And Here We GOOO: Scott Jennings SHUTS DOWN Dems Who Want Racist Districts...
Thomas Massie Allegations, Reportedly From His Ex-GF, Making the Rounds on X and...
REEEE! Nutbag Rebekah Jones Sees Something Super FASCIST-Y on Redistricted Tennessee Map a...
He Isn't Just Unhinged, He's REALLY Stupid: Check Out How BAD VA AG...
PA Supreme Court Justice David Wecht Leaves Democratic Party Over Rise in Antisemitism
Dem Katie Porter Says Fellow Gubernatorial Candidate Leaked Video of Her Verbally Abusing...
Politico ‘Journo’ Warns Republicans They’ll Be Called ‘Racists’ for Umpteenth Time If VRA...
Dem FCC Official Tells Jimmy Kimmel Bestie Jake Tapper About Trump's Effort to...
Spanish Police Fear Islamist Terrorists Taking Advantage of Massive Grant of Legal Status
WaPo: Immigrants Are Giving Up Their Cases and Leaving In Soaring Numbers
Hantavirus Cruise Ship Scare Hits Nebraska; Experts Say No Pandemic Risk — Lockdown...
Chris Van Hollen: If You’re Mad Trump’s Trying to Muzzle Jimmy Kimmel, Be...
D'OH! The Left's Redistricting Efforts in the Courts Continue to Backfire (Cue MORE...
Backfire: Family Demands Answers in Police Shooting, Gets Them in Bodycam Footage
Shuttering Chicago Walgreens Says It Lost $1 Million, Mostly Due to Theft

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein cautions against anonymous sources in bizarre, strange, curious statement

Whatever it is that’s going on right now — a criminal investigation of President Trump for obstruction of justice, perhaps — took an interesting twist when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein issued a statement Thursday night cautioning Americans against stories attributed to anonymous officials … which would include just about every story published since January or so.

Advertisement

The very best part of the statement, though, was the way it managed to send journalists searching for that perfect word to describe it. What could Rosenstein mean, “be skeptical about anonymous allegations”?

Advertisement

That makes two votes for “bizarre,” one for “curious,” one for “interesting,” two for “strange,” one for “odd” … and add a late entry for “super odd.”

This is weird … all of the usual suspects are wondering why Rosenstein would issue a caution about believing anonymous sources. Which reporter is getting ready to drop tomorrow’s anonymously sourced 5 p.m. bombshell and isn’t telling?

https://twitter.com/celestemc/status/875530186799939584

https://twitter.com/Leadback_/status/875528389909659648

We’ll have to see. As strange as the statement might seem, it’s nice that there was a name attached to it in case anyone has questions.

Advertisement

 

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement