Gen-Z Biden Shill Claiming He Left Trump Supporter Speechless Listing Biden's Accomplishme...
Since Dems Have Officially Deserted Women, Female WV Athletes Take Matters Into Their...
Here's What the Biden WH Is Touting As 'Campaign Rallies' (Beverage Warning)
YIKES: Leaked Video Shows Biden's 'Spontaneous' WaWa Visit Was Scripted DOWN to Cashier's...
*SNORT* Nancy Pelosi's Book Release Announced and Twitter Has SO Much Fun (at...
For Once I Actually Believe Something Biden Said (There's a First Time for...
We Can Take a Guess: Israel Unsure Why Pentagon Leaked Info on Iran...
Hawley Lights a Fire Under Mayorkas, Leaves Him Sweating After Fiery Exchange
Riley Gaines Calls Biden Out for 'Officially Abolishing Title IX As We Know...
AOC RAGES at Barnard and Columbia for Suspending Pro-Hamas Protesters and X Just...
*EYE ROLL* Sheldon Whitehouse DRAGGED for Thread Defending Dems Rejecting Mayorkas Impeach...
WH Adviser Says Biden Will Make Sure Gas Prices 'Remain Affordable' (Yeah, About...
Rand Paul Rips Mayorkas to Shreds During Tense Questioning
Oh Honey, NO: Joy Behar Tries to Claim That Biden Cares MORE About...
Meet the Canadian Katherine Maher: Head of CBC Is EXACTLY As Deranged a...

New spin from team Clinton: Emails were top secret, but totally 'innocuous,' so leave poor Hillary alone!

Hillary Clinton’s press secretary Brian Fallon share a new theory on the top secret emails found on her private server. They’re “top secret,” but “innocuous” so it’s no big deal:

Advertisement

So, who are the “officials” that decided the emails were “innocuous”? We don’t know, of course, because they won’t go on the record. And it wasn’t until the 11th paragraph that NBC got around to telling readers that the “officials” have an ax to grind:

The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

They point out that McCullough, a career intelligence official, contributed $1,000 to George W. Bush’s 2004 presidential campaign.

“They” pointed out that McCullough was a Bush donor? “They” all decided to look that up themselves and tell NBC News the exact same thing when interviewed? Really?

Anyway, “innocuous” or not, it’s still a problem no matter how they spin it:

https://twitter.com/Jack0Spades/status/690163554398400512

Advertisement

And let’s not forget the potential conflict of interest thanks to Chelsea’s former employment at NBC:

https://twitter.com/RepublicanPunk/status/689954328245882880

NBC does have one on-the-record source for the piece — Brian Fallon, himself:

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said the latest information about the emails makes it “absurd to suggest that Secretary Clinton did anything wrong.”

He added, “Both the sending and the leaking of [the IG’s] letter was a reckless and irresponsible act.”

If we were the skeptical type, we’d almost think that maybe Fallon was the guy who arranged for the “officials” to get interviewed by NBC in the first place.

***

Related:

Clinton camp’s Brian Fallon accuses Intel inspector general of conspiring with GOP

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement