- Share on Facebook 1
-
1 SHARES
@DanFosterType NYT really needs to develop app for this
— Nino (@baldingschemer) September 10, 2015
Have you ever thought to yourself, “Gee, wouldn’t it be great if I could keep track of all the Jews, all in one place?” Well, the wait is over. The New York Times is here to help:
Via @DanFosterType, NYT has a helpful Jew column in its Iran deal roundup http://t.co/uekKumNuBn
— Michael C Moynihan (@mcmoynihan) September 10, 2015
No, it’s true:
The lawmakers against the Iran nuclear deal http://t.co/WsvuvPoczO pic.twitter.com/7TJaUzqW0Z
— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 10, 2015
Hey, thanks, New York Times! We knew we could count on you!
*clap*…*clap*…*clap*… pic.twitter.com/bXObEZKzGK
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
Jew Tracker 9000 is now my pet name for NYT. https://t.co/P0wDXh7KKf
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
My favorite part of the NYT Jew tracker is the part where specifically track how loyal to the political party the Jews are
— Political Math (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015
Ever wonder how loyal to America your Jewish senator is? The NY Times is here to help!
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) September 10, 2015
Oh good a list of politically problematic Jews. This is sure to come in handy. https://t.co/YrB49aljTa
— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) September 10, 2015
We’ll give the Times this much: They always manage to find a way to top themselves.
NYT keeping tabs of all those Jews and their Jew-y votes. Never know what Jewery they're up to http://t.co/Fpk8fjaX6v pic.twitter.com/oVhMic2Npu
— Political Math (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015
If you were wondering if Dems take the Jewish vote for granted, look no further than the NY Times list of Jews and Jewy districts.
— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) September 10, 2015
@SethAMandel GP And Jewy states, at least in the Senate version.
— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) September 10, 2015
Has the New York Times ever done something analogous with e.g. Black, Latino, Asian, etc. Congressmen? Just Jews? https://t.co/rMw41nLO30
— Lee Doren (@LDoren) September 10, 2015
NYTimes categorizes Senators as Jewish? or Not…for Iran vote. I can't wait for the Gay votes…. http://t.co/eieqMLIQBN
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 10, 2015
WITAF. https://t.co/hNtn6QH6fl
— sarah (@mamaswati) September 10, 2015
@TheBrandonMorse this NYT piece is pretty disgusting. Basically saying only Dem opposition is due to Jewish roots or jew pressure.
— Yaakov Labowitz (@yaakovlabowitz) September 10, 2015
This is a VERY misleading cropping of the list, since majority of lawmakers against the deal on it *aren't* Jewish https://t.co/2i84zpxHHg
— Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) September 10, 2015
Weird that the NYT decided to sort its list of Iran deal opponents by putting the minority of Jews on top, rather than going alphabetically
— Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) September 10, 2015
@Yair_Rosenberg @LoriLMarcus It makes them easier to separate on the train platform.
— Roy Abrams (@RQA) September 10, 2015
@nytimes @JewishJournal When did publishing lists of Jews come back into style?
— righteous axe (@righteousaxe) September 10, 2015
@nytimes Yellow marks seems appropriate for the dual-loyalty accusation being implied here.
— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015
.@mr_markjacobs Yeah, we're calling you out, @nytimes. The reason you ONLY put Jews in your box is….?
— Lori LowenthalMarcus (@LoriLMarcus) September 10, 2015
Get those lapel stars ready! @nytimes
— MBC (@MoonbatCatnip) September 10, 2015
@nytimes Have you picked out the stars you want them to wear yet?
— R Thomas (@Plate0fShrimp) September 10, 2015
@nytimes Why didn't you just mark them with the Star of David?
— NewEnglandDevil (@NewEnglandDevil) September 10, 2015
@LoriLMarcus @nytimes is not even trying to hide their institutional antisemitism any longer. Are they that ignorant? @Sulliview
— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015
@nytimes Sick that you're so fixated on whether people are Jewish. I thought we left this kind of thing in the 1940s.
— Julia Kite (@juliakite) September 10, 2015
The New York Times literally printed a list of Jews who did something it didn't like.
— Lee Doren (@LDoren) September 10, 2015
Yyyyup. What a crap show. https://t.co/cDE9rS475X
— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015
Time for a slogan update, don’t you think?
@TheBrandonMorse @politicalmath alternately, "All the Jews that's fit to print," because "The Jewspaper of record" could give the wrong idea
— Jason Hart (@jasonahart) September 10, 2015
***
Update:
‘It’s still disgusting’: NYT sneakily alters ‘Jew tracker’ piece, doesn’t fool anyone
