Pallywood: Palestinian Women Devastated at the Loss of a Loved One in Gaza
BREAKING: Washington Post Writer Doesn't Read The Washington Post
A Constitutional Crisis of the Democrats' Making
Elon Musk Calls NPR CEO Katherine Maher 'One of the Worst Human Beings...
Check Out These Highlights of Columbia President Beclowning Herself During Congressional H...
President Joe Biden Warns the Israelis Not to Attack Israel
SPOILED: NYC Illegal Immigrant Complains Free Food, Housing Not Good Enough and Is...
Explaining Judge Stoner’s Verdict in the Dacia Lacey Baby ‘Smothering’ Case (A Deep...
President Biden Says Voters Have to Choose Freedom Over Democracy
CBP Account Warns of *Consequences for Entering US Illegally (*Yeah, About That...)
Biden's Baffling Brain-Rot, Mayorkas' Worst Day Yet
Where Is Pete? Josh Hawley Gets DAMNING Boeing Whistleblower Testimony
Oh, Honey, NO: NPR Host DRAGGED for Trying to Passive-Aggressively Dunk on Uri...
Breaking: 'Transgender' Student in Maryland Wrote 129-Page Manifesto, Planned to Shoot Up...
NPR Reporter Assures Us They’re Working Hard Broadcasting Moments of Joy and Insight

Lawrence O'Donnell, tweeters want Bible out of inauguration — or banned outright

On the heels of a recent rant by MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell calling for Barack Obama to remove the Bible from his inauguration, atheist tweeters and others are glomming on. Some are even taking it a step further and calling for the Bible to be banned entirely. This is a great window into the mind of O’Donnell’s particular corner of the religious-bigot Left. They find things in the Bible they don’t agree with — in O’Donnell’s case about homosexuality — and therefore think the entire book ought to be condemned and removed from public functions.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/ExquisiteIdea/status/291538192144924673

https://twitter.com/ArtLeverone/status/291364407555010560

A second media voice jumped in today in the person of CNN’s Dean Obeidallah. He was more restrained than O’Donnell and refrained from actually condemning and mocking the Bible, but he did say that the president should swear on the Constitution rather than the Bible for reasons of separation of church and state. Even that more reasoned argument goes over the edge of saying that religion — of any form — should be considered distasteful in civil functions. That’s a step too far for most people, who think of the Constitution as protecting their rights rather than muzzling them.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/bduff179/status/290824498842832896

There’s a White House petition for just about everything, including one to “have President Obama place his hands on something other than religious texts during the inauguration ceremony.” It suggests that Obama swear on either the Constitution or, curiously, “his immediate family’s shoulders” as a sign of solidarity to the secular community. It’s stalled at 30 signatures.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement