CONFIRMED: Paul Krugman won't come to grips with the election results any time soon

New York Times columnist Paul Krugman can’t decide which of two things is to blame for Hillary Clinton’s election loss (and neither possibility is named “Hillary Clinton”).

Krugman previously complained that Donald Trump won because of the Electoral College:

Before you despair of the American people, remember that there were multiple thumbs on the scales against HRC 1/ https://t.co/DfWPkXM6Lf

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 13, 2016

And despite all of that she clearly won the popular vote solidly; the electoral college, not the people, made Trump president 2/

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 13, 2016

Today, Krugman expanded on his past criticism of James Comey to make it sound as if the FBI director colluded with Vladimir Putin:

As evidence accumulates that Trump benefited from a lot of late deciders breaking his way, the case that it was Comey gets stronger 1/

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 17, 2016

So it looks more and more as if we had an election swung, in effect, by a faction of our own security sector in alliance with Putin 2/

— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 17, 2016

Recommended

Scott Jennings Explains the ‘Patriotism Gap’ Between Republicans and Democrats to CNN’s Anderson Cooper

Warren Squire

Advertisement

Remember when liberals used to mock talk of a “rigged” election (but only when Trump mentioned the possibility)?

And once again, you totally ignore what triggered the whole FBI investigation in the first place: Hillary's bad judgment! 🙁

— Gray Goods (@graygoods) November 17, 2016

https://twitter.com/Orkmaniac/status/799270083453403136

I couldn't find any evidence that Comey is a Putin sympathiser or has links. Do you have any?

— Fionn O'Donovan (@FODonovan) November 17, 2016

It wasn’t all that long ago that the Left were applauding Comey. Things changed quickly.