That seems like quite a leap. The Walt Disney Company has been offering its employees benefits for their same-sex partners since 1996, but a princess marrying a princess? Spoiler warning for “Frozen”: the princess doesn’t marry the prince in this one, but she does end up with “ice dude.”

https://twitter.com/sallykohn/status/427217008846209024

Plenty think it’s time for Disney to move ahead with same-sex couples and families.

https://twitter.com/ZerlinaMaxwell/status/427206683941961728

https://twitter.com/Toure/status/427206308811780096

https://twitter.com/jaypsyd/status/427241521101168640

https://twitter.com/lo3_oscar/status/427206896311754753

https://twitter.com/alexvanroekel/status/427208140539453440

https://twitter.com/EileenBresnahan/status/427234432647311361

What do the rest of you think?

https://twitter.com/_vanessamarissa/status/427220180557910016

https://twitter.com/omobobo/status/427201046583476224

https://twitter.com/Random_acct/status/427201133107355648

https://twitter.com/JulieLvsPACKERS/status/427201176057036801

https://twitter.com/KingJHJ/status/427203860424581120

https://twitter.com/CUSTOMMADEJ/status/427204077450448896

https://twitter.com/RobinThrilliams/status/427205925925953536

https://twitter.com/StarDogCh4mpion/status/427222955005734913

https://twitter.com/Yvadne/status/427211773142642688

https://twitter.com/football_jay/status/427218671044280320

https://twitter.com/JulieLvsPACKERS/status/427247941888122880

https://twitter.com/Larry__Calvin/status/427236372877815808

Some are encouraged by the “baby steps” Disney has been taking.

https://twitter.com/DataDiva/status/427198832217047040

https://twitter.com/BoucherLeanne/status/427198804555997184

https://twitter.com/Shook_Jones/status/427207791103975425

https://twitter.com/cunningpike/status/427222154401161216

What about Oaken’s gay family?

https://twitter.com/HiroSkye/status/427253029838942212

  • Tugger – ✓unamused

    Sally, I think I speak for a large segment of society when I say “F*uck You”.(Not litterally, but figuratively)

    • Calcat36

      I would ask her why would it really matter? Why do liberals pigeon hole people into groups? Would a fictitious (AHEM) “marriage” in cartoon land make her “FEEL” more accepted?

      How about leaving the cartoons to kids and NOT using cartoons to push an agenda on the littlest among us?

      • syvyn11

        The more they separate us, the more they can play us against each other.

        • Calcat36

          Liberals pigeon hole their victims into groups. Conservatives see it for what it is. Racism. Bigotry. Hatred. Plantation mentality.

      • http://www.almarquardt.com/ almarquardt

        One of the things I loved about Frozen was there was no political agenda attached.

      • Frustrated Teacher

        But that is they way the operate….it is their M.O.

    • John Castigo

      ..yes, of course. How about instead we have a “coming of age” animated movie wherein one of the seven dwarves decides he he wants to be a chick and wants to date Sleepy Or is only lesbian homosexuality supported?.

      • Gregg Hammerquist

        That’s what I was thinking; Sally Kohn is a misandrist.

        • John Castigo

          By default, aren’t all female homosexuals misandrists?

          • Gregg Hammerquist

            Not necessarily but often.

  • TheAmishDude

    Typical parasitic left.

    They could make a movie of their own, independent of the Disney system and see if it’s popular and compelling. But they’d rather take the existing institution (in this case, Disney animation) and mooch off of it.

    • DaMello ®

      Exactly! Those who can organize a Pride Rally can’t organize something like, oh say, the Gay Scouts? Let the Free Market decide!

      • nc ✓s & balances

        STOP! Have you thought about what you’re saying?

        • V the K

          Yes, he’s proposing an organization for liberal parents who want to send their young boys off into the the woods for long weekends with gay men. What could possibly go wrong?

          • Kathy Horner Somers

            The point is… Who would send their kids?

      • H50 ✓RAT

        Actually, I think that could be a good idea. The gay population is such a small segment of the overall population that it would fail. But, hey everyone involved would be totally supportive and their uniforms would be to die for….

        • Kathy Horner Somers

          exactly.

    • Catchance

      Actually, I found the whole discussion really disturbing. This is indoctrination on steroids.

      • Bill Phillips

        Indoctrination on steroids and coming to a public school near you ….even more disturbing is might already be happening at a school near you!

        • Calcat36

          Woodrow Wilson fought for women’s suffrage…

          A point that my daughter gladly told her history indoctrinator that that was not the truth.

          It is happening. Know what your children are being taught.

          Yes, I will not stop now until he is fired for telling her to sit down and shut up. Who does he think he is? Woodrow Wilson jailing and torturing suffragists in 2013?

    • Michael Rice

      I have said that Christianity for years. Why does the left always need to hijack a faith or a religion? Start their own…call it the log cabin Methodists or something.

      • TexSizzle

        They already hijacked a church group called the Metropolitan Community Church. My sister finds it highly amusing that the one in Corinth, TX, is on a dead-end street with a “NO OUTLET” sign at its entrance.

    • kenhowes

      The point is that they know that Disney is run by a crew that sympathizes with them but has a brand name that is identified with wholesomeness. If they can break this down, they reach all the little tykes in the country with the gay message, and they think that they can break it down because of the powers that be inside the company.

    • AntiquityNow

      Thank you for your observation! Conservatives tend to respect existing institutions and establish their own to convey a political agenda. On the other hand, Liberals are fanatical about taking over supposedly neutral institutions (in education, bureaucracy, entertainment, etc.) and pushing their warped view on decent yet unsuspecting folks. Liberals are also shocked when they don’t control every aspect of government as they feel it is their natural right as the “government” party. They will not be content until they pervert every last aspect of American culture then blame it on others when everything falls apart.

    • URGR82

      Mooch? Hah! I’d say more like harassment.

    • Summerwarmth

      Yes, but if it was a movie outside of the Disney system they could not then insist that the character be included in all the Disney princess lines, be part of Disney promos, part of the on site Disney experience, even on birthday cakes and etc and promoted as Disney.
      Disney has a huge in road into children’s lives including the Disney channel. Once the foot is in the door then there would be an insistence for a tv show and etc etc etc. Parents who did not agree would basically have to discontinue the Disney channel and all Disney video, Internet, and etc. If any other Disney character was featured then this character would have to be too or there would be a law suit.
      Personally, I would have no issues except I see a lot of it as agenda driven – protest if there is any hint of Christianity so that Christians are driven out but also protest if their character is not right in the front and featured. I think people should just live and let live.

  • H50 ✓RAT

    I suppose they could if they wanted to.

    But that begs two questions;
    Would anyone take their kids to go see it, and;
    Dont our kids already get enough indoctrination thru Common Core?

  • DaMello ®

    You see, this is why we can’t have nice things. Smh…

  • Servo1969

    I am so tired of hearing about where some people like to stick their faces.
    Because, really, that’s all it amounts to isn’t it?
    Seriously. Get a 2 cell flashlight and put in fresh batteries with either both positives touching or both negatives touching. That’s homosexuality. The batteries are there, they’re fully charged, but… who cares?

    • JeffWRidge

      I saw your avatar and just had to say that you have good tastes.

      • Servo1969

        Huzzah!

    • WhoDat

      You seem to say same sex couples are all about the sex. Are you saying opposite sex couples are only together for the sex?

      • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

        No that is not what he is saying. What he is saying is that we’re tired of listening about the whole damn thing just everywhere. I don’t really care who marries whom. If you want to marry your dog go ahead it ain’t really none of my damn business. But at the same time I don’t really wish to be bombarded with the whole dog/man agenda and how I’m totally backwards for being straight.

        • nc ✓s & balances

          BB, your governor, senator and mayor all say you have no place in New York because you “hate gays.” So there’s that.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            I know! I don’t stop there either! I believe in the Constitution and Jesus. I’m the definition of backwards. *hangs head in shame*

          • nc ✓s & balances

            Give me a minute while I think of a suitable punishment.

          • Jay Stevens

            Does not bother me. I need to ride through New York from Texas to Maine when I visit my mother in Maine. I don’t need to spend much time or any money doing it.

        • Kathy Horner Somers

          Right. We don’t need to know…

      • Servo1969

        No, opposite sex couples are the natural result of having opposite sexes.

        Same sex couples aren’t.

      • J_W_C_NM

        How many straight pride parades have you seen?

        • WhoDat

          Every non-gay pride parade.

          • Servo1969

            Every parade that doesn’t celebrate homosexuality is a NON-gay pride parade?

            Well, there you have the reasoning of the modern gay-rights movement:

            Anything which does not actively promote homosexuality is to be considered homosexual oppression. There is no middle ground.

          • AMERICAN Kafir™✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            Holy crap…

            My little town here in Michigan has parades ALL the time… I wasn’t aware that my little town had to showcase just how much they embrace heterosexuality (no gay pride parades here)…. enough that there’s a parade at least once a month here…. and to cleverly disguise them as the Winter Festival Parade… or the Homecoming Parade… Hell, even our Victorian Day parade is chock full of people loudly and proudly proclaiming how heterosexual they are…

            What a f*cking crock of sh!t.

            You’re an idiot, Whodat.

          • sambar2

            Wait, the purpose of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade is to celebrate heterosexual relations? Wow! They might want to work on the descriptive title a little then, amirite?

          • Calcat36

            The Rose Bowl Parade is pro-heterosexual?

          • Ronald Green

            Damn but you can say the dumbest crap!

          • TocksNedlog

            Umb•day

      • Calcat36

        Yes. They share a desire for perverted sex.

        What does your cult teach about that type of perversion?

    • Michael Anderson (WB)

      As an electrical engineer I’m going to have to correct your example. We put batteries positive to positive all the time for higher current capacity.
      The mechanical example works though, two bolts or two nuts don’t do much together.

      • Servo1969

        In a flashlight? In series?

        • Michael Anderson (WB)

          Not as often, but yes. They aren’t in series though, even if it might look like it.

      • AMERICAN Kafir™✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

        Imaging plumbing your house with all male couplings.

  • WhoDat

    I’d pay to watch it.

    • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

      Don’t stop there. You could live it. Do the whole same sex marriage. Show us how it’s done. I, for one, would attend and bring you a nice present. Deal?

      • WhoDat

        I’m not LGBT, so I wouldn’t want to marry a man.

        • nc ✓s & balances

          Hater.

        • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

          Homophobe.

        • H50 ✓RAT

          So youd pay to watch it, but you wont use it?
          Pimp.

          • TheOriginalDonald

            WHODat is FOR it, as long as it involves two hot chicks. Otherwise FORGET IT!

        • AmericanMom

          The way it’s going, you may be required to do that if liberals keep telling us what to do in our private lives. Just saying!

          • H50 ✓RAT

            Mandatory same sex relations as part of the compassion, tolerance and mental health wing of government socialized medicine.

          • nc ✓s & balances

            OMG, it could happen.

          • H50 ✓RAT

            LOL, yea I was only half kidding…

          • Jay Stevens

            Hey! Don’t give them ideas.

        • Bklynnygirl

          The Democrats eventually will be “forcing” health insurance companies to cover sex change operations.
          Just think about it, you won’t even have to pay for it..

          • nc ✓s & balances

            Aren’t we, the taxpayers, paying for that sex change operation for that 63 year old murderer who’s serving a life sentence?

            http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/17/us-usa-crime-sexchange-idUSBREA0G1LD20140117

          • Bklynnygirl

            The Democrats think everything is FREE.
            And yes, we are paying for that murderer in Boston to have a sex change operation..

          • Calcat36

            Being here, want to know the reason?

            When the sex change is complete, the person that murdered his wife will no longer exist, therefore, the charges do not apply to the reassigned victim!

            The next step will be the argument to release this new person who did not kill his husband since he is now a she.

          • Bklynnygirl

            Good observation, I can see it happening.

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil
          • NRPax

            Except that the new person will have the same DNA. And since he can’t argue that he has an identical twin, he’s back where he started except now he’s mutilated.

        • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

          Ls don’t want to marry men. Gs do, Bs are just Gs who don’t want people to call them G, and Ts are mentally ill. They shouldn’t marry.

          • H50 ✓RAT

            LOL, I had to read that twice.

          • nc ✓s & balances

            My head is still reeling.

          • Catchance

            The T’s are sort of like mules… they can’t propagate.

          • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            A gelding is not a mule.
            But it can’t propagate either.

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            Geldings don’t choose that route either.

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            I’ll never look at a mule the same way again!

          • AMERICAN Kafir™✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            Jacks are typically sterile, but you can mate a jenny with another horse.

            Jack=male mule, jenny=female mule.

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            In my best Johnny Carson voice, “I did not know that.” Thanks!

          • Calcat36

            You Sir, have been watching too much Team America!

      • AmericanMom

        Live on the internet please for WhoDat doing dat!

    • Michael Rice

      I bet you pay to watch a lot of things..

  • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

    Or maybe the princess could marry a talking female donkey! Wouldn’t that be just totally awesome? We get rid of gender and species constraints all in the same cartoon. It would save a ton of money and a polar bear or two. TWOFER

    • TheOriginalDonald

      Why didn’t the producers of Shrek thought of that?

  • Maxx

    Yes Sally, because as we all know, princesses marrying princesses are the obsession of six-year-old girls. What’s next…are you going to opine on why Disney movies don’t feature an abortion or two?

  • JeffWRidge

    This just goes to show that there’s nothing the left isn’t willing to use to push their agenda. Remember the old expression, the hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.

    • WhoDat

      There is no agenda but to show that same sex couples are just as normal as an opposite sex one.

      • nc ✓s & balances

        Ding ding ding! That IS the agenda.

        • WhoDat

          Exactly. And that’s a bad thing?

          • Servo1969

            It’s an untrue thing.

          • TocksNedlog

            What? That you lied by not even making it out of the same sentence in which you claimed “there is no agenda” before admitting that there is an agenda? No, dude; that’s not bad …
            predictable, but not bad.

          • AMERICAN Kafir™✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            Therein lies the crux…

            They AREN’T normal.

            Period.

        • http://politicallyincorrectcanadian.blogspot.ca/ Reverend Ken

          That IS the agenda, but same sex couples are just NOT normal.

          This mental illness must be put back into the psychiatric hospitals before it’s to late.

      • Servo1969

        But they aren’t.

        • WhoDat

          Your opinion.

          • Elizabeth

            They aren’t.

          • H50 ✓RAT

            So do you support bestiality? It is the opinion of some that its normal too.
            I once knew a City Attorney that loved her German Shepard so much she got disbarred.
            The dog seemed happy tho.

          • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            Lord forgive me and save all the pygmies in New Guinea, but I gotta tell you this ‘un here:

            Fella’s in deep to a loan shark, needs a ton o’ cash quick, finds out there’s an experiment where they’re gonna try to mate human males with female gorillas “to see if anything happens.” He goes there, does the nasty.

            Place is busted, he’s brought in front of a judge the next day, he pleads guilty, judge asks him, “C’mon, didya really, umm, y’know… with a female gorilla?”

            “Of course a female, do you think I’m a pervert?”

            I don’t care who y’are, that’s funny, right there…

          • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

            In any given area of life, something that is the overwhelming majority in a particular category or behavior is “normal.” Otherwise, we’d have no need for the word “normal.”

          • Maxx

            Agreed. In addition, only 3.8% of the population appear to be gay. Significantly less than the oft-overhyped statistics over the years designed to sell this lifestyle as mainstream.

            http://carm.org/percent-population-homosexual

            Normal might not be the right word. Rare would be more accurate and thus a liberal pushing for Disney to highlight something that only occurs in less than 4% of the population most certainly qualifies as “agenda driven.”

          • Calcat36

            Even lower than that? Law abiding firearms owners shooting up schools!

            Only liberals do that.

          • Michael Rice

            And that they are is yours….why do you always talk in circles with no apparent point?

          • Guest

            because #PretzelLogic #Clueless

          • Calcat36

            Yes, it does indeed. It has help of certain folks on this board as well. See below.

      • aegean1

        I don’t think you understand the definition of “normal.”

      • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

        Just curious – do you think it is also ‘normal’ for 9 year old girls to have boys in their school bathrooms because boys said they “feel” like girls? Do you think it is ‘normal’ to have something like that forced on a 100 little girls to satisfy 1 person of different orientation?

        • WhoDat

          I have no issue with a transgender person using a restroom they believe they should use.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            I’m assuming you’re a grown man. So good for you.

            What I asked was not that at all. Nowhere even close. I asked about scores of little girls.

          • Calcat36

            That is typical liberal deflection.

            It only matters until a grown man visits his daughter in her stall…

          • WhoDat

            A transgender female feels she is a female, and feels she should use a women’s restroom.

            I’m assuming you feel that there will be someone, who is a male, will abuse it, and take advantage of the girls?

          • Michael Rice

            That or it will scare the heck out of the little girl.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            Nooooo! I mean it never happened before, why would it happen now????

            I’m an adult so really if a guy came to use the ladies’ restroom I wouldn’t really care.

            But again for the 10th time this isn’t about you or me or any adults that can take care of themselves. I was asking you about little girls (bolded hoping that it would finally register) who are not really capable of taking care of themselves and who are children and as such shouldn’t have to worry about these things.

          • Calcat36

            It knows. Mind you, the christian attitude it is displaying…

          • WhoDat

            At that age, what difference would who uses what restroom really matter?

            Honestly, I still have my own questions about how this would work.

          • Calcat36

            Adults can carry firearms.

          • WhoDat

            Yeah, and?

          • Calcat36

            Figure it out, professor.

          • WhoDat

            You’re going to shoot someone of the opposite sex if they come into your bathroom?

          • Calcat36

            Where was that written? Closed minded much?

            How old are your kids? And to which sex do they identify with?

          • http://politicallyincorrectcanadian.blogspot.ca/ Reverend Ken

            Like anyone would mate with that…
            Chances are he isn’t even 15 yet but has a scout leader who has recruited him already.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            Wait you really really really think that at age 9, or 6 for that matter, children don’t know the difference between genders and also that they are not self conscious in the presence of the opposite gender, let alone in the bathroom which should be a private place?

            Are you THAT stupid or just so incredibly callous so that you’d say/do anything just to advance this insane agenda?

            Edit to add that I’m thoroughly disgusted and that I hope you never have any children.

          • sambar2

            “Are you THAT stupid or just so incredibly callous so that you’d say/do anything just to advance this insane agenda?”

            This is the question I want to ask every liberal ever.

          • WhoDat

            If you’re living as a girl and want to use the girl’s bathroom, or vice-versa, what’s the issue?

            You said the bathroom is a private place, are people looking at each other’s genitalia to verify what someone is?

            Well, I hope my kids have an open mind.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            This is not about an open mind you halfwit. This is about children not having to feel threatened at every turn. If 1% of kids are transgender the other 99% shouldn’t have to pay for it. The other 99% shouldn’t have to feel scared to go to the bathroom. At 6 or 9 the notion of “open mind” doesn’t exist. And if you want to introduce it well the best way would be to force it on them, is that it?

            Transgender kids should have separate bathrooms, problem solved. There is no need on this earth to dump this on all the other children how do you not get this. They are too young to grasp this whole “gender confusion” whatever.

            You know what is the most appalling of this whole thing? You and yours scream bloody murder when someone feels that gays can be straightened out. But now you are doing the same to the straight kids/people! Have you not learned anything? People are born with a sexual orientation, they can’t be changed into something else. We agree on this? So why now try to force straight kids into something they are not? Growing up is hard enough but hey let’s confuse them into thinking that they *should* be gay. Because that is less wrong than telling gay kids that they should be straight.

            You are simply a disgusting pile of putrid crap.

          • WhoDat

            Making transgender children use a separate bathroom just advances the stigma more.

            No one is telling kids they should be gay.

            I’m sorry, I just don’t see the problem with letting what a child self-identifies with use the bathroom for what sex they identify with.

          • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

            I repeat – either you’re too stupid to be alive or just plain callous and would do anything for your insane agenda and to hell with who it harms. Either way as a human being you’re worth less than an amoeba.

          • WhoDat

            Well, good day to you, then.

            Sheesh.

          • Calcat36

            It is their stigma to embrace, taught b liberal stooges.

            Name any well known liberal that preaches this crap while having a five year old transgender child.

          • Maxwell

            I’ll try to sound civil since everyone seems to be hounding on you.

            For me, it’s a privacy concern, and a safety concern. A girl who identifies as male but has not received any type of operation, would be at risk for harassment, or, worse, rape.

            On the flip, a boy who identifies as female walks into the girl’s restroom creates an uncomfortable situation for the girls, who have some expectation of privacy from boys in their respective restroom.

          • SturJen

            I’ve been trying to figure out where to insert this flashback into this conversation, this is as good as place as any.

            Back when I was about 5 or 6, my Mom took us girls to visit a friend of hers. I don’t remember who, but I remember that this person had a son that was about 2-3 years older than me. So we were on our way out, coats on and all, when I hear the boy call my name. I turn to look and lo and behold, the boy’s got his junk out, flashing me. I was so mortified that I beat it out of there as fast as possible. It frightened me so much that I did not ever tell my Mom what happened.

            Now, some 40 years later, that memory is still imprinted on my mind. The feelings come back of shame and shock, but according to others…I’m over-reacting.

            Nope, I don’t think so.

          • http://politicallyincorrectcanadian.blogspot.ca/ Reverend Ken

            Seek professional mental health treatment ASAP.

          • Ryan Johnson

            Thank you. My mom had to go to the bathroom at work once with a man in there with painted fingernails, trying to be a woman. Of course she couldn’t say shit about it at risk of losing her job.

          • http://politicallyincorrectcanadian.blogspot.ca/ Reverend Ken

            Every time he comments he re-enforce the fact that “gay” is a mental disorder that needs to be dealt with.

          • Ryan Johnson

            The only thing we can really do is pray. These are troubled times we live in.

      • AmericanMom

        Sounds like you need to spend some time in the LGBT zone and see just how “normal” they are.

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        You do realize that you just described the agenda of the political, homosexual activists.

      • sambar2

        Hogwash. Jounalist and LGBT activist Masha Gessen admitted in a radio interview what the true agenda is:

        “It’s a no-brainer that (homosexual activists) should have the right to marry, but I also think equally that it’s a no-brainer that the institution of marriage should not exist. …(F)ighting for gay marriage generally involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there — because we lie that the institution of marriage is not going to change, and that is a lie.

        The institution of marriage is going to change, and it should change. And again, I don’t think it should exist. And I don’t like taking part in creating fictions about my life. That’s sort of not what I had in mind when I came out thirty years ago.

        I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I met my new partner, and she had just had a baby, and that baby’s biological father is my brother, and my daughter’s biological father is a man who lives in Russia, and my adopted son also considers him his father. So the five parents break down into two groups of three… And really, I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.”

        Article here:
        http://illinoisfamily.org/homosexuality/homosexual-activist-admits-true-purpose-of-battle-is-to-destroy-marriage/

        Audio here:
        http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/lifematters/why-get-married/4058506

        To say the agenda is devious is the understatement of the century.

        • Bill Phillips

          Demented would be a more accurate description than merely calling them devious ….though agreed …. that they truly are devious!

        • NRPax

          Good Lord; you can’t do enough drugs to have that convoluted thinking make sense.

      • Maxx

        Most recent polling data reveals that just under 4% of the population are gay, considerably lower than previously overhyped statistics throughout the years.

        http://carm.org/percent-population-homosexual

        With that in mind, contrary to your denial, it does seem agenda-driven that a liberal lesbian would want Disney to highlight a segment of the population that, statistically, remains quite rare.

      • Calcat36

        Who defines NORMAL, you?

        • WhoDat

          If a same sex couple loves each other, takes care of each other, love their kids, and work hard, I’d call that pretty normal.

          • Calcat36

            What would Jesus call it, deceiver?

          • WhoDat

            Not sure, Jesus never spoke about same-sex couples.

          • Calcat36

            Oh you fool! Did He not follow the law of His Father?

            Jesus was a Jew. Subject to the Old Testament and His Father’s teachings handed down to man at that time. Jesus never broke the law.

            Try again, rabbi?

          • Richard Jefferies

            Sure he did. Jesus said

            “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two, but one flesh.”

            Homosexuality was already forbidden under Jewish Law, so there was no reason he needed to expound upon it, and since he didn’t denounce it, it sands that he agreed with it.

          • Calcat36

            Then He (God), drove the nail home with Sodom and Gomorrah.

          • Richard Jefferies

            Yes, but that was before Jesus, and it wasn’t just about homosexuality. Homosexuality isn’t the cause, it is the symptom. Its wide acceptance is like a festering, purulent soar on the body politic. The cancer is rebellion against God.

          • Calcat36

            I would argue that the two angels would disagree with you. As you typed, Jesus did not apologize for Sodom and Gomorrah, and that was an example of God’s law. Nor did Jesus recant Leviticus 18: 21’You shall not give any of your offspring to offer them to Molech, nor shall you profane the name of your God; I am the LORD. 22’You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. 23’Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion.…

            I could be wrong…

            EDIT: Genesis was before Jesus using your thought process, yet Jesus always was, always is, and will always be…

          • WhoDat

            Curious, do you demean people who wear cotton/poly blends or eat pork and shell fish for being sinners?

            Leviticus 11:9-12

            9 “Of all the marine animals, these are ones you may use for food. You may eat anything from the water if it has both fins and scales, whether taken from salt water or from streams. 10 But you must never eat animals from the sea or from rivers that do not have both fins and scales. They are detestable to you. This applies both to little creatures that live in shallow water and to all creatures that live in deep water. 11 They will always be detestable to you. You must never eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies. 12 Any marine animal that does not have both fins and scales is detestable to you.

          • Calcat36

            I reject magic underwear, cultist troll.

            Show me that in Leviticus, and then we can discuss.

          • WhoDat

            It’s a remembrance of a covenant, much like those the Israelites made. They were told to wear tassels as a sign of their belief.

            http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0415.htm#38

          • Calcat36

            Wrong, cultist! Try learning the truth! The garment was introducedas part of temple worship by Joseph Smith (THE CRIMINAL, The Glass Looker), Mormon Cult founder during the Nauvoo period sometime around 1842-43, about seven weeks after he had been initiated into Freemasonry. Smith was heavily influenced by the Old Testament and often used OT conceptions of priesthood as the basis for the temple worship. Joseph Smith was also influenced by his modern surroundings in designing garments.

            Shellfish, given the time, was restricted because it was considered unclean, ie, UNSANITARY. Think SUSHI today, idiot.

            Same reason that homosexuality is an abomination, in case AIDS/HIV eludes you. No one gets those homosexual diseases from shellfish, cultist.

          • WhoDat

            All those straight people who have HIV/AIDS might want to ask you about it being a homosexual disease.

          • Calcat36

            Yeah, so now you deny the truth! How did they get the blood borne disease again?

            There is NOT ONE account of a heterosexual, NORMAL couple ever contracting the disease outside of drugs/prostitutes/blood transfusions from infected abusers.

          • Onyx

            This is probably the dumbest thing I’ve read on this site. Which is *really* saying something.

          • Calcat36

            Read your own posts, stupid.

            So from you and your warped leftist bullshit, I will consider your stupid comment as a badge of honor, you liberal douche bag.

          • Gregg Hammerquist

            His comment on mixed fibers is an Old Testament command. The Jews were told not to blend fibers; not a Mormon comment. And try not being a bigot yourself sometime.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            Curious, do you demean people who wear cotton/poly blends or eat pork and shell fish for being sinners?

            When you find a Scripture mentioning cotton and polyester, let us know.

            As for the pork/shellfish thing, I refer you to Acts, Chapter 10, verses 9-15:

            About noon the following day as they were on their journey and approaching the city, Peter went up on the roof to pray.
            10He became hungry and wanted something to eat, and while the meal was being prepared, he fell into a trance.
            11He saw heaven opened and something like a large sheet being let down to earth by its four corners.
            12It contained all kinds of four-footed animals, as well as reptiles and birds.
            13Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”

            14“Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

            15The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”

          • Bill Phillips

            Excellent reply!

          • Bill Phillips

            Jesus would call it sin & an abomination. Forgivabe …but sin no less!

          • Calcat36

            All sin is forgivable, Bill, but you take my comment/reply out of context. Get to know whodat and how he agitates, while claiming to be a Christian and supporting everything Jesus would condemn.

            Jesus did not come here to make nice. He came to divide and gave dire warning about His return for those that did not accept Him.

          • Bill Phillips

            My reply was intended to back up your retort to WhoDat! I’m in agreement with you.
            I’m well aware of WhoDat & his/her leftist trolling on Twitchy! My only question to you and anyone else who is aware of his trolling …Why waste your time ‘feeding’ the troll?

          • Calcat36

            You got me there. Hat Tip Sir.

            I miss reading between the lines as well, Bill. My apology.

          • Bill Phillips

            Apology accepted! It’s difficult to keep a cool and level head when we try to reason with those like WhoDat, who defend the indefensible!
            It might well fit the biblical admonition to NOT “cast pearls before swine”…as I understand it!

          • Calcat36

            He has yet to tear me to pieces.

            2 Timothy 4: 1 I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: 2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires,…

          • Bill Phillips

            No doubt! You have done a great job! My hat’s off to you!

          • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

            Laudable– MAYBE. “Normal”– ‘fraid not. Not that such a word means anything any more. But any fool knows there’s something unusual about it. Not exactly the sort of thing you run across every day. Not even that there’s anything else out of the ordinary about these folks, but “normal” ain’t a word that describes it.

          • Calcat36

            If my squash plants have no male and female flowers, guess what happens? The LAWS OF NATURE take over and I get NOTHING reproduced.

            Squash plants get it. Why can’t libtards? Oh yeah, the squash has more brains and reasoning skills…

      • JeffWRidge

        The left pushing this stuff of other people’s children is an agenda. They are trying to get other people’s kids to think the way the left thinks. Let people raise their own kids, in their own way. If parents want their kids to know about homosexuality, then they can tell their kids all about it. But leave other people’s kids alone.

      • Michael Rice

        That is an agenda…

        • WhoDat

          Oh, really?

          Thanks for pointing out what I wrote.

      • TocksNedlog

        “There’s no ‘agenda’! There’s just an agenda.”

      • Big Meanie

        No…They aren’t.

  • Brother bob

    I’d say go for it. Watching Libtard Hollywood go bankrupt.

  • Love of Country

    Hey Sally, I think it’s about time for a Disney movie that shows how the DNC has been obsessed with controlling black people for the last 175 years …. the script literally writes itself, for Pete’s sake ….

    Democrats opposed and/or filibustered:

    1.The Emancipation Proclamation
    2.The 13th Amendment
    3.The 14th Amendment
    4.The 15th Amendment
    5.The Reconstruction Act of 1867
    6.The Civil Rights Act of 1866
    7.The Enforcement Act of 1870
    8.The Forced Act of 1871
    9.The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871
    10.The Civil Rights Act of 1875
    11.The Freeman Bureau
    12.The Civil Rights Act of 1957
    13.The Civil Rights Act of 1960
    14.The United States Civil Rights Commission

    Now please be a dear and go pitch the idea for me since you already have some name recognition, yes?

    • WhoDat

      Most were conservative Democrats, if I remember correctly.

      • H50 ✓RAT

        Whats a conservative Democrat?
        Are we re-writing history again? Changing the definition of words?

        • Michael Rice

          It is like a white hispanic.

      • Bklynnygirl

        Name them?

      • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

        Let’s see Abraham Lincoln republican, nope not a conservative democrat.

      • Catchance

        WhoDat, you’re just digging yourself into a hole on that…

        Democrat Senators organized the record Senate filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Included among the organizers were several prominent and well known liberal Democrat standard bearers including:
        – Robert Byrd, senator from West Virginia (high-ranking member of the KKK)
        – J. William Fulbright, Arkansas senator and political mentor of Bill Clinton
        – Albert Gore Sr., Tennessee senator, father and political mentor of Al Gore. (Gore Jr. has been known to lie about his father’s opposition to the Civil Rights Act.)
        – Sam Ervin, North Carolina senator of Watergate hearings fame
        – Richard Russell, famed Georgia senator and later President Pro Tempore

        The Democrats were the majority party in both the Senate and the House. 60% voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, while over 80% of Republicans voted for it.

        • WhoDat

          So, then, a majority of Democrats did vote for it.

          • Calcat36

            You already know this, LIAR:

            June 9, 1964 Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV).

            June 10, 1964 Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists-one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed.

            August 4, 1965 Senate Republican Leader Everett
            Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose. Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            Yes, they did… and a LARGER majority of Republicans also voted for it.

            Overall vote:
            Dems: 64% for, 36% against
            Reps: 80% for, 20% against

      • digitalPimple

        This sums it up.

        • Love of Country

          Good post …. I’ve tried to post the exact same pic but was told by moderators that it was too offensive.

          It is offensive but it is also quite historical and must be seen by America-at-large as well as by the deniers and finger-pointers in the 175-years-racist DNC!.

      • Calcat36

        You do not remember, you were indoctrinated into the Southern Strategy LIE.

      • Love of Country

        You said they were conservative what’s?

  • TJ

    They tried to get Princess Merida from Brave be a lesbian as she was not interested in any of the boys. But it never made sense when taken in context of the movie. It was about a mother/daughter relationship not carrying on the clan. When you go down the list of princes they have one from every ethnic background, now they need one from every sexual preference.

  • frozeninbemidji

    Didn’t John Lithgow play her in World According To Garp?

  • nc ✓s & balances

    This was entirely predictable when we were bombarded with the argument “How does someone’s gay marriage affect anyone else?”

    I really didn’t think it would all happen so quickly though.

  • Spasmolytic

    I hear Disney is doing a remake of Snow White and The Seven Dwarfs called — “Snow White and the Seven Carpet Munchers”

    • brewerandpatriot

      Live action or hentai-style animation? I’m asking…for a friend…

  • Elizabeth

    Aww…poor Sally. Could never be a Disney princess so she must rail against that which she feels has rejected her. Such a faux feminist.

  • jaun456

    MY stomach hurts from this crap!

  • http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/ keyboard jockey

    Why does Disney have to make it? What’s stopping you Sally? Make your own movie stop expecting other people to fulfill your wants. Don’t you call yourself feminist? Do it yourself.

  • ee1774

    Imagine the iconic ‘Gone With The Wind’ photo that depicts Rhett Butler embracing Scarlett O’Hara.
    Now imagine Ashley Wilkes in Scarlett’s place.
    Think the public would accept that?

    ……..me neither….

    • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

      Sweet Jesus I did not need that mental image. You just made me cry. :/

      • H50 ✓RAT

        I can never watch GWTW the same way again. Sigh.

        • http://lordfoggybottom.com/ BlahBlah

          I’ll have another vodka hoping for a bad case of amnesia. :/

          • H50 ✓RAT

            Just asked the hubbs to refill my glass……with a double shot.

          • thedumbblonde

            Couple ‘a boozers. :)

    • therealguyfaux ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

      “Lawsy, Missy Scarlett, ah do believe I done seen dat Mr Wilkes wit’ dat Cap’n Butler, an’ ah don’ think you wants me tellin’ yuh whut I seen…”
      “Why fiddle dee dee, Prissy, are you telling me Ashley’s…well, y’know?”
      “He sho’ always did look light in his loafers t’ me, Missy… an’ now ah knows it fo’ a fack!”

      • Catchance

        Okay, that’s really terrible, but I’m still laughing.

  • John Hasley

    Strangely enough, Disney keeps going for the movie that can sell $100 million appealing to multitudes, rather than $5 by appealing to a handful of people.

  • Alabama Mike

    Yes Sal, yes! Let us completely screw up what’s left of normalcy for 6 year old kids so that we can continue to mollycoddle the 2% of the population that happens to be gay.

    Seriously, STFU!

  • http://rightontheleftcoast.wordpress.com/ missplace

    Princesses are not like normal spouses. They have the obligation to produce an heir, and usually, a spare. When you can do that with two princesses, then we can talk about having princesses marry another princess.
    And hey, isn’t insisting that princesses should marry other princesses class discrimination?

  • TVree

    Ain’t it finally time for libtards to let kids be kids and stop trying to indoctrinating them?

    • Pat

      I thought they wanted to abort children, even after their born. Damn, liberals are so confusing.

  • The Apostle

    Hannity actually likes this freak. Said so himself on his radio program last week.

    • brewerandpatriot

      Perhaps he mistook her for Justin Bieber.

  • Marvin Nelson

    Walt Disney must be spinning in his grave just hearing talk of same-sex couples in children’s movies. All I can say is EEEEWWWWW, the thought of it grosses me out.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    It’s time for a Disney movie where the princess marries her father.

    Love is love.

  • Kvinna

    Ugh!

  • Michael Rice

    Love is Love? So, libs, you okay with the idea of me divorcing my wife and marrying my 18 year old daughter? Well, she will be 18 in a few months…but that is besides the point. If not, why not? I thought love is love. Is it wrong? Why? Who are you to judge? Is it gross…well right back at you..

    • Bklynnygirl

      That’s coming, their now looking to normalize pedophilia.

      An article from left-wing British paper The Guardian titled ‘Pedophilia: Bringing Dark Desires to Light’. The article’s author John Henley discussed various lines of research on the brains of pedophiles, and described how there is a ‘growing conviction, notably in Canada, that pedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality.

    • WhoDat

      Go for it. Just when you have kids, they might come out deformed.

      • Calcat36

        Why is that? Using YOUR lack-of-thought process, love only matters, right? Now why are you drawing a line in the DNA?

      • ERMERGERD

        That would take generations of inbreeding.

        • Calcat36

          He knows, ER, he is the product of said inbreeding.

  • CR

    This is what drives me INSANE about lefties.
    Every time they gain an inch, they take a mile.

    They aren’t content to just leave gay people in peace. No, the entirety of society has to celebrate the choice (including Christian florists and bakers) and the homosexual agenda has to be celebrated in every facet of our lives.

    They do this with everything.
    It’s not enough to force a health insurance program on the public that no one wants, they also need to make sure that health insurance program forces nuns to buy contraception.

    It’s not enough that you can abort a baby for any reason up until 20 weeks (or 26 weeks depending upon where you live), there must be complete and unfettered access to abortion at your nearest grocery store with no questions asked even if you are 12.

    No normal people behave like this.

    And then they wonder why we don’t trust them on “gun control…”

    • WhoDat

      Allowing two people to be married regardless of their gender has nothing to do with healthcare reform or abortion.

      • CR

        As usual, a liberal has trouble with advanced concepts.

        It is the pattern and practice of the left to continually force everyone to celebrate the things that the left believes are right, regardless of the fact that other people might have their own perfectly valid opinions.

        The point I was making, for those smart enough to make connections, is that leftists do the same on all other issues as well. That’s how “safe legal and rare” becomes “abortions for everyone!”

        The left always starts with a small demand that theoretically seems reasonable, like giving homosexuals the right to get married. And then, it becomes, let’s push gay marriage in kids movies; get people fired if they perhaps object to gay marriage; and sue Christian florists who don’t want to do flowers for a gay wedding (WHY? Why not just go to a different florist?)

        I could give numerous other examples of how liberals do this but there’s no point in wasting time with you.

        • WhoDat

          Change “homosexuals” to “Negroes” and it could have been written in the 50s.

          Gay people can get fired just for being gay in most states, in case you didn’t know.

          People can’t deny services to minorities just because they’re minorities.

          • Calcat36

            Tell that to your ME-ssiah who is forcing Christians to go against their faith and see how far that gets you, as a heterosexual (normal), black/white/brown, and then get back to us.

          • WhoDat

            Where is Obama forcing someone to go against their faith?

          • Calcat36

            Nice try troll.
            Ask the Pope.
            Or the Bishops who are speaking out against your ME-ssiah’s filth of an errorcare plan.
            Or the nuns he has threatened.

            Oh yeah, you only watch MSDNC…

          • WhoDat

            They’re all exempt from the BC mandates if they file for a religious exemption.

          • Calcat36

            So now you display your ignorance again for all to see! Try reading the court documents… Something about third party is mentioned, stoopid.

            WhoDat Calcat36
            • 2 minutes ago

            They’re all exempt from the BC mandates if they file for a religious exemption.

          • Bklynnygirl

            White House urges Supreme Court to reject nuns’ “Little Sisters of the Poor” appeal for birth control exemption.

            http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/3/obama-urges-supreme-court-reject-nuns-appeal-contr/?page=all.

          • OpenTheDoor

            Why do you need to file for an exemption to be covered by the Bill of Rights?

          • Calcat36

            Because we have progressed to 1984?

          • mike_in_kosovo

            The book, not the year….

          • Roto ✓Intentionally Left Blank

            Little Sisters of the Poor v. Sebelius, Sec. of H&HS (SCOTUS application 13A691)

            Little Sisters of the Poor 1, Sebelius 0.

          • CR

            People cannot deny services to minorities if those minorities fall within a protected class e.g. services cannot be denied on the basis of race, religion, gender or national origin.

            Homosexuality is not a protected class. That is why people can be fired for being gay.

            There are a few fundamental differences between homosexuality and race/gender/religion/national origin. E.g. people don’t have to announce their sexuality to the whole world. Outside of the protected classes, a business or employer can discriminate on the basis of anything they wish. A business could fire someone or refuse to serve someone because they don’t like his politics, his appearance, the shirt he’s wearing, etc. Why do homosexuals get special protection?

            There’s another important point here as well. The 1st amendment explicitly protects freedom of religion. Religious business owners should not have to go against their religion to provide services for a homosexual wedding.

            When the government interferes with a person’s right to freedom of religion (like by forcing that person to provide services for a homosexual marriage), an undue burden test is applied because the Constitution guarantees free exercise of religious beliefs. This means that there must be an overwhelming state interest & that the restrictions must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

            I find it very difficult to believe that anyone could argue that a business owner should be forced to go against longstanding and fundamental religious beliefs because a gay couple cannot just find another florist.

          • NRPax

            Gay people can get fired just for being gay in most states, in case you didn’t know.

            A statement that already was proven wrong in an earlier discussion. Heck, even Snopes wouldn’t back it up.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            C’mon…do you *really* expect Whodat to actually *research* his…ahem… “Talking Points Memo” (seewhutididthere) after getting it?

          • NRPax

            Of course not. When he’s acting irrationally, he ignores all inconvenient questions and moves on to the next talking point. Doesn’t stop me from having fun with my snark level.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            You can almost see him checking them off one-by-one as he uses them…

          • drw

            Good point, because the repression of the negroes in the 50’s has so much similarity to the plight of 21st century abnormals. I mean it has to, right? Because equality and stuff? It’s not like the abnormals are trying to destroy an institution or anything. They aren’t demanding that we re-define the cornerstone of civilization, what the vast majority of the worlds population throughout history has held sacred so they can get a tax break or something are they? They certainly don’t expect their chosen lifestyle to be celebrated and held superior by the children of people who have their own beliefs and sense of morality that may disagree with theirs. The abnormals wouldn’t think to stoop so low as to compare the plight of a repressed race to a disagreement over the definition of the relationship between (insert value) “consenting” adults?
            Your argument is specious at best, there is no comparison, no similarity, the negroes of the 50’s wanted, rightfully, to be considered as equal individuals citizens of this country. They didn’t demand that we celebrate them, merely recognize them as human beings with all of the rights inherent in that description and commensurate with the long established values of a free civilization.

          • mike_in_kosovo

            Gay people can get fired just for being gay in most states, in case you didn’t know.

            Twaddle.

      • Roto ✓Intentionally Left Blank
    • Richard Jefferies

      That’s because no matter how much ground they gain they can’t completely rid themselves of the emptiness they feel.

  • Katie Shafer

    i really hope disney sticks to what made them the company they are when it comes to making their movies…

    FYI – Frozen is NOT the first movie where the princess doesn’t marry the prince, have they never seen Aladdin or Tangled???
    …sorry that was bugging me…

    • waltzingmtilda

      That was bugging me too! And lets not forget how Belle saves the Beast with her love.

      Most of the Disney princesses are very strong characters that overcome adversity, and so what if they get married in the end?

      I could write 8 paragraphs about this but I won’t. :)

    • unknown

      Or how about The Princess and The Frog where, despite the title, the two end up running a five-star restaurant (the “princess” and her father’s dream) rather than living a royal life.

      • Katie Shafer

        oh yeah forgot about that one….i don’t own it so i haven’t seen that much!
        Sally needs to brush up on her Disney movies because despite what she thinks they all aren’t the same!

  • Isaac Clark

    Isn’t time for two princesses to marry?

    Toure says: “Love is love.”

    Now I really didn’t want to have to say this but, when you take love is love, add it to the idea that Disney should be portraying all kinds of families, let’s just say:
    If Disney decides to make a Hansel and Grettel cartoon, Hansel and Grettel (brother and sister) get married at the end? Love is love is it not?

    That’s why “love is love,” and “Marry who you love,” are stupid things to say when talking about marriage equality.

    • Maxwell

      It’s annoying to point this out to Libs. They can’t comprehend the slippery slope that comes from saying “Love is love, so let’s legalize gay marriage.”

      … come to think of it, Libs really can’t see the slippery slope in anything.

  • Richard Jefferies

    Why don’t you make a movie where two princesses marry. Why does Disney have to placate you. Oh, because you are liberals and you don’t produce anything.

    Weren’t the Disney princesses the poster children for feminist 2-minutes hate. Now they are pining that Disney won’t placate them. Schizophrenia is bad, mmmmmkay.

  • Hot_wings

    Uhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmm……..no.

  • FreedomFighter

    The liberal and progressive ideology is rated R.

  • Gregg Hammerquist

    *Facepalm* I just love how they all ignore that a lot of the early Princess may have been rescued by a prince but that didn’t mean they were worthless. Snow White, Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty all grew up working for the living. Beyond that they were kindly and loving; is that worth nothing.

    • Roto ✓Intentionally Left Blank

      “… growing up and working for a living” is completely against liberal ideology.
      :-)

  • Richard Jefferies

    Maybe Disney should have a princess who flees the Kingdom to get an abortion and pursued by her evil Republican father. I’m sure libs would wet themselves with joy over that.

    I’ve got a better one. Maybe Disney can make a princess who sends troops into the lands to confiscate anything that might be considered a weapon, and then dispatches aggressive tax collectors. Wouldn’t’ that be a great movie, Sally?

  • disqus_RkyOrjAAu0

    Does she also think they should make one where the princess gets an abortion. We know how much she loves those

    • Richard Jefferies

      Oh, let’s make one called the Princess and the Pink Shoes. Princess Wendy converts the dungeon into an abortion/infanticide clinic. After all, we can’t have too many people dependent on the crown, now can we?

  • YesterdayzNewz

    I know, I know…The Flatcocker’s

  • Kathy Ann

    Does anyone else think that @sallykohn just says this crap to keep her name in the spotlight?

    • MartiniShark

      Either that, or she’s just incapable of rationality in general. Earlier this week she was complaining about the lack of enough blacks getting nominated for Oscars, and she then said conservatives had to answer for this slight!
      That’s a special kind of oblivious.

      • sambar2

        Ha! That’s classic.

      • Kathy Ann

        She cares about attention – nothing else. The only way she can get it is by saying outrageous and hurtful things, and she makes the most of it.

    • gracepmc

      Sally Kohn shot out of the OWS cannon and has been desperate to be relevant ever since. It’s almost painful to watch.

    • Chevypowered

      Yes and yes.

  • MartiniShark

    I have a novel thought for Ms. Kohn: Rather than suggesting what Disney should do, why not go ahead and produce this kind of product yourself? Fund it, produce it, market it, and deliver the property if you truly believe this is a viable product in the market place. Or are you more comfortable having somebody else place their capital at risk for your whims?

    • Chevypowered

      Exactly. They know it will fail and fail miserably. Sure critics will sing it’s high praises but in the end, the numbers will speak for themselves and will be the ultimate equalizer.

      • MartiniShark

        And that’s why her post was not, “I’LL make the princess-princess film!”
        Far easier to demand others provide her demanded entertainment.

  • ERMERGERD

    No. Kay, glad we settled that.

    • Calcat36

      EMERGERD, to the point! +10!

  • syvyn11

    Sally, just do a google search for ‘disney princesses and ‘rule 34” and you’ll get princess on princess to your hearts content.

    • Richard Jefferies

      LOL

  • http://example.com/ SwiperTheFox

    I don’t really get the big deal here. Have Princes with Princesses. Have two Princes with each other. Have Princesses with each other.

    That’s the free market. People do what they want, and different studios, companies, etc make different things. Whatever sells the best succeeds the most.

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      If Disney pumps Millions of dollars into a movie like this and it fails, you think they’re gonna keep doing it, until it makes them a profit? The definition of Insanity….Of course, when their movie studios go bankrupt, they still have their Amusement Parks and Resorts to fall back on… Understaaannddd?
      Jawamax 8<{D}

      • Chevypowered

        Exactly. People like Sally love the rewards without the risks. That is why they love to force others to do their will. If it works, all fun and swell. However if it fails then whomever they forced into submission did not try hard enough.

  • praymorenow1

    Isn’t it time NBC hires someone to host the evening news who isn’t whiter than white?
    Isn’t it time MSNBC hire someone to host a show in key prime time who is not whiter than white (I mean Chris & Rachel & Schultz have horrific ratings).
    Isn’t it time someone of color be the weekday male host of the morning shows?
    Isn’t it time the Academy Awards reflect the American public – which means over 1/2 of all nominations should be given to people who are not white, white or white……
    not just a few non-white nominations here & there periodically.
    Isn’t it time when a black female is hired to be a star on SNL, that isn’t news…..that only shows you how few black stars, non-white stars have been cast members……….
    Just asking……

  • Jack Deth

    Inquisitive Memo to Ms. Kohn:

    Isn’t it time you lost the “Opie” from ‘Andy of Mayberry’ look?

  • Maryland_Malcontent

    How about we have more kids programming where the female characters are actually strong-no more “tough on the outside but emotional trainwrecks on the inside” rot-and they have this strength without the male characters surrounding them having to be weaker and wimpier than Pajama Boy?

    Is that too much to ask?

    • Calcat36

      By that, you mean to challenge the liberals to empower women to become leaders without regard to gender? Or party affiliation?

      SEXIST!!!!!

  • c2

    Come, Lord Jesus!

  • Jay Stevens

    Eileen Bresnahan tweeted:

    ” Progressive lesbian princesses would abdicate their titles and work together to bring democracy to the kingdom.”

    They would need to. They wouldn’t be able to produce an heir/heiress.

    Actually, that is not quite accurate. It is theoretically possible for a female to asexually produce a female offspring through parthenogenesis.

  • brightshadows

    Life of Julia?

  • Ronald Green

    In answer to your stupid question, Sally… ummm… no.

  • HARP2

    Take 50 bucks out of petty cash and get a decent haircut.

  • Joseph O Morrow

    There are signs which the truly literate perceive as a nation on its last legs, and this is certainly one of them.

  • Charles Kunold

    I have written this hoodrat several times challenging her on some of her disgusting. comments. But I guess because i didn’t dumb it down.enough for her. I guess I forgot that skunka has a limited vocabulary. Sick, perverted, depraved, immoral, repulsive, ignorant, moronic, twisted, and idioitic
    But anyone who listen’s to her when FOX actually let’s her through the door knows she is a graduate of the Obama Institute for Mind Control and Manipulation for the Intellectually Challenged and Morally Bankrupt. She graduated magna cum laude.

  • RblDiver

    “And then the princess married the other princess and they lived happily ever after. Until they both died and their lines were extinct, causing two major civil wars as multiple parties vied for power. So everyone else was screwed. The end.”

  • Roto ✓Intentionally Left Blank

    Kohn probably wants Woody the cowboy to be the sperm donor. :rolleyes:

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      I’ll bet you could find a “Gay Buzz and Woody”/”Toy Story” send-up on YouTube, or somewhere on the interwebz…. Just sayin’… Jawamax 8<{D}

  • petroniabern

    I know this might be nitpicking and off-topic, but this isn’t the first Disney movie ever (especially if you count Brave, which I realise is Pixar) where the ‘princess’ (can we put, ‘heroine’, since they’re not all princesses anyway?) ‘solves the problem herself’. In several movies prior to this, the whole plot hinges on the heroine’s choices and strength of character (particularly in Beauty and the Beast), and often she’s not absolutely miserable, and without a life, until the prince sweeps her off her feet. Just saying, Frozen is not breaking a mold.

  • CO2 Producer

    Um…no, Sally. Disney’s likely more interested in making make a profit.

    • Chevypowered

      From the talk though it did seem like they were able to eek out a gay family? I have not seen the movie so I’m not sure if it’s true or not. If it is Disney may be testing the water.

  • PatriotRG

    Leave the children alone Sally – and oh yes f*ck you

  • Guest

    The book of Henoch describes a number of Heavens and several hells, including
    “a place of cruel bindings and terrible torments for the child-corruptors of the sodomitic tradition.”

  • MrApple

    No, it is not time for that.

  • Paige Jackson

    So much for their claims that they don’t have plans for our kids.

  • Danny Wheeler

    Shut up, Kohn! We don’t want you scaring the children!

  • Gallatin

    Sally Kohn
    @sallykohn
    Watching Frozen, it’s awesome. But come on @DisneyPictures ain’t it finally time for a kid’s film where the princess marries a princess?!

    sallie darling if you believe that there is a market for that kind of movie why don’t you spend YOUR money to write, cast, direct, produce and market? Why does Disney have to spend THEIR money?

  • Blake Waymire

    She probably wants Disney to do it because everyone else has failed miserably at it.

  • forgetyoutooo

    Sally, if the boy “princess” looks like you, the kiddies will never know the difference.

  • Julius500

    How about just watching movie for grown ups next time?

  • PeterP

    I’ve predicted this for years. The gay rights community doesn’t want mere equality, it wants adherence. Pretty soon men will be called homophobes for not felating their cute male neighbors.

  • Steve__Jacobson

    It isn’t the norm, never has been the norm, never will be the norm no matter how hard Kohn pushes the homosexual agenda.

  • Julescat

    so Disney should sink funds into a film that will appeal to 2% of the country?

    why don’t gays fund their own films?

  • R.C.

    Why stop there? If “love is love” (Toure) why not depict the princess marrying multiple women and while your at it throw in a few animals, because after all, “love is love”. Who are we to judge? Right?

    Slippery slope.

    • tops116 ✓Quipper

      Sounds increasingly like an al Qaeda fairy tale.

    • unknown

      Weren’t the two female characters in this movie sisters? Why not have them marry each other?

      • Anyone00

        I would do good business in Japan.

  • notenoughtime

    Let’s leave the social agenda out of our children’s lives since they deserve better from adults! Life is complicated enough that we should embrace the innocence of children’s lives for as long as possible! Enough of the population is screwed up already!

  • DallenH

    In the 2012 census, under 4% of the population identified themselves as gay.

  • Pedro

    No, Sally. It’s not. While “society” seems to be increasingly non-judgemental regarding homosexuality- there is nothing “gay” about it. It started out with homosexuals just asking to be tolerated… you know, out of the closet. Now, they insist on being celebrated. I say NO and will always say NO.

  • beachmom H

    Maybe it’s time for the homosexual activists to stop trying to force the lifestyle choice of 3% of the population on the rest of us?
    Make your own movie Sally, if you want to see different endings.

  • JT

    The left loves to pervert children.

  • Gothguy

    Let kids be kids and enjoy a movie!

  • OpenTheDoor

    Disney should make a movie about an irresponsible woman who abandons her husband and children while she pursues a higher degree.
    After earning the free degree she divorces the husband who paid for the education and gives up custody of the children so she could be free to pursue her drunken, drugged, promiscuous lifestyle.
    How great a movie would that be?

    • tops116 ✓Quipper

      Heh, I still remember when liberals were actively talking about making a movie of Wendy’s life. Your pitch is certainly more accurate.

      • rainman

        Liberals can’t make a positive movie, even about their own darlings. If it doesn’t spew hate and misinformation, they’re not interested.

        Seems they backed themselves in a corner with all their Palin hate, with SNL , Veep, HBO movies, they’ve convinced a large portion of their audience (men) that women are incompetent fools. It’s gonna be hard to change the narrative for Killary and Windy.

    • HWarrior13

      I’d go see that movie, but it would have to be in the fiction genre, because no one would believe that anyone in the real world who would do all that and then would than actually have the audacity to run for high office….too unbelievable.

  • TTTCOTTH

    Now that would be a “Fairy” tale, wouldn’t it?

    • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

      BUBBLE GUM CIGAR WINNER!!! Jawamax 8<{D}

      • HWarrior13

        Hey, I didn’t know that there were prizes involved for best comment
        : – /

        • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

          Can’t give out Real Cigars, tho’…You know, the Safety Nazis, or something… XD Jawamax 8<{D}

  • NickGranite

    Yeah, great business decision. How many families would take their young children to see Disney lesb*an princesses? YOU produce it Sally.

  • tops116 ✓Quipper

    Hey, if they made it a good story, I’d be all for it. Unfortunately, many writers in Hollywood have long demonstrated that they lack the ability to craft interesting stories around hot-button topics and instead use the movies as a soapbox to badger people. Movies about soldiers shaken by war, for example, could be compelling, but Stop Loss and other anti-Iraq War movies were garbage because the makers got consumed by their politics.

    Besides, Sally, why focus on fiction? You should be more concerned with how the current president is only “open to the idea” of gay marriage and still to the right of Dick Cheney on the issue.

    By the way, in the interests of being progressive, I would like to see a movie ends with a woman feeling she’s no longer a lesbian and instead marries a man. Besides, it’d be great just because GLADD would flip the hell out over it.

  • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

    First of all Sally, that’s the way Disney Pictures/Disney Animation has ALWAYS done things…The TRADITIONAL WAY! (e.g. Prince meets Princess, saves her from Peril/impending doom, they fall in love, get married, and live happily ever after. Rinse, repeat…) They have stuck to this successful formula for better than seventy-five years, and IT WORKS! So, why should they change it now? For the purpose of introducing modern Politics to children who may not understand it, and will end up asking their parents (and maybe a high-priced Shrink) questions about it for the next few decades? I think this Whack-A-Mole has taken too many Mallet shots to the head… Jawamax 8<{D}

  • DirigoMark

    “Watching Frozen, it’s awesome.” The real outrage here is that she’s tweeting in the theater. Turn off the phone!

  • Jim Denney

    More perversion masquerading as liberalism….

  • Stephen L. Hall #NonquamTrump

    . . . and then we can have a movie where Prince Charming marries his horse.

  • jdubya_az

    Perhaps she should sue Disney to force them into making a movie like others have sued to get a wedding cake or a photographer…
    Why doesn’t this idiot and her colleagues put together their own money and make a movie?
    Oh, that’s right, whiners are untalented and losers in life…

    • Hillary’s Lies Matter

      Like most libs, Kohn thinks because she says it, it will happen
      Look at Jugs, he believes the more he talks, the more hell get what he wants. I do believe that delusion is inherent.

  • unknown

    I wonder if Sally knows you can find all that already on Internet

  • ogama843

    Nah lets show kids the natural biological way to have babies first.

  • Axelgreaser

    PLUTO AND GOOFY SHARING A HOT LOVE SCENE!? I can’t wait to see what becomes of the child this androgyny fashions into adulthood, along with her partner, with whom she actually shares a child. For fear of being censored, I can say no more except that anytime I read the fantastical musings of Kohn the mind races and sputter’s. There really is no way to respond to this left of the universe progressive curio.

  • junkbondtrader41

    Anyone remember how raucously Jerry Falwell was ridiculed for his newsletter’s suggestion that one of the Teletubbies was encouraging and mainstreaming homosexuality to kids? Can someone explain to me the difference here?

    Anyone ready to admit Falwell was probably right?

  • Bill Gryan

    I like how the liberal’s knee-jerk reaction is a call for someone else to make the movie that supports their agenda. Why don’t you make the movie, Sally? And while you’re at it, can you make a movie about a family of friendly Christian penguins who own guns?

    • Jocon307

      That’s what I was thinking, it’s never about what they can do, it’s always about forcing someone else to do something that person doesn’t want to do.

      But I’m not sure about the penguins with guns, aren’t their arms kind of short for that?

      • Bill Gryan

        To be fair, I only said “own”, not “shoot”. A few years ago, someone wrote a children’s book about gay penguins. While their arms may be short, it sounds like they’re otherwise well-endowed enough to attract a penguin of the same sex. And I’m sure we’ll somehow be required to pay for their birth control even though they can’t procreate.

  • ashknothole

    That counts for deep thinking on the shallow left.

  • anjullyn

    Ain’t it finally about time for this minority to shut-up?

  • TocksNedlog

    Rated G-spot

    • mfrazee29

      Now that’s low! HAHA

  • rebjava

    Separated at birth: Sally Kohn and Dolph Lundgren.

    • Ruth

      That would explain Sally’s adam’s apple.

  • TocksNedlog

    This gives a whole new meaning to “The Sword in the Stone”.

  • Mackie

    Not exactly the majority of Americans fantasy to see a same sex marriage. If you want to make such a film, be my guest but the market is a bit weak.

  • chetnapier

    Isn’t that what michelle obama did?

  • mfrazee29

    You gotta love how liberals who have no intention of ever having children are such experts about telling the rest of the world how to raise their children and what is appropriate to show them. Let them raise their own children and we’ll see how those poor mixed up kids turn out.

    • Paige Jackson

      HEY, now. They’re fertility-challenged. Show some sensitivity.

      /sarc

  • Zathras11 @B5

    I agree with her.

    And it will finally expose Disney for the evil company (all wrapped up in a pretty package) that they are.

  • Pat Loudoun

    “Love is Love”! Because all the cum-drenched antics in an AIDS-ridden San Francisco bathhouse was the equivalent of a sunny June wedding.

    • Pawtrax

      You’ve got a pretty vivid imagination there! Unless…

      • Pat Loudoun

        Oh look. A liberal who won’t admit how AIDS got it’s start in the 80’s.

        Entirely predictable.

        • Pawtrax

          Since you seem to have some intimate knowledge of “cum-drenched antics” perhaps you’d like to enlighten me?

          • rainman

            Pawtrax
            Stop acting like you really don’t know what happened in those bath houses. You didn’t have to go there to find out, it was well documented. The attendees felt no shame in going there, and if cell phones had been around, the internet would be full of examples of said antics.
            Why are you trolling?
            BTW, it’s always the tolerant liberals who try to shut up their opponents with homophobic innuendo.

          • Belinda Henry

            Was in an Atlantic City Hotel and saw up close and personal how the homosexual males act out. Not pretty, gonna have to say no to gay Disney.

          • Pawtrax

            Sorry to seem so naive, lorraine! I am certain Pat would agree with me that neither of us would ever be so reductive as to equate ALL homosexual relationships to “cum-drenched antics” or to equate ALL heterosexual relationships to “a sunny June wedding.” I know I can speak for Pat who, as a man of the world, recognizes that BOTH homosexuals and heterosexuals engage in a wide array of sexual and romantic relationships, from the “cum-drenched” to the “sun-soaked.” (Unless, of course, Pat has fallen under the thrall of the duel, demon influences of gay pornography and Disney animated fantasies!)

            That said, I remain curious: Are you saying that the “cum-drenched antics” Pat is so intimately aware of are well-documented or are you suggesting that there is a “document” called “Cum-Drenched Antics,” that you could make available for further research?

            Let me know and sorry again for the confusion!

          • Pat Loudoun

            Well, let’s see. I can read?

            Seriously, how could you have lived the last 30 years without stumbling across the truth about Aids?

  • bodysouls

    Hey Sally isn’t it about time YOU stop forcing YOUR lifestyle down people’s throats who do not agree with you? We are silent too long

  • http://politicallyincorrectcanadian.blogspot.ca/ Reverend Ken

    This nutcase needs time in a mental institution.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmSIOoy6MlE&app=desktop Booker

    My money goes to my values.

  • DeadlockVictim

    I take it Miss Kohn hasn’t watched much hentai.

  • Leslie Lesaroo

    Sally, stop being a whiner and trying to guilt others to produce something you want. No one believes you really mean what you say when all you do is pitch little fits. If you think it’s time for such a movie, make it yourself, crybaby. It’s a free country…no one is stopping you. But no, all you do is sit and whine.

  • CLEmom

    Ummm, no, Sally, it is not .

    It is, however, well past the time to start asking, “Where are the freaking jobs??”

  • rainman

    Isn’t it about time that you liberals let parents decide when to expose their children to sex? Thanks to our last liberal president and the non-stop new coverage of his escapades, I had to explain to my very young daughter about oral sex, and why the president was doing it in the White House.

    Parents don’t need to worry about leaving a Disney movie with their 5 year old and having to explain gay sex. You don’t get to decide when is the right time, I do.

  • craigzimmerman12

    Why is the homosexual rights movement so interested in destroying the innocence of children?

    • $84598387

      Then they can have their child lovers.
      Look what Disney does with their starlets? The little cute girls on Nickelodean, then they are in soft porn and violent films like Spring Breakers. Look at Disney darling Molly Cyrus the inbred.

  • $84598387

    Kohn and those like her are sick ugly human beings.

  • pbtruth

    It probably is time to have Disney do a prince on prince story. Then every Mom and Dad can explain just what acts of perversion are. When in the closing scene you see them plant a kiss on each other inside a heart as the camera pulls away until the heart becomes the “d” in “the end”!!!

    • mike_in_kosovo

      “the “d” in “the end”!!!”

      No, that’s the NC-17 version…. ;oP

  • AtomicMountain

    No.

  • CLL

    Uh, no! It is NOT time for a princess to marry a princess in a DISNEY movie!! Jesus is NOTHING sacred????

  • traffic_robot

    Just let her review children’s movies. Seems more her speed.

  • Sturmritter

    Anything that Sally approves of, is a signal for me to avoid it like the plague. Sorry Disney, Times are tough.

  • marion vega

    then what. we’d have to seek permission to make/ watch a normal movie?

  • right_on

    Look what happens when militant lesbians get empowered…they just can’t help trying to shove their “gay-ness” down our throats.

    Dear Homosexuals: I DON”T CARE about your sexuality, nor should you care about mine, (or at least that was your liberal masters messages for the past forty or so years.) Why does the gay community feel the overwhelming need to make heterosexuals angry, and unhappy? Is it another case of projection, I wonder? Without the heterosexual community you so despise, YOU wouldn’t BE here.

  • jetch

    these left wing nutjobs just won’t be satisfied until the world is bombarded with a constant stream of their subliminal messages. if anyone had any doubts, here is your proof, these people are sick!!!
    if you’re still on the fence about what teachers unions, universities, gays, hollywood and left wing politicians are doing to our kids, just listen to what this nutjob wants and why!

  • gold7406

    hey sally, I guess you’re waiting for the ads:
    viagra with two men
    therapeutic mattress with two women

    bath wash with two women in the shower
    trojan gel with two women

    most of the left are all for this in the abstract, when they start to see the actual ads on tv they will freak out, just like everyone else.

  • Jay Jay

    Well it’s actually not the first film a princess didn’t marry a prince. I guess it’s too long back to remember Tangled and Aladdin. Snow White, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty and the Little Mermaid were folk tales and stories written in a society not nearly as screwed up and stupid as ours is today. I don’t put the idea past the present CEO but it will not get a dime of my money and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone.

  • FGCU_James

    Having seen Frozen, it is a different take on the “true love saves the day” line that Disney flicks tend to be about, but certainly not in a bad way. Nothing wrong with (spoiler alert) the source of the love being from a family member, rather than an outside love interest. And another spoiler, the guy who runs the general store/sauna in the mountains appeared to be gay (when he introduced his family, the adult in the sauna was a guy, and didn’t look similar enough to be a brother/other family member), so technically, Disney already had a gay character in a very major picture.

    Regardless, it is Disney’s choice of whether or not to include a gay prince/princess in their movies, that is their prerogative, as is our decision to watch such a movie.

    If I remember correctly, there was a similar rejoicing by the libs when the prince & princess in “The Princess and The Frog” were revealed to be black, but the movie never made it out to be a big deal, their skin color didn’t enter into the equation, unlike the people who screamed over it.

    In much the same way, folks like Sally Kohn demanding a gay princess/prince don’t care about making a good movie, rather, they care about advancing a certain worldview, one which, IMO, is not something kids should be concerned with.

    • unknown

      I think the only time when race was brought up in The Princess and The Frog” was when the main female lead was told even if she raised enough money to buy the lot needed for her restaurant, she would not get it “given her background” (I think that was the quote) and that was as subtle as it got.

  • des111168

    “Isn’t it time a Disney princess marries a princess?”

    Only in hell.

  • ZH38

    See, it does not stop with same-sex marriage. These cultural sodomites want to drag everything and everyone into their cesspool of filth with them.

    Sick and disgusting.

  • ZH38

    Sally looks like the dude who played drums in The Police. What’s his name?

    • Cantbelieveyouthinkthis

      Stewart Copeland, and I thought it was a dude, just named Sally.

  • Donna

    Can’t stand to look at this “woman” She has to have mental issues.

  • Ryan Johnson

    Leave the kids movies alone. Kids entertainment is the last bastion of freedom from the gay agenda.

    • defiant12314

      true mate, I watched Despicable Me 2 Last weekend…… great film and SO pro family

  • https://twitter.com/UnicornOfMayhem Hi This Is My Username

    If love is love, why does it matter what kind of couples Disney has in their movies, Sally?

    • https://twitter.com/UnicornOfMayhem Hi This Is My Username

      Really? I got a down vote for using the “love is love” argument against a Liberal? Someone is angry.

      In the off chance it was a misunderstanding, I added Sally’s name to it to be more direct.

      • Cantbelieveyouthinkthis

        There up voted ya. I got what you were saying that there isn’t a need for a same sex marriage if love is love. It’s all good. On the bright side you know that person knee jerked so fast that they broke their jaw when they down voted ya.

        • https://twitter.com/UnicornOfMayhem Hi This Is My Username

          Thank you.

  • vdetillion

    I THINK DISNEY WANTS TO GO BANKRUPT REALLY FAST

  • TocksNedlog

    Cinder-Wants-To-Be-A-Fella

  • Charles Kunold

    Sally, Sally. Sally….no one cares what you think. But then again, we never did. All you are doing is imposing your lifestyle on everyone else. Let’s legislate it! ObamNuts can issue an order mandating that Disney produce such a film so jerks like you can see once again how the LGBT legislates change instead of letting people decide for themselves. But that’s war extreme radical left wing socialists fools do. And Sally, you fit the bill. Finally, if being ugly was a disease you’d be on life support with no hope of recovery

  • kateorjane

    Just what the Disney folks are looking for – pandering to a hysterical minority and offending the majority

  • Freethinker01

    Despite your sexual preferences, Sally, there is a huge portion of our society that still believes that homosexual behavior is abnormal behavior and don’t want their children exposed to your sexual proclivities.
    You can push your sexual mores in adult sitcoms all you want. When you start messing with people’s kids, you’re gonna get the horns.

  • Zachary Goldberg

    Just do it…Disney has already hindered any chance of me buying their merchandise with “Gay Day” now give me an excuse to not buy any more films.

  • Kathy Horner Somers

    Who would watch it?

  • FeralFemale

    NO NO NO NO!

    Look, I don’t give a flying flip about whether someone is gay or not gay.

    I believe love is love. Which means the only difference between gay love and hetero love is the sex. And people do NOT want to be explaining that particular difference to their young children and they shouldn’t be forced to until they feel their child is ready for it. Such things do NOT belong in a children’s movie.

  • Thom Harris

    So she wants Disney to commit business suicide just to make her happy. Are we being that narcissistic? Well she is a liberal.

  • jamson64

    He’s scary looking.

  • Sean P Hamilton

    Shouldnt the Pricess marry who she wants to, not what mkes Sally Kohn Happy? Is Sally Kohn settingthe standards now?

  • JCRocks

    The answer would be a resounding “No f***ing way”. Sally, we tolerate you but that doesn’t mean we should promote your lifestyle to our children.

  • Mimi Mayes

    Sally is one of many resident LWNJ ‘contributors’ who have made FoxNews unwatchable. *CLICK*

  • JonInVA

    These degenerates are the definition of crazy – they don’t realize they’re crazy precisely because they’re crazy. Progress, in their warped minds, is mankind always acting towards and capitulating to, their most base instincts, cravings, desires, and unfortunately, their lunacies. Nine gazillion personality traits or human behaviors classified as some form of mental illness or at least psychological imbalance, from children to old people, that are treated with psychiatry, psychology and/or meds. But men wanting men or women wanting women, in direct contradiction of biological and physiological reality, is considered “normal” and “love”. Sheesh.

  • James McEnanly

    I find it more interesting that a Disney villain is shown turning to the Dark side, and then back to the Light. Previously, they’ve been irredeemably evil, and usually for no other reason than to give the heroes and heroines a chance to do something heroic.This makes for a more interesting story

  • http://wingedpanther.wordpress.com/ WingedPanther73

    Let’s think about this for a minute: how many prepubescent girls have any sense of sexuality? I’m guessing it’s close to 0. The target audience is girls between kindergarten and 3rd grade. I think it’s safe to say that all of them still associate their dreams with finding a prince, not a princess. But don’t worry, after a few more years, public education will have “fixed” that.

    • Pawtrax

      Are you suggesting that dreaming of “finding a prince” is not related to “sexuality”?

      • http://wingedpanther.wordpress.com/ WingedPanther73

        In that age range, yes.

        Are you suggesting that girls between the ages of 6 and 10 have a concept of sexuality that in any way resembles that of a teenager or an adult?

        • Pawtrax

          Ok. But it appears you also think that a girl dreamimg of “finding a princess” is somehow related to sexuality. Is that the case?

          • http://wingedpanther.wordpress.com/ WingedPanther73

            I think the push for Disney showing a princess finding her

            princess is about pushing alternative sexualities.

          • Pawtrax

            Sure, but that’s not what you wrote. You said zero prepubescent girls have a sense of sexuality.

            My point is that a third grade girl, to use your understanding of Disney’s target audience, who pines for Prince Charming is expressing as much a sense of sexuality as a third grade girl dreaming of a Princess Charming.

            Either they both have a sense of sexuality or neither of them do.

            The reason you’re not offended at the underlying sexuality at work in Disney movies about young girls finding princes is because they tend to evoke an idealized, platonic sense of love–devoid of explicit sexuality, even though it’s obviously present as subtext.

            There is no reason why a Disney movie about a young girl finding a princess couldn’t do the same.

          • http://wingedpanther.wordpress.com/ WingedPanther73

            I don’t think there’s an underlying sexuality in a girl seeking a Prince Charming at that young age. However, the ideas that a girl entertains at a very young age DO impact how she’s going to think about sexuality as she hits puberty.

            Understand, I do not believe homosexuality is genetic, but rather is the result of numerous small choices made early in life, especially around puberty. I see introducing ideas that will promote homosexual thinking to very young girls as a grave disservice to them. The fact that adults are seeking to introduce these ideas to impressionable young girls is disturbing to me, because it introduces the types of thinking that may encourage girls to think of themselves as lesbians as they enter puberty.

            I’m sure the idea that Sally Kohn had is that lesbians would like to be validated, but I suspect that by the time a girl is old enough to identify as a lesbian, she’s pretty much over Disney.

          • http://wingedpanther.wordpress.com/ WingedPanther73

            Either you didn’t understand my most recent post, or you disagree with me on the potential influence.

  • Howard Roark

    So when a princess marries a princess which one is treated like THE princess?
    Asking for a friend

  • LordElrond09

    Talk about living in your own idiotic world. I can see that discussion with the financiers of such a movie I think it would set a record for lowest box office gross ever

  • Phoenix

    Uh, NO! Kids do not need the gay lifestyle SHOVED down their throats, no one does. I could care less what someone does in the privacy of their own home, I don’t want to see it, hear about or be forced to watch it.

  • ProLifeDynasty

    We boycotted dismal world when we found out about their homosexual, pro-abort agenda (fightpp.org). The rat sucks!

  • John

    Sally.

    You’re nuts.

    Over and out.

  • Native SpiritWarrior

    they should, when a princess can biologically have two parents of the same sex, but then again everything is up to being redefined to whatever feels good now.

  • HoneyTree EvilEye

    Make that film and watch nobody go see that film. The 3% or less of society that is “gay”(more than half I’d say swing both ways) and then the other…20% or so who back them(Not sure why none of them understand gays can marry all day, gay marriage isn’t illegal) will maybe go watch it, but that flick will crash.

  • georgiadee

    Does she think wearing a suit makes her look smarter or more dude-like??

  • PatriotRG

    why ? how about its not time now and it never will be time Sally . Leave the children alone – indoctrinating then in to believing what you do is usual is simply not true however much you think it is. Gays like you are a very small fraction of the population insignificantly small – you just make a lot of noise. So shut it.

  • PatriotRG

    i would say 3% of the population being gay is un usual in a statistical sense . Why would one want to portray a rare event such as lesbian couples being together as normal to a child ? Logically it doesnt make sense. Its a stupid self serving opinion.

  • disqus_eric

    Disney girl on girl action, yeah!

    Disclaimer: Someone hijacked by disqus account. I’m not me. Really.

  • ojfl

    Simple answer with no additional explanation: no.

  • higgy01

    The majority of the people in this country, including California, voted against same sex marriage. Then the warped left wing liberal democrat appointed judges decided they knew more than We the People and reversed the decision we made. They basically made this perversion legal although many of us will never recognize it.

  • Biff_Maliboo

    Another nudge toward Peak LGBT…

  • GulfPundit

    It’s time for an obnoxious minority of less than 3% of the population to stop annoying the sh^t out of the rest of the country.

  • Cool Ranch, Texas

    While we may not think about them nor fully understand why we follow them in a particular instance, we tend to use the ways learned from the lessons of others’ experience.

  • j95lee

    A gay Disney movie (regardless of quality) is going to flop anywhere outside of North America. It might be banned in some places.

    Why not be even more ahead of the time and make a family film about polygamy, bestiality, and cross dressers? The answer is obvious.

    • Richard Jefferies

      A portly, androgynous, minority princess in a polyamorous relationship with an epicene man and a butch she-male.

  • muslimmustgo

    They want to know why they are so disliked,this is why!! They just can’t be satisfied with more unwarranted “civil rights” and just go away,they have to force their degenerate lifestyle upon everyone that disagrees with them,they have to demoralize our children with their sick,inhuman activities!! Their ultimate goal is to make their twisted,sub-human idiosyncrasy’s the norm and heterosexuality the corrupted lifestyle!

  • Chad G. Singer

    Dear Mr. Kohn, while we all appreciate your wanting to see two disney princesses get married, I should point out that Internet rule #34 says A. It has already happened, and B. Is available from google. Now leave us alone.

  • dave dykstra

    Hey Sally, feel free to start your own business, create your own princess character and have her marry another princess. Stop thinking the world evolves around you. Stop thinking people should do as you command. In a free market, if the owners believed he could make money from a lesbian princess, don’t you think he would make one?

  • fatalrob0t

    Since same sex couples cannot produce heirs to the throne, that would be ill-advised for their movies with royalty. Second, they do mostly fairytales and if they change the fairytale too much to be recognized for the original that it comes from then they alienate people who actually like the fairytale. Frozen actually has a similar premise to The Snow Queen in that an act of true love will thaw a frozen heart. Kai and Gerda were just replaced with Kristoff and the Snow Queen’s sister Anna and taking the Snow Queen in her early years.