The blood at the Sikh temple in Oak Creek, Wis., was barely dry before Deepak Chopra began using the tragic loss of six lives to feed his gun-grabbing agenda.

Ah. We see Chopra is branching out from pseudoscientific quantum quackery to ignorant leftist crankery. The conservative Twitterverse slammed the “poet-prophet of alternative medicine” for drooling out a liberal gun control platitude just hours after the deadly shooting.

Chopra didn’t stop at just one tweet.

Golly, Australia sounds swell, what with no pesky Second Amendment to get in the way of disarming the people.

Or not.

Chopra eventually got around to grieving instead of simply politicizing.

But, really it’s all about the energy, man.

Guns don’t kill people, the shadow energy of shame and impotence kills people?

Hours later he’s still at it.

Oh, man. Somebody better break the news to the Olympic skeet shooters and trap shooters, not to mention the countless women and men who use firearms to deter assailants every hour of every day. Maybe he can let them know on Piers Morgan’s CNN show tonight:

Evidently Morgan and Chopra will do their best to out-ghoul one another.

Does Deepak Chopra have the “courage to try”? That all depends on the current state of the thermodynamic inclines.

  • Jim Humbert

    2nd Amendment— The right of the peopel to keep and bear arms ! Guns don’t kill people do ! If guns kill how come people walk out of gun shows shouldn’t they all be shot ? just asking ?

  • Jim Humbert

    If you take guns away frow Law abiding citizens only criminals will have guns !

    • Ntr

      That’s probably what they want.

      • Jim Humbert

        I agree ! And they will let the U.N do it !

  • Im_Rick_James

    what the f#ck does that last statement by chopra mean anyways? Am I the only one that just doesn’t get it?

    • TugboatPhil

      No. We’re among the millions of people that don’t know wth he’s saying.

      Deepak Chopra in Spanish is El Guano Loco.

    • Mary Lu Duffy

      no, you’re not. it’s gobbledigook. apparently he’s smoking crack… or needs to.

  • peteee363

    deepak chopra does not belong in a civil society, guns are welcome :-)

    • TugboatPhil

      Even better, Deepak Chopra does not belong in America. He should go to LalaLand where he apparently spends a lot of time.

    • Mr

      I’ll do you one better. If liberals want to live in a country without guns,and they refuse to move to Great Britain,Australia,or some country where they aren’t legal, then they should secede from the Union like they did “back in the day”. I’m sure no one will try to stop them this time. I imagine conservatives have had enough of this bullshit .

    • Patricia Rhudy Cook

      Deepak Chopra belongs in a society where he can’t hurt anybody and nobody can hurt him.

  • Botzilla

    They just don’t get it, gun control laws only serve to punish the innocent law abiding citizens, crazy people and criminals could care less about laws.

    • Ntr

      I sometimes think they do get it and that is their intent. The common thought processes of irrational leftists.

  • CoastalMaineBird

    If laws against guns will stop this, then why don’t we pass laws against killing people?

    Oh, wait…

  • Joe Stauffer

    Has there ever been a mass shooting at a gun show?

    • JoeMyGodNYC


      • Angelfire4280

        You’re not the brightest bulb in the pack are ya.

      • Patricia Rhudy Cook

        You’re not supposed to bring up stuff like that. Stop asking sensible questions.

  • Rodney Brungardt

    An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life.

    Robert A. Heinlein

  • gekkobear

    “The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” Mao Tze Tung, 1938

    No different now; we must disarm the populace to give absolute control to the government so that nobody can ever turn on them

    But don’t worry, liberals have decided that power doesn’t corrupt anymore so we’ll be fine.

    • Angelfire4280

      This one is right on target too, gekko:
      “This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has
      full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and
      the world will follow our lead into the future!” – Adolph Hitler, 1935, on The
      Weapons Act of Nazi Germany
      Friggin’ socialists.

      • steenkinbadges

        Actually…Hitler never said that…but he didn’t have to. The Weapons Act had been passed in 1928, long before the Nazis came to power. He just used the laws on the books already to ensure nobody got guns, exc. for the Nazis and their pals. Anybody else? Death.

      • nemir

        Um, Hitler wasn’t a socialist.
        Socialism has nothing to do with national socialism.

        • JackGalt

          hmm… Socialism has NOTHING to do with national SOCIALISM…hmm cogitation required on that one.

        • JackGalt

          hmm… Socialism has NOTHING to do with national SOCIALISM…hmm cogitation required on that one.


    I had this chump, CHOPRA on my radio show once. I mean once. He is the poster child of foolishness and fraud. Gonna go clean my Walther now.

  • Carl Brown

    there goes the left- clinging to their entitlements and Chopra!

  • Booker T.

    The only use of a gun is to kill
    Yes! Of course! And the only use of a butcher knife is to cut meat!

  • DavidS

    Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country… How civil is it there ? New flash Deepak… We don’t have a very civil society and I’m not going to wait around for the authorities to protect me from the many uncivil factions of our society … wake up. Bet you have body guards, don’t cha?

  • Jim Humbert

    Evil criminals are going to find a way to hurts innocent people !

  • J.N. Ashby

    “Guns don’t belong in civil society” Neither do criminals. Maybe we should make it illegal to be a criminal.

    • JackGalt

      excellent… lets get debbie whatsername shultz on it right away

    • JackGalt

      excellent… lets get debbie whatsername shultz on it right away

  • Jim Humbert

    Most people with guns don’t buy them to hurt anyone and don’t enjoy to use them to protect someone with it !

  • Ntr

    People like Deepak Chopra and Piers Morgan, who both express deep anti-American views every once in a while, would love nothing more than seeing Americans disarmed and then cheer on as this country is laid to desolation and tens of millions imprisoned or worse for speaking out. Because once one of our constitutional rights are outlawed the rest are that much easier to take away, like a domino effect.

  • Ntr

    I’m sure the last tweet up above is Chopra’s BS “word-playing” way of saying life and love are heartwarming. Awwwwwww! *vomits*

  • Jim Humbert

    American are not Haters and America is good because Americans are great !

  • Guest

    Guns do not belong in make for a civil society. Fixed.

  • Marty Luther

    Many people have achieved the pinnacle of self-help by getting their concealed weapon permit. #DeepakChopra

  • Buckshot LeFonque

    Deepak Chopra = Asshat

  • Mike

    As a conservative, I’ve followed Deepak for many years. He truly has a lot of good things to say, and honestly, he’s correct in his most recent statement. The catch is, while we have a civil society, there are individuals who are NOT civil, and for that reason it is necessary to have the freedom to bear arms.

  • Angelfire4280

    As a woman, I agree with Ann Coulter (paraphrase): “Even a 90 lb weakling man is stronger than any woman. Guns are a great equalizer.” Deep Chunks sounds more and more like one of the race hustlers.

  • MovingToNevada

    This kook is still around?

  • steenkinbadges

    Who pays attention to him? NPR listeners? They would…..

  • Johnny Blade

    Had Satwant Singh Kaleka (God rest his soul) filled his hand with a Smith & Wesson instead of just his courage he would be a live hero today.

  • Ron Taylor

    you know it is a strange coincidence that these shootings are happening approximately 90 days before the elections, wouldn’t be something if those responsible were in the current administration? If enough of these tragedies occur the people will demand action, Obummer could declare martial law in the U.S. to combat these “domestic terrorists” and what do you know…he wouldn’t have to step down if he loses in November, he could proclaim himself a dictator using whatever title he prefers. Something to think about

  • timzank

    Piers Moron “Some politician in America will come out soon and say, ‘If those Sikhs
    had all been armed with guns in their temple, they’d be alive.'” i don’t know if a politician will say that but this real estate broker will, how stupid do you have to be (Piers) to NOT realize that when only the bad guys have guns (and they always and they always will) the good people die…You are a fricking idiot….GFY and take DeepGack with ya…

  • Joe Eschman

    Someone needs to tell Piers that we don’t call it a ‘fortnight’ in America …

  • labillyboy

    Yep… yep… get rid of guns so big strong men like me can do anything we want… I’m all for it. I can take a baseball bat and a big knife and nobody could stop me. Heck I could get 3-4 of my big strong friends, form a gang and really take over.

    Of course that’s not why we even have the 2nd Amendment… it is to allow us to organize as militia’s using military grade weapons we are allowed to “keep” and to “bear” them against our gov’t or other agency that would deny us our freedom and liberty. It’s not about hunting as the socialist democrat party would like to sell…

    There will always be sick individuals that commit murder, they don’t need guns. The people who need guns are the weak, small, timid who would otherwise be slaves to the big, aggressive and strong or corrupt gov’t.

    Why do you think the leftist/socialist/democrat party wants to get rid of guns? They know it will result in an increase in violent crimes against the weak and elderly. No, they are afraid of what armed, free men will do when faced with their creeping socialism, confiscation of wealth and gov’t control.

  • Annie Parlant

    Chopra owns the company that makes those horrible screening machines at airport, what a scammer this man is… I suppose it was not for profit but for the good of humanity. Please show restraint, we know who you are, false philosopher !

  • Shawn

    I don’t see deepak wearing a turban

  • Paul Richards

    The example of the drop in gun violence in Australia is comical considering the US has 15 times the population of Austrailia. Perhaps Mr Chopra would like to explain why gun violence is predominant in the black community , Chicago as an example ,rather than pointing out random acts of violence by crazed gunman and blaming the gun rather than the shooter. As for Piers Morgan , the English Larry King, just go back to England.

  • Eleska Kay

    Such stupidity. I hate it when liberals say that the government will be happy to investigate my rape, robbery or murder when I’d prefer having the means to prevent or stop the crime itself. Recent study says it happens 2.5 million times a year in this country, but they want to let us die. Gee, thanks.

  • Corbinian

    I replied to one each of their tweets. These lefties are ghastly in their pathological need to exploit tragedies for political leverage.

  • Adam

    Deepak can go home and take his snake oil psycho babble crap with him and leave America and our 2nd Amendment alone!!!! Little revelation for ya Deepak, criminals don’t follow the law. Shocking I know.

  • John Hanover

    Those two could kill with their boredom. Oslo, Toronto…do I need to remind them again?

  • JSebastian

    Since we’re on the topic of banning or restricting “dangerous things”. What should society do about all those pesky black males in our country? They commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime….how can people possibly tolerate something so inordinately more dangerous than other things?

    Oh wait…..

    I couldn’t possibly apply the same rational against guns to people, could I? I mean, a gun is more dangerous than a fist, or a knife, or a rock, just because its a gun, right? So if a black man is more dangerous than a white man, or an Asian…

    Guys, help me out here! My liberal logic pretzel machine is malfunctioning. Its leading me to the conclusion that some things are more dangerous than other things…and also that some people are just more dangerous than other people, and now I’m so confused, because how can we ban people just because of what they are?

    Oh boy. What to DO? What to THINK? Let me puzzle this out.

    Guns = are only for killing, so therefore they are dangerous…need to ban them. Except for certain people who won’t ever do bad things with them, like police and soldiers, and of course, our politicians, who wouldn’t ever kill anyone or order others to. Except for people who needed killing. Okay, I’m okay with that. I feel better. The world makes sense now, with all the dangerous stuff being allocated to people who like to control other people. But I can trust them. They’re responsible with the dangerous stuff.

    Black men = dangerous….need to ….give them something….so they don’t hurt us.
    Oh…that didn’t work. The bad man didn’t go away when we made concessions. Still attacking other people, raping other people, stealing other people’s things. Can’t have that. What can we do to make them stop? More concession….better schools! Maybe some free money! How about we make it easier for them to get government jobs, then they will be grateful for all the help so they will stop hurting us. Oh no! It still didn’t work! We’ll elect one of them President. They can’t possibly be mad at us then! Oh NOES! It isn’t working! Why isnt it working!????
    Okay…more prisons, we’ll punish them. I know, the people we said could have the guns can take of them for us! Oh, NOES, wait a second…what do you mean we each don’t get our own personal “good guy” to protect us? But we’re entitled to that, aren’t we? We paid for that! The good people are supposed to protect us from the bad people!

    Now what?

  • DaleVM14W

    Why is hack Deepak here in the US? He couldn’t stand seeing hamburgers pass him by everyday in India? What would he do if a bunch of Thugees tried to rip the hearts out of the chest of his family? Just stand by and watch?! Useless jerk, go back to India!

  • twolaneflash

    The last I read from Deep, he was complaining about his uncontrollable masturbation problem. Deep’s “gun’ apparently has a hair-trigger, and Deep has itchy fingers.

    What a psycho-maroon!

  • CheddarPants

    Who the fuck is this Threepak Shakur to tell me I can’t own guns? Come try to get them, bitch. I dare you.

  • Norbit Peters

    Don’t demean the man’s intellect because you disagree with his stance on gun ownership.
    I’ve read numerous books from both he and Wayne Dyer, and they’ve expressed considerable knowledge and awareness on scientifically acknowledged cognitive development, and its processes.

    I will say I am somewhat surprised at Deepak’s slide into liberal orthodoxy indoctrination, as that phenomenon is diametrically opposed to the fundamental principles he once extolled.

  • B-rad

    Would Piers have preferred that the unhinged skinhead white supremacist procured an illegal firearm?

  • Dragon

    If all law abiding citizens had guns, then the country would be a safer place.

  • Durwood Robison

    What is so hard to understand? We have laws against murder. We have laws against attacking people for no reason. We have laws that state that dangerous people should not own firearms. CRIMINALS DO NOT OBEY LAWS! The police only respond to lawbreakers. It is up to the people who obey they laws to enforce them. It is up to us to defend ourselves. It is sad that this person attacked unarmed people, but more laws won’t fix that. Only thing we as a society can do is continue to defend ourselves, and show these insane and troubled people we will not stand for these attacks.

  • 1911HeadBanger

    Sometimes you have to laugh at people like Piers Morgan. A celebrity who suddenly becomes and authority, because of his celebrity. He longs for the days of Jolly Old England, when he can destroy the guns (and the rights) of the people (as England has repeatedly done through the centuries) as if England has no crime or murder problem. Hilarious. England has no constitution for the protection of rights for the people. Armed robberies, rapes and assaults still skyrocket in the land of Piers. Maybe we should stop the Liberal Method of coddling criminals. They’ve screwed up the laws and legal system, so let’s fix it. You didn’t have this sort of thing happening in the 50’s, 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. Maybe we should stop violent video games, violent movies and TV shows, along with Trash TV that Piers Morgan has helped to promote.

  • 1911HeadBanger

    When England was under attack during the early years of World War II, and repeatedly getting their asses kicked by Nazi thugs. They called for more guns for the citizenry and home guard. You see, England in all of their brilliance and advanced thinking, had disarmed the people and even much of their military and law enforcement. When scary times came to them, they had a vast shortage of guns and ammo. They called upon American Citizens, Not the American government, but the Citizens. Our Government was busy making their own guns for the war. But they called on the American people to donate and loan guns to the British people to protect themselves against an invading enemy. American gun owners collected and sent thousands upon thousands of privately owned rifles, shotguns and handguns to the people and government of England to use for their defense. Most of them were returned to the American people who loaned them, after the war was over.
    Our Founding Fathers FLED from England and their oppressive laws, leadership and treatment of their citizens for a new free land they could govern themselves. THAT is the reason for the Second Amendment in our Constitution. So that we can defend ourselves against violent enemies. So we could rise up and stop our government from becomming oppressive as England has done. Take away our gun rights and you take away our freedom. PERIOD. Chew on that little bit of Jolly Old British history Piers. Or have you forgotten what we did for you to save your nation?

  • Patricia Rhudy Cook

    The uphill movement of heat? I’m a little confused about that, but not about the gun control issue. New and improved gun control laws won’t deter anyone who wants a gun for the purpose of committing a crime. They will simply start with committing the crime of illegally obtaining the gun, then move on to the next crime. I can’t understand why the pro gun control softies don’t get it.