The September jobs report is less than stellar, but the Washington Post was spotted putting a firm spin on it anyway:
Why is the word "solid" in here? pic.twitter.com/OQ9BRysWs3
— James Taranto (@jamestaranto) October 7, 2016
Advertisement
Asked, and answered:
https://twitter.com/LoganDobson/status/784395104287154176
Ding! Ding! Ding!
The WaPo’s definition of “solid” doesn’t have a high bar:
.@jamestaranto "Solid" appears to go anywhere from 151,000 to 223,000 https://t.co/Qby4HQjT59 pic.twitter.com/hmzNlXg2xx
— Jeryl Bier (@JerylBier) October 7, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member