://www.facebook.com/joseph.a.white.16 Joseph A White

    “A yabba-dabba-do time…We’ll have a gay old time!!!…”……God help us…..the SCOTUS surely will not….

  • tuxkatz

    It’s funny that they’re playing Katy Perry…they must have forgotten this song of hers: http://youtu.be/5qYp-bMQ_hU
    (Lyric sample: You’re so gay and you don’t even like boys)

  • Midnight Cow

    Whether you are for gay marriage or against gay marriage, when I look at the guy in the pink mesh outfit, I think we can all agree that whatever he’s doing probably should be illegal.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

      Only if whatever it is these red caped loons are doing can also be made illegal. So flamboyantly scandalous! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-3kZGceHhc

      • VerminMcCann

        In which a progressive both ridicules my pointing out that progressives try to control how people think and announces his desire to outlaw political speech he disagrees with.

  • ML

    This whole spectacle actually deeply saddends me. God would not want this.

  • Andy Rigo

    When Westboro Baptists and flaming homosexuals begin exchanging punches, who wins? You, the viewing audience.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

      Why do you dislike Westboro Baptists? They are only preaching God’s loving gospel. Bad PR for other Christians because WBC are bit too honest in their beliefs?

      • pinkelephant22

        What a mind-numbingly ignorant comment. WBC in no way represents Christianity and you have to be a full-fledged birdbrain to believe they do. You’re ignorant of the gospel. Clearly.

      • $45875941

        Like I said before Li’l Luke, you just don’t get it, do you? Thoroughly indoctrinated LWL.

      • $45875941

        And btw Luke, what would you know about God? Does the word “abomination” ring a bell? How about “show them the evil of their ways?” Kinda like your understanding of the word “infringed,” huh?

      • $5326605

        Hate monger.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

        They are as effective at perverting religion as you are at trolling.

      • Guest

        No church I know preaches what they do or acts in that manner. NONE. Had you been to any you might know that as well…
        Village idiots are just that..

        • nc

          Luke gave it the ol’ college try, but no one bit.

      • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

        Here’s a new name for WBC….”The SATANIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH!” Jawamax 8<{D}

  • JINNASH

    Imagine one of these freaks as your kids elementary school teachers.

    • RightThinking1

      I’d rather not…

    • therantinggeek

      From which side? I’ve already decided that I’m not sending my son to public school. It’ll either be a private school or homeschool.

  • reving19

    I think Westboro Church is funded by the Liberals to make REAL Christians look bad. No Christian I know would dress up like a freak and taunt homosexuals, lesbians, bi’s, etc. They are probably being paid to do this so the general public will discredit Christians, and then the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, etc. soon after. That way, they can take over “the people.” Think I’m nuts? Study history, look deeper into what is happening today and then see if you still think I’m “crazy.”

    • Lady 12

      Well said, reving. I agree %100.

    • conservativemomma

      The founder of Westboro, Fred Phelps, is actually a big Dem who has run for office as a Dem. Also good friends with Al and Tipper Gore. Google for lots of pictures

      • http://www.facebook.com/138900508 Patrick Dennehy

        HA! I bet that will be CNN’s lead story tonight :

      • digitalPimple

        Yup. Pictures with him a Hillary, Al Gore and the rest of the usuals.

      • digitalPimple

        Yup. Pictures with him a Hillary, Al Gore and the rest of the usuals.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

      They do have a history of funding liberals. Google Al Gore/Bill Clinton and the WBC for the photos and long history of donations to both campaigns.

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      Possibly…GEORGE SOROS? Any other guesses? Jawamax 8<{D}

  • RightThinking1

    Homopaloosa.

  • $7610427

    Both sides are freaks! Why can’t people just act normal? You can get your freaky deaky on behind closed doors all you want, but when in public, please refrain from dressing in mesh devil costumes and carrying signs that say ridiculous sh it like “God hates fa gs” and “He ll is fabulous”. These people need to be shuffled off to some remote island and forced to live together and leave the rest of us alone!

  • Matt

    So I’m having to either root for the Westboro idiots or the flaming idiots. Its a tough call.

    • Meshell

      I say neither- both groups are full of hate!

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    Judging by words of Justice Roberts at the hearing, it appears that the overturn of Prop 8 will be upheld. It looks like the case will dismissed on the grounds of standing, which will immediately return gay marriage to California. The ruling is due in late June.

    • $38343398

      The APA is working to remove the stigma of pedophilia. The next stage will be normalization and then legalization. Judging by your approval of deviant behavior, you’ll be jumping on that wagon too….

      • JoeMyGodNYC

        I am uninterested in stories about your family.

        • $38343398

          It’s only an insult in your mind, Boy.

          You come here looking for trouble. Don’t expect to be gored by a unicorn.

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    Kudos to Twitchy for finding the one gay person in a costume.

    • conservativemomma

      LOL!! Because it is usually impossible to find a gay person in a costume.

      • JoeMyGodNYC

        We do love to dress up. Today, however, there were thousands of other gay people dressed appropriately for the event. Unlike the haters, some of whom arrived today wearing sackcloth, dressed like Jesus, or wearing bizarre “patriotic” costumes from the revolutionary war. One of the women I saw on CSPAN appeared to be dressed as the Statue of Liberty.

        • $45875941

          Joe, you guys are so pathetically ignorant, you can only come up with the same old tired pet words; if we live by moral Christian beliefs, we’re HATERS! If we disagree with the President’s policy, we’re RACISTS! You really need to denounce your liberal indoctrination degree.

          • JoeMyGodNYC

            Why do you suppose Twitchy ignored the costumes worn by today’s anti-gay protesters? Inconvenient?

          • WilliamAmos

            Or isn”t it possible that the cameras focused mainly on the most outrageous person there and ignored others ?

          • JoeMyGodNYC

            Dressing in raggedy sackcloth, shoeless and dragging a cross on a wheel isn’t “outrageous”?

          • Catchance

            I guess you aren’t aware that this is holy week? Friday marks the day that Jesus was scourged, carried his cross through the streets, and was crucified. For most people it’s a reminder of what our savior did for us.

          • JoeMyGodNYC

            Fairy tales. Did the alleged Jesus also wear a sign denouncing gay marriage? What does that have to do with holy week? (PS: He took his place with Westboro Baptist Church after ranting for amused reporters. I think WaPo has the story.)

          • magules13

            You sure he wasn’t trolling web forums? Jesus never commented on bestiality either, so don’t take it as some kind of approval.

          • $45875941

            Which specific costumes Joey; like the patriotic Statue of Liberty? LOOK, SQUIRREL Joey! Are you getting off in mommies undies again while you enjoy all the pretty costumes?

          • $38343398

            I’m sure you can find all the costumes you want on the alphabet channels and the left wing nut blogs. Don’t expect conservatives to kowtow to you deviants.

    • vino veritas

      You’re just mad because it isn’t you up there. Waa Waa!

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      She looks like a younger version of an old GF of mine, who lives in BKLYN…Jawamax 8<{D}

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    The same preacher who screamed “Gay are worth of death!” at NOM’s Bronx march is on their stage at this writing. #CSPAN

  • http://Twitter.com/jkerrysforehead John Kerry’s Forehead

    Imagine the loss in tax revenue when all these couples start filing Married – Filing Jointly.

  • Clayton Grant

    Westboro = Talibangelicals

  • http://Twitter.com/jkerrysforehead John Kerry’s Forehead

    Is marriage a privilege to all US Citizens that states cannot abridge? Is this what SCOTUS is being asked to define? 14A.

  • Lamontyoubigdummy

    Bread & Circuses.

    Had dinner with a bunch’a friends over the weekend. Table conversation included the following:

    “Do you think God just DVR’s us now? Like a train wreck reality TV show? You know, so he can just watch later and skip all humanity’s ridiculous ‘commercials’?”

    He got a +1 for Gryffindor.

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    Fox, CBS, WaPo are all reporting that Prop 8 will be overturned. Let’s hope for a similar result tomorrow on DOMA. Looks promising.

    • $38343398

      Sure, let’s legalize all deviant behavior. Polygamy and pedophilia are up next. After that, bestiality and cannibalism.

      • JoeMyGodNYC

        The Supreme Court cases have nothing to do with behavior. Homosexual acts are already legal. But do tell us more about your family.

        • $38343398

          Legalizing same-sex marriage is the penultimate step in normalizing deviant behavior. You are a deviant. Fact. However, because some deviant psychologists in the APA removed the stigma from their Rules in the 1970s, it paved the way. That same APA is now in the process of removing the stigma of pedophilia. After that, normalization. Then legalization by dropping the age requirements. It’s a sick pattern, no thanks to your contribution.

          I lost my younger brother to his deviant behavior. It wasn’t pretty and he suffered.

          • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

            I also know a person who lost their life to deviant behavior…A teenager whom I went to school with, near Marietta, Georgia (He was killed by two homosexuals in Texas, in 1983). And that’s just ONE reason I’m against an “Anything Goes” Society.. Jawamax 8<{D}

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      In other words, if 2/3 of Californians vote Against Gay Marriage, The Gays can override THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE Because they’re OBAMA CRONIES /Supporters? Just askin’.. Jawamax 8<{D}

  • http://www.irregulars.us/ towerclimber37

    LOL! these people are all waiting on someone else to tell them how to think.

    isn’t that precious.

  • ERMERGERD

    What a complete waste of time.

  • http://www.freedomreconnection.com CO2 Producer

    Bizarro Superman made an appearance. He was heard muttering, “Me am so disturbed. You humans scare me. You not normal,” before flying off with tears in his eyes, looking far more pale than when he arrived.

    • http://www.nleomf.org/officers/ FlatFoot

      No kidding.

      I’ve been saying it for a couple years now…

      Superman’s Bizarro World ain’t got nothin’ on our ObamaNation

  • kim

    Well what did we expect? Majority of people with common sense and actual opinions drowned out by gays who want to shove their beliefs down your throat and Westboro haters who hate even themselves

    • Richard Wayne

      phrasing…

  • JoeMyGodNYC

    In the begginning, there was home schooling.

  • WVS

    One time I read this book where the government defined the language.

  • http://www.facebook.com/AnonMedia Decolonize Carlisle

    I call bs. I was standing there the whole time. No punches were thrown.