Shameful: Kids recruited to hold ‘pro-choice’ sign featuring wire hanger [pic]

The “pro-choice” Left has little regard for children — except, evidently, as tools. Protesters against Texas’ S.B. 5 bill have stooped to recruiting kids to peddle their sick pro-abortion message:

https://twitter.com/erin_nichols/status/351755707730755585

Horrifying.

https://twitter.com/forewit/status/351766313326239744

Prayers for these poor children.

***

Related:

Midnight chaos: Screaming pro-abortion mob disrupts Texas state legislature vote on SB 5

#TexasSpring: Morally bankrupt mob declares abortion screamfest the new Arab Spring

Sick: Ana Marie Cox sheds tears of joy for late-term abortion in Texas

  • Pulchritudinous

    Pro-choicers are probably saying the same thing when they see pro-lifers using children…

    • http://blog.khelek.us Brian Johnson

      I suppose the difference between a pro-lifer using a 5 year old and a pro-abortionist using a 5 year old is the pro-lifer doesn’t believe that killing the child 5 and a half years earlier is a-ok….

      Or, let’s look at it this way. A pro-lifer’s child is there because there are people who stand for life. Where are the children as a result of pro-abortion policies?

      • ThreeOranges

        They’re all around you. Because, of course, there are no pro-abortion policies, only pro-choice policies.

        • http://blog.khelek.us Brian Johnson

          “they’re all around you”

          Really? 56M children who have died as a result of pro-abortion policies are around me? Where?

          Because, of course, there are no pro-abortion policies, only pro-choice policies

          Cute. Trust me, if it were about choice, then the pro-abortion crowd wouldn’t have conniptions anytime there’s legislation such as the 20-week ban or other restrictions are brought up to lessen the number of abortions. Because they would value the choice of life as much as the choice for abortion. But no, instead, they want to make sure that abortions are as limitless and accessible as possible for any reason whatsoever. Because somehow having the ability to kill your unborn child is empowering or something.

          • zj sky

            “Because, of course, there are no pro-abortion policies, only pro-choice policies”

            This is what offends me in this whole debate. If you support a woman’s right to abort a baby, then say so. It is intellectually dishonest to play semantics and as ThreeOranges does above.

            It is pathetic to watch thinking human beings twist themselves in knots trying to hide what abortion is – abortion is a “choice” – the choice being made is to end the life of a growing human baby prior to birth. It is not JUST choice nor is being against abortion indicate a “war on women”.

        • Mary Lee

          If there’s nothing wrong with abortion, as you believe, then why are you trying to hide from the word?

          It is pro-abortion. Not pro-choice. Pro-abortion. There is no such thing as “pro-choice.” “To choose” is an active verb; it requires an object, something to be chosen. Pro-lifers believe in all choices EXCEPT abortion, so we are not anti-choice, but anti-abortion. Unless the word “choice” is employed by someone who is pro-abortion, and then “choice” is just a euphemism for the word “abortion,” which, you believe, is a right, and completely justifiable. Yet you try to distance yourselves from it, as if there is something wrong with it. I mean….what’s THAT about? Just own it, people.

      • julibear

        I am pro-choice and I’m about to have my first child…into a stable loving, family home where myself and my husband can provide everything she needs. This is a planned pregnancy that I was able to have due to pro-choice policies, education, and birth control. I’m choosing this time of my life to have a child so that she can have these things. There are other times in my life when it would have been sheer cruelty to bring a child into the world. So there you go– child as a result of ‘pro-abortion’ policies. And get your nose out of women’s lady business!

        • Charles Curreri

          So killing your baby would not be cruel, had you elected an abortion?

        • Douche

          So.how many abortions have you had during the times “when it would have been sheer cruelty to bring a child into the world.”?

        • Joe Freeman

          So what you are saying is the life of the child currently in your womb is only a ‘life’ because you have decided it is? Because you and your husband are in a financially secure place? Otherwise that child, currenlty growing inside you, would not be worthy of living???

          Is that really what you are saying? Have you ever considered how selfish your position really is?

        • zj sky

          “And get your nose out of women’s lady business”

          If your business is to support and advocate for the death of growing human babies inside a women’s body, then there is no way people are going to get out of your business.

          • Mary Lee

            Yeah, but we’re supposed to pay for her birth control. Yeesh, these people.

        • Frank

          Nice one there Julibear – you are doing the child a favor by killing them. Why not go into area where poverty exists and exterminate everyone? They are unhappy and certainly it is “cruel” to allow them to exist in such a condition.

          Where does your killing for mercy stop? What is the measure we are to use in determining those living a cruel existence?

          BTW, I am assuming that you had an abortion at some point, which is why you so vehemently argue for it as an option for birth control.

        • Paul Kersey

          you need to stop posting; you’re embarrassing yourself.

        • Mary Lee

          Well, my pregnancy was unplanned, and a crisis pregnancy, in the midst of abuse, as well as a pivotal turning point in my career. But I was aware that she had her own body–her own bodily autonomy–and it was never a RIGHT to choose to kill her. Now she’s twelve. And she’s drawing at the kitchen table. Her life was not “convenient” for me, but how in the world could I deny her own body and her own humanity when I saw her heart flickering like a light on the ultrasound, at EIGHT WEEKS ALONG?

          The *ability* to choose something is not the same as the *right* to choose something. There are rights (the right to live, which trumps all other rights) and then there are entitlements (the so-called “right” to have your own child dismembered and incinerated for one low, low price and call it “choice”)….Pro-aborts like you get the two confused. Wise up.

      • dasfdsfasd

        Exactly, Brian!
        Where are the children as a result of pro-abortion polices?!

    • Suegirly

      At least when pro-lifers explain to their children what it was all about, they can say they were protesting because they would NEVER have wanted ANYONE to do that to a precious little child. And the child won’t wonder if mommy would have aborted them…or their siblings.

    • seek456

      really – the little chat with Mommy would go: “you don’t know how lucky you are you little bastardo – see that coat hanger – nearly happened!”

      Now, call me crazy but I can’t see the pro lifer having that conversation with their child that they celebrated and wanted from the moment it was conceived.

    • Guest

      Well to be accurate, the pro-abortioners should be holding aborted fetuses with coat hangers to be equivalent to the pro-lifers having live children hold signs.

    • Frank

      Bringing children into political arguments and using them as props is despicable. I do not care which side of the argument – most particularly an argument on a topic as ugly as abortion.

      It is gratuitous and immoral no matter how you spin it.

  • Taylor Brown

    If their mothers had done to them what they’re protesting for–they wouldn’t even be there.. So shameful.

    • John (magnum)

      Effing liberal loon idiots have no shame. They will use any means to advance their sick pathetic desire to kill unborn babies !!

      • Pendog

        Just typical liberal disinformation-mush ladled out to the uninformed but easy-to-stir-up base. It ain’t an attack on your precious infanticide you progressive morons. It’s about late-term, (after 20 weeks) butchery. You can still kill any ‘mass of cells’ five months old or less. Now you can go back to watching Entertainment Tonite and obsessing over the Kardashians.

      • King_Solomon1

        LIBERALS ARE VILE AND DISGUSTING AND DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY MORE AND MORE EACH DAY. THEY ARE GOING TO FORCE US INTO A CIVIL WAR>

        • trixiewoobeans

          They’ll have to have someone else do their dirty work, seeings they hate “Guns and violence” (unless it’s something that can’t fight back, like a baby.)

      • Karen Walker

        Liberals care more about the life of baby seals than they do the life of baby humans. Do you think these mothers actually explained to these kids that they were protesting for the right to murder baby humans?

        • Northern_home_Southern_soul

          What these kids don’t understand, but more importantly, what their parents and the other wacko-bird liberals also don’t understand is that even professional doctors who perform abortions past 20 weeks or 5 MONTHS, actually do just as much harm and mayhem as a coat hanger.

          A Dr. who use to preform these killings testified before Congress that he (and all Dr. who preform late term abortion) need to insert a metal clamp and guess as to what they grab a hold of, once the get an arm or a leg they rip it off, then they crush the skull. They do this because the child would not fit out the “opening” because they are to big and developed. The Dr. said they have to guess and sometimes they guess wrong and start tugging on the women’s part, hence the Gosnell case.

          I’m willing to bet that when people learn the facts about late term abortion they wont stand for it, filibuster to keep it or use small children as props.

        • Chazael

          “[…] but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matt 18:6

          • konservative1

            [Matthew 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife,
            saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and
            whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.]

  • CatHerder

    Not ‘shameful’, shameless! When these kids are a lot older and the family albums come out, I hope they be able to live with being made pawns in a game they were too young to understand.

    • trixiewoobeans

      Obviously “kids” are not of primary importance to this howling mob. If those kids grasp even a little bit of this, now and later, I bet they are now scared sh**less of their parents.

  • Bodaddio

    They are only recruited when it has to do with Right ideology isn’t it?

    • denis urbano

      In others news, people working at Google HQ are outside of the white House holding up signs with wire hangers on them saying “NSA is doing his job, they are keeping America safe”

    • SAM ADAMS

      It’s a wonder the klan hasn’t come out for pro choice events like this. Abortion kills more blacks in 2 days then they lynched in 82 years ! Way to set the civil rights and human rights movement back 150 years pro choicers !

      • john cummins

        You mean pro baby murderers!

        • SAM ADAMS

          Yep the very same !

      • Mike Latoris

        Amen, Sam Adams! Shame on the racist baby killers. The baby killers should be forced to pay reparation once legal abortion is repealed.

        • MilesMonroe

          Pay reparations? For what? Killing their own children? You’re as warped as those people.

      • bilgi

        Abolish Human Abortion – AHA

      • CRITman

        Historical Info FYI: Very true, After the KKK, a Democrat organization, was formed, their lynching record from 1866 to 1964 was approximately 3,500+ Blacks, and, what you didn’t know, 1,500+ White Republicans. Don’t forget that one of Margaret Sanger’s primary goals. as the founder of Planned Parenthood, was to decrease the Black population by abortion as much as possible. She actually wanted to see them wiped out. Planned Parenthood has never disavowed that goal. When you compare her Planned Parenthood goals to the Nazi Regime’s Eugenics program, they are very similar. ie; do away with baby’s/children that are “defective” in mind, body, or color. Also people should have to get a permit from the government to have a baby. Most couples should only be allowed to have two children, unless wealthy, and if they have more, those should have a “Post-birth” abortion. Note: The goals/thoughts from “Nazi Regime’s…. ” on down are stated beliefs of Margaret Sanger, not policies of Planned Parenthood, as far as I know.

        • $6295081

          Not only were abortion laws designed for genocide, but the gun laws were begun as a means of keeping guns out of the hands of blacks. Neither plan seems to have worked very well, did they?

        • The Bishop Paradox

          While I absolutely agree with everything you are saying, I do want to clarify one issue: apparently, Margaret Sanger did in fact oppose abortions.

          From Wikipedia:

          Sanger’s family planning advocacy always focused on contraception, rather than abortion. It was not until the mid-1960s, after Sanger’s death, that the reproductive rights movement expanded its scope to include abortion rights as well as contraception.

          Sanger was opposed to abortions, both because they were dangerous for the mother in the early 20th century and because she believed that life should not be terminated after conception. In her book Woman and the New Race, she wrote, “while there are cases where even the law recognizes an abortion as justifiable if recommended by a physician, I assert that thehundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization.”

          But you are absolutely right about everything else. She believed that light-skinned people were superior to dark-skinned people, etc.

          Planned Parenthood has evil origins, and evolved into something far beyond the scope of what even its founder originally intended.

          I bring this up because I don’t want anyone dismissing your entire argument just because there was one misstatement.

          • CRITman

            Thank you Cotton. Appreciate the info.

          • Mike Latoris

            Your apologetic clarification of Sanger’s stance on abortion is worthless and meaningless in the scope of decency and human rights.

            “The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
            –Margaret Sanger

          • The Bishop Paradox

            I think you misunderstand my intentions, Mike. I absolutely agree with the original poster. I posted that clarification for 2 reasons:

            1) The woman was evil enough in her own right – posting inaccurate statements about her only serve to discredit our argument. A liberal moron who does research will look at that and be able to say that we are “lying.” Again, there is no need to believe/spread rumors about the woman. She was, as your quote suggests, the embodiment of evil.

            2) This is a great example of what happens when evil is allowed to flourish. Maybe her opposition to abortion was a “redeeming” quality (I am in no position to judge), but her organization flourished into something that goes far beyond even the wildest dreams its creator. When evil is allowed to take root, this is what happens.

        • The Bishop Paradox

          While I absolutely agree with everything you are saying, I do want to clarify one issue: apparently, Margaret Sanger did in fact oppose abortions.

          From Wikipedia:

          Sanger’s family planning advocacy always focused on contraception, rather than abortion. It was not until the mid-1960s, after Sanger’s death, that the reproductive rights movement expanded its scope to include abortion rights as well as contraception.

          Sanger was opposed to abortions, both because they were dangerous for the mother in the early 20th century and because she believed that life should not be terminated after conception. In her book Woman and the New Race, she wrote, “while there are cases where even the law recognizes an abortion as justifiable if recommended by a physician, I assert that thehundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization.”

          But you are absolutely right about everything else. She believed that light-skinned people were superior to dark-skinned people, etc.

          Planned Parenthood has evil origins, and evolved into something far beyond the scope of what even its founder originally intended.

          I bring this up because I don’t want anyone dismissing your entire argument just because there was one misstatement.

      • CRITman

        Historical Info FYI: Very true, After the KKK, a Democrat organization, was formed, their lynching record from 1866 to 1964 was approximately 3,500+ Blacks, and, what you didn’t know, 1,500+ White Republicans. Don’t forget that one of Margaret Sanger’s primary goals. as the founder of Planned Parenthood, was to decrease the Black population by abortion as much as possible. She actually wanted to see them wiped out. Planned Parenthood has never disavowed that goal. When you compare her Planned Parenthood goals to the Nazi Regime’s Eugenics program, they are very similar. ie; do away with baby’s/children that are “defective” in mind, body, or color. Also people should have to get a permit from the government to have a baby. Most couples should only be allowed to have two children, unless wealthy, and if they have more, those should have a “Post-birth” abortion. Note: The goals/thoughts from “Nazi Regime’s…. ” on down are stated beliefs of Margaret Sanger, not policies of Planned Parenthood, as far as I know.

      • carl6352

        that was what margerat sanger wanted when she started planned parenthood. it also seems her plan to reduce the black and jewish pouplation is happening on a daily basis.

      • Marcel Pacheco

        Good point!

      • $6295081

        They aren’t pro-choice. To prove it, tell them your are pro-choice and that you choose life. See what happens to you then.

    • J. Moore

      Anytime one hears ‘It’s for the children’, or children being used as a pillar to support any issue, one can bet that the proponents of that issue have run out of logical arguments. It is a mainstay in the liberal assault on American values…

      • john cummins

        Inaccurate, promotion of truth and life by youngsters is a fine and upstanding thing to do. In this case they are promoting the slaughter of the unborn, a despicable (but predictable) thing to do by the pro aborts.

        • biteme11

          When is the unborn, viable outside the womb ? That should be the question and threshold. The answer is NOT at the moment of conception !

          • AlwysReady

            I will only ask, is the viable child able to survive without much care or should you be able to murder them until they can make their own way in the world?

          • ktoo

            You will have a Liberal mob at your door with their coat hangar kids for speaking this heresy! This is about NO limits; AT ALL!!

          • Booger Jones

            This is a fairly standard argument of the abortionists. Apparently, the criteria for determining the value of life is “viability”. Without the moment of conception, there is no future viability. If the newly conceived zygote isn’t viable, then the whole question of viability outside the womb is moot. Watch the videos of babies in the womb sucking their thumb….and then having a forceps jammed into the back of their neck, their mouth agape attempting to scream as they writhe in excruciating agony as their spinal cord is severed….and tell me with a straight face that they were not “viable”.

          • JP

            If that’s so, then why is it considered a double homicide when you murder a pregnant woman? Abortion isn’t a question of whether a fetus is alive or not, because it is. It’s a question of whether a fetus is wanted or not.

          • Antoinette Ribisi Boulet

            Why should that matter? The proposed bill doesn’t prevent abortion unless the fetus is over 20 weeks old. Tests have shown that the baby can feel pain starting at week 20 of gestation, so I believe that is why they are looking to dial that number down from week 24, which is the current law in Texas (because at 24 weeks the baby is viable). There are also instances of babies delivered at 22-23 weeks surviving, and the youngest I’ve heard of was 21 weeks and six days old. What the proposed bill does is require a certain level of medical equipment, staff, and cleanliness on hand in any facility that performs these elective procedures. There are only 5 facilities in the state that currently meet the proposed requirements, so other facilities either need to upgrade or close down. Frankly, if the pro-abortion crowd is so horrified at the idea of some facilities having to close rather than upgrade, I don’t see why they don’t just raise the funds to get all (or some, or even most) of the existing facilities upgraded to the new requirements. Don’t they claim that we need abortion clinics so women don’t have to die having hanger abortions in a dark alley somewhere? The new rules are to protect the women who choose abortion, so they don’t end up like Konamayer Mongar, who died after an infection from having an abortion in an unregulated, filthy facility in Pennsylvania, run by Dr. Gosnell. Have you heard of the “House of Horrors” abortionist murder trial? Shortly after Gosnell’s conviction, it was discovered that similar circumstances are occurring right here in Texas. Personally, I support these changes.

          • The Bishop Paradox

            Antoinette, you said this better than I (or anyone else who agrees with you) ever could. I am going to copy your response and send it to a few people I know, if you don’t mind. You are exactly right, and with millions of dollars being funneled into groups like Planned Parenthood, there is absolutely no reason to think that they won’t be able to perform the necessary upgrades.

          • The Bishop Paradox

            You are looking at this issue two dimensionally, I am afraid.

        • biteme11

          “Truth” is entirely subjective depending on who is speaking it. Seek reality.

          • Maggie Hernandez

            Seek a rock and crawl back underneath it.

          • Booger Jones

            You’re making this too easy….. Truth is entirely objective and based solely on reality. No matter who is speaking it.

          • $6295081

            You wouldn’t know reality if it crawled up on your face and spun.

      • Matthew Greggs

        what is a mainstain of republican stupid is the ramrodding of an abortion ban as being pro life the same week the 500th execution takes place….now that is a slop bucket full of republican ignorance and arrogance and hypocrisy…you cretins are pro fetus not pro baby because in the glory of your massive stupidity then then support a party that votes to cut aid and funding for the feeding and education of poor childern….now that is the kind of republican stupid that is a terminal mental disorder

        • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

          The baby didn’t murder anyone: the convict did. yours is a false argument.

          Now, personally, I’m against state execution because the state gets it wrong sometimes, and I’d like the convict to still be alive when he’s acquitted. But even a pro-death-penalty individual can argue against abortion.

          As to education funding, it is not the government’s job to educate kids. That’s how we end up with people as misinformed as you.

          • $27024138

            GREAT POINT ON EDUCATION FUNDING!!!! He’s living proof that it has failed! KUDOS!

          • Katepatate

            Government fails at all things. At one time the military and NASA were successful, but the government has even fouled them up with its social agenda. My husband, a thirty-six year veteran says the military started going downhill when women started to join. I’m a woman and I believe that is true.

          • $6295081

            The point can be made that giving women the right to vote is when our country started going downhill as well. Men tend to vote for protection of the country militarily, while women tend to vote for their own security. This led to the “gimme” class which elected Obama to provide that security for them. This is basically a thesis Ann Coulter has put forth.

          • david martin

            I’m not sure I buy Ann’s argument against women voting, but she makes a similar point against lowering the voting age to 18 that I think is valid.

          • Portia2708

            Not sure where you are from, but, YES, it is the government’s job to educate our children…why do you think there is a law that required them to go to school…WOW

          • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

            Government’s job is to make sure your rights are not violated, to uphold contracts, and to adjudicate disputes.

            Not provide safety. Not regulate business. Not tell you how to live. And certainly not to educate our kids.

          • Botvinnik

            and defend the borders and deliver the fucking mail.

          • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

            FedEx and UPS do a fine job, IMHO. And honestly, the feds have to hosed up the border that I’d rather private land owners handle the issue than DC. Congress can mess up a wet dream.

          • Botvinnik

            valid points.

          • eztalk

            Some of them already patrol their lands with guns.

            They’ve actually had illegals knock on their doors looking for money, food, water,and if they can’t get it……they steal it.

          • Me

            Actually keeping America safe is a tennant of the constitution.

          • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

            No, it isn’t. Keeping you free is, but not safe. Ben Franklin laid your fallacy to rest.

          • $6295081

            “Establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”

            That is ALL the government’s job is. Note that it says “promote the general welfare,” not PROVIDE it. That goes for education as well, which used to be the stay-at-home mom’s job, or sometimes a schoolteacher whom a local community hired to teach their kids. You need to learn history, Portia; you seem to want us to repeat the worst parts of it.

          • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

            Well said.

          • $21790226

            We spend more per capita on education in this country than any other does.. Yet literacy, and graduation rates are abysmal.. doesn’t seem like the govt cares very much

          • eztalk

            Gov’t care a lot………..TEACHER’S UNIONS!

          • Katepatate

            The government cannot educate our children in a one size fits all environment.

          • John E. Conway

            the problem in education is not the government. it is the lack of funding, and the fact that we cannot get people to get thier BS beliefs out of the educational system. We are behind countries beucase we cant keep fantasy out of schools.

          • J. Moore

            deleted

          • http://luxomni.blogspot.com/ Luxomni

            Portia, that is the state’s and really, the local government’s responsibility, not a Federal responsibility.The idea that the further you can get from the child, the better you know what the child needs is ludicrous.

          • http://luxomni.blogspot.com/ Luxomni

            Portia, that is the state’s and really, the local government’s responsibility, not a Federal responsibility.The idea that the further you can get from the child, the better you know what the child needs is ludicrous.

          • JamesJ

            Please cite the Paragraph, amendment, and article in the Constitution where it says, or even implies, that its the govt’s obligation to educate our children

          • JamesJ

            Please cite the Paragraph, amendment, and article in the Constitution where it says, or even implies, that its the govt’s obligation to educate our children

          • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkcZp-ofXEE TRoweLamontBentlyPrice

            Another liberal Ftard that gleefully wants it’s kids to be indoctrinated(educated) by the government.

          • Me

            Not a law until the late 1800’s. Before that, it was a state’s issue, but don’t let the fact hit you .

          • Lola Guin

            It is NOT the government’s job to educate children. They didn’t educate me. My parents paid for my education at private schools. The government is in place to ensure that our liberties are not violated. It’s not their job to educate us, nor is their job to keep us safe. Protecting our God-given rights is their duty and purpose. The Department of Education was founded in 1979. We got along just fine without them for 200 years.

          • J. Moore

            Lola, you and few others could relate that fact so well. Thank goodness the government did NOT educate you.

          • beanbag2020

            No portia, if you are a parent it is your responsibility to educate your kids!

          • Katepatate

            No, it isn’t the government’s job to educate your children. It is up to you to find the best place for your child to get an education and believe me, it’s not in government schools now. Home schooled children and children in private and Christian schools are far ahead of any government school child.

          • John Smith

            First of all, when and if children go to school is decided on a state level, not by the all mighty federal government.
            There are laws against illegal immigration, but apparently its not the governments job to stop that.

          • J. Moore

            Um, WRONG. Wow.

          • J. Moore

            Perfectly done, TC. Thanks.

          • The Bishop Paradox

            I am against state execution as well, albeit for a different reason: It doesn’t accomplish anything. It’s supposedly a deterrent, but the people who commit an act like that certainly aren’t going to sit there and think to themselves “oh gee, I might get the death penalty if I do this.” The consequences of their actions is the LAST thing that is on their mind when they are committing murder. Kind of like women who get abortions, now that I think about it.

          • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

            I can totally respect your argument, if not completely agree. I think it is a deterrent, but not significant enough to rick executing innocent people.

        • BeccaLeigh

          they have 20 weeks of being pregnant to make the decision…..there’s also an exception if the baby is terminally ill…..also, the claim that all these clinics will close is complete bullshit…..I live in Va and the pro-aborts told us that we’d be left with only 3 or 4 clinics after new regs went into place, well they got our hopes up for nothing because only one clinic in the entire state has closed and it was because of lack of demand

          • http://luxomni.blogspot.com/ Luxomni

            You always hear the rationalization about rape and incest in defense of abortion. But if rape is the case, why is third trimester so sacred to them? Why would you wait that long?

          • http://luxomni.blogspot.com/ Luxomni

            You always hear the rationalization about rape and incest in defense of abortion. But if rape is the case, why is third trimester so sacred to them? Why would you wait that long?

        • BeccaLeigh

          FYI…..I personally am against the death penalty…..I believe that it is a much worse fate to be stuck in a cell in solitary confinement (most go insane) and then have to meet your maker

          • $27024138

            But the problem is we are all paying a HUGE price for providing these convicted criminals, most of horrible and violent acts, 3 square meals, healthcare, full access to media, internet and lawyers, education, etc…. where does it end? I can tell you…. it ends with more and more mid level criminals being released early due to bugetary cuts. Unless we can agree on a way these criminals can “pay their own way”, or at least contribute to society while incarcerated… I say close the book on them. I would sleep just fine.

          • Portia2708

            I’d sleep just fine too, IF…and, it is one big IF they could actually PROVE they are guilty…many are not…it’s much too easy to find someone who fits the part than actually do their job

          • $27024138

            I agree to a point. But what is the positive proof? DNA? Multiple eye witnesses? Confession?

            My opinion is YES on all three of these. Once they go through the appeals process and ANY of these three is in play… I say thats good enough for me.

            But your point is taken.

          • J. Moore

            Good thing all those murdered babies were easy to convict, huh?

          • $21790226

            How about not putting people in Prison for minor drug offenses? My body my choice ..they actually believe that BS?

          • $27024138

            Agreed… even better, get rid of the minor drug laws all together.

            So after 30 years…. how’s that “War on Drugs” going? No better than the 50 year old “War on Poverty”. End the WARS!!!! 😉

          • $1692758

            better yet, don’t do drugs and inflict this expense on the rest of us for your little habits.

          • $27024138

            Yea… some would say alcohol, tobacco, soft drinks and junk food have the same affect in terms of expense. So do we outlaw those things?

            I say, leave it to personal choice. Besides, I fail to see the expense to the general public if a person grows a plant or two and smokes in their own home and stays off the road.

            Sounds like a victimless crime to me.

          • $27024138

            Agreed… even better, get rid of the minor drug laws all together.

            So after 30 years…. how’s that “War on Drugs” going? No better than the 50 year old “War on Poverty”. End the WARS!!!! 😉

          • $21790226

            How about not putting people in Prison for minor drug offenses? My body my choice ..they actually believe that BS?

          • $1692758

            They used to send prisoners to far away places back in the day. Interesting to think that is how Australia was once used by the British. Amazing.

          • http://theweeklyworldview.com dougmcburney

            You should get to know your maker better…

            It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

          • tcarey

            So you want to steal my money to do it and then use it to torture people… Wow you are so compassionate.

        • $27024138

          We’ve been spending more than any other country in the world on education and we have some of the lowest scores in the world. I’d say we’re NOT spending money wisely and that we can do better with the money we DO spend! Is your answer to everything to just pour more cash into it, or to not EVER cut spending? Even on something that is NOT working?

          And far as your point on the hypocracy of abortion, which is really what this article is about. I have no problem seeing the difference between an innocent fetus and a convicted criminal who has gone through the judicial process… and lost. Bye Bye. No Problem. That is NOT hypocracy my friend, thats the ability to see the forest through the trees.

          This whole debate in Texas is about providing safe and top notch abortion. Yes it will cost more cash… but I’m guessing Planned Parenthood or other similar liberal non-profs can find another budget line to help offset this expence… that is IF it is really about womens rights and womens health.

          • Portia2708

            If it were really about women’s health, you would FORCE them to have ultrasounds and listen to LIES about what the fetus is feeling,etc. Stop pretending you all care one whit about women…they are just tools to use and abuse

          • $27024138

            Huh? Not sure what you’re saying.

        • dpierce

          If a man takes another’s life..it his life for that life, according to law. Over the years many more than five hundred murders were committed in Texas by at least five hundred murderers. The executions of those murderers..preserves and saves the lives of those they would have killed as well, given the opportunity. Now compare that to the innocent babies killed today, and who are the murderers? I think abortionists that kill nine month old babies ready to be born are murderers, and those who promote this their accomplices. No different from the nazis who took innocent life..and sanitized it by making it legal to do so. They fight to any legislation that might indicate that abortion- to any age- is illegal. That is why they fight for euthanasia, too. Sorry you cant understand the difference between the death of an innocent baby and the death of a murderer. But that is the world you are in: Deceptive.

          • $21790226

            That’s BS .. murder rates are not reduced by the death penalty.. in fact they are higher in countries that execute their citizens much higher.. I guess when you as a govt show no value for life,and deals with its problems by killing people, its hard for some citizens to get the message that its wrong to deal with your problems by killing people.. hmm … but dont worry we are in fine company with China, North Korea, and and Iran AKA the Axis of Evil .. you can throw in a few African dictatorships and middle eastern stone throwers but thats it .. we are the only western country that still act like barbarians

          • HookLineandStinker

            Are you speaking about abortion?

          • Guest

            Death Penalty

          • HookLineandStinker

            Couldn’t he say the same about abortion?

          • TexSizzle

            The evil b@$t@rd who murdered 2 women in cold blood after torturing them in Amarillo in the late 1970s didn’t kill anybody else after his execution. How did it not prevent JKP from murdering any more women?

          • $21790226

            That’s BS .. murder rates are not reduced by the death penalty.. in fact they are higher in countries that execute their citizens much higher.. I guess when you as a govt show no value for life,and deals with its problems by killing people, its hard for some citizens to get the message that its wrong to deal with your problems by killing people.. hmm … but dont worry we are in fine company with China, North Korea, and and Iran AKA the Axis of Evil .. you can throw in a few African dictatorships and middle eastern stone throwers but thats it .. we are the only western country that still act like barbarians

        • Doa74656

          You would have a point if the fetus commits a crime but till then I suggest you go to McDonalds to grasp for straws I’m sure they’ll let you have one without making a purchase

        • JJChronicles.com

          Matthew Greggs explain to us idiots the equivalence between a convicted criminal and a fetus.

          This argument is used by the progressive mind usually with words like ignorance, arrogance and hypocrisy. It’s an argument that fails on many fronts. The unborn fetus is guilty of nothing other than being conceived. One must assume that every execution involves a wrongly convicted killer for this argument to work.

          so in your brilliant mind an unborn child that can live outside the womb, possible at 24 weeks, is identical to a convicted criminal.

          If you are assuming all the executed criminals were wrongly convicted are you saying killing them would be ok anyway. That is what your argument says if you are justifying abortion by the existence of capital punishment.

          The charge of hypocrisy works in both direction except the pro-life crowd draws separation between an innocent life and murderous life.

          The progressive mind is drawing a parallel between innocent life and a murderous life.

          Your hatred for those who simply want to protect innocent life obviously is clouding your judgment

          You would grant rights to murderers but deny the basic right to life to a baby that can live outside the womb after 24 weeks and you talk about a mental disorder. Hmmmm

        • cwms2005

          Conservatives donate over 10x what liberals do to the poor and needy. Perhaps that’s why you believe in abortion, so you don’t have to contribute.

          • gobnait

            Margaret Sanger, whom Hillary Clinton cites as her hero, was a proponent of eugenics as were the Nazis. Abortion on demand has been an effective way to cull out the children of poor and minority women, hasn’t it?

        • Jerry Camp

          What are these pre-birth children guilty of, by the way?

        • Jerry Camp

          What are these pre-birth children guilty of, by the way?

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkcZp-ofXEE TRoweLamontBentlyPrice

          WOW!
          Matthew Greggs is one of the most vile,ignorant sub humans I have seen post a comment in a while.

        • AlwysReady

          You complain about 500 executions of murderers in their own right and you don’t complain about the slaughter of millions? Who cares what the Republicans stand for or the Democrats for that matter, it is murder. God said to be fruitful and multiply, Genesis 1:28, not kill the child in the womb, but human sacrifice will finally be put to an end soon, by the return of Jesus Christ, Maranatha!

        • texguy46

          Pull your planned (non)parenthood head out!

        • Katepatate

          How many of your one night stands have you pressured into aborting?

        • ManORight

          Great liberal logic – kill the innocent, save the guilty.

        • redware

          Guess you don’t see a bit of difference between murderering filth and innocent babies.You extreme leftists sure live in a moral fantasy land!

        • J. Moore

          Besides demonstrating that you are completely illiterate, have no argument, and only call names to deflect from your lack of social skills, do you have ANYTHING of value to add to this conversation?

        • $6295081

          Babies are innocent and don’t deserve death; Murderers ARE guilty and deserve death.

        • The Bishop Paradox

          I’m am not a proponent of capital punishment, but I at least understand the intentions behind it. And if you don’t see the difference between murdering someone who has committed a heinous act and murdering an innocent life, then I can’t help you.

      • adnawsr

        ISNT THIS WHAT OBAMA DOES, NEXT HE WILL SEEK OUT THE TALKING DOGS AND CATS

      • Lola Guin

        Yep. Just like the TSA groping/radiating granny and her grandkids. It’s for their own good/safety. Those dirty terrorists will kill the children. Or like the “drug war”. It’s for the children, until they grow up and smoke weed and end up with a permanent stain on their record. Or zero tolerance rules at public schools. A 5 yr. old boy brings a cap gun to school and is interrogated till he wets himself in fear, and is then suspended. Or the boy who ate his pop tart into the shape of gun and was suspended. Or the little girl who had a Hello Kitty bubble gun and was “threatening” others with it. It’s all for the children. Disgusting.

      • popdoug

        “It’s all for the children”. Isn’t that a bit hypocritical when dealing with abortion? But then again its understandable, they’re liberals. Remember libs, make sure you use your glass belly button and snorkel, it makes it easier to see and breath with you head up your usual place.

        • mewp12

          It’s for the killing of children.

      • Historianted

        Yes it is. Liberals are so twisted! They are the ones that says “sorry sweetie, I’m killing you for your own good…Mommy loves you baby…now die!”

      • Historianted

        Yes it is. Liberals are so twisted! They are the ones that says “sorry sweetie, I’m killing you for your own good…Mommy loves you baby…now die!”

      • Meg Graham Jaworowski

        It used to be said, “The last refuge of scoundrels is to wrap themselves in the flag.” Scoundrels now hide behind children like the cowards they are.

    • john cummins

      In this case the right is right. If you are in favor of murder of the unborn you are quite simply wrong. “Using” children to promote truth is fine, to promote murder, death and lies is wrong Bodo.

      • mikemazzla

        well John said its ok for one but not another so I guess its ok

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100004796350564 Raja Tank

      You were almost right Bodaddio. The Right has NO PROBLEM recruiting children for their anti-gay message, but how dare the Left use their children to advocate rights for control of their own bodies. All the cons need to go to the South and rot in their cesspool of crap.

      • thomjohn3

        your ‘advocacy’ for the rights of children to control their own bodies (??) supports the murder of the same class of individuals you claim to protect. please remove your head from your posterior, and think a little.

      • coldything

        the left should stop trying to influence children before they are 18, let they have a normal life then make up their minds

        kind of goes along with their education agenda – don’t teach them to think for themselves ( critical thinking skills – they might figure out how deceptive and dishonest the left is – though very eloquent) , just tell them what to think

        • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uz_eZ8-exE0 Detex

          maybe both sides should practice that.

          • $27024138

            So true…. I wish it were that siomple to get both sides to stop raising “children” and raise ‘adults” who can begin to think and formulate an opinion by the time they are 15… instead of just following the crowd.

      • Ima Right

        How dare the Right use children to promote their “family values” stance. Raja Tank its up to you to post evidence of this atrocity. The world eagerly awaits your evidence

      • just_the_facts_man

        Where are you seeing children being used for anti-gay messages? Please document factually. One of the messages that angered me out the most is showing Bert and Ernie as they were portrayed on magazine cover. Those are childrens’ “heroes”. Leave kids out of it. And “control of their own bodies”, why didn’t they control those bodies before the sex and then control those bodies to the abortion clinic before 5 months? Sounds like control has nothing to do with it.

      • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

        I have no problem with gays using their own children to protest heterosexual marriage.

        Except they don’t procreate. Because homosexuality is an abomination.

      • $27024138

        Proof please?!? Who was it who paraded kids for “health care”, or “gun control”, or “global warming”??? One party consistantly uses kids… and it is NOT conservatives.

    • gymlock

      Obfuscation… a major line of defense for liberals. Throwing in irrelevant tidbits or unrelated issues to dilute the issue at hand.

    • socilasatelite

      That excuse is getting tired and weak pretty sad that’s all you on the left run to every time. How does that make you have the morale high ground again?

    • carl6352

      no its the left ideology.

  • Oxbow

  • Canadian in USA

    The irony is that these “cute kids” wouldn’t be here if her parents exercised their “choice”.

  • http://blog.khelek.us Brian Johnson

    “nothing horrifying” about this? The idea that a child is holding up a sign, “recruited” or not, implying that because of legislation that bans abortions after 20 weeks will lead to back ally abortions with coat hangers, isn’t “horrifying” to you? Do you think those children have any idea what that coat hanger stands for?

    “concerned about women’s rights” <- this phrase tells me all I need to know.

    • ThreeOranges

      What does it tell you?

      • http://blog.khelek.us Brian Johnson

        It tells me exactly why you don’t think there’s anything horrifying about this. Or about abortion. It tells me you’re a pro-abortion apologist who doesn’t see this as a fight for life, but rather, some imagined “right” that a woman should be able to kill their unborn children for whatever selfish reason.

        • john cummins

          with emphasis on selfish reason, and the sad thing is that the great majority of these women will be psychologically damaged the rest of their lives because of the perceived or non-perceived guilt they will acquire as a result of hiring hit men to kill their unborn babies…

      • Chriss Markey

        btw – you reveal your lack of honesty on the abortion issue – framing it as a women’s right issue.
        get this straight – no matter how much you or the media repeat the lie, THERE IS NO RIGHT TO ABORTION in America.

        • John E. Conway

          Roe vs Wade begs to differ. The current bill has no exception for the life or health of the mother, and there are instances where the life of the mother will be at risk of she carries the child. that is unreasonable. Anyone who says they should have to carry it anyway, will be deemed subhuman as they obviously do not care about human life, they are simply picking which ones live or die, and unworthy of further discourse.

          • Guy Fromage

            If you imagine for one moment, a woman entering the ER with an ectopic pregnancy will be denied the services required to preserve her life, you must really be smoking some high-grade.

            The rest of the incoherent nonsense concerning “subhumans” is not worthy of response.

          • crowdie

            An ectopic pregnancy is not an abortion; by definition, it is not viable. So, yeah, that woman will always receive medical attention, regardless of anyone’s beliefs.

          • john cummins

            Duh, John thinks that abortionists are somehow superhuman or a genetically superior race, evidently! Typical of Sangerites, Banned Parenthood/ Planned Barrenhood, “thinking”.

          • coldything

            I wonder if Gosnell was Sanger’s son

          • John E. Conway

            So obviously you are not one of those who would force her to carry it even though it would kill her, so you were not one of those ones the sub human per was intended for anyway, so you are free to ignore that part. So my question for you is, are you Against universal health care? Food assistance programs? How about the other programs that Planned Parenthood provides, like pregnancy prevention, pap smears, breast screenings, etc? if we close the planned parenthood, someone has to pick up the slack, and with the added unwanted pregnancies, there will be more children needing substance and assistance, including health care. Does your care for teh rights of the child end at its birth?

          • DenverDiva

            While he was United States Surgeon General, Dr. C. Everett Koop stated publicly that in his thirty-eight years as a pediatric surgeon, he was never aware of a single situation in which a freeborn child’s life had to be taken in order to save the life of the mother. He said the use of this argument to justify abortion in general was a “smoke screen.”

            Due to significant medical advances, the danger of pregnancy to the mother has declined considerably since 1967. Yet even at that time Dr. Alan Guttmacher of Planned Parenthood acknowledged: [1]

            “Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffers from a fatal illness such as cancer or leukemia, and, if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save, life.”

            Just for the record, go ahead and re-read that quote again and pay close attention to the source.

            To repeat, the person making the quote is Dr Alan Guttmacher of Planned Parenthood.

            Dispute that – if you can. Your basis is full of holes – abortion is hardly EVER about saving the life of the mother. It’s about destroying the life of the child because the ‘mother/murderer’ doesn’t want the child.

          • Diogenes71

            Good try of introducing facts and reality and morality into the discussion. Liberlas have no use none of them.

          • John E. Conway

            And yet in the united stated 16.7 women die in every 100K births.

          • Janet Mathews

            More Leftist claptrap. Supposing a person actually believes that in America in 2013, a woman is risking her life by carrying an infant to term, I have a great solution. Instead of a guaranteed gruesome death for an innocent infant (late-term abortion), how about going to the hospital (a nice, clean, sanitary hospital, with licensed medical professionals working there, unlike a late-term abortion clinic) and having a C-section? If it is so risky to carry the child, then safely deliver the child early, and then do your best to keep him alive and well. If he does not make it, at least you did your best for him. Goodness, if celebrity skanks like Kim Kardashian and Jessica Simpson can have early C-sections a month or two early just due to their vanity (because they don’t want to get “too big”), then certainly we can deliver a baby early if he is truly risking his mother’s life. THERE IS NO EXCUSE TO MURDER HIM.

          • John E. Conway

            http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/12/maternal-mortality-rates-millennium-development-goals

            the US ranks 39th in Maternal Deaths, with 16.7 deaths for every 100k live births. not a bad ration, but certainly not sterling. And this is for a normal pregnancy. you want to tell me that a high risk pregnancy where we know that it will kill her, and you think just going to the hospital will solve all the problems? At what point did your brain stop developing?

          • Mary Lee

            I’m sorry, YOU’RE picking which ones live or die, dude.

            Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton has made it possible to abort a baby at any point in pregnancy, for any reason. “Life or health of the mother” is painted with a BROAD brush–it is categorized not just as the physical health, but the “emotional” and “financial” health of the mother as well. As for “life” of the mother, 99% of all abortions are about the LIFESTYLE of the mother, not the mother’s LIFE. There is a big, big difference.

            Most pro-lifers I know are aware of hard cases, and have compassion for women in those situations. But hard cases are few, and are exploited by the pro-abortion camp, when the goal is not actually “safe, legal, and rare,” but “abortion uber alles,” as it is now. The key is to try to save both the mother AND the baby….if the baby dies, then the abortion is incidental. Abortion is used as birth control, and it is the only so-called “medical” procedure in which the sole purpose is to actually kill another human being. Think of how many beautiful people are missing today–doctors, researchers, writers, musicians, dancers, cooks, teachers, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters–because people like you believe they were expendable, based on their size. That’s a damn shame.

          • Lola Guin

            Great comment. You hit the nail right on the head. It’s really sad to think of the people that might have been, if not for a selfish mother. I wish that pro-abortion people could imagine if their mother robbed their right to life from them. It’s all well and good when it’s not your life being taken away, isn’t it? The truth is that any one of those aborted children could have been us. So sad.

          • John E. Conway

            No. you completely missed my point. I only spoke to those who said that if the woman had to carry the child even those it woudl kill her, she had to carry it anyway. those are the idiots that have no place to speak. those are the ones we are picking who lives and dies. hard cases are more common than people realize. We are lucky to be in the us with a decent medical care system (not nearly as good as people want you to believe) but we still have a fair number or women die every year during child birth. And those are the ones where everything seemed normal. now I wont say that they are common, no. But it isnt like they only happen once in a few thousand. I wuld like to see the stats on how often an atypical pregnancy happens. I bet it would surprise you how often they occur. Still not frequent no. but more often than you think I believe. As for all those people who are not here, they also could have been Hitler, Dalmer, Attilla, Himler, Stalin, Amin, or numerous others. We will never know, and wondering achieves nothing. I cant claim to know the minds of the women who have gotten abortions, but I highly doubt it is ever an easy choice. It isn’t something that is done lightly. This is not birth control. This is a potentially life altering decision. Do not claim you know their minds any better.

          • http://www.wakeupblackamerica.blogspot.com/ goteki45

            Roe Vs Wade isn’t legislation. Laws come from the legislative branch of government as bills and are created and enforced once the president as the leader of the executive branch signs the bill into law. The judicial branch can only interrupt a law to determine whether or not it’s constitutional or not. So many people don’t realize that Supreme Court doesn’t have the power to make law which makes Roe Vs Wade a judical ruling but not a binding law.

          • john cummins

            yes, it was merely opinion and opinions not rooted in the constitution should be ignored, period! These executioners in black robes ought often to be ignored when they can’t understand the English language…

          • sonofamichelleo

            You are perfectly correct. However, the marxist democrats are not interested in proper legislative procedure. They always end up on the losing end of it. They prefer to intimidate, harass and spew hate until they get their way.

          • John E. Conway

            it isnt a law no, but it is legal precedent. that means it is the law of the land. And Stare Decisis means it should remain

          • VeraSt

            Roe v Wade is anti-constitutional — “right to life, liberty, property” — just because a panel of pro-death leftists ruled that child-slaughter is cool … doesn’t make it right

          • john cummins

            it was just an opinion…and a deliberately ignorant or evil one…

          • John E. Conway

            On person’s opinion. one would argue that it isn’t alive yet since it cannot survive on its ow outside the womb. And please dont give me pro death. this come from the group that is willing to let starving people die, let those who need health care die. Is for the death penalty. Supports the wars. Supported selling weapons to our enemies…I could go on all night…

          • Diogenes71

            The question is: Is it moral to kill the most defenseless for the sake of convenience?

          • Stacey g

            yes, in the case of inner city abortions…it saves tax money long term from public assistance and incarceration costs! I am for those!

          • AMSilver

            If that were true, then the out-of-wedlock birth rate in inner cities would be lower than those in the suburbs. Abortion does not decrease the birthrate – it invites women not to make the decision of whether to have a child or not until after they are already pregnant, sometimes not until the 3rd trimester. Not all of those women are going to choose abortion, while if they had to decide before getting pregnant whether or not they were prepared and willing to raise a child, many of them would acknowledge that they are not. We spend more money because of abortion and it’s role in *increasing* out of wedlock births, and also because the devaluing of life in communities who embrace it leads to more of the crime that you don’t want to pay for.

          • John E. Conway

            That is not the question. That is not the question at all. This has nothing to do with convenience. This has to do with necessity. We are taking at 20 weeks, nobody at 20 weeks is doing it for convenience. I would generally argue nobody does it for convenience at all. In the end, and the courts have already decided, stare decisis, so the ruling stands and it is the law of the land, like it or not. A woman has the right to chose what to do with her body. This is also about public health and safety, you were not around when back alley abortions were the norm, and you really do not want them to be again. But they will come back if you get your way, and people will die. Our daughters will die. Our mothers will die. And unscrupulous people no better than drug dealers will profit. Thank you GOP.

          • john cummins

            …er/and the murder of unborn is somehow “superhuman” or human?

          • John E. Conway

            You comment has nothing to do with mine. Mine addresses one group of people who would force a woman to die to carry a child that will kill her. You are making a sweeping statement about all abortions. Reign it in, make it a little more specific and maybe your sarcasm might work. Otherwise, I grade you a d-. You can try harder than that.

          • Proud2bfromtheUSA

            The risk to mothers and the Health of the mother myth is so rare as to be non existent. There is actually more risk to the mother to abort especially late term than there is to actually have a c section.

          • John E. Conway

            It is not a myth and it is not rare. Do you have any idea how many women die in childbirth each year?

          • sonofamichelleo

            Your reasoning is extremely flawed. You show that you are set in an ignorant and unenlightened mindset which you have no intention of modifying. As cavemen do, you should crawl back under your rock and leave modern, civilized society to those who have an educated and developed intellect.

          • John E. Conway

            Really? No, I am simply sick of those who are set on forcing their religious views and their ethics upon everyone else. The issue of abortion has been settled. Stare Decisis. You should look this up. I am fine with debating points, but this went past debate long ago. If people say that a woman has to carry a child that will kill her, there is no hope for them, I see nothing wrong with my reasoning on this. They simple want to decide which life is more important at that time. After the child is born, they do not care about the life anymore. They will fight against all the programs that will help support it, and the programs that will help prevent it, or end it. In fact, to it seems the only thing they support is fighting.

          • trueroxfan

            ” The current bill has no exception for the life or health of the mother”

            False.

            Sec. 171.046. EXCEPTIONS. (a) The prohibitions and

            5-3

            requirements under Sections 171.043, 171.044, and 171.045(b) do not

            5-4

            apply to an abortion performed if there exists a condition that, in

            5-5

            the physician’s reasonable medical judgment, so complicates the

            5-6

            medical condition of the woman that, to avert the woman’s death or a

            5-7

            serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of

            5-8

            a major bodily function, other than a psychological condition, it

            5-9

            necessitates, as applicable:

          • John E. Conway

            This I need to look into, as it was my understanding that there were no exceptions, but I will admit, I did not read it in it entirety myself, so could have been misled in that area. If this is the case, I do stand corrected. I have no problem admitting when I am wrong if, indeed, I am.

          • AMSilver

            After the 20th week of gestation, it is more dangerous to the life of a mother to have an abortion (especially in a case where her life is already in danger) than it is to have labor induced in a hospital setting or have a C-section. At abortion clinics, they generally inject a woman with a baby-killing solution and then *send her home, unmonitored* for a day or more. If a woman’s life is really in danger, then they have just upped her chance of dying due to the pregnancy by inducing labor with no oversight, and no personnel on hand to monitor if everything is progressing smoothly. At this point in a pregnancy, if a woman’s life is endangered by continuing the pregnancy, then she needs to be in a hospital setting, where doctors can do everything in their power to ensure the survival of the mother, and if possible the child.

        • http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/05/09/elizabeth_warren_dances_with_lies/page/full Nola_Navy_Vet

          Well Stated, Thanks.

        • Mary Lee

          There is really no right to abortion, period. Is there? I mean, it just doesn’t exist. The right to kill our children does not exist.

          And I believe in human rights—this “women’s rights” b.s. is out of control. We have the right to vote, we can go to any college we want, we can become anything we want….We *do* have to work on the pay gap, but other than that, how in the world are we “oppressed.” What other rights do we need? The right to rip our babies from our wombs? How is that a right?

          • john cummins

            The right to kill children does not exist but the duty of civil governments to take the life of those that murder clearly does…

          • Mary Lee

            Okay. I’m also philosophically against the death penalty. I’m not sure how capital punishment (the killing of a convicted murderer after due process) is the same as abortion (a mother having her own son or daughter killed for convenience, and without due process).

        • john cummins

          There IS a court opinon! BUT, it is an opinion and courts can’t make law!

      • rightsofAmerica

        Recruited might be the wrong word, indoctrinated into the belief that our choice in a way of life is more important than a human life is more like it. And yes the children’s parents did bring them but don’t you think if this issue is important to their parents, that the parents wouldn’t push their agenda onto their kids? What’s horrifying is kids advocating for the rights of parents to kill kids before they are born.

    • 1UncleEric

      The hoax of “women’s rights” even before Row v. Wade, is horrendously startling if it is looked at objectively. There are two people that come to mind that would be very pleased with this “grand hoax”; one that would cause a baby’s own mother to kill it, despite any maternal, let alone spiritual instincts of protection of that child. Most loving, right thinking parents would gladly give their lives for ANY child let alone their own. And the two that would most proud of this illusion of rights…….Hitler and Stalin. We’ve killed more than 40,000,000 babies to their 26-30 million lives killed. But since our government schools no longer bother with teaching History…why let the facts get in the way….of murdering our own offspring.

      • bob

        This is from the Pro-Life Action League website -Since the legalization of abortion in 1973, there have been approximately 50 million abortions performed in the United States –
        Sorry to correct that number I wish it wasn’t so, they use this numbers to brag on there accomplishments, its sick.

        • john cummins

          and that doesn’t touch on the 3rd mode of action in birth control pills, which is Abortion…so my estimate is that you jack that up by say 10X and say, 400 million

          • john cummins

            Anyway, ONE is too many!

      • john cummins

        Well, Hitler started, and even before him, with “doctors” getting rid of the “helpless” and useless eaters in the German hospital system BEFORE Nazis were in total power, a result of about 80 years of Haeckel pseudo Science in the textbooks in Germany and the false Darwinism Junk Science Hoax promoting survival of the fittest…It was a result of Government Schools…same has happened over here…

    • cscape

      The fallacious assumption that the alternative to (late term) abortion is returning to back alley abortions with coat hangers is the problem here …… Giving birth to the child is the alternative

      • irvinelady

        wow, that was so spot on. if you’re on the 20 yard line, for God’s sake, score the damn touchdown.

      • john cummins

        Yes, they prefer front alley abortions.

    • Lola Guin

      It’s incredibly disturbing. Poor babies. I feel bad for them. What selfish and disgusting parents they must have.

    • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

      I agree. The people doing this to their kids are like those lunatics from Westboro. Crazy, sick, and twisted.

  • yviemarie88

    Clueless, they really are clueless. Believe them when they say ‘they don’t see…’, because they really don’t!

  • greatunconformity

    When does life begin and when should it be protected?

    Apparently only when you can hear their screams.

    • ObamaFail

      If libs have their way, even after that, they want to be able to abort their babies. Obama supported it.

  • marcellucci

    Com’on Billy….hold that sign up…Remember momma’s fighting for the right to terminate you any time I feel like it….

  • Jeremy

    The left loves to use kids to hold up signs like that because,they know kids will not be challenged over it.The parents of these kids have no shame at all and just exploiting their kids to promote their vile agenda.

    • Sons Thunder

      Yes – using kids to hold up signs is something only those on the left do.

      • Jeremy

        The left must be so proud of people supporting killing babies and I have no problem with people supporting life.

      • ClarkFL

        Kids can read you dumb@ss, but they might not know the correlation between abortion and coat hangers. I’m sure even very young kids know the difference between wanting babies to live and wanting to kill them, which the left is all about.

      • Damien Johnson

        Kids holding up signs against killing kids =/= kids holding up signs for killing kids.

      • Suegirly

        Reading is FUNDAMENTAL! Try reading the comments here and GET the POINT before you post.

        • http://www.FireKarlRove.com/ C. Edmund Wright

          Methinks you’re gonna have to splain it to Sons Thunder…I doubt he understood what you are saying….

      • Chessah

        Wow…..you had to time travel back to 70’s for this photo? The kids holding up these signs are probably industry captains, CEO’s and the like, by now. Lives lived, talent and potential allowed to thrive. Unlike the ‘clumps of human tissue’ you deem as disposable! We’ll never know their potential. SB5 is NOT about preventing abortion, it’s about defining a time line of no more than twenty weeks. That’s 5 months gestation…….surely that’s enough time to make your coveted ‘Choice’!!!

        • Jeremy

          Yeah those clothes are definitely from the 70’s

          • JReaS

            Based on the cars I can see in the background, I’m guessing ’72 or ’73. Probably when Roe v. Wade was before the SCOTUS.

        • Sons Thunder

          I picked the first three pics (of many) that showed up on an image search. I love how people here insult me and make assumptions about my stance on abortion.

          I was responding to @Jeremy who wrote “The left loves to use kids to hold up signs like that because,they know kids will not be challenged over it.” For the reading challenged, I was simply pointing out how absurd it is to claim this is a tactic employed solely by the left.

      • John Thomas “Jack” Ward III

        When I first found I was against Abortion, I was thirteen years old… I walked (or rode my bike) to a nearby Abortion Clinic, and offered myself to fight for the cause, without nudging from my parents (They had a business to run). I had nobody trying to coerce, influence or intimidate me into believing what they believed. So tell me… Was I WRONG for having a Point of View? #Stand4Life #RightWard Jawamax 8<{D}

      • http://www.FireKarlRove.com/ C. Edmund Wright

        dude…you stepped in it BIGTIME!!!

      • Guy Fromage

        It strikes me, that a child thanking his parents for not killing him, is sincere.

        Quite a stark contrast from shoving a sign in a kids hands, and essentially, if not explicitly saying, “just be glad I didn’t kill you.”

      • sonofamichelleo

        Re-read the post. OP did not use the term only. That is your term.

      • MarvLS1

        Yep – but one side demands the right to murder the kids, and the other side is trying to protect them…

      • Delphinus13

        Yes, but it’s one thing to have kids help protest FOR the lives of other kids (i.e. advocate for life). Totally evil to exploit kids to advocate for the KILLING of other kids (i.e. advocate for death).

  • The Penguin

    I almost responded to your justification of this… but instead I’ll just say you’re a repugnant slime. This is sick. Period.

    • Caleb Bryant

      Guys, lets try to be more civil. We have much more credibility when we don’t stoop down to “trash talking” the other side.

  • EyesWideOpen

    It is disturbing because those young children are unwittingly promoting the “right” to murder babies. They are too young to even understand what their sign means…it is actually very sad.

  • RIChris

    Hard to imagine a mother who is such a rabid abortion activist that she uses her own children to push for the slaughter of both the unborn and the born-alive. Sad to imagine these children as adults.

    • CR

      Ladies and gentlemen you are looking at the future Sandra Flukes of 2024. Brought up self-entitled and stupid from birth. Poor kids, but at least their mothers didn’t abort them but instead let them live so they can grow up to be the ignorant democrat voters of the future.

    • trixiewoobeans

      Just when I wonder how much lower they can go, they show me.

  • NixTyranny

    Would love to have an investigative reporter, if not totally extinct yet, ask those kids what their mom has explained to them that the sign means.

  • Okie_pastor

    my question to liberals: If you don’t mind spine snippers, scalpels, and vacuum hoses, what do you have against hangers? It all gets the job done right?
    sick!

    • MrApple

      Where’s the “demand a plan” campaign for the 1.21 million abort each year? The Liberals couldn’t wait to call for the restriction of rights after 20 kids were mercilessly gunned down at Newtown, CT.

  • Damien Johnson

    And Christians are the bad guys who so-called “indoctrinate” kids with knowledge of heaven and hell? These people (people?) tricked kids into promoting the murder of their own.

  • Chip

    Yup. Teach your daughters that it is OK to get knocked up because you can do away with the baby later….. (note sarcasm)

  • kateorjane

    So it would be okay with you if some protestor on the other side asked the kiddies if they weren’t happy that Mommy hadn’t ripped them out of her and flushed them away?

  • wwbdinct

    I edited my first post to you. I don’t really care to hear what you have to say. You’re a sick, pathetic individual. Such a shame.

    • just_the_facts_man

      The usual – no argument, just name-calling and bluster.

  • RememberSekhmet

    It’s Austin, y’all. What can I say?

  • walterc

    If their mother is pro abortion, why does she have children? Makes me wonder if these kids were borrowed from a middle of the road, unread voter/relative to the rabid abortionist liberal.

  • MrApple

    I guess it is a good thing that at least one woman didn’t get the Planned Parenthood brochure so that they could have those cute kids around to lamely try and make their political point.

  • Suegirly

    I SHUDDER to think how the mother of these children will try to explain this picture to them when they are actually OLD ENOUGH to understand what abortion is, does, and what her support of it could have meant in their lives…and possibly what it meant to their siblings.

    • idiotmitten

      Makes you wonder how many of this child’s potential siblings have been flushed.

  • thunderstrikes

    I would make a more intelligent comment, but that photo made me barf all over my computer. Its utterly sick to use children as props to advocate killing children.

  • seek456

    really – did they explain to the little darlings that they were the lucky ones?

    How freaking stupid are you?

  • seek456

    no – it’s not a fight for life for any woman. It’s a fight for the death of children. Unwanted – unplanned, just plain unjust that these awesome women would be burdened with such a task.

    You make me sick.

    • SFXDM9MM

      ThreeOranges short of a bushel

  • TJ

    If someone does use a coat hanger in an alley they would still end up in the hospital with a punctured uterus and parts left inside.

  • Scorpion

    Are they mad that their parents chose life?
    Who are these people that would let somebody put a coat hanger up there?

  • Spasmolytic

    Using children as props is reprehensible.

  • Waldo

    PROPS

  • ObamaFail

    You libs act like this is a complete ban on abortion. It’s just banning abortion after 5 ENTIRE MONTHS. You’re telling me that these idiot women who are too stupid to not get knocked up need 5 whole months to decide if they want to murder their child? You can’t say “rape”, because rape kits come with morning after pills to prevent pregnancy. And nothing in the bill says it’s not okay for a woman to get an abortion if the pregnancy has taken a bad turn and her life is in danger. You libs just want the right to carry a baby to full term and then slaughter a baby that could easily survive outside the womb. Women’s rights shouldn’t include the slaughter of an innocent child who didn’t ask that stupid whore it’s growing inside of to spread her legs to everything with a dick.

    • julibear

      This is exactly the attitude that women are fighting. “Idiot women, too stupid not to get knocked up…” some of these women are barely adults, a lot of them never received any sex education thanks to abstinence only programs, and wait a minute– doesn’t it take two to tango? What about those idiot men who are too stupid to put a condom on? Or who persuade the women that they don’t need one because ‘nothing will happen’ and ‘it doesn’t feel good.’ Your paternalistic attitude is exactly what we are against. We are not fighting to kill babies, we are fighting for bodily autonomy, which is basic human right. You cannot use someone else’s body without their permission, and no legislator, priest or “Gary Freeman” can tell me what to do with it. Its my body and only I know what is best for it. These women with these kids holding up signs made that choice, but that is not what is right for every woman.

      • Jazzman47

        Hey here’s a thought for you. Make certain that both partners understand that there is an option called “birth control” and that all types of contraceptives are available to both men and women For Free.

        • Slim Picnic

          And don’t forget to tell them that the only proven 100% effective birth control method is absinence, and that they ARE in control of of their body and spirit and that they do have free have a choice to say “no”, and that depite what the media and others lying libs tell them – not having sex until marriage is a viable and beautiful and the most safe decision. Have you people no self respect and dignity that you have to kill the unborn to satisfy your cocktail of lust and irresponsibility. May God have mercy on us.

      • Carl Jones

        juliebear – 2 people invoved -one dies- doesn’t the one who dies have any bodily autonomy ? Abortion the ultimate act of selfishness. Denying someone else of the precious gift you had.

        • julibear

          No, the fetus does not have bodily autonomy as it is using someone else’s body prior to viability. And Jazzman47–BRILLIANT idea! Now please communicate this to the schools and to every teenager in America. All they are making certain of is that our kids are ignorant of how their bodies work.

          • Caleb Bryant

            There’s plenty of people in comas, with mental disorders, with artificial organs, etc. who are utterly dependent on others to survive. Is it okay to kill them on a whim? They might never recover, but the children we’re talking about are almost certain to become just like you.
            The last I checked, my body shares my DNA
            When do you think that a fetus becomes a human?

          • zj sky

            It is not just a “fetus”, it is a human baby. It is not an orange or a clump of cells (after five months) or a tumor that can be excised – it is a human baby. No amount of mental gymnastics you do will make this less true.

            I salute your passion to empower women and believe it comes from a very positive place. Unfortunately you and many on the left are choosing THIS as the feminist hill to die on – abortion is not just a “choice” or a matter of body autonomy for the woman. You are involving another living organism and as soon as you do so, your argument falls apart.

          • Guest

            How many babies have you killed? It is a baby and you do want mothers to have the option to kill the baby. Why not have the option to kill your baby up to a year after its born? There are many mothers who have buyers remorse and cannot deal with their kids so they abuse them.

          • Guy Fromage

            I’m glad that we’ve establish an unborn child is not “part of” her mother’s body.

            Now, the bodily autonomy argument is equally fallacious, as a newborn is still hardly autonomous. Without someone providing care for the child, she will soon perish. Consequently, it is dependent upon someone else’s body for nourishment and care.

            I will also point out that while your bodily autonomy distinction is fallacious, the circumstances it denotes differ not at all between an unborn child and 20 weeks, and one who is minutes away from experiencing birth. Do you argue that a child just about to be born, should be still be vulnerable to execution?

          • DenverDiva

            Oh, so you’re using the worn out excuse that the baby is a parasite? I get it now. Hmmmmm – how many parasite showers have you been to? How about baby showers? I think the difference in the words used are only about the perspective of the carrier of the baby – it’s a parasite when she wants to kill it. Its a baby when she wants and loves it. Right?

          • captainbaby3

            Are you on crack? “our kids are ignorant of how their bodies work”??? We have more sex education and condoms on cucumbers going on in the schools than ever before in history. . . the shameful promotion of promiscuity shoved on our kids every day! Just look at the slime on television. . . you are completely nuts to insinuate that kids don’t know about sex or how their “bodies work”. . . that’s the stupidest thing I ever heard. . .

          • Anthony Cracolice

            I have yet to hear anyone say, “Congratulations on your fetus,” or see anyone throw a fetus shower. Why is it that the word baby just can’t flow from the mouths or pens of pro-choicers? Fetus sounds less human, I suppose. How viable are infants? Should we allow the Roman practice of exposure? Abortions have victims: babies. I agree that the life or safety of a mother should extenuate circumstances. I seldom encounter a pro-choicer willing to make any concessions, even as to the humanity of the victims.

      • AirFrank

        Your points about the men are true. They are just as responsible. But you have no basic human right to kill the results of your freely engaging in the activity that created this life.

      • DJH78745

        Since when is it the responsibility of the school to ‘educate’ children about sex.

        It’s not the schools job to teach sex, indoctrinate or ‘lead’ our kids, it sure as hell isn’t their job to teach self manipulation or how to please the boy jumping from 1 of your friends to the next. It’s the parents responsibility, not the schools.

        Considering the miserable failure the liberalization of our school system has been over the last 40-50 years and you actually believe they’d get it right?

        • ConvoyScout

          Excellent post.

      • dasfdsfasd

        Wow…so, it’s okay to call them idiot women or idiot men. Riddle me this then…if they are idiots, then why are they smart enough to kill a human being. A baby has life from the moment it’s conceived. If you say otherwise, then you’ve never seen/heard a sonogram.

      • Guest

        You created the baby. We are trying to protect it from YOU.

      • Frank

        You are fighting for the right to kill for your convenience. Period.

      • GaryLeeT

        Sex education will enlighten the ignorant? So a couple is smart enough to figure out how to engage in intercourse, but they still think babies come from a cabbage patch?
        Oh, I know what you mean now. Educate them on how there is no consequence for practicing their hedonism, which we’ll call plan A, as long as they are informed about where to get Plan B for free.

        • idiotmitten

          No, silly. Babies are brought by storks.

      • GaryLeeT

        “Its my body and only I know what is best for it”

        In a society, everything you do, even to yourself, affects somebody else, in some way. We don’t live our lives in a vacuum.

      • John Briley

        If you are willing to kill another life in the name of “pro choice”, then choose not to have sex. No sex = no pregnancy = no abortion possible. Once you CHOOSE to have sex, then you are risking getting pregnant. Keep your legs closed or your dick in your pants. Problem solved.

      • DenverDiva

        it’s also YOUR CHILD that you’re killing! Do you not GET THIS??? It’s not about your body – it’s about your lifestyle and having a baby would make it more difficult! The give it up for adoption instead of murdering your child! This is so easy – why are you so stupid??

        • Gabriel

          There is nothing in the bible about abortions. If you think their is you are putting your faith in god you’re wrong men made this all up, not an imaginary guy in the sky.

      • Chantel

        I really don’t care what you do with your body. I don’t care how many or few your sexual partners. I don’t care if you cover yourself in tatoos, piercings or like to do anything else to yourself. What I do care about is you killing another human being because of it’s placement inside your body vs. outside. Because I know that the child is a person, it would be immoral of me to sit by the wayside and let that person be killed without even speaking out against their death. In this country even serial killers are given a trial and a good defense.yet innocent children who have committed no crime are chopped up and suctioned out. That does not represent liberty to me. When the right that you are fighting for is compared with the most basic human right-the right to life, it will always ve on the losing wide with those that use logic as their guide. If helping women is what you actually want instead of a quick fix, why don’t these pro-abortion and late term abortion zealots put that force behind free sexual education and contraceptives. You can’t actually believe that people would be calling for defunding Planned Parenthood if they stopped doing abortions and started focusing on sexual education and actual women’s health issues do you?

  • ‘Fugahlee Jenkins’

    The day they start deliberating on penis laws will be the day I abide by their vagina laws. I have not seen ONE penis law placed on ANY ballot EVER. With that said- if you would like all of these women to keep the babies GREAT! All that I ask is that they force each and every male she came into contact with to submit to a DNA test until the father is found (since all of you refer to these women in horrid ways) and then the male should be forced to pay child support through wage garnishment! Problem solved! Everyone wins! Including the CHILDREN!

    • Frank McAvoy

      It sounds very selfish and myopic to suggest that abortion laws are all about your vagina, rather than the reality; protecting the lives of the unborn. You also have to pretend that there’s no such thing as adoption, so that you can act as though abortion is the ONLY other possible solution to an unwanted baby.

      Although I’m with you on the idea of forcing more men to, in the very least, financially support the kids they frump up. While we’re at it, maybe we could think of some ways to make them actually stay in the kid’s life.

      • ‘Fugahlee Jenkins’

        Can you please tell me how many children/babies you have adopted? Many people scream at the top of their lungs to people what they believe without actually putting their beliefs to work. As for keeping the man in a child’s life….if that was the case, we would not be having this conversation. I am not familiar with the term “frump up” but I cannot imagine it to be good. I never knew that a pregnancy was the result of a “frump up”.

        • Frank McAvoy

          I’ll tell you what, you can know how many kids I’ve adopted after you tell me how many you’ve had aborted because their lives posed an inconvenience for you.

          Regardless of how many kids I may or may not have, it has no bearing on the fact that adoption remains a valid a viable alternative to abortion, particularly when we’re talking about late term abortion, like this case is all about.

          If it weren’t for histrionics and hyperbole, you’d have no reason to be against this bill.
          It simply banned late-term abortions (which is medically equivalent to infanticide), except in the case of the pregnancy posing a risk to the mother’s health or life, and required all abortion providing facilities in the state to meet the SAME requirements and regulations as EVERY OTHER medical facility.
          That’s the reason many of the clinics would have been shuttered; they wouldn’t have met the basic requirements in place that protect the health of both mother AND child.

          As far as “frump.”

          Well, when a man and a woman love each other very much, or just really like each other and there may quite possibly be “grown up drinks” involved, they get together in bed or sometimes the bathroom at the nightclub, and frump up some kids that show up 9 months later via stork. Unless of course the mommy gets a shotgun and chooses to blow the stork out of the sky before it lands. We call that an abortion.

          Is everything clear to you know, sweetheart?

    • archerb

      What if you are pregnant with a boy? If I can’t tell you what to do with your vagina because I don’t have one, then you can’t decide the fate of that penis wielding boy in your womb because you lack a penis.

      As for the child support thing, I think that’s a great idea, but if we are going to be fair, shouldn’t the father be able to make the abortion decision? If he is going to have a role, shouldn’t it be equal to the mother’s? If he wants the child, he should pay for it. If he doesn’t, then it should be aborted. That’s the power the mother has, isn’t it? Don’t you think we should have equal rights?

      Of course, I’m not suggesting that a man should ever force a woman to abort a child she wants, but I do feel that both parents should make the decision. In the event that a father wants the child, he should be allowed to have it. It is his child too.

      • ‘Fugahlee Jenkins’

        I agree with you in the fact that both parents should have the opportunity to decide whether or not to have the child. I think the main issue is that it is the woman that has to carry the child. Bottom line- I agree with most of you in the fact that women often choose their mates. Choosing to sleep with a man that you know is a loser is your own undoing. I was just trying to come up with a sensible solution that causes both to be responsible for what they made together. What I often see on forums and chats is that so many are ready to rant about a problem with no thought toward a solution.

    • justjello

      uh, I realize since I live in Illinois im ignorant to other state laws. However, here in Illinois they do just that. Any man the woman names the state goes after and forces a DNA test if found to be the father they are ordered to pay child support. Sometimes those test come out of the pocket of the male, other times the state foots the bill. I honestly thought your post was sarcasm…

    • Rob

      I have an idea, how about you be accountable for your actions? Don’t want to get pregnant? Don’t spread your legs. There are other things that you can use too, called birth control. They can prevent pregnancy.

      • ‘Fugahlee Jenkins’

        How about EVERYONE be responsible for their actions. How about men use condoms for their OWN personal safety. How about men keeping it in their pants as well? I seem to recall a story of a young man with 30+ children asking the state to “give him a break” I could think of something else he should have given a break. Women do not make children alone and it was the choice of BOTH people to not use protection.

    • Curious

      But as long as women like you view children as a pay day the
      problem will not get better. “I can have as many babies as i please,
      some man or the government will pay for it.” That mentality is what is
      killing our social services and our society. You view a split family as
      a Win/Win? Really?

      I mean what a novel idea Fug, get knocked up
      then treat the guy like crap be cause you know your going to get paid
      no matter if he stays or leaves. No reason to ever stay through the hard times with that setup.

      • ‘Fugahlee Jenkins’

        I never said or implied any of this. I am asking all parties accept responsibility for their actions. In addition…women like me? You know nothing to me to speak to the subject. Lets stick to the subject at hand instead of going on mindless off topic rants.Taking a jab at me still does not change the fact that there is not one penis law in place.

    • Dr Chambers

      It was women that clamored for “vagina laws”, not men. And now male leftists, RINOS and democrats with vaginas have jumped on that bandwagon. But I digress. It’s time for ‘progressive’ women to accept responsibility for their own sexual behavior and stop laying it on the taxpayer. Rape and incest are not at issue.

  • BobVa112

    So let me get this straight, the left is using children as props to allow the “right” to kill children… wow.

  • dreamkitten61

    Pro-choicers don’t have children…they have survivors.

    • http://www.FireKarlRove.com/ C. Edmund Wright

      ….or “accidents” or “diseases”…….

  • ICOYAR

    Of course, children do not know what that really means. And it is no surprise that evil ALWAYS tries to exploit impressionable children on them.

    If you give them the definition of an abortion, then almost none of them would be for it.

  • Guest

    Wow their liberals must have forgotten to abort these kids..

  • $2457116

    That’s the problem.

  • Jim1937

    What kind of disgusting parents would use their children to support the murder of babies?

  • Mitchell

    I would support abortion if you gave the woman a sonigram first, see the baby’s face and still want to do it fine. At 20 weeks you can know if it is a boy or girl you are aborting. The only real reason to have an abortion is the babies health, I can get it if you dont want to outlive a child with downs or something.

  • LibLieExposer

    It’s a shame that Stanley Ann Dunham wasn’t able to take a trip to Planned Parenthood in 1961.

  • Curly

    Why don’t you tell us all, what is contained in Texas SB 5 that you have a problem with? Let’s see if you really have read the bill and understand it.

  • helen

    How Disgusting!!!! There are alot of sick people in this world and it’s getting worst. What a sick mind to have a child stand there with a poster of a hanger…

  • jerryhulick

    I know two parents that need their asses kick, big time. If they have an agenda, which they do, but leave the children Oh wait they chosse to have their children but other women need to abort. People like this make me sick. Your typical jackass liberal

  • kestrel27

    Well folks, that’s all children are to Liberals…”Props”! The amazing thing is, if Progressives actually got their way, these kids probably would have been aborted, except for now they are useful to the idiots that call themselves Liberals.

  • rural_americans

    3 O’s – I doubt anything you don’t doubt. The filth that is the liberal left, has taken over the democrats.

  • D’

    I guess you’d rather them see Dr. Kermit Gosnell instead….google that abortionist..

  • Jeremy Grimes

    Troll……

  • James V.

    There are no boundaries to which scumbag liberals will not cross to feed their immoral beliefs. And they involve children? Despiciable, but not surprising. Time to take our country back.

  • DOCTOR_NICK

    Hi Everybody! Babies killed for $129.95

  • Michael Barrett

    If they wanted to be honest why didn’t they have the kids holding up signs withj dead babies on them…with captions like “My Brogther”..or “My Sister”: rather than a coat hanger…but pro-choice people can’t stand the truth.

  • James V.

    Liberals actually EMBRACE Infanticide. What a sick, deluded group of animals. Let’s take America back, Patriots. For our unborn, AND living children.

  • http://snd.sc/XTO3LX HIStory Indeed

    I guess they figured it’s becoming trendy since the public didn’t cry,
    piss and moan about it much when The President used children
    inappropriately from Newtown, or more recently when 3rd grade kids
    introduced him at an LGBT function at the White House.

  • RickQPublic

    Perhaps they are happy that they have a Mother & a Father who were married and wanted them and did not want them dead?

    • Dr Chambers

      NO. Leftists are angry, unhappy people. They feel guilty they were born and are too cowardly to self abort. They are “shamed” into having children and then use them as tools to foster their agenda and regret not terminating their pregnancies. It’s a vicious cycle.

  • John

    Murder is an acceptable alternative to responsibility in the bedroom. No wonder eugenics was popular at one time. If any of you question the intent of Margaret Sanger, feel free to delve into the true leftist agenda. Who are the racists now ???

  • zagnut64

    In Philly they have doctors killing abortion patients in free clinics, in a state where abortion is legal.

  • http://pelicanparts.com/ Melissa Lipnutz

    I’m all for aborting future liberals/progressives…

    • Dr Chambers

      Too bad Hillary’s parents were conservatives back in the day. Sigh . . .

  • jsmithcsa

    Tell that kid if his Mom really believed in abortion he wouldn’t have been born.

  • Walter Adams

    It use to puzzle me that people who had no qualms about slaughtering a baby would generaly be opposed to the death penalty. It the child can be condemned to death by dis-memberment for the henious crime of being ‘Unwanted’, or ‘Inconvenient’, then surely there is no one more unwanted or inconvenient that a convicted murderer.
    But, I think I have finally worked out the logic behind Pro-Choice people opposing the death penalty;
    If you are in favor of killing the innocent, you must by logical extension be for preserving the guilty.
    After all, the killer is only exercising their “Choice” to end an unwanted human life.
    Or at least, one unwanted by the killer.

  • YouCouldBeRight

    How quickly these protesters forgot the Philadelphia abortion clinic case (and now the news-suppressed case in Texas), where using hangers would be an improvement over the debauched procedures used in killing the innocent.

  • Stacey g

    you have to be one sick SOB to support partial birth or late term abortions on a healthy mother and healthy fetus…Live Action has another audio tape of some “doctor” encouraging a lady to sit on the toilet after taking abortion inducing meds and let the baby drop…really? that isn’t sick to you abortion activists?

  • vonveezil

    You’re all missing the point here. Abortion isn’t illegal anywhere in the USA. There are just supposed limits on how late you can abort. In Texas they are trying to make it I think, 21 weeks. In North Dakota, they just made it 13 weeks.In NY, you can abort the day before the due date. Abortion is not illegal, like I said. Funny how the left keeps this subject alive when they won it 40 yrs ago.

    • Dr Chambers

      They could care less. The leftists are still selling obamacare and it is actually the law of the land. They believe they have a solution for every non-existant problem.

      • GenJohnStarkReturns

        Code of the land, actually.

        I hate to nit-pick, but I’m tired of people being fooled by the government’s misuse and abuse of language and grammar.

        • Dr Chambers

          General, sometimes you have to put in language everyone understands. For example, when certain patients visit my clinic and I recommend a procedure to them, I say, “are you down wif?”. They understand the meaning.

          • GenJohnStarkReturns

            Understood.

          • Dr Chambers

            BTW, I do agree with (wif) your post.

          • GenJohnStarkReturns

            Yo, I’m down wif dat, homey! lol (feeling wiggerish at the moment)

  • Thomas Kirkland

    Too bad a few of these Liberal protesters weren’t aborted… Sadly Ironic that they claim to be about freedom of choice only to take the voice and life of those to be born who have no voice or freedom… Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness (but only if your a liberal)… Hypocrites!

  • Bob Smith

    Children aren’t natural born killers. That’s something their “progressive” parents help to teach them.

  • Rich Rochester

    Yes. To abortion activists, whose goal is the realization of every possible abortion, which one of these children should have been aborted? Hmmmmm??? And if you’re fair, listen-to-all-sides parents, why not genuinely ask your children, after showing them a sonogram of an baby eligible for abortion and the techniques used for said abortion (which none of you will actually look upon or even talk about), whether they would abort the child? If I were a gambler, I would bet huge money that the first words out of their mouths is NOT about women’s sexual freedom or sovereignty over their bodies. Have you noticed that most abortion activists will not even say the word abortion on the air? Abortion is at the least bad law. It was granted based on there being a mythical right for sovereignty concerning their bodies. No such right exists because we already have laws which deny their right to prostitute their bodies or inject illegal drugs into them. Abortions are all simply about lack of self control and irresponsibility – and they want to employ barbarism to murder innocent babies WHO HAVE NO CHOICE!!!

    • vonveezil

      Well said

  • MegaLiberty74

    Abortion is force, a violent act.

  • Dave P

    Toddlers? Come on, I was elbow high to my mother in 1987, and at that time I knew what the coat hanger was for. I watched Dirty Dancing. That said, I distinctly remember being four feet high and having a mind of my own. I’ll concede that it is exploitative, if the children are coerced, but why is it so appalling that children are world-wise?

    • oeb25

      “World wise?” That’s SICK. You were a small child and had been exposed to the concept of abortion? That’s sick. Apparently, biology class was not taught in your school. You think it’s normal for people to have two completely different sets of DNA. These “children” have been robbed of their childhood.

      • Dave P

        The world is sick, we find out sooner or later. If abortion is outlawed, it gets pushed into the alleys and abandoned warehouses, just like prohibition did for alcohol, and the war on drugs does for drugs. You can’t paint a rose on it. The practice is sick. BTW: I have not revealed my personal beliefs on abortion.

    • jack

      Yeah, Dave, you are right. Now the 8 year old can be wise and get an abortion after you get her pregnant.

  • bill_a_bob

    Awww Twitchy, give them a break. This is understandable since Dr Gosnell is unavailable.

  • vonveezil

    Just think about this : In NY, you can abort a baby that is just about full term. IF you shoot that same mother and kill the baby its called murder but not if its aborted. Hypocrisy at its liberal best.

    • jack

      PLUS, liberals supposedly support gay and lesbian but also support the mass genocide of gay and lesbian babies…since they believe babies are born gay.

    • Dr Chambers

      It’s called a double homicide. Go figure.

  • SteffieJ

    Poor kids, what a sick and twisted mother they must be living with…and with what sad values she must be raising them. How about this kiddies, how about skipping the coat hangers and abortion and give an unborn child a life…and if mommy doesn’t want the baby, then some sweet couple would be happy to adopt it. How about THAT?

  • scott young

    Go through the crowd and check IDs. I smell a rent-a-mob. Typical of the left. This should have always been a states rights issue. If you don’t like what’s happening in your state then YOU move. I wish I had the same ability with the abomination they call Obamacare.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001717736633 Wang Newton

    These people are worthless c#nt$…..scum of the Earth….

  • Warrior1

    People should be advocating for a change to the Constitution which would declare the human fetus as having full protection under the law. Arguing whether you can abort at 4, 5 or 6 months is a waste of time – dead is dead. If a woman doesn’t want the child, she can give it up for adoption. Or remove the child and let it come to term in an incubator. Abortion is an uncivilized practice, but just like headhunters in Borneo, it’s hard to convince the average headhunter that what they’re doing is fundamentally wrong.

  • eeddggy

    Great parenting skills. These poor kids being raised by Monsters. Looks like yet another group of kids with no moral compass coming through.
    I wonder if Dear Mommies explained what abortion entails to the little ones.

  • jack

    Humanity.

  • chefjim

    What do they think, that recruiting children to promote their murderous agenda will be effective in furthering their cause? People are heartless, selfish, slanderous, mean, ill willed, full of hate and sedition, poised and ready to strike out and murder at the drop of a hat.

    • Dr Chambers

      Leftists! Would you expect anything else from their ilk?

  • like I CM

    These are the same people that say it would’ve been okay to kill these same toddlers 2,3,4 years ago….using a hanger. I am not surprised at all…disgusted, but not surprised

  • Gungy

    One little girl holding a sign that says, “My mommy should have the right to decide that my lil’ sister standing next to me didn’t have to be born”.

  • JH

    People forget that there is always a choice involved…the choice comes when the person has sex. The sex that brings about conception. Once that baby is conceived, what about the choice that that person doesn’t get to make? Abortion is morally wrong on any level.

  • Purplesuiter

    Talk about sick.

    Those children have no concept of what the coat hanger represents, yet so call ADULTS took advantage of them.

    Those so called adults are no different than pedophiles in my book.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001717736633 Wang Newton

    The Pro-Abortion movement is simply about wanting to live your life with no personal responsibilities and forcing your neighbor to pay for your whorish behaviour….

  • jack

    All this so women can have sex and one night stands without any consequences.

  • Schmoe

    the left isn’t stupid.

    shock serves terror, terror brings subservience.

    They noisiest, most obnoxious people in society all seem to be getting their inspiration from the same place.

  • Schmoe

    “If my mommy had choice, I wouldn’t be here holding this sign for her!”

  • JoeS

    The Left is ALWAYS using children to get their messages across. Know why? Grown up Leftists don’t know how to do it. They need surrogates.

  • SID

    something tells me these kids have no clue what abortion is. if they did they would cry

  • $1230510

    The parents of these kids should be arrested and charged with child endangerment.

  • GoldenRudy

    Psychological child abuse. No doubt indoctrinated to believe homosexuality is normal and “gay” too.

  • Craymin

    Abortions disproportionately target minorities thereby creating an effective institute of self regulated population control for a demographic of persons that would most likely identify with the liberal agenda and nanny state. Have a nice day!

  • rennyangel2

    Well, the good side is these are children who escaped the “safe and rare” 1.5 million abortions the left loves to sponsor every year.

  • Montgomery Draxel

    Abortion will be outlawed, eventually, because the kind of people that think nothing of terminating a pregnancy, often have few (if any) children.

    People who embrace life, human life, in all forms, have more children.

    Those children grow up to become voters.

    The left is aborting itself out of a constituency, which is why they want to control the education system: must indoctrinate new champions of “progress”. Young children holding up signs without the foggiest idea of what it means, this is truly a look inside depraved minds.

    They push for changing the model family to include all manners of non-normal or non-ideal configurations. Homosexuals, single parents, to the left are just as valid as a married mom and dad. Except they are not and never will be. History shows us that great civilizations do not form and will never last unless the foundation is in place: that foundation is the family.

    Prisons are full of the children of broken families. Aborting them before they’ve had the chance to make it isn’t the answer; the answer is to prevent broken families in the first place. How? Eliminate any government welfare that creates dependency.

    It is important for all of you good people, religious or not, to marry and have children. Get involved in local politics. Take over the school board. Fight against the forces of collectivism, left wing feminism and racial identity politics.

    The future begins in the womb, not the tomb. The left celebrates the murder of millions of ‘unwanted’ children. This is all you ever need to know about their character.

  • Meaunkey Snaut

    I would not have believed it if the picture didn’t exist.

    Hey, Nancy Grace, what say you on this?

  • algebra

    Kill the babies, let the politicians wear the diapers!

  • nobama

    I find it to be disgusting beyond belief when coward adults exploit children to get their messages across. O’Bama is famous for these kind of tactics as is the left.

  • markgl

    And the left cries saying we indoctrinate children with religion. I have to say having them carry pro-choice signs with wire hangers is the most grotesque form of indoctrination I’ve seen.

  • The Working Man

    Ironic, young children being used to promote a right to an abortion at a pro-choice rally….

  • Joe_E_in_the_IE

    Children today, babies in silk-screened t-shirts tomorrow.

  • Jeffrey Gee

    A child holding a sign supporting abortion is pretty sick. Children really don’t have much say until they are adults. Their parents are twisted I am surprised by these actions they even have kids instead of aborting them all in the womb…

  • Jack Frost

    Standard democrat tactic… hide behind children.

  • http://twistedmuser.com/ Twisted Muser

    I don’t see how you don’t consider that sick, no matter what side of the issue you are on.

  • notenoughtime

    Responsible parents do not recruit their children for adult causes. The hangers highlights that some adults do not operate in the best interests of their children but in their own narrow minded interest.

    • Dr Chambers

      We’re not talking about responsible parents here. Calling these people parents is a stretch at best.

  • GenJohnStarkReturns

    Children: the favorite tool in the tool box for sickos and government (sorry for the redundancy there).

    Most recently, Sandy Hoax.
    And now this, abortion.

  • ModdKenwood

    it fails to dawn on that little girl that her mommy may have considered aborting her

    • GenJohnStarkReturns

      Or that that very coat hanger was used to murder her would-be sibling(s).

  • Jeebus

    Austin used to be a cool city. Now, it’s become nothing but a dumping ground for idiot transplants and brain-damaged libtards. Not that conservatives are any better, but still. You’ve poisoned Austin. Go the hell back where you came from.

  • Montgomery Draxel

    Abortion will (eventually) be outlawed because the kind of people that think nothing of terminating a pregnancy often have few (if any) children. People who embrace life, human life, in all forms, have more children.

    Those children grow up to become voters.

    The left is aborting itself out of a constituency, which is why they want to control the education system: must indoctrinate new champions of “progress”. This is also why they want tons of illegals flooding into our nation.

    They want a permanent underclass of uneducated minorities and ‘oppressed’ womyn to reflexively pull the lever for democrats.

    This is why the most important fight in America today is over the Education system.

    The future begins in the womb, not the tomb. Never let those that celebrate the murder of the most innocent humans get to control of the narrative.

    • Sissel Byington

      Which is also why they need 11 million new voters

  • tie_banana

    Oh the irony……

  • RecoveringLiberal

    Please note that all the advocates for abortion including the kids in this story were not aborted. Everyone else can be aborted, though, but not them.

  • Tony2000s

    Morally reprehensible the way the parents of these children chose to use them.

  • Jeff

    The fact that you are surprised that the left would stoop to such tactics explains why the left has been winning the war. You keep debating them like you were engaged with civilized people possessing honor and dignity. They are none of the above. They will lie, cheat, steal, slander, use, and abuse anyone and anything to have their way. Wake-up! Realize what your dealing with and stop trying to reason with the unreasonable, before it’s too late (if it’s not already).

  • markdstump

    Personally, I would never use my kids to hold up a sign for ANY political cause.*

    I don’t teach my kids opinionated or unsubstantiated dogma.
    My kids are taught the difference between fact and opinion,
    between reason and emotion. Then, when they are old enough (30), they can begin to think they know enough of the world to have an opinion :)

    *I confess, I don’t hold up signs either. I’m satisfied w/ my one vote and the occasional, hopefully principled, reasoned, post.

    ~Mark

  • Stick and Move

    The next generation of indoctrinated clowns.

  • Hulie04

    I wonder if those parents have explained abortion to the children and why a hanger is on the poster? Can any of us imagine telling children this age about how a woman is pregnant and then has the baby sucked out of her or torn out of her? That image is as disgusting as this photo of very small children supporting abortion. Makes me think of the radical Muslims who educate their young from birth on how to hate and kill for this is no different to me.

    • Tigerclaw1

      That’s the kind of trash we are fighting on the left – the political ideology that is made up of hurt feelings, puerile minds, daddy issues, and ugly women.

    • http://ragingvanity.wordpress.com/ God is Laughing

      They were probably told that pro-lifers want to jam them into their female parts to kill THEIR babies.

  • Sissel Byington

    This is pretty much disgusting. Shame on this child’s mom.

  • gnorville

    The kids are obviously being used, but do they realize that they could have been that “choice”?

  • ImpStout

    Explain to a child what that means and I will bet 100% would be opposed to abortion in any form!

  • franktell

    Disgusting! The next thing they will use kids to host LGBT events. No wait…already do that!

  • Tigerclaw1

    That’s like cows holding up McDonald’s signs.

  • $20822404

    Hey it is just the future Abortion users.

  • iamcrm

    That’s like cows and chickens holding signs in support of the slaughterhouse!

    • GenJohnStarkReturns

      Even animals know better. I recently built a smoke house near my pig pens. They avoid it like the plague….

  • servinc

    and under what legal terms could these children be “terminated”? play fast and loose with the definition of “life” and you end up with “le deluge”…

  • Jack Levitt

    Leftwingers are mentally ill.

  • http://ragingvanity.wordpress.com/ God is Laughing

    Maybe we can get them some dead 30 week term babies to hold, that would make an impact.

  • Allen Craig

    Womb survivor, “Don’t make mommies kill their kids with wire hangars”

  • coneil5150

    Killing babies is not only a right… it’s fun !
    Right, Dr. Gosnell ?

    Show these kids and their parents pictures of some of his handy work.

  • Sentry Virginia

    Babies turning into baby killers early these days.

  • sailordude

    The right should start counting the ethnicity mix of this pro abortion movement because I’m NOT seeing ANY blacks or Latinos there. The left calls us racist when the Tea Party DOES have minorities in it’s midst (lying saying there are none), this is so obvious it needs to be called out that white liberals want to populate control minorities through free abortion.

  • President Nimrod

    Sort of like a Jew protesting the closing of Hitlers Death Camps

  • Torde Lisbet

    They are not “pro-choice.”
    They are “pro-kill babies.”

  • dasfdsfasd

    Irony…A mother using her children as supporters to allow other women the ability to have a choice to destroy a life after 20 weeks. Is the mother of these children wishing she had the choice to eliminate her own children after 20 weeks?
    I listen, respect, and enjoy discussing the opinions of many; however, when one uses a child to advocate anything (political, religious, etc…anything), then you no longer get to speak on behalf of others.
    Whomever posts on this site the mother of these children are good women needn’t speak either.
    THESE ARE CHILDREN!!!!

  • servinc

    the Nazis were fast and loose in defining humanity, our crime is to be fast and loose with the definition of life. We’ve exceeded the death toll of the concentration camps already. Were those victims more innocent or worthy of consideration than the unborn we’ve encouraged our daughters to rip from their bellies? and we point the finger at Hitler. Is this not hypocrisy?

  • siggyvidir

    Does an aborted fetus become a human being if let to be born??? Nuff said! Woman s right because “it” is inconvenient. Grow the hell up people and take responsibility!

  • Laurie

    When abortion was legalized:

    1. We didn’t have home pregnancy tests capable of determining pregnancy within hours of missing a period

    2. We didn’t have sensitive ultrasound that showed exactly what was happening in the womb within a few weeks post-conception

    3. We didn’t have morning after pills

    4. Birth Control pills weren’t $10.00 a month-OR FREE as they are now

    5. Condoms were behind the counter at pharmacies

    6. Pharmacies weren’t open all night

    7. Condoms were only available in pharmacies

    The legality of abortion must be revisited due to the above. The morality hasn’t changed but the mentality MUST. Pro-Lifers must set aside their emotions & focus on the LOGIC in order to make progress. Abortion is wrong but legal. Texas has the right idea->find ways to limit it & the “doctors.” I would add that clinics must operate as NON-Profit. Planned Parenthood is a billion $ BUSINESS. Look at their financial statement available online. Use logic & the pocketbook to reduce abortion because those two aspects are inarguable.

    • Laurie

      There is absolutely NO reason to have an “abortion” as late as 20 weeks. If it is medically necessary, it’s not called an abortion and it’s performed by an OB/GYN.

    • Dr Chambers

      You are fooling yourself if you think Non-Profits do not make money. PP can change their status and it will not put a dent on their bottom-line. I can take apart everyone of your arguments but haven’t the time to fritter away.

      • Laurie

        PP is in the abortion business to make money, not to care for “women’s health issues.” Their assets are $1.517.9 BILLION. You don’t make that much money handing out contraceptives.

        What fact did I state that you can take apart? That Roe v Wade was settled 30 years ago. Do you think we use cancer research/treatments from 30 years ago? Today, do we base anything in technology on what was known 30 years ago? Good thing we don’t or we wouldn’t have personal computers, laptops, pdas, fax machines, digital cameras, electric cars, dvds, MTV, HBO etc. So why do we not reevaluate Roe v Wade? The ruling was based on what was known then about fetal development.

  • Kevin Stowell

    Since when did the left have a problem with child abuse?

  • racerrex9727

    I think I’m going to be sick…

  • zj sky

    Interesting – kids holding pro-choice signs at a rally defending a women’s “right” to abortion. The very same medical procedure that these kids should be thankful was not done to them!

  • eeddggy

    The Left knows no shame. Children are not people to the Lefties, they are props.

  • johnjgriffin

    I guess if we were all aborted here, these comments would not exist.

  • red65

    I am in no way advocating this, but I imagine the hanger represents that they believe the bill would cause women to have to “use a hanger in the bathroom, or go to a butcher in a back alley and end up sick or worse”. Never mind the baby and his or her suffering. In REALITY, the bill keeps THAT or Gosnell crap from happening. I simply do not understand the mentality at all but I especially don’t understand it from people who call themselves Christians and in particular Catholics….(PELOSI!).

  • Jeff

    Child abuse in the worst form. What kind of parent would allow this?

    • eeddggy

      I’ll take that question. Answer: Horrendous Monsters calling themselves parents.

    • Dan_o

      That’s what I was thinking. Must be a loving home for a child to live in.

    • ModdKenwood

      she’ll turn out gay or want to be made into a boy

      • Dr Chambers

        However she turns out her mother will say she was born that way.

  • chefjim

    Don’t these people have any fear of God? Oh, wait, they don’t believe in God, I forgot. The judgement of God is being stored up on this country and we are living on borrowed time. This is just how the bible says it would be in the last days and it is seen everywhere we look.

    Much of the prophecy of the bible is coming to pass as I write and it would behoove everyone within the sound of my keypad to REPENT and turn back to God. He is merciful and ready to forgive. He is full of Love and Compassion and wants for everyone to be saved.

    The offer is still open but will soon slam shut after millions of people disappear; those who love Jesus Christ will suddenly be snatched away into the hand of God and those left behind will face horrific times on the earth where evil will be unleashed, a star will strike the earth (Wormwood) many asteroid impacts and a possible pole shift. It will be indescribably horror. Billions will die…

    “Behold, the Lord maketh the earth empty and maketh it waste and turneth it upside down and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.” Isaiah 24:1 If you read the rest of that chapter, you will see that God is going to pour out His wrath on an unbelieving world. “The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants thereof because they have TRANSGRESSED THE LAWS, changed the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant.” v. 5 (emphasis mine)

    Does that sound familiar? What has our president been doing lately with the laws of the land and with the constitution? He is changing the laws and ordinances for marriage, freedom, civil rights, privacy, taxes, healthcare, just about anything he can change, he is changing and many in the country are behind him in this destruction of the laws that have been part of our constitution since the founding of the nation.

    As each day goes by, this message that I preach becomes more and more absurd to most people and it will continue that way until a law is made which restricts the use of the name of Jesus Christ entirely. That isn’t where it will end. During the Tribulation period (7 years of God pouring out His wrath, intended for the Jews who have rejected Him but includes every unbeliever in the world) they will KILL Christians by beheading. (those people who have had loved ones who have disappeared and found that what they had been told by them was true and that Jesus really did remove them from the earth before unleashing His wrath)

    Again, it is not too late. Confess your sins to Jesus. Tell Him you are genuinely sorry for them and that you repent of them. Invite Him to live in your heart and to take control of your body, mind and spirit and to save you. If you are sincere, you too will be going on a trip in which your body will be changed, in the twinkling of an eye; because this mortal must put on immortality. We will be changed into beings much like Christ Himself and we will see Him as He really is. He is waiting for that last person to be saved and then He is coming for us. Take heed. The time is at hand.

  • eeddggy

    These Loons make themselves feel better about “Murder” by calling it “Pro Choice”.

  • dogwonder

    Hitler brainwashed millions, if you get the kids young enough you can teach them how to hate like a good liberal loon.

  • WeHoldTheseTruths2

    It makes my heart hurt to see this foto.
    Parents, friends, protect your families and children. We’re living in the days of Noah and Lot. (Dear Lord, please have mercy on US).

  • jhs

    Classy left. Irony is a little kid advertising pro-abortion.

  • mauloa

    Only “Cretans” use little children to push an ideology or product, be it this hellacious activity or drugs. God does not like people to abuse “his little ones” and, this is exactly what is taking place. No rock is big enough for these evil creatures to hide under.

  • Chriss Markey

    Some 25 years AGO a local liberal state rep in Essex county, MA used some 3 dozen kids from mentally handicapped kids from a state institution to stage sign-holding activities downtown and at major street crossings. (My brother was volunteering at the time they bused the kids from the facility. He was asked not to come back after revealing this.)

    The issue was raised to the local (biased) media, and (biased) officials at the state institution; NOTHING was done.

    That was 25 YEARS AGO. You doubting that liberals would do such a thing reveals gross naiveté, gross stupidity, or flat out bias on the issue.

    The reality is the left pulls this crap ALL THE TIME – they can NOT win on the merits of their arguements, so they cheat. Pure and simple.

  • PeaceThruNoParties

    I wonder if those kids know how close they were to an encounter with a coat hanger.

  • DougFL

    when do the pro-choice people believe it’s not just “up to the women”? When the baby is actually born? Do they believe they could murder an “unborn” child right up to the moment of delivery?

    • Dan_o

      I’ve heard a doctor argue it should be up to 28 months. Yes, I said months, not weeks.

      • DougFL

        my wife is pregnant with our fourth and seeing the fetus at 12 weeks in an ultrasound and knowing that probably every single pro-choicer believes that 12 weeks is PLENTY early to abort makes me sick and very sad. you can see the limbs and heart beating. humans are a brutally disgusting species sometimes.

        • Mark81150

          unfortunately, yes.. when they asked my wife and I during her pregnancies if we wanted to test for Downes,.. just in case so we could “abort if necessary”.. we both refused the test..

          If our babies were less than perfect, they’re still a gift from God, not subject to a veto for being inconvenient.. The first two, were healthy, beautiful babies, our third, was a beautiful boy, we lost to a still birth.. We still carry that loss, 9 years later..

          I held my second son, till they took him from me.. if I could have traded my life for his, I would have in a heartbeat.. my wife, she still tears up.. well we both do, when someone asks about him.

          and these scumbags want more dead infants.. right up to the moment of delivery.. a position so extreme

          • Mr. Saturn

            I always wonder if they actually discover the genetic markers (presuming there are) for homosexuality what would happen if people started getting abortions because of that. The clash would be hilarious.

          • Dan_o

            Amen.

  • IDoubtIt

    Why would you use kids who were born to advocate against kids being born?

  • ThomasCollins1

    As Maxine Waters (D-CA) once said at a pro-choice rally in DC, “I have to march because my mother couldn’t have an abortion.”

    These kids are made to look as ridiculous as Maxine Waters. That’s not a good start to life.

    • Dr Chambers

      Which speaks volumes about Water’s lazy, ever widening asss.

  • George Orwell

    How compassionate of the Dems. I know those 21 week old babies would much rather be cut into little piece by an abortion “doctor” than pulled out of the womb by it’s mother with a coat hanger.

    • Mark81150

      Yeah… how much more humane, to be executed by an expert like Gosnell.. seems to be their logic..

  • ThomasCollins1

    One kid’s sign says;

    “If we had mandatory abortion, you wouldn’t be reading this sign”

  • Gerard Neumann

    Don’t even have the right bill number. Their parents keep proving their own stupidity.

  • Randy Hitt

    Put abortion back in the alley where it belongs.

    And while were at it let’s re-closet all the pervs.

  • bigfatslob

    Does this vision offend some ??? Keep your damn legs closed, be responsible and don’t get pregnant and kill your baby !

  • Randy Hitt

    Mothers who ‘choose’ to MURDER their babies should be punished like ANY OTHER murderer.

  • BobDow123

    Well, at least the pro-abortionists are consistent, THEY HAVE NO RESPECT FOR THE LIVES OF CHILDREN OF ANY AGE!!!

  • Scarface13

    The pro-infanticide lobby has outdone even its hellacious standards! SHAME!

  • westside_resident

    Kid probably thinks that’s her daddy as mom has explained to her.

  • ocean

    The Supreme Court of the United States
    ruled a constitutional right to abortion.
    A constitutional right to kill a baby.
    Choice means to “Kill” or “Not to Kill” a baby.
    Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion
    provider in America. Its on your conscience.
    God help you.

    • Mario Morales

      I disagree, The Supreme Court of the United States ruled a constitutional right to do with your own body what ever you see fit or needed. And even if I don’t agree with abortion, I will defend to the death your right to choose.

      • oi812

        I think it is funny because the fetus is not part of the woman’s body+try going into a hospital and asked to have your heart removed-you do not have the right to do with your body what you want but we grant women the right to do what they want with a living human organism inside her body?? Just does not make sense-all we are doing is trying to justify murder on a tough decision

      • mrunpc

        As an apparent “Conservative” you are right on the “right to choose”, but liberals/socialists/democrats/communists only agree with any “right to choose” if it suits their evil agenda.

        http://www.zazzle.com/mrunpc
        ANTI-Obama/Democrat/Commie/Union stickers, etc.

      • Nordog6561

        “I will defend to the death of babies your right to choose.”
        Fixed it for you.

        • Mario Morales

          Yes you are right it is your choice….your choice….

          • Kimmie Smith

            The fetus is a separate individual with a unique DNA apart from the mother and the father, so it is no longer the woman’s choice in the matter. The fetus has a right to life, it is a human being.

      • Dr Chambers

        You won’t defend to the death the right to choose or you wouldn’t be posting this dribble.

      • gsud1

        How about dropping a deuce on the 50 yard line right before kickoff at the Super Bowl? Think the SC would okay that too? Just because the SC allows something doesn’t make it right. They also just said it’s constitutional for the federal government to make you buy something. They’ve had lots of bad decisions.

        • Mario Morales

          It is your choice to do that, you will answer later on to whome ever, but it is your choice…

      • Kimmie Smith

        If honestly do not agree with abortion then you will defend to all lengths the right to life of the fetus, period. You either agree with abortion or you don’t.

  • hrvydngr

    All those who are for abortion are ALREADY here…it’s that an unfair advantage?

  • Mark81150

    The irony is more weapons grade than a 250 Kiloton MIRV Minuteman III warhead..

    The only difference between these children and their dead siblings, is momma didn’t decide to kill them before hand like their lost brothers, sisters, cousins.. Filthy despicable trash these parents are..

    Like using kids to carry anti-death penalty signs outside a prison when a convicted child molester killer is getting a needle in his arm..

    the level of scumbaggery is that bad..

    their parents should be turned in for child abuse.

    • cmerlo1

      Mark- couldn’t find the original thread we were posting on. No need to apologize- we are entitled to our own opinions and all are important. We agree that overall, the country is under bad leadership and headed in the wrong direction, and as long as we can all work together on that, the country can be saved.

  • RAB

    Using children as “props”…wonder where they learned that technique…ACA signing photo op.

  • General Dindu

    Libtard parenting personified.

  • Damien_Son_of_Hussein

    You Texans might as well start digging a moat around Austin now. You are going to have to get rid of them eventually.

    • freedom_is_good

      I think a lot of people are hoping that all their dope catches fire and burns the place to the ground.

  • TheFallofAmerica

    I’d rather be aborted than have two “daddies”.

    • oi812

      no you won’t

  • Kimmie Smith

    This just boggles my mind to no end. Using little kids to hold up signs fighting for the right to abortion. That’s just plain evil and absolutely the works of the devil.

    I think there are many young women who have really been mislead in knowing what abortion is. They really don’t look at it as murdering a human life because they’ve been taught that it’s only a bunch of cells and more like a cancerous tumor. I’d be willing to bet if there could be a law passed requiring them to have an ultrasound when they find out they’re pregnant and also go so far as to require them to either watch on video or be in a room where an abortion is performed, they would quickly change their minds about having the procedure done.

    These women showing up at the capitol and showing support for Davis are choosing to ignore reality because it gives them an easy way out. If they turn their heads at the facts like pictures of abortion, then they think they can escape having it on their conscious. But it WILL catch up to them eventually. You cannot choose to eliminate your own offspring and not be emotionally affected later in life, you cannot escape it, if you are human there is no way you can not be affected by this choice, it’s part of human nature for the woman to feel a certain motherly bond to their offspring and it starts in the womb.

    • Paul Kersey

      yes, dealing personally with women who have had abortions I know that the reality of an abortion is devestating mentally, emotionally, and often physically. The pro-death camps deal in philosophy not in accordance with reality. “Silent Scream” changed a lot of minds in my circles.

  • General Dindu

    Abort 50 million babies, import tens of millions of foreigners to replace the negative birth rate. A once healthy society commiting suicide….

  • Paul Kersey

    This is not much different than using a liberal of any age… limited capacity for independent thought, easily manipulated, not able to process issues in a logical or rational manner. (OK, tongue in cheek, here… it is obviously morally reprehensible to use kids as props in campaigns on either side.)

  • JReaS

    You know, if we just legalized murder in this country, we wouldn’t have people stabbing or beating people to death in dark alleys, which is often dangerous for the murderer. If you want to murder someone, with legalized murder you just take them to a “clinic” and have them injected with the same stuff they give people on death row. Let’s make murder rare, but safe.

    Sound absurd? Well that’s the same argument they’re making with the coat hanger analogy.

    • Damien_Son_of_Hussein

      Except that they equate a human fetus with a parasitical bacteria. Some people are simply evil. There is no logic in a death cult.

      • JReaS

        You’re right, but in reality that fetus has it’s own unique human DNA. Scientifically, it’s a human being at conception.

      • Ian Farnsley

        Parasitical bacteria? We talkin’ Congress now?

  • Ian Farnsley

    Aborting a child after sex is the penultimate example of irresponsibility in our culture. Everything MUST be a disease so there is no Accountability! Nothing can be MY fault! There can be NO bad consequences for my actions or I’m NOT happy! Even in the case of rape, the victim is the Adult in the situation. An adult stands up for the innocent. YES it’s a tragedy. Don’t make it MORE of a tragedy. Bring out what good there is and LIVE in it! OVERCOME! God save us! rant/off

  • oi812

    Women do not have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies-They can not have their heart removed. Plus the fetus is not part of her body. It is a living human organism that is living inside her body

  • $824679

    Liberals are really sick people: They defend the rights of murderous criminals by opposing the death penalty yet support late-term abortions. They defend the rights of animals not to be used as food or clothing but again support killing a defenseless human being capable of being born into life.

  • bladyblah

    its a disgusting culture of death

  • LaLou

    LOL the faux outrage is hysterical. It’s the same as those “godly” children who hold photos of what their parents believe are aborted fetuses (when most are actually stolen medical photos of stillborn or miscarried fetuses) outside of health clinics. One distinction however, the parents of this child are doing a great job and I, and the majority of this nation who are not misogynistic wingnuts, applaud them.

  • John Galt

    IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THIS!!!! But, I don’t know. I’m a guy. Ladies, answer this for me.

    When does an unborn child become a CITIZEN of the United States, afforded the protection of the government from Child abuse?

    • bladyblah

      in the womb … there have been cases of double murder when someone killed a pregnant woman. Nidal Hassan killed a pregnant woman (who intended to carry the baby full term) but they are only charging him with 13 deaths instead of 14. but it depends on the state you live in.

      • John Galt

        But wouldn’t that allow the government to Imprison the abortion wanting woman till birth. Yikes! That is cruel and unusual AND Unequal as men don’t get pregnant yet.
        I posit that it is when the baby can be removed and kept alive by technical means. But I’m a guy, I have no say?

  • mbarnwell

    Will you please look up and read on Margret Sanger…he high priestess of planned parenthood and eliminating the unfit from society…and WHO she wanted to eliminate from society! Then follow the path to Germany in the 1930s and Dr. Mengele her admirer in the Nazi regime. Lay this on your liberal leftist, pro choice emotional childish friends and associates and watch their utopian mouths drop!
    Do your homework.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001590484510 Brendan Flynn

    What type of individuals do you think are going to be performing these abortions if the law doesn’t require it’s performed by a physician? Most likely the “back-alley abortionist”. Current law makes it possible for the back-alley abortionist to perform these unsafe acts right there in the clinic. SB5 is trying to prevent that.

    • WhiteBoy65

      Well there’s always birth control pills. What a novel idea…

  • Yu So Wong

    The libtards are ……………well, libtards.

  • Doug Davis

    Many here are trying to reason with the Democrat, I admire your desire to do so but it is wasted effort, they don’t think like you do. They cannot love or care, they cannot think of others.
    The Democrat you wish to understand and help admires Dr. Gosnell and Mao, their moral impairment cannot be fixed, they are an evil that no words can describe.

  • Yu So Wong

    I guess the pro-choice children will get to meet all of their murdered brother and sisters when they get to heaven.

  • bladyblah

    I don’t think a coat hanger has ever been used to perform an abortion

    • John Galt

      Comment withdrawn

  • patriot_5245

    What if 20 years from now doctors will be able to determine that a baby will be born gay, after all they say they are born that way, would it be okay for a parent to abort it because they did not want a gay child. How about a interracial couple, black and white, were having a baby, but wanted a light skin child. What if the doctor could determine the skin tone of the child and says the child will be dark, would it be okay for those parents to abort their child?

    • Ted Scanlon

      if it were ever to become possible to determine the sexual preference of a child in the womb, you would see the biggest switch among the gay community from pro-choice/abortion to pro-life. the switch would be so fast it would make your head spin.

      • patriot_5245

        Well said Ted Scanion.

      • Guest

        Now that was funny,sad ,true,and repugnant all at the same time.

    • Tim_Parker_999

      Ever see Gattaca? It is coming. . .

    • Guest

      What about it? Neither example is a condition which would excuse that kind of choice. And a capital P S, no one is born homosexual nor lesbian.

  • DougFL

    we have the greatest gift of all – life. we can create life. that fact alone is so astounding most can’t begin to comprehend it. yet most people have no respect for it. how utterly shameful and disgusting. there is NOTHING more amazing and beautiful than a baby being born. CONVERSELY, there is NOTHING more repugnant than brutally snuffing out an unborn child who is already alive in the womb.

  • jnsesq

    For the children, eh, libs?

  • http://www.cigarmemoir.com/ Joshua Child

    I won’t be using my children to protest these kids parents.

    • Paul Kersey

      You’re a child. HA. Couldn’t resist!

      • http://www.cigarmemoir.com/ Joshua Child

        I don’t have children, but if I did. lol

  • mcmash54

    The poor kids dont even know what abortion means, and apparantly Chelsea Clinton dosent know what planned parenthood is or she wouldnt have wished her grandmother had used their services when she was pregnant with her mother.

    • Guest

      Was that not one of the most incredibly moronic statements ever? She will be a fine demonrat.

    • trixiewoobeans

      Maybe she really wished that…I mean, look at her mother!

  • Pronghorn

    Abortions kill about 1 million innocent Americans every year, compared to a few thousand innocents killed by guns. How about we set aside gun control for a while and focus on abortion control?

  • loansta

    Liberals are sick, frickin’ people. Killing babies is sick. Encouraging your children to kill babies is REALLY SICK!!

  • Dave Dk Kelly

    You liberal pukes can’t stand it that kids were killed in a classroom, but you demand the right to kill as many babies as you can create???? Explain please.

    • Guest

      Their only explanation divulges their hypocrisy and their ” its all about me” doctrine .

  • e-dog

    I will stand with Wendy Davis! That’s right, if we want to kill our children we should be able to do it in peace! 6 months preggers 7 months preggers 8 months who cares if you don’t want it that’s all that matters we live in the me society and it’s all about women’s rights! The right to vacuum that little sucker out viable or not! You go Wendy, get those little unborn babies show’em what you got girl!

  • Tim_Parker_999

    Abortion is the killing of a human life. If you can deny that fact then you are truly delusional.

    • Mary Lee

      Not just human life…a human being. A human being with his or her own body. How do they not understand this?

      • $57813486

        Liberals appear to have zero comprehension of morals. This is why even the most rudimentary morality such as “killing babies is evil” is so confusing to them.

        • Mary Lee

          Yes, they say “it’s not a baby” ….unless it’s wanted, or unless it’s a certain size, or it meets certain arbitrary criteria. The baby tries to avoid the abortionist’s tools, it is heartbreaking to see. What about their bodily autonomy? Their instinct is to fight for their lives. Anyone with a heart and a brain should know instinctively that abortion is a crime and a tragedy.

          • $57813486

            Modern DNA science routinely employed as authoritative in criminal and family courts nationwide, demonstrates the presence of a totally unique human being at the moment of conception. The science on this matter is absolutely settled.

            Yet the liberals … self-described apostles of science … utterly reject the entire field of biology in their support of infanticide.

  • ConvoyScout

    Wow, nothing like indoctrinating at an early age for your own personal political gain, nothing is to low/beneath these Liberal/Sheeple.

    • Guest

      And it doesn’t stop there, it is continued all thru the edumacation process, or is it better described indoctrination !???!!!!!!

      • $57813486

        And then it is amplified by Hollywood, the press, the music industry, the university, etc. And enforced by the IRS, the NSA, etc.

  • larryPTL

    That kid survived her mother’s desire to to control her body and now she’s being used by the pro-death camp? Howe ironic!

  • PROUD_TEXAN

    Just more proof that liberalism is a mental disorder.

    • Charles Sutter

      We are two great minds!!

  • MovingToNevada

    Kind of ironic they have children holding up pro-abortion signs. Go figure.

  • Charles Sutter

    I must repeat over and over again…”Liberalism is a Mental Illness.” How can you refute after this article?

    • Guest

      Maybe there is a shot for this?

    • Curly Bill

      It is not a mental disorder. It is a social disease caused by syphillis.

  • NotHereEither

    How can you be pro-choice, yet want to deny peoples choice to carry a gun. On the other hand, how can you be pro-life and support the death penalty? Sick of the oxymoronic wedge issues from both parties.

    • Ziegler45314

      Pro-life + support death penalty = The innocent should not be punished for the sins of their parents, on the other hand the guilty and unredeemable should not be made comfortable in captivity, but given a swift execution. That is the theory anyway.

    • rightsofAmerica

      Wouldn’t you agree that there’s a difference between taking an innocent life and that of someone that in a court of law, has been found guilty of brutally taking someone’s life and that is still a continued threat to society?

    • Guest

      That is an oxymoron only in your head,one is totally innocent, the other is not, there are NO oxymoron s, just morons without morals, and hose whom do have .

    • $57813486

      Is there in your mind any distinction between a convicted capital criminal judged by a jury of his peers, and an entirely innocent baby?

      Life is sacred. Thus, the only conceivable and equal penalty for capital murder is forfeiture of your own life. It is the only conceivable penalty that would match the crime.

      Free clue: Your lamentable intellectual shortcomings constitute no problem on anyone else’s part.

  • Charles Sutter

    Liberalism is certainly a mental Illness!!

  • Tim_Parker_999

    There is a tribe in Africa that when twins are born one of them is immediately thrown in the river (it is a traditional form of population control & superstition). I see no difference between abortion & this method. Maybe the pro choice people will take the killing all the way up to birth someday?

    • TheFallofAmerica

      The difference is no one cares about African Babies. We’re talking humans here!

      • Janet Mathews

        Go troll somewhere else, racist.

      • $57813486

        Ron Paul libertarian, I presume? Did you tire of the Jews?

      • $57813486

        Ron Paul libertarian, I presume? Did you tire of the Jews?

    • http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/05/09/elizabeth_warren_dances_with_lies/page/full Nola_Navy_Vet

      Only if democrats stay in office.

    • Dan_o

      That argument has already been made repeatedly, though it’s not legal yet.

    • Curly Bill

      They are past birth now. Have you forgotten Dr. Kermit Gosnell already?

    • TheFallofAmerica

      That should cut the crime rate in half

  • Monastery

    The irony of a parent using his or her child to promote the abortion agenda.

  • TheFallofAmerica

    Every abortion should leave the Mother sterile. Then they will only have to deal with the spirit crushing agony of murdering a child just once.

    • Janet Mathews

      Women who have previously had abortions often repent and become Christians. Star Parker is a great example. Before she came to Christ, she had four abortions while living as a “welfare queen”. After she became a Christian, got off welfare, started a successful business and got married, G-d had mercy on her and sent her one more child, a daughter. She is a great mother to her daughter, and a truly inspiring public speaker who is very open about her previous life and behavior. Our G-d is a G-d of second chances.

    • Guest

      That is an excellent idea.

    • $57813486

      Abortion must end. Just like slavery, and for the identical reasons.

      • TheFallofAmerica

        And what might those be? ……….and why do I have a feeling that I’m going to regret asking?

        • $57813486

          Arbitrarily defining as non-person … for personal convenience … other people based on an uncontrollable attribute. Like skin color, or age.

          Infanticide and slavery are the identical moral crime.

          • TheFallofAmerica

            You should probably go lie down for a while.

          • $57813486

            Why don’t you explain as concisely as you are able, the defect in my argument.

          • TheFallofAmerica

            I have no time for a pissing contest with a mental case. Find another victim. Good day!

          • $57813486

            When faced with an irrefutable rebuttal, the practitioner of infanticide invariably rotates the conversation away from the points, and toward the person of his opponent. Typically employing playground taunts.

  • Susan Gate

    I hope there are some people holding up signs showing aborted fetuses. scary for the kids though, but might as well learn early what their parents support.

  • cmerlo1

    There’s an abortion clinic not far from my house, and I often see anti-abortion protestors there with children and all are holding signs. This is vile on both sides of the argument as far as I’m concerned.

    • Dan_o

      This is a good demonstration of the problem that is post-modern thinking.

    • $57813486

      It’s not about holding signs, dimbulb. It’s what’s on the sign you’re having your child hold.

      Having your child hold a sign that says, “Kill kids!” isn’t very cool. Grok?

    • Guest

      you are only half right,ripping a human being to pieces IS vile, protesting places that do this filth IS NOT.

      • cmerlo1

        I agree with half of what you said. I have no problem with people protesting abortion clinics. I take issue with using children to do it, as much as I do using them to protest for it.

        • $57813486

          I agree with you. I would never employ my very own children as props for a policy preference. That being said, it’s hard to fault having a kid hold a sign that advances his own, obvious interests. Like being born. Even though he doesn’t fully understand his own interests on the matter.

          Having him hold a sign that says, “Kill kids!” is exploiting his ignorance in order to thwart his own interest in the matter. The former might be a bit tacky, but the latter is just plain evil.

    • cmerlo1

      The bulk of the comments here are not about what the kids are protesting, it’s that they’re being used to do it. If doing so is considered wrong, then it is, period.

      • $57813486

        Adults with functioning brains don’t subscribe to juvenility such as “binary reasoning”. We are able to make gradations on a scale.

        Thus we don’t advocate that shoplifting have the same penalty as grand larceny, for instance, even though both are stealing. Try to grow up.

  • Ziegler45314

    Find their parents, start child welfare investigations immediately. Your child isn’t there to act as an easel for your political free speech.

  • Kathleen Smythe

    Nothing says motherly love than teaching your child it’s OK to kill a child in your womb.

  • Bruce Pal

    These kids are called future low class citizens…aka liberals.

  • http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2012/05/09/elizabeth_warren_dances_with_lies/page/full Nola_Navy_Vet

    The despicable pro abortion lobby is using children to get their message out. These are the same children the pro abortion lobby would abort without conscience. The left has no conscience, morals or shame. Ana Marie Cox; sheds tears of joy for late-term abortion rights in Texas and Texas State Senator Wendy Davis of District 10 are the new faces of evil in Texas. Abortion is Murder.

  • SHREDIT

    What’s confusing about the pro-abortion thinking is that Roe v Wade argument screams that we will force women to go back to dirty, back alley, clinics. What these professional protesters are now screaming about is that SB 5 requires abortion clinics to meet the same standards as any other surgical hospital or clinic. These clinics are threatening to close down if they are forced to meet the same hygenic and safety standards. So, what’s the complaint?

  • PLT_3004

    Well you wouldn’t expect the pro-abortionists to make their little darlings hold up a picture of a scalpel and a suction tube…you know, because the kids probably wouldn’t understand that. Oh, but a hanger on the other hand, they’re at least old enough to figure out it’s a protest for higher wages for dry cleaners.

  • Juan

    They are not kids, you bunch of…, it’s small citizenry. They have their little rights too! And they might have a small army. And certainly, very small hearts.
    In a country gone insane, it is only proper that I make an insane comment.

  • $22809435

    SIgh. You do realize that America is now officially depraved and God is “perfectly pissed” at us. We have finally “jumped the shark” right into End Times or at least a pre-Civil War Mach II “reality show” of a country. Everything is over-under-sideways-down now. Right is wrong and wrong is right. All things evil are good and all things good are punishable by “Bull Horn” criticism and ostracism. It’s getting close to the point we normal citizens, Christians and Patriots “saddle up” and bring a musket and a pitchfork to the front steps of The Capitol. It’s going to happen sooner or later unless God has bigger plans and cuts us one last break before he has to walk away and let us do our 40 years in the desert eating crappy stale food that falls from the sky. Bummer in the summer.
    TINfoilhatisoff!

    • Guest

      It was not crappy stale food, and this country has the president it deserves, which is an incredible statement, however true and sad that may be.

  • like I CM

    And could I suggest that we stop using the term “pro-choice”? there is nothing pro-choice about liberal ideology (guns, sodas, salt, speech, healthcare, what t-shirt you wear to school, thoughts).They are about control, self-promotion, me, me, me, me. They are Pro-Self.

    • PLT_3004

      If you went to one of their “pro-choice” rallies and held up a sign saying “Pro-abortion & proud of it!” or maybe one saying “Abort minorities” they’d probably get you out of there as quickly as possible. They hate having to think about what they’re actually supporting.

      • like I CM

        couldn’t agree more

      • trixiewoobeans

        Wouldn’t that be funny? Infiltrate and carry a TRUTHFUL sign saying what it’s all about. When OCCUPY was here, I was just itching to make a sign saying “WE HAVEN’T GOT A CLUE!” and go picket in solidarity, lol! For Pro-Choice rallies, maybe a sign saying, “I Don’t Wanna Be A Grandma!”, or “I Have No Self-Control, Get Rid of This!” would be more fitting. Hey Twitchy, you need to start a hashtag suggestion thread for #TwitchyProChoiceSigns!

  • Clover11111

    These kids don’t realize that they could have ended up in the same way as their opportunist mothers.

  • http://www.wakeupblackamerica.blogspot.com/ goteki45

    The left is do deceptive in their terminology, yet the sound so stupid when they use it. The call abortion “reproductive healthcare”. Um, reproduction means to add, abortion on the other hands is to “subtract” or terminate. It’s the opposite of reproduction.

  • taylorRod

    The left has come out of its closet, where it hides the dead babies in jars and has its makeshift shrine to Satan. They are a death cult. That they advertise that now is their most honest attribute, as they try to force, cajole, bribe and lure the nation down a path toward the mass grave of secular humanist “utopia.” They are ghouls. Everything they propose should be scrutinized the way one would scrutinize an invitation to a private dinner with a serial killer. That they would put children out on the street to do their filthy work is almost as obscene as Dr. Gosnell’s back room. I guess offers the kids a break from being prostituted out by mom, and gives her time to do volunteer work for Organizing for America.

  • $57813486

    The liberal has two uses for born children. High-status adornments they can exploit like above as figurative human shields, when it’s their children, and future sex partners they can groom to early sexuality via the public schools, for other people’s children.

    When they visit Planned Parenthood, they illustrate what they honestly feel about children in general.

    • Guest

      Ready future partners? One wonders, considering their total lack of morals.

      • $57813486

        Why else would any adult teach a child to apply a condom to a banana in the third grade? Is there any aspect of modern liberal culture that lacks an endless stream of sexual innuendo and imagery? Bert and Ernie just came out of the closet. We’re flooded with it.

        There is no innocent explanation for such a thing.

  • VeraSt

    if the kids were holding up anti-amnesty signs, CPS would remove them from their parents (& give them to pederasts for their very own state-provided sex-toys)

  • Buddy Zuckerman

    Does anyone else see the irony of children being used as pawns to promote abortion?

  • $28814471

    how about some pro life kids holding a sign saying “I’m glad I wasn’t aborted” or maybe a pro choice kid holding one say “too bad my Mom wasn’t aborted, then I wouldn’t have to live with her”

  • Buddy Zuckerman

    everyone who thinks abortion is a good idea has already been born.

  • RecoveringLiberal

    How come that for pro-choice people, choice always means death?

    • $57813486

      “Choice” is half a thought. It lacks the “what”. Abortion is the “what”. Abortion always means death. Choose abortion is choose death.

      The left enjoys half-thoughts, since it obscures the aim. Maybe they all suffered a recent brain injury?

  • john cummins

    Leave it to the pro deathers to promote death via children that escaped death!

  • Diogenes71

    Leave it to the Lefties to use children to promote killing. They are just following the example of Nancy Pelosi, Plugs Biden, O and all the usual rogues without a moral core.

  • Steve Sharkman

    too bad those kids parents and grand parents didn’t believe in abortion.

  • $34803771

    Those people are so gross, and by “those people,” I mean Democrats.

  • randyo99

    Fortunately those kids somehow survived their parents’ obvious beliefs.

    • Mark81150

      they did.. and how many didn’t who are weeping looking down on what their siblings are made to do?

  • Sally Turnip

    Take a tip from the Liberal Mental cases of this country. Indoctrinate them young and destroy any hope of morality before they can even spell it. According to the Libtard Moonbats you can’t burn coal, own a gun, use conventional light bulbs, worship God, or be a Heterosexual. The only right they will afford you is killing unborn children. This country is so Phucked.

  • rightsofAmerica

    What’s horrifying is kids advocating for the rights of parents to kill kids before they are born.

  • maxonepercent

    What kind of sick parent exposes such young children to the abortion debate? I mean, that girl can’t be more than four! Either they explained the procedure in such vague terms that the children have no idea what is really going on, or they have severely traumatized their kids by explaining the true nature of abortion.

    • cmerlo1

      ^This.

  • PJSTX

    Im curious – are all these people from Texas? I doubt it. I think many are union members from elsewhere, IPPF employees from elsewhere – polls consistantly say Texans want this bill – these folks don’t have regular jobs? Or is this their regular job?

    I smell some professional “protesters”. Can anybody verify?

    • Mark81150

      I hear they have a few pockets of transplanted lefty’s… enough to populate daily protests, I have no idea..

      haven’t been in Texas since 82… near San Antonio… Lackland AFB and Camp Bullis.

    • trixiewoobeans

      Governor Perry DID say many were brought in from elsewhere.

    • trixiewoobeans

      Got the verification. An organization called “Grassroots Campaigns” pays $1200-$2200/mo. for “professional” protesters. The advert I saw was specifically hiring for this rally. They even advertise on Craigslist.

  • http://politivajustice.com/ Politiva_com

    Keeping it Classy.

    • http://verizon.net/ Only One

      How classy can you get with this.
      Children holding up pro-abortion signs. They don’t realize that their parents wish they were not born.

      • bobalouski

        I think that was sarcasm…

    • Mark81150

      I wish I could be that concise..

      Says everything about them, the arrogance, the ignorance, the pious attitudes.. all wrapped in hypocrisy..

  • mallen717

    The myth of the coat hanger. Nothing like building an abortion movement on a lie.

    • $57813486

      What aspect of modern liberalism is not built upon a lie? Satan is the Prince of Lies.

      • trixiewoobeans

        The Father.

    • Mark81150

      It is… before Roe V. Wade, only “rich” families aborted at all, by planning a Mexican vacation usually, safely away from gossip… because the pro-abortion crowd even then, was ashamed to admit they’d pushed a daughter into one, wether she wanted it or not..

      Most abortions now are purely for lazy birth control and these ghouls know it. Ask the girls going in these clinics, and most will tell you, they had birth control… but “forgot” to use it.. or couldn’t wait that long.. since PPH now teaches being responsible is such a drag on their primitive urges..

      When the abortion industry became a HUGE money maker for the PPH people, any thought to “choice” was thrown out the window.. you aren’t ca “real woman” if you haven’t had one..

      The scarring of the uterus, the later miscarriages when they DO want a baby, the nightmares, the depression, the long long nights of tears and guilt..

      They never mention that aspect of their money machine..

      do they?

  • jackcandobutwont

    Imagine how the media would portray this if it were a group of NRA’ers, or tea bag’ers…..the media would be saying this is indoctrination and brain washing…..shame on the media…again and again!!

  • Leland Williams Jr,

    If the left is willing to kill babies, what makes you think they aren’t willing to use kids for propaganda as well.

  • The Good Bad n UgLy

    For those that fight and battle for death and destruction, I tell you now, there shall be a great banquet honoring you and all those who stood beside you. It will be a magnificent ceremony and many awards shall be given for your work and great achievement. Unfortunately, …… Satan will be the MC, at this particular event.

  • Chris Dubay

    How about the kids holding up signs of aborted fetuses by the other side? Don’t throw stones when your house is made of glass.

    • $57813486

      “But mommy, he did it too!” remains confession, not mitigation.

      Say what you will, but a child holding an anti-infanticide poster is advertising in his own best interests. A child holding a “Kill kids!” sign is having his ignorance willfully exploited against his own best interests.

      Add the coat hanger canard, and you’re having him also advance a total lie, in order to subvert his own best interests.

      • Chris Dubay

        Which is exactly what you are doing to begin with. So nice of you to point out your own bigotry. I expect nothing less from the brainwashed religious right.

    • Dan_Lef

      Hey Chris. The difference is that the aborted fetuses are real and the coat hangers are figments of the imaginations of Liberals like you.

      • Chris Dubay

        No the difference is that if this asinine law goes through, the coat hangers are going to be the only way for a woman to have an abortion because of the cult mentality of the religious conservatives like you that demand that the entire world conform to your idiocy. Those pictures exist because of you, so accept it and continue to abuse your children with them.

      • Chris Dubay

        No the difference is that if this asinine law goes through, the coat hangers are going to be the only way for a woman to have an abortion because of the cult mentality of the religious conservatives like you that demand that the entire world conform to your idiocy. Those pictures exist because of you, so accept it and continue to abuse your children with them.

    • cmerlo1

      Apparently, it’s OK to expose kids to violent images, as long as it’s an aborted fetus or a man nailed to a cross.

      • Mark81150

        But lefty violence is ok?

        You explain in detail what the hanger is used for?… or just lie to them about it meaning something else.. a ghoul who inserts a wire inside her self to murder her baby isn’t exactly violence free is it?

        You people exploit kids to make it legal to kill their siblings in the womb.. do you tell them THAT truth?

        and you people wonder why the pro-life movement is GROWING larger among the youth..

        You LOOK at the pictures of what you want legal.. I hope you feel sick about it..

        but I doubt it, you need a soul for that.

        You wanna lecture about violent images, really?.. your secular left society in the entertainment field pretty well has dropped that bomb a LOOOOOOOONNNNNG time ago.. You can’t escape your version of violent images..

        The only ones which bother you, are the ones rubbing your face in the results of what you want.

        • cmerlo1

          See my post above. I am anti-amnesty, anti-debt, anti-big government, anti-Obama, pro-constitution, and pro-gun. I choose not to participate in religion, and disagree with most conservatives on abortion and gay marriage. You made an assumption about me based on that. I don’t have to agree with the hive on everything. I can think for myself.

          • Mark81150

            Then you’re a libertarian conservative.

            my apologies for assuming you were left wing.. I was wrong to do that. If you look at the post I made above, you’ll see why I was very angry when I posted to you right after answering another comment. I should have paused and not typed in an anger which wasn’t caused by your post.

            We’ll disagree on abortion, for that I do not apologize,..

            for what it’s worth.. I’m sorry for making a false assumption.

          • $57813486

            You’re a typical libertarian. You and the liberals constitute the Army of Amorality. You are two battalions that form the cultural invasion seeking to destroy America.

            I don’t see why you advance the specious notion that you are cousins of Conservatives, when you are the enemy of Conservatism equally as the Liberal is.

      • $57813486

        Lacking detectable cogency, the liberal invariably distorts the point to absurdity, then mocks his own argument as if it were actually someone else’s.

        The liberal has not yet grasped that a desire to talk to yourself can be satisfied absent a public forum.

        • cmerlo1

          If you think I’m liberal, you haven’t read any of my other posts on this site. I’m simply not religious. I am a free thinker, and have some opinions that differ from those of other conservatives. I don’t agree with conservatives on this issue for the most part (though I support the Texas law), because to me it is a religious issue. Not everyone has the same beliefs you do, and feel as strongly about it. A lot of conservatives work themselves into a frenzy over this, instead of putting that energy into winning elections, which can’t happen if we start thumping the bible every time abortion or gay marriage is mentioned. Religion should be a personal and family thing, not the law of the land.

          • $57813486

            Libertarians are the second battalion of the Army of Amorality. You are indistinguishable from a liberal in that context.

      • like I CM

        now stupity have reached some new levels. And by the way that man is God your Lord and His name is Jesus

    • Jim

      Sorry Chris, the comparison is NOT valid.
      WHY? because one opinion is to PROTECT that life. THE other is to commit the act that made that picture of an aborted fetus possible.
      IF it is so hard to SEE that picture, then try going to a GOSNELL style clinic and watch and listen as as a baby of 5 months of gestation is ripped apart screaming. OR wait until the baby is trying to life and take your scissors and snip his/her neck. THAT is “choice” IF it is too ugly, then you’re hiding from the truth.
      IF by “pro-choice” they hold up hangers because thats how they ILLEGALLY killed their babies before ROE V Wade is TOO ugly for you, then perhaps you are hiding from the truth.

      • Chris Dubay

        You have no idea even remotely what you are talking about other than the cult literature you got at church. I can’t even begin to think about having a rational discussion with anyone who actually believes that garbage. You are the perfect poser-boy for the Pro-Life cult.

    • like I CM

      i refuse to believe you are totally missing it. come on Chris, I have faith in you(still). wake up! look at the picture you posted and tell me that this has anything to do with houses made out of glass or stones. This has to do with life vs brutal murder, man (as if there is any other kind)

    • Mark81150

      and you see the results of what you preach.. and aren’t even slightly bothered by it…

      I held our dead son in my arms the day he died douche.. and you soulless ghouls want to create even more dead infants after 5 months.. INFANTS, not a mass of cells..

      DEAD FRIGGIN INFANTS.. and you think that’s just fine?

      The difference, is our people are marching to save lives…

      Yours?

      To butcher infants…

      the moral high ground is something you’ll have to imagine, since you’ll never actually see it.

      I had posted a very personal insult, I removed it,.. I buried a son who died at birth, there is no way I can ever forgive anyone who would do the unthinkable and claim it as a “right”… you don’t forgive or forget something like that… abortion may not have caused his death.. but in defending it, you would repeat his death by the millions..

      millions..

      in what universe can you soulless husks see yourselves as “moral”?

      • like I CM

        nuff said. sorry for your loss

        • Mark81150

          yes… well thank you for that..

          it is extremely personal to me, and to everyone who’s lost an infant, or come to deeply profoundly regret their “choice”..
          For ever story they would tell of being “proud” of their “choice” we can match and triple them on the deep pain it inflicts.. I and my wife, took in her two single mom sisters, and their combined 4 kids, when they lost their apartments in this Obama economy.. meaning we pay all the bills as they struggle back on their feet, helping with their kids.. I mentor/father 6 kids now, instead of just our two.

          and there isn’t a day that goes by, when I’m NOT grateful to the Lord, these women didn’t abort.. the eyes of my nieces and nephews are as dear as our own children..

          We choose life.. and like family, we help each other survive… thrive… learn.. love…. there is no such thing as an un-needed or unwanted child.

    • auh2064

      Yes, Chrissy, that’s wrong, too.

    • Charles Nash

      Buzz off shit-fly

  • Chris Dubay
  • sonofamichelleo

    The marxist democrats are well versed in scare tactics and using hate as a tool. They do not win at the ballot box, so they must strong arm their radical ideology into policy and law.

  • Dan_Lef

    Liberals have no shame. None.

    • $57813486

      When you elevate Lust, Envy, Sloth, Greed, Wrath, Gluttony and Pride to human virtue, the need for shame is obviated.

  • My Shocked Face

    Do they not hear themselves speak? Yes we demand the right to kill babies 5 months after conception! We demand that abortion clinics like Gosnell’s remain open and available! I feel sorry for those poor kids.

  • bobalouski

    Those kids’ parents should be retroactively aborted.

  • Bobbie

    The Left always exudes class.

  • CCBanks

    One day they’ll get the cruel irony and hate their POS parents that put them out there.

    • Mark81150

      Their parents are exactly why the youth are turning more pro-life.. Pol after pol confirms this, enough so, the left is holding seminars on how to push back against the rising sentiment of pro-life advocacy among young people..

      They’re telling their kids..

      I demanded a right to have you killed, if I felt like it..

      Then they wonder why the kids are coming our way on abortion?

      • interpcurves

        The parents are so selfish, they will not share their finances with children, that is the problem, A_bort Liberals Babies

      • BinRaleigh

        The left has to do that. They have killed 60,000,000 babies that would probably have grown up and become Democrats, just like Mom.

  • Jim

    Does this remind anyone else of Nazi brainwashing in the 1930s? When German Nazis made films of mentally disabled people and titled it ,’Life without meaning.’ This was an attempt to make it totally legit to kill people who have ‘no worth.’

  • andyring

    Makes me wonder what the reaction would be from those kids if someone was able to explain to them what abortion is.

    “Hey there, kiddo! That’s a big sign you’re holding. Do you know what it means?”

    “No, mommy just wanted me to hold it for her.”

    “Well, you look like a smart girl. I bet you like kids, and babies, right?”

    “Yea I do! There’s a little baby that lives across the street from us, he cries sometimes but I might get to babysit him when I’m a little older. I want to be a mommy some day too.”

    “They’re pretty cute and fun, aren’t they. Well, this might sound mean, but you know that sign you’re holding? Your mommy thinks it’s OK for mommies like her to ask a doctor to cut up and kill a little baby when it’s still inside her, growing, so that it dies and never gets a chance to grow up like you.”

    The truth hurts, doesn’t it?

  • sam860

    The Left just can’t kill enough babies…

  • Honest Abe

    Why are you Leftards using abortion for birth control….man you are dumb!!!

  • Tim_Parker_999

    Maybe they should thank their mothers for not aborting them “how very decent of you mommy not to abort me like you did my 2 other would have been siblings”.

  • rp454

    Disgusting! Typical, but disgusting.

  • another_engineer

    Sort of ironic that children who were allowed to be born are being used as pawns by the pro-abortion crowd.

    • RightLane1111

      You know…I ask my husband the exact same thing. These people are stick

  • Pedro Gonzales

    This is horrifying to use an innocent child this way. Of course why not? They kill their children to the tune of over 60,000,000 since a corrupt Supreme Court encouraged them to.

  • RightLane1111

    My words for Governor Perry…BRAVO…YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO DO WHAT THIS GOVERNMENT WILL NOT. Yes..folks, I was shouting. If she wins this late term abortion issue…say goodbye to Texas.

  • predator24

    Future fans/stars of MTV’s Teen Mom 7

  • coldything

    gots to train those kids that its OK to kill babies

    thats so we can make room for more illegal immigrants for their votes ( ostly they are catholic and don’t believe in abortion

  • Imperator Cydonius

    Under Obama anything goes, he is out to destroy America from within

    • interpcurves

      Bra_in washing is cool with these people

  • gary lacey

    There is no excusing evil.

  • mikemazzla

    LOL UMMM I have seen a ton of pictures of parents who bring kids to pro life rallies with signs..how is that any different?

    • Imperator Cydonius

      very different, as much as night and day are different or literally life vs murder.

      • mikemazzla

        Well it is different for you because you are pro life…but it is essentially the same thing..using a child to promote an adults way of thinking

        • $57813486

          One child is holding sign that says, “Kids should die!”. One child is holding a sign that says, “Kids should live!”.

          All you can see is two kids with signs. Typical libtard/libertardian.

          • mikemazzla

            LOL Libtard that’s a good one. Ive never heard that before. Trust me kiddo..this libtard is more educated and on the ball than you can ever hope to be…but I know education is a dirty word in the rt wing world. Maybe you should go and pray to your non existent sky god.

          • rp454

            The only thing we can ascertain about you from your posts is that you are intentionally ignorant of reality, you are a narcissist and and atheist. Oh, and yes, a libtard.

          • PLT_3004

            As a conservative who loves teaching at a university I just have to ask…how in the heck do you know you’re “more educated and on the ball” than anybody else on these boards? Besides, you’re perpetuating the liberal’s latest popular myth when you assert that intelligent, highly educated people do not believe in God. Sheldon Cooper would be proud.

          • mikemazzla

            I didn’t say that I was more educated than anyone on this board, just the gomer I was replying to. Try actually reading what I wrote. But lets assume you do teach at a university lol. The classic rt wing complaint is all these liberal colleges teaching liberal things.. that is your argument not ours. But for the record although I am sure you can find an educated person who is religious… the vast majority of scientists and people of science, math and those disciplines know the real deal. Im sure you can pick and choose someone who says they believe but we know the real deal don’t we.

            BTW I had to look up Sheldon Cooper..lol

          • PLT_3004

            Fine; semantics. How in the heck do you know you’re “more educated and on the ball” than the person to whom you were replying? Perhaps you used the same scientific method to determine that most intelligent people are atheists. I’ll have to look up the real deal; I don’t remember seeing it in any of my science books.

          • mikemazzla

            Yes admitted I am making an educated guess when it is obvious that I am speaking with someone who isn’t that educated. Seems I am usually right because when I sense that the person rarely debates me on that.

            But lets be real here PLT, I think it safe to assume that the more educated one is the less likely they are to believe in god…especially if you are into the sciences and all that. And as you get younger you tend to believe less. Its sort of like my 4 grandparents who are in their 90s and 3 didn’t go to college and tend to believe, my grandfather who did is agnostic, my parents who are HS graduates are middle of the road just because they are younger..my 3 siblings and I are all graduates and all do not believe in God and my teenage kids and my friends teenage kids are total atheists.

            It is just demographics and changing times. As people are more educated and understand the world, religion and the belief in god wanes. I mean you can see it now church goer demo graphics are greyer and greyer.

            Yes there are deviations and maybe people like you who are educated and still believe..but I have to say and I know you will never admit it.. but deep down you probably don’t either.. it is more of a cultural thing or something that you want to pretend you do..but if you look at it rationally you know its all BS. But of course you will never admit it and of course I cant prove it..just common sense that a person with any sense of a brain knows the real deal.

            We are all going to the same place when we die..I am just ok with it.

    • interpcurves

      these children are UNDER AGE

    • Kenneth Medlin

      you’re not real intelligent are you?

    • Art Granda

      How ignorant Mike, seriously. Do you have, or even know, any kids? Do you think a kid would protest a no-kill animal shelter, wanting them to gas little puppies instead of working to get them adopted? Use your brain.

    • $57813486

      Not your family’s sharpest tool.

  • Shannon Pendergrass

    That is absolutely SHAMEFUL!!!!! Murder should not be a choice, and abortion is murder no matter how you look at it, a seed is life and as soon as that sperm meets the egg it becomes a seed which is LIFE!!! Abortion should only be an option in cases of rape, child molestation, or severe deformity otherwise it is an extremely selfish answer to an irresponsible action!!! Even more so children should not be promoting it!!!

    • BinRaleigh

      How non-progressive you are!

      Keep up the good work.

      • Shannon Pendergrass

        How inhuman you are!!! Murder is NOT progress no matter HOW you look at it; it is still MURDER!!! Just because you put a pretty name on it does not make it any less in-humane!!! Just because you want to make excuses for your own irresponsible actions does not make it any less in-humane either!!!
        Example: A woman 6 months pregnant walks into a Dr’s office and says “Dr. I want to abort this child. It is going to be too much for me to handle with another baby.” The doctor takes one look at her and says “well how about I just kill the child in your arms instead that way you can have a break before the next one gets here.” It doesn’t matter which life you take murder is murder! You don’t have to like it but only an in-humane monster would think that taking a life is any thing but murder!!

        • BinRaleigh

          Shannon, I was agreeing with you. The progressives are the one that want to kill the unborn. I said you were not one of them and to keep up the good work.

          • Shannon Pendergrass

            My apologies I missed the NON part in front of that. I do everything that I can but I get blasted so much for having morals that I have learned to automatically be on the defensive which was the stance I took to your reply. I apologize for my angry retort even though I still stand by what I said about people who believe in abortion/murder.

            It is going to take everyone we can get to stop these senseless murders of those who are completely unable to defend themselves! Thank you for clearing up the matter and again my apologies.

          • BinRaleigh

            No problem. I sort of guessed that was the issue.

            Keep fighting for what is right. All the best.

          • Shannon Pendergrass

            Thank you for your understanding and again I apologize for my rude behavior. I should have read your reply more carefully.

  • Brian9999

    Wow! If these kids actually knew how close they came to being extinguished!

  • Gabriel

    This is just like a children’s Mass where a church indoctrinates children to walk around with symbols of a zombie rising. No different than making kids wear crosses or pray in school. Why don’t all you good christian people start adopting all these children so people don’t think that the baby will have a life. Orphans have more social and criminal problems than non orphaned children, so thank you clinics for keeping criminals off my street.

    • andyring

      Obviously you’re just trying to bait people here but I’ll take it for the fun of it.

      We good Christian people WOULD HAPPILY adopt these children if they were given a chance to survive the womb.

      And of course I’m sure you’re smart enough to acknowledge that instilling religious beliefs in your children is in NO WAY comparable to teaching children that murdering babies is OK. Yeah yeah yeah you’re going to illogically retort with “But the crusades!” etc. etc. etc. Shove it. Abortion is murder, there’s no way around it. Teaching children the love of Jesus is as far from murder as possible.

  • Stacey g

    to be fair, I hope the parent of the little girl holding the sign explained the coat hanger trick to her…what cred do you have if you are not aware of what is on a poster you are holding after all…What’s a back alley abortion without a coathanger for those pesky fetuses!

  • donmag

    I feel sorry for these children as their parents are allowing them to hold signs that embrace the killing of their sisters and brothers. Shame on these parents they obviously are mothers and fathers that have had experienced abortions and are covering their own guilt by teaching their children the same wrong thinking.. it goes to show you the evil that are in the minds of those who claim pro choice is for womans health,,, what about the unborn BABY’s health where is the responsibility of the mother and her protection of her child… God help these selfish people..

  • Jim

    These people should be arrested and charged with corruption of children. These kids cannot rationally understand the real issues and the have them brainwashed by adults into getting involved in such a controversy is criminal.

    • Miles to Code

      Anybody who uses children in that manner should be charged, left or right. When you use kids as pawns in a political protest, you’re an ass.

    • BinRaleigh

      The leaders involve the children just for this type of “photo-op”.
      It shows a real lack of morals to involve children.

  • D-Dash

    I imagine that when they outlawed murder long, long ago, there was a similar argument: But, but, but now I will have to murder my victims in some back alley where no one can see it. That’s outrageous!

  • gymlock

    Actually, they only allow “choice” when you agree with them.

  • mikemazzla

    In the words of George Carlin: The right is all about saving the fetus saving the fetus..but as soon as they are born they are like ” F–k em” Lets force a teen to have a kid bit not help them financially because they had to drop out of school

    • msb204

      Life is about choices and if two teens are going to engage in an adult act, then they need to be an adult in dealing with the results.

      It is not the nations job to raise everyone else’s kids or to provide the financial means for these kids to not learn from their mistakes. I am assuming these kids have parents and this is their job.

      Why is it such a weird concept of being responsible and handling life by dealing with mistakes and learning from them? What good does it do to shelter people from the results of their choices? We throw trillions of dollars at resources to help these people and you want to make it look like nothing is being done? BS

      It doesn’t benefit anyone and only causes people to have a more irresponsible attitude and a distorted outlook on how life is.

      • mikemazzla

        Life is about choices ( funny you should use that word). When I was 19 in college my GF got pregnant. We were both well on our way to great degrees. We both immediately knew that abortion was the correct option. We did it, went on with our lives got our degrees. We ended up later getting married and have two kids we wanted and were ready for and we can support. In your warped world we should have had a child in college, dropped out, struggled etc? Sorry man to me that is warped. No one goes out wanting an abortion..but it happens.

        You will say you didn’t give that fetus a chance or whatever but that is not an argument. Your side is the same that doesn’t like the day after pill that prevents the fertilization an egg so there is no fetus. So what is the excuse on that? Ill tell you what it is.. the right thinks sex is just about making a baby. No condoms in schools, no day after pill, abstinence only education. It is this totally immature attitude about sex.

        • $57813486

          Mikemazzla wrote: “Your side is the same that doesn’t like the day after pill”

          We dislike minors having such medicines absent a prescription or parental knowledge. Naturally, you must distort everything and create an utterly bogus strawman. Lies are the cornerstone of liberalism.

          • mikemazzla

            Condoms are medicine? who knew. The morning after pill is not a drug BTW..it is just a hormone that stops fertilization of an egg. And BTW the rt opposed it i many cases because the catholic church weirdly said it was abortion LOL

          • $57813486

            Mikemazzla wrote: “Your side is the same that doesn’t like the day after pill”

            Pot will kill your short-term memory.

        • msb204

          Ok let’s breakdown your comment.

          First you say it was the correct option for you and your girlfriend to get an abortion because you were both your way to great degrees.

          I am thinking the correct option would have been to either use protection, not have sex, or one of you put your degree on hold to be a parent. You and your GF knew what your actions could lead to and rather than putting your lives on hold you ended your child’s life. It is called sacrifice. You two chose yourselves and that is your right. Just not very caring. Like I said there are plenty of resources that we throw trillions of dollars to that address the financial side of things.

          In my warped world I don’t do something knowing it could have consequences or results I am not prepared to face.

          You say we don’t like the pill and you are wrong. We just don’t feel that we should have to purchase it for people because once again we are having to be responsible for other’s in acting in a mature and responsible manner.

          You want to go out and live your lives the way you want, which is fine, but then you want to guilt people into shielding from and that is fine.

          I don’t give a damn what people do but quit asking everyone to finance it for you and manage your lives like an adult.

    • $57813486

      Unlike thoughtful people, the liberal will turn to comedians for his policy instruction. His fellows will find this admirable, and erudite.

      • mikemazzla

        Well sometimes a person puts it in perspective..comedian or otherwise. We like to turn to people, science, things like that rather than say some who doesn’t exist ( wink wink)

        • $57813486

          Science? Bwahahahahahaha!

          Doesn’t DNA testing indicate an entirely new and unique human being at the moment of conception? Isn’t that same DNA testing considered absolutely authoritative in criminal and family courts nationwide?

          You have to discard the entire field of biology, to support infanticide. Roflmao, science. There is zero science behind any aspect of liberalism. You people are savages, who use the word “science” as if it were a magical talisman dangling with voodoo chicken bones.

          And your comedian has made no contribution to any aspect of human life.

          • mikemazzla

            Totally simplistic argument. So what if a fertilized egg has unique DNA. so what. Please the use of science by the left and right isn’t even close my man.

          • $57813486

            My argument is simplistic, in comparison to “so what”. Gotcha…

          • $57813486

            My argument is simplistic, as compared to “so what”. Gotcha.

        • Guest

          And that is what its all about ,perspective,no right,no wrong,its all good, so the typical liberal all caught up in their little world, but call the right intolerant? And science,really,that ilk has done so much garbage ,and said soo much that “science” is discredited to the point of not being a source to use in a discussion about subjects such as abortion. It has no solid ground,its all over the place on way too many subjects to be used in this way. Prove your last comment ,beyond any doubt,or wink at yourself when in front of a mirror. Your disbelief goes against real science,so choosing only that which supports your view is ,well , soo scientific of you.

    • Tim_Parker_999

      That’s it, quote a mentally unsound, drug addict. . .

      • mikemazzla

        Well you know he actually exists also. More than I can say for something else the right likes to quote

        • $57813486

          You can touch the drug addict, but not God. Thus the drug addict is superior. Gotcha.

          • mikemazzla

            Good at least you understand that he/she doesn’t exist. Who wants to get into that argument

  • Matthew Greggs

    well i see the nazis running this site are censoring out comments negative to the rightwingnuts….heil hitler turdbandits!!!!

    • ProjectThor

      they are doing it to ALL comments,SFB…

  • Jenness

    I have no idea why Pro-Choice ONLY means aborting fetuses that have gestated long enough to survive outside the womb. There are other choices besides late-term abortion which medically is known to harm a mother’s life, not save it. In fact there are countless scores of medical papers, case studies showing that late-term abortions even when the mother’s health is failing overwhelmingly harm the mother more than help her. The entire ‘for the mother’s life’ argument is so preposterous that I’m astounded that anyone with more than a 1st grade education can believe it. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23553240 Or watch an OB/GYN testify that abortions should be banned due to harming women http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8szDctI9lXM

    The liberals that support late-term abortion do not care, and in fact hate, women.

    There is no way they can care for them and squelch and ignore all the scientific data about bowel perforations, sepsis, sterilization due to complications and infection, and suicide rates for women who’ve ever had an abortion. Of all women who end up dying by suicide a an overwhelming majority of them have had an abortion (early and late term). http://afterabortion.org/2012/higher-death-rates-after-abortion-found-in-u-s-finland-and-denmark/

    It’s hatred of women and racial genocide that promotes these laws, not love, tolerance or concern for anyone’s health.

  • nobama

    Exploiting kids to support late term abortion? How twisted is that.

  • AtlasObjectivist

    Liberals are the scum of the earth.

  • Art Granda

    “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ourselves and our posterity”. Posterity means what? NO, it’s not the latest smart phone …. it means “all future generations”, which are the unborn. Abortion is unconstitutional, Roe vs. Wade is unconstitutional, and fooling kids into supporting the killing of future americans is not only irresponsible, reprehensible, and unconstitutional, it’s also illegal.

  • Kenneth Medlin

    fifty six million dead babies and counting.

  • Barbara

    Tell the kids what the coat hanger is for and the question would be to the mother..”Mommy would you have done that to me???” How Freak’n Sick can you get? The ends justtifies the means crowd..

  • http://caseybrownmyers.blogspot.com/ CB Myers

    I will never understand the ‘logic’ of people that demand we don’t execute murderers, but say they have the right to execute innocent babies.

  • Chauncey Freeman

    Indoctrinating children with “secular progressivism” is child abuse. More evidence that neo-liberalism is a sociopathy.

  • Chip

    “My mommy says it’s OK for me to get knocked up because I can always kill the baby later.”

  • chronovisor

    libtards like windy davis and her ilk have no shame, they don’t even know the definition of shame, i’d love explain to the children what the hangar is used for

    • nobama

      She’s running for governor of Texas. Yeah, when pigs fly..

      • chronovisor

        dude she has NO chance of winning, i hope/wish she did/does so she can be humiliated like the last woman to run, anne “ma ” richards who was crushed by W in her re election bid, after she lost, she wasn’t heard from again.

        • nobama

          Perry will squash her like the roach that she is. No worries here.

  • Gary Bruce

    So these people do not like their kids and wish they had been aborted. Good message to send to the kids.

  • anoni mouse

    In 1857 the Supreme Court decided that Black people weren’t really people. Most look back on this with disgust and shame. Someday the same will be true for Abortion

  • rebman

    Funny how those that were not aborted are so in favor of it.

    • nobama

      Maybe they should have been aborted.

  • obamaisacorn

    Libs do everything “for the children”. Matter of fact regardless of the topic, they just add, “for the children” after it. Clinton made a living off that simple lie.

  • obamaisacorn

    FACT: Liberalism is an incurable sickness.

    • $57813486

      Liberalism is unmitigated evil.

  • Karl Edward

    They should have signs featuring a Doctor snipping the spinal column of a baby, that would be a more realistic graphic.

  • Custom Commentator

    The sickos that love abortion get nervous when the the details of their horrible murderous butchery get exposed. What really is the difference between a coat hanger and surgeon’s tools when the effect is the same?

  • Rhogue

    This is the Left taking a cue from the POTUS who brings children to the fight at every opportunity. The POTUS and the Left should take a cue from the Mafia which has the decency to leave children out of a fight.

    • Guest

      Thats a “on the money” statement, but what would be expected from that ilk, they rarely disappoint, and are always repulsive

  • Francis Xavier

    I just hope someday the kids will reach the age of reason, and ask their welfare mommies why they were forced to do this…was this a message to others or to the kids that their mommies wish they aborted….hmmm the libtards are setting up future business for their libtard psychiatrist friends!

  • Fastgirl

    Every parent I know complains about the fact that their child can’t have a childhood. Should going to protests and holding up signs any sign much less signs like this be a part of childhood?

  • Charles Nash

    Liberals are uncouth people that exist in their bubble of
    pseudo-intellectual smugness.

    They think they have everything figured out.
    Where’s the joy in that? Ever see a happy liberal? I’ve never known any – unless
    they were high on something being the only exception. It took me a few years
    growing up to notice that.

    • Archie Bunker

      there are a lot of liberals that are against abortion, just as there are a lot of conservatives that dont care about it (hence, support it). no matter what side you sit on, there are left and right idiots on the other side

      • Guest

        REALLY? a lot of libbies, sure, O K , whatever

      • Fred hgggg

        I like you archie, you have the most level headed comments here but always seem to get the downvotes.

        what has this country become

        • ProjectThor

          Less than what is was… more than a pile of horse dip.

  • Archie Bunker

    its weird and creepy, but pro life protesters get their kids to hold up posters of bloody tiny fetuses too. so both sides of the fence play this game…

    • nobama

      The conservatives are making a point. The kid won’t be there to hold up a sign if it becomes an abortion ( no future).

    • $57813486

      Which child’s interests are served? The one with the “Kid’s must live!” sign or the one with the “Kid’s must die!” sign?

      Recent brain injury or something? All you see is two kids with signs. Something wrong with your mind there.

      • Archie Bunker

        i did not take a side in my comment, just saying that both sides use kids and it is weird and i dont support it.

        Chemical imbalance in your brain or something?

        • Guest

          A not so rare disease of the libbies,its called Dumass, you should be checked by a doctor BEFORE the reform hits the fan, it could be fatal,and for you that would be a death panel call by the oh-sooo compassionate libbies.

    • vestamerica

      Those children should be holding signs thanking their parents for not having gone to Kermit “The Muppet” Gosnell!!

    • Pepperjack

      Wanna rethink that one, Archie? Do you really not see the difference? A kid holding up a pro-abortion sign with a hanger on it? THIS, is the tool of what would have been my demise! Thank you for not using it, mommy!

      • Archie Bunker

        of course i know the difference. i still think its wrong to use kids on either side. they are not old enough to fully grasp the situation and make an choice for themselves.

        • Pepperjack

          I agree with that. They’re just doing what they’re told. What they don’t know is that they’re being used to advocate for feticide. I wouldn’t put a picture of aborted babies in my kids’ hands, to be sure, but I would tell them what we were advocating for and educate them on what abortion is. They’ll know it’s wrong in their innocent little hearts without needing the picture.

  • madmanhiker

    using children as pawns, shameful in of itself.

    • $57813486

      Using kids as pawns is simply tacky. Using kids to agitate for killing kids is evil.

  • Charles Nash

    Isn’t it odd that the Democratic National Committee, aka DNC — is the same 3 letters for an abortion procedure – also DNC. They are too stupid to even notice the irony of that.

    • vestamerica

      It is the Democrat National Committee. People, stop using the verb to describe the DemocRats.

      • Lincoln30

        Verb or not, “Democratic National Committee” is the correct name. Funny, it should be called the Socialist National Commies…

  • Giglio Casanova

    This REALLY makes my stomach turn…Is there anything too low for these individuals?

    • Guest

      They are still exploring how low they can go, they have no “puke-alarm”, aka, morals

      • Giglio Casanova

        It’s like a bottomless pit……to put young children as props in an abortion rally…..really?…..no…..REALLY????….

  • mewp12

    Their parents should be horse whipped.

    • nobama

      Hanger whipped instead.

      • ProjectThor

        Shades of Mommy Dearest….

  • Dr Chambers

    I’m surprised that libs haven’t considered a peni s a pre-existing condition and clamored for some kind of eunuch legislation.

  • Pepperjack

    Do these folks even get the irony of having a child hold up that sign? “I’m alive today because of…..!”

    Oh….. wait.

  • 4BlueStars

    Pretty G-D sick!
    And you know, they probably don’t even know what it is they are protesting.

    “Hey kid, you are protesting for your mother’s right to kill you before you are born.”

  • Teas On Yo

    Obama would never do this when trying to pass gun control legislation. Never.

  • TooFunny

    Oh what a perfect opportunity. Someone should go down there with pictures from the Gosnell trial and show those kids what they are protesting for. I would love to be the fly on the wall as the those kids ask mommy why did the doctor snip the spinal cords of those babies!!

  • dodgergirl88

    Gee, they’re lucky they weren’t aborted. Poor little things, with parents like theirs, who needs enemies?

  • obozo_the_gelded_clown

    I wonder if they got the coat hangers from Gosnell’s office?

  • Lore Earll

    Kind of like people who take the mentally disabled to vote; THE LOWEST OF LOW, total lack of morality. I wonder if mommy explained to these girls she wants to maintain the right to kill a live baby with that hangar…………..Wow.

  • junani baraldi

    Isnt it ironic that those kids wouldn’t be there, if some pro-choicer decided to abort them…. Such a sad Society that we live in….

  • ralphie44

    welcome to the jeu world order

    look into the history of the promotion, funding, political backing of choice
    know who to thank

    • $57813486

      Ron Paul libertarian I presume?

  • Benjamin Joseph

    this is heinous beyond words – this is Satan at work, people, believe it

  • Bob Danley

    Liberals…they never see the dichotomy in anything they do.

  • The Bishop Paradox

    The stupidity of these people is absolutely mind-blowing. The wire hanger stuff would be a freaking UPGRADE over Gosnell’s clinic!!!

    Even worse, I know one idiot who is not only bringing her kids to this, but openly lamented on Facebook that there may be people holding pictures of aborted fetuses up. She asked her audience how to “shield” her children from something like that. So, in other words, she has no problem using them for her own selfish purpose, but goodness forbid that her children actually learn the truth about what is actually going on here.

    Sidenote: I say “goodness” instead of “God” because He has been completely left out of this circus. And we are the lesser for it.

  • http://www.medusae.net Wazmo Nares

    There is no low the rabid psychotic Left will not stoop. SHameful.

  • http://eastsidehunky.wordpress.com/ EastSideHunky

    Hey if you can’t kill them, use them, right? SICK!

  • http://texnat.org/ Texas Chris

    These poor kids. They really don’t have much of a chance in life do they…

  • War_Machine2

    The libtards are at it again. How any parent can support abortion is beyond me. And having their children be prochoice advocates is down right sick!

  • Korban Dallas

    synonymous to Terrorists utilizing Down children and expectant mothers for the murdering of innocent civilians.

  • Korban Dallas

    synonymous to Al Queda utilizing Down children and expectant mothers to take out innocent civilians.

  • E Pluribus Chaos

    Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do.

    God help this tired country.

  • TexasPlowboy

    Kids as props are abominations……..should be illegal…….

  • warpsix

    If the Liberals had there way kids under 10 could be Put down just as easy as an abortion . These kids have No Idea how lucky they are to have survived to be born .

  • Korban Dallas

    Synonymous to certain Muslims (can’t use common word for them because of moderation) utilizing Down children and expectant mothers to take out innocent civilians.

  • Savonarola

    Should not Child Protective Services look into this? May be a sign of physical or mental abuse at home.

    • shotz90s

      Then all liberals would lose their children.

  • Bukkiah Golden

    What would happen if a pro-life supporter showed those kids a picture of an aborted baby, I wonder…..

    • shotz90s

      Then that person would be charged with harassing those poor, innocent children. Possibly hate speech as well.

  • $12473321

    Let me get this straight. Women want to wait over five
    months so the baby can kick before she decides to abort it? If they want the
    right of self-responsibility of their own bodies why don’t they just avoid
    pregnancy in the first place with all the options out there? Wouldn’t that make more
    sense and this issue mute? Pardon my saying but this is a smokescreen for bigger fetuses to fry. Excuse the pun. Why would a woman wait five months?

  • Machismo

    It is sick to involve children in demonstrations such as these. The Baby Killers need to tell their children how many brothers and sisters they could have had.

  • Dawn

    They may as well holding up signs that say ‘my mom shouldn’t have had me!’
    These are gonna be some mentally messed up adults with that kind of message implanted their subconscious. What were the parents thinking??? They’re kids! It’s summer! They should be playing in the pool with friends and enjoying childhood! They have plenty of time to make political statement when they’re adults who can form their own opinions.

  • JoeNJ8

    Why didn’t they show pictures of their parents?

  • Greese Monky

    So what does the sign say “I wouldn’t have had these damn kids if I had more abortion rights”, thank God for mothers who love their children!

  • dpierce

    The “abortion to nine months” use vulnerable children to spread their deceitful campaigns because whatever is corrupt seeks to make itself look sanitized, pure. That is why murder is called “a medical procedure”. “Choice” the vile decision to end life. There is no longer any”vallidity” for life in the womb- and even a perfect baby- what they would call “viable”-could still be butchered by an abortionist as long as just the head and not the rest of the body was out of the womb. Obama voted for “partial birth abortion”. So did Hillary, Pelosi and Bill Clinton. The use of children to “sanitize” their bloody “cause” is vile. These are people who walk in “darkness” in this country, who have connection to witchcraft. I know that the clinic not far from the home we had in Sacramento, CA was run by a woman named Shawna Heckert, a bonafide witch. Was she the only coven that did this? Truely, we are blind to evil. Let us not walk in darkness anymore. Expose evil and you redeem the innocent.

  • Bogart

    I wish somebody asked the KID what the hanger represents, would have loved to hear her answer. Dumb parents.

  • 0WLBORE

    What they really need to do is implant these kids with catheters so they can stay out there without stop for 12 hours like their abortion promoter star, Texas Senator Wendy Davis. The democrats have no shame and too often it seems, no brains.

    • konc2

      Wendy Davis ” Baby Butcher” for Governor, has a nice ring to it. These leftist barbarians really need to have a very late term abortion performed on then.

  • DSB71

    Sick bastards. Those kids would never have made it into this world if these hideous, pro-infanticide freaks had their way. They all would have been jammed down Doctor Gosnell’s abortion clinic toilet with plungers. Sick, depraved monsters.

    Pure, unbridled evil.

  • vanessa565

    Maybe the parents of these children, being pro-choice, should sit these children down and tell them how very, very lucky they are that mommy decided to let them be born while she could have easily killed them instead. Perhaps they should tell these children that they are among the fortunate that did not get pulled feet first out of the womb, stabbed in the back of the head with scissors and have their brains sucked out. That would make a great pro-choice bedtime story me thinks.

  • AbidewithMe

    There is no limit to how low the left will stoop to further their sick agenda.

  • HoosierDave

    Perhaps the mother of the kid in this photo should have had a safe, tax payer funded abortion. I am completely ok with spending millions of tax payor dollars to find the gene which Pre-disposes a woman to be pro choice. Once found, a simple pre birth test can be administered. If the fetus carries the gene, a new national law which mandates all fetuses carrying this gene must be aborted will kick in.

  • Wingman

    As a Right winger….I see the same thing from the Anti side of this mess as well….no story here

  • John Robinson

    Someone should take a video of them explaining to these kids exactly what it is that their signs are advocating; their facial expressions would be priceless. Most kids I’ve seen don’t like the idea of killing babies; it’s kind of an instinctive reaction. Go figure.

  • LLinLa

    Ah, I hate when Progressives make me start thinking scatologically . . . how about pro-Lifers holding up a hanger with a doll dangling and a sign reading “Pro-choice means this could’ve been YOU!” marching past those same kids. Kind of puts a little reality into the propaganda, huh?

    • ThomasCollins1

      “Ah, I hate when Progressives make me start thinking scatologically…”

      I find it hard to do otherwise…

    • john cummins

      Excellent idea there LL. This is exactly what NEEDS to be done, great, great idea!

  • $12473321

    Let me get this straight. Women want to wait over five
    months so the baby can kick before she decides to murder it? If they want the
    right of self-responsibility of their own bodies why don’t they just avoid
    pregnancy in the first place with all the options out there? Wouldn’t that make more
    sense and this issue mute?

  • Richard Vandiamondsworth

    These children escaped the spine-snipping scissors of liberal hero kermit gosnell.

    ATTENTION CONSERVS AND LIBERTARIANS. Paying for liberals’ birth control/abortions/sterilizations is money well spent. Look how desperate they’ve become, trying to import 30 million illegal invaders for votes and expanding welfare rolls.

    • $57813486

      Libertarians, in the main, are identical to liberals on the moral issues. They love abortion, gay marriage, detest religion, etc.

      • john cummins

        Wrongo, I am a true Libertarian, thus am pro-baby. Any true Libertarian MUST be pro-baby because a baby has a separate DNA code from either mother or father and thus is an individual and the core of a proper Libertarian understanding IS rights of the individual and thus, ANY “libertarian” that is “prochoice” in the nonsensical manner of Banned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger is simply NOT Libertarian and can NOT be. We can call them Libertines but NOT Libertarian.

        • $57813486

          That you represent an exception amplifies my point. Nothing on Earth is perfectly uniform, as we all know.

  • konc2

    If you are voting for insane liberal democrats you are getting the government you voted for. Only insane liberals call slaughtering and butchering their children a choice, and then stand in front of a prison screaming that putting a mass murderer to death is barbaric. Only liberals consider 26 year old adults children when it comes to health care, but consider 12 year old girls adults when it comes to getting abortions without telling their parents. Liberals are truly insane sick animals.

  • edjuk8

    I’m dumbfounded by the stupidity of these people. Abortion is legal. What the freak are they bi***ing about?

    • shotz90s

      They want it up to 9 months I’m guessing. As long as it doesn’t come out the vag it must not be a person yet.

      • $57813486
        • shotz90s

          I think I’m going to toss my lunch right at my desk. How in God’s name are these people any different than those who ran the death camps in Nazi Germany?

          • john cummins

            How? You ask how? They are more ruthless and kill at a younger level, at least more at a younger level. As far as being anti certain people groups upon following Sanger they are NO different than Nazis and, in fact, can NOT be different if truly they are following their Goddess, Sanger.

          • shotz90s

            And they compare us to Nazi’s LOL.

          • $57813486

            Now you’re seeing the light. They don’t differ, they are the identical force, in a new generation.

            Why are Evangelicals and Conservatives portrayed as sewer-rats of society in every single cultural and political venue, just like the Nazi portrayed the Jews? Justice Kennedy just declared us entirely diseased members of society, merely for subscribing to a 20,000+ year-old utterly non-controversial societal prescription.

            They are cultivating holocaust.

          • Rogue Cheddar

            They don’t dress as nice.

    • john cummins

      you meant lethal, lethal!!!

  • Todd Clemmer

    And those that make it will be trained to hold signs in order to prevent others from making it.

  • Steven Paul

    1.5 billion deaths by abortions since 1945 worldwide 20% of the worlds population more kills then all wars, disease, starvation,all other ways to die and the only argument the pro abortion/murder crowd has is calling people teabaggers.SAD INSANE AND REALLY STUPID

  • ToughStuff2012

    Coat hanger, chemicals, or a tube that sucks their brain matter out, dying is dying.

  • rainwash

    They should have the kids hold up a sign with a coat hanger with the caption “This was supposed to be my little sister.”

  • Historyrepete

    what do you expect from people who want to kill infants? no surprise that they use and abuse children for political gain. these miscreants have no understanding of decency nor do they see the irony in their behavior

  • Joe Sheit

    They just don’t want anybody (especially a male) telling them what they can do with their bearded clams.

  • Stan Lee

    So its shameful to hold a sign but killing a child is aces…..oh the irony

  • Rogue Cheddar

    Well either the kid was going to hold the wire hanger outside for Mom’s protest or stay inside all day and hold the wire hanger on the TV antenna for Dad. I guess he thought it would be better to get some fresh air.

  • RCD

    What if you have already aborted the child that cures cancer, or solves world hunger, or makes other breakthroughs in the arts, science and medicine that eases the suffering of the masses? At 55 million since the 70’s in the US alone, chances are your choices have already deprived mankind of some of the most brilliant minds in history. How much human talent and ability do you have to destroy in the name of convenience? Do you even have a number?

  • NYCER2

    Liberalism is truly a mental disorder.

  • Earl

    Child abuse, but libs have no moral compass so why do you expect anything different. They always parade kids out for everything, Healthcare, unions, education, entitlement programs their slogan is it hurts the kids. I guess pro life is all about the kids, uh?

  • $24185928

    Can the left stoop any lower?
    Oh, I’m sure they can. Anything to preserve the “right” to kill your baby up until birth…or sometimes after…

  • 1Psuche

    This is truly SHAMEFUL!

    To use small children as political props who are essentially protesting for the right to have been killed by their parents is a diseased mind!!

  • anonymous

    Exploitation of children and their innocence. It is criminal.

  • $31961319

    What a selfish answer to a complicated issue Kill the baby.You know these liberals would love to abort any one that disagrees with them, its theyre choice.Shallow sick people.

  • alanwillingham

    Do they also have Jewish children advocating the use of ovens to dispose of inconvenient relatives?

  • rayg

    To paraphrase Malcolm X: “Real men and women don’t put their children on the firing line.”

  • Morgana

    I dont think its right to use kids this way, but as a youngster myself when the wire hanger as a symbol came into play, I find it interesting how little regard there is for the actual history of the prop here. There is a story behind it and its real. Historical data is so manipulated these days, they’ve even convinced the younger generations Reagan was a great president, but some of us were there. I understand all of history I think a little better having experienced some and then seeing how it gets rewritten and manipulated. I guess I’m a little off topic, but that is what this story triggered for me. The world just isnt what it presents itself to be, and is falsely dividing us so manipulatively and with endgame. This world needs fixing and our theatrical divide wont ever let that happen.

  • $15290728

    Of course they would treat their children this way. Their children are expendable when it comes to fulfilling their own wanton desires.

  • Brad Chance

    “But if you cause one of these little ones who trusts in me to fall into sin, it would be better for you to have a large millstone tied around your neck and be drowned in the depths of the sea.”

  • sparky24w

    now that’s child abuse….

  • quadbravo80

    Three groups support abortion. 1. Women who are so stupid that they believe what liberals tell them about choice and they see no value in families and children. 2. Liberals who profit from abortion clinics like Eric Holder and his wife who own them. 3 Muslims who don’t subscribe to abortion for themselves but are interested in killing non Muslims which include libtards and gays. These children have a moron for a mother. Eventually support for abortion will die because they kill their children.

    • Matt Piney

      4. People who believe the government doesn’t have any business imposing control over private lives.

      • Traci McGary

        Then do NOT expect nanny government to “FIX” the results of your free s ex ual capades.

        Take control AND responsibility.

      • OBUMYA

        Oh ok Matt — so you must be really opposed to ObamaCare because it does just that> Or are you perhaps unable to see this because your vision is blocked by your own sphincter?
        Perhaps if liberal at least pretended to be consistent once in a while we would not detest you so much.

        • Matt Piney

          Absolutely oppose mandatory health insurance. All “mandatory” insurance for that matter.

          oppose gun control
          oppose property rights infringement (domain)

          oppose religious persecution
          oppose anti-gay issues
          oppose globalist issues

          My guess is that I am not the one with consistency issues in this issue.

    • Matt Piney

      4. People who believe the government doesn’t have any business imposing control over private lives.

  • quadbravo80

    Three groups support abortion. 1. Women who are so stupid that they believe what liberals tell them about choice and they see no value in families and children. 2. Liberals who profit from abortion clinics like Eric Holder and his wife who own them. 3 Muslims who don’t subscribe to abortion for themselves but are interested in killing non Muslims which include libtards and gays. These children have a moron for a mother. Eventually support for abortion will die because they kill their children.

  • Historianted

    They are vile! Wendy Davis is a vile pig! Funny, these murderers use the very kids they probably thought of killing in the womb. Filthy pigs!

  • Historianted

    They are vile! Wendy Davis is a vile pig! Funny, these murderers use the very kids they probably thought of killing in the womb. Filthy pigs!

  • sparky24w

    The Texas senate is not out lawing abortion, just banning late term abortion, 3rd trimester is considered infanticide in which even 78% of pro choice people agree
    is bad. In Europe infanticide is illegal that’s the 3rd trimester..

    • OBUMYA

      never let the facts get between a mindless liberal and the rest of the Nation!

      • Matt Piney

        20 weeks, which the bill clearly states is NOT 3rd trimester. Aside from personal conviction, facts DO matter.

  • sparky24w

    The Texas senate is not out lawing abortion, just banning late term abortion, 3rd trimester is considered infanticide in which even 78% of pro choice people agree
    is bad. In Europe infanticide is illegal that’s the 3rd trimester..

  • Grim

    I wonder, just how many of these liberals know, that what they are supporting is not about ‘women’s rights’, but instead it’s about government sponsored eugenics? There are many people who also support the concept of ‘post birth abortion’, which is the politically correct way of saying, “if you don’t like your kid, feel free to kill it up to age 3″….Life is cheap in society these days, because we are all living in a New World Order death cult…..and, it’s about to get much, much worse.

  • Grim

    I wonder, just how many of these liberals know, that what they are supporting is not about ‘women’s rights’, but instead it’s about government sponsored eugenics? There are many people who also support the concept of ‘post birth abortion’, which is the politically correct way of saying, “if you don’t like your kid, feel free to kill it up to age 3″….Life is cheap in society these days, because we are all living in a New World Order death cult…..and, it’s about to get much, much worse.

  • Matt Piney

    Nothing different than the rightists that use their kids standing outside the Supreme Court with red tape over their mouths.

    Parents of both parties use their kids as photo ops all the time. I feel sorry for kids in both situations.

    • randyo99

      Vastly different. Using children to advocate what (in some minds anyway) is murder vs. pro-life. Though I agree the exploitation of children, for any political cause, is morally wrong and disgusting.

      • Matt Piney

        Children are used all the time in photo ops for sending/receiving troops for war. In some minds anyway, a kill during war is murder.

        People on every side of major issues can rationalize their superior position until the cows come home. Using children to gain sympathy and innocence for their position is common for all.

    • randyo99

      Vastly different. Using children to advocate what (in some minds anyway) is murder vs. pro-life. Though I agree the exploitation of children, for any political cause, is morally wrong and disgusting.

  • Matt Piney

    Nothing different than the rightists that use their kids standing outside the Supreme Court with red tape over their mouths.

    Parents of both parties use their kids as photo ops all the time. I feel sorry for kids in both situations.

  • Historianted

    Liberals are so twisted! They are the ones that says “sorry
    sweetie, I’m killing you for your own good…Mommy loves you baby…now
    die!”

  • Historianted

    Liberals are so twisted! They are the ones that says “sorry
    sweetie, I’m killing you for your own good…Mommy loves you baby…now
    die!”

  • salharmonic

    With wacko mothers’ like theirs they don’t know how lucky they are they made it out of the birth canal

  • salharmonic

    With wacko mothers’ like theirs they don’t know how lucky they are they made it out of the birth canal

  • Lamar Carnes

    Another child abuse case promoted by liberal Democrats as they have children hold up banners supporting murder! Every one of them shold be arressted for child abuse of children living indoctrinating them into endorsing murder. So, they abuse the baby in the womb by killling it and when they are alive they abuse the child by teaching the child to commit murder if they so chose when they get pregnant! How evil can peopel get?

    • $57813486

      Let’s not forget their felonious minor grooming, sponsored by the government in the public schools, where every child is meticulously groomed into early sexuality. A felony if any one of us did it.

      Liberalism is the depraved worldview of the Satanically evil.

    • $57813486

      Let’s not forget their felonious minor grooming, sponsored by the government in the public schools, where every child is meticulously groomed into early sexuality. A felony if any one of us did it.

      Liberalism is the depraved worldview of the Satanically evil.

  • Lamar Carnes

    Another child abuse case promoted by liberal Democrats as they have children hold up banners supporting murder! Every one of them shold be arressted for child abuse of children living indoctrinating them into endorsing murder. So, they abuse the baby in the womb by killling it and when they are alive they abuse the child by teaching the child to commit murder if they so chose when they get pregnant! How evil can peopel get?

  • $26547161

    Liberal Democrats are astute at exploiting children.

    • $7522954

      Why do you think the issue is such a hot one – the progressive fascists exploit women in the name of “women’s rights” to make money off the abortion industry. And the abortion industry uses the unborn children (or their deaths) to perpetuate their money making ventures. Quite a little operation.

    • OBUMYA

      Barack Hussein Obama…MMM MMMM MMMMMMM

      • Guest

        Yea, gotta love that little tune!!!! Scary-catchy though.

  • $26547161

    Liberal Democrats are astute at exploiting children.

  • jwbaumann

    This is child abuse, plain and simple. Notice to any doctors, nurses, teacher, social workers, etc. in the crowd – you are legally (and morally) obligated to report this to the authorities, and may be subject to disciplinary action for failure to do so. This is serious, as Liberals/Democrats are sexually dangerous creatures as well, basing their views on child molester Kinsey.

  • jwbaumann

    This is child abuse, plain and simple. Notice to any doctors, nurses, teacher, social workers, etc. in the crowd – you are legally (and morally) obligated to report this to the authorities, and may be subject to disciplinary action for failure to do so. This is serious, as Liberals/Democrats are sexually dangerous creatures as well, basing their views on child molester Kinsey.

  • Historianted

    Found the link to this on Headline Digest.

  • Historianted

    Found the link to this on Headline Digest.

  • nomame

    The baby killing Demons, will try to deceive all.

    I see just 2 kids holding signs, why is that did they kill all the others?

    It is a shame that these Demon pigs are alive. God bless the unborn, they are our future, not these demons.

  • nomame

    The baby killing Demons, will try to deceive all.

    I see just 2 kids holding signs, why is that did they kill all the others?

    It is a shame that these Demon pigs are alive. God bless the unborn, they are our future, not these demons.

  • violetvirginia

    WOMEN have CHOICE already without abortion!

    They just have to be responsible human beings.

    They have the choice to keep their legs together and say NO to every Tom’s DICK and Harry’s.
    But No, they have such low self esteem they take on every guy that comes along. Just like alley cats! Therefore, keeping themselves in a low self esteem rut.
    Pregnancy happens and a human life is the victim of irresponsible woman.
    Think more of yourselves and human kind girls!
    Only sluts are easy. Don’t be one!

    • Guest

      There’s always adoption but who would want the child of a loose moral scumbag, right?

      • violetvirginia

        That does not mean that the child will be a loose moral scumbag! Shame on you! Look at Louis Armstrong, Pearl Bailey. Tons of children of people perceived as having loose morals are gems!
        Who are we to judge! Good people beget loose moral scumbags!
        The genes are random. All must be given a chance at the lottery of life!

  • randyo99

    Essentially a diminishing returns, self-fulfilling fallacy.

  • nomame

    .

    I see just 2 kids holding signs, why is that did they kill all the others?

    It is a shame that these Demon are alive. God bless the unborn, they are our future, not these demons.

  • nomame

    I see just 2 kids holding signs, why is that did they kill all the others?

    It is a shame that these so called people are alive. God bless the unborn, they are our future. Not the so called people that forced the kids to hold the signs.

  • diegoAT

    The Brainwashing these children get at home is far worse than being used by their parents to promote abortion.

  • Baiambo

    What signs should they be holding then?

    • $57813486

      Ones for the bake sale at Sunday School, and the Wednesday pancake supper. Girl Scout cookies, that sort of stuff. You know, the sort of things we used to call “childhood” before liberals erased childhood.

    • $53095342

      “Lemonade 10 cents”

    • $7522954

      How about none, you disordered dolt. Those are 4,5 yr old kids.

    • OBUMYA

      Gee how about — I was not aborted.

    • OBUMYA

      How about:

      I am alive. I am not a choice. I am a human being.

    • shotz90s

      Their signs should read “My parents are going to burn in hell, please help me”.

  • Cuthbert J Twillie

    I’m surprise these agents of death don’t use a sign like this:

    Late Term Abortion — It’s For The Children!

    Nothing is unthinkable with left-wing moon-battery

    • $7522954

      The ends are all that matter to a progressive fascist.

  • Carolann313

    Now the progressives are picking on the innocent children to do their dirty work, and the sad thing is that these kids don’t even know what the heck is going on! I must say punishment is on its’ way.

  • gcannon

    It not about women wanting to do with THEIR bodies as they like… it is what they do with the BODY IN THEM that I have a great problem with. It is a choice… Chose Life or Chose Death? It ain’t rocket science.

  • Jonathan

    getting children to help you have the “right” to abort unborn children … The irony of it.

    • Don

      Someone should explain to little Susie or Johnnie that mommy believes in aborting other little children who will never grow up to have a mom or dad.

  • giatny

    The MSM seem to be ignoring the fact that this bill only bans
    abortions after 20 weeks unless the life of the mother or deformity
    of the baby is the issue. Five months is a long time for a woman
    to exercise her “reproductive rights” and a reasonable time for
    a baby’s “right to life” to take precedence. The bill also insures

    that clinics will be safe. I can’t image taking a young child to such
    a protest. It takes inappropriate to the highest level.

    • shotz90s

      Its about indoctrination into a life of hate and murder. The younger you get them used to it, the easier it is to perpetuate your lifestyle and ideology of death. These are empty, soulless people hell-bent on dragging their children with them. They also have the blessings of the public school systems.

    • OBUMYA

      they are not ignoring it. they are mis-reporting this. THAT is the issue here….

    • RShaw

      I have read elsewhere that something like 9 out of 10 abortions happen within the first 12 weeks, while 6 out of 10 happen within 8 weeks. So 20 weeks is reasonable. Of course this does not make it into the reporting.

  • eztalk

    There was an actual ad on Craig’s List recruiting these idiots to hold signs. The pay was advertised for up to $24,000 yr to do work like this. The ad has since been taken down: http://austin.craigslist.org/npo/3866256094.html

    But, there are more: http://austin.craigslist.org/npo/

    THIS, this is where the left get their protestors. They’re paid to show up. Talk about a bunch of losers.

    EDIT: OK. they forgot to take this one down: http://austin.craigslist.org/npo/3876551803.html

  • $7522954

    Gotta love the mentally disordered liberal (progressive fascist)! Use a living child to advocate for the death of an unborn child! If it wasn’t so sick, I’d be laughing.

  • Don

    Typical gutless Liberal tactic. Abortion in itself is bad enough, but late term abortion is simply inexcusable. If a woman wants an abortion deep into a pregnancy, she should then be required to have her tubes tied, because it appears then that she obviously would be unfit to be a mother. At what point should a late term abortion be deemed a murder??? I am a conservative person, but have always felt that abortion wasn’t my call to make, but it certainly should be done with more careful consideration, and as a last resort. Many women have them done without any regard to the unborn or consideration of the father, or of their own future. This isn’t a Constitutional right, why do you think Liberals feel that the Constitution should be changed to fit their own beliefs, right or not? Abortion rights is a showcase example of that. I have a huge problem with federally funded abortion. Half of the country, or more, is paying for the recklessness of someone else’s behavior. Their is definitely something wrong with that picture.

  • LysolMotorola

    The irony of using NON-ABORTED children to oppose a bill that would lessen the likelihood of other children being murdered is powerful. Too bad these one issue morons are too stupid to understand. For them it is the power – ONLY the power and all else is disposable.
    May they rot in hell with their backs broken.

  • OBUMYA

    Ironic isnt it…non-aborted kids being used as tools/fools to make sure some kids are never born. How about the pro-life groups get kids to hold up signs of a dead fetus that reads…

    I am alive, he/she is not…any questions?

    This will 100% backfire on the Dems not just in Texas but across the country…bank on it. I saw the Gosnell trial…NO living person has the right to put their needs above babies who are crucified and butchered in the name of choice.
    Nazis do those things, not Americans….

  • $7522954

    Sorry ladies. Once the egg is fertilized, it’s not your body any longer. It’s both of your bodies. No matter how you spin the bull schit it’s the simple biological fact.

  • Traci McGary

    Liberal Logic:’ If abortion is permissible, infanticide should be permissible.

    h/t to shotz90s and the link to an appalling article

    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/02/29/medical-ethicists-propose-after-birth-abortion-law_n_1309985.html

  • Shears-of-Atropos

    That’s it… for the left, whatever works. Use kids who were Not aborted, to plead for the right to kill their unborn siblings. How low can you go? Ask a Democrat, and be told that there is no limit.

  • Yarply Twelve

    Anyone who would abort a baby without a valid life threatening reason deserves the coat hanger. Abort the mother. Save the Baby.

  • NoParty

    What do you think their mothers told them about the hangers? If they told them the truth, those kids will have nightmares for the rest of their lives. What trashy people they must be to use children in that manner.

    • shotz90s

      This isn’t simply using a child, this is abuse of a child.

  • biteme11

    Shame on the toddlers parents.

  • nearablackhole

    Perhaps the sign should have a forceps and vacuum cleaner.

    I would imagine the botched coat-hanger abortions of years ago were few and far between. The coat-hanger symbol is not only inaccurate (it is highly unlikely that a women with a modicum of intelligence would resort to anything like that in this day and age), it cannot even come close to impressing anyone who knows the widespread mutilation now performed on children with modern devices.

    • nickshaw

      Don’t kid yourself. There are places in America where the coat hanger or something similar is still used.
      With the mother’s permission.

  • irishalaman

    apparently the the state senator missed a couple..glad to see she could make good use of the little varmints….wonder if she has a 10 year old abortion plan or if these two can stick around and create Carbon Dioxide and BOIL THE EARTH!

  • DawgByte

    I’m sorry, but liberals are just pathetic in every sense of the word. They go ballistic when a mentally defective person goes into a school and shoots a crowd of people, but sit on their megaphones when doctors abort babies that are still alive and then shove them down a toilet. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds!

  • CATHERINE

    OH I LOVE IT………..YOU LEFTWINGNUTS THINK ONLY YOU CAN SHOCK, ONLY YOU HAVE FREE SPEECH??????
    ALL THAT ‘KILL BUSH’ HATE YOU DRIPPED ON US AND THEN YOU PUT THIS PIG OBAMA IN POWER?????
    STRAP IN BOYS, STRAP IN

  • treachery

    This is a new low even for Austin.

  • Me

    The child should be holding a sign that says thanks mom for not using one of these on me………..

    • nickshaw

      ‘Cause drawing that vacuum machine is really hard.

  • Milke Alston

    Mom told them she would delay abort them if they didn’t !

  • DirtyRatBastards

    classless left

  • Victor Seal

    I don’t get their point of supporting murder. Was the point that these children should have been aborted?

  • 99magna

    Do they not see the contradiction of using kids for pro-abortion. Post- fetus’ that survived. If the kids would only ask mommy” how many brothers or sisters did you have flushed down the toilet so I don’t have to share my toys mommy dearest”.

  • jerseydave

    Actually we were told that “Keep Abortion Safe and Legal” would protect womens’ health, but then came Kermit Gosnell and the realization that this system and the politicians who regulate it don’t care about womens’ health.

  • Mike0oSS

    Everyone should be aborted!!! At least once!!

  • clay coker

    This is nothing new. The religious recruit kids to keep their religion alive. Taxpayer funded schools force children to learn a biased view of history, and teach them all to think the same. There are militias in Africa made up of children recruited at a young age. Children are used, and abused everywhere for just about every purpose.

    • eztalk

      You’re sick. Abuse??

      I guess we should just let children grow up wild and untaught?

      When I see someone post this type of tripe, and has only 30 posts to your name, I strongly suspect you’re either trolling or working for an organization which pays you to post garbage to derail conversations, such as Organizing for America and such? Or, did you just answer one of those Craig’s List ads that libs put out?
      http://austin(dot)craigslist(dot)org/npo/

      • clay coker

        How about we teach them what they need to survive, and stop ramming our personal opinions down their throats. Forming your own opinions should be the number one principal taught to children, or we can throw innovation out the window.

  • Ken M.

    Give the children a cigarette and the left will scream bloody murder!!

  • grizzled1two

    Lucky for the kids their mom made the right “choice”.

    • nickshaw

      And their parents convinced them that sucking out the brains of their brothers or sisters was the right thing to do.

      • eztalk

        Unfortunately, sucking out the brains would be more charitable than what really happens to these babies.

  • bvikay

    Wire hanger=planned parenthood=pro choice=Gosnell’s of the world. End of discussion.

  • Richard Vandiamondsworth

    More liberal hypocrisy: it’s a woman’s “right to choose” what to do with her body when it comes to killing a baby, but she’ll be locked up for renting her p___y or lighting up a joint.

    • wvcaver

      but they want the GOV to invade there body with Obummer care !

  • texguy46

    Lowlife lib parents, they should be arrested. I love that Texas is going to shutdown 20-25 unsanitary planned parenthood abortion mills leaving about 7 in the state with restrictions. Go gettem Gov. Perry

  • nickshaw

    You mean the parents couldn’t convince the kids to loop the coat hangers around their own necks?
    Do these kids know they probably don’t have siblings because of their parent’s “choice”?
    I wonder how they will think of that later in life?

  • Richard Bickleberry

    A tip for single guys: Abortion clinics are great places to pick up left wing chicks that put out. And the longer the bun is in the oven the bigger the funbags, at least that’s what grandma used to tell me when I visited her and mom in prison. Life is short, if something feels good, just do it. There is usually always a way to foist the consequences of your actions onto someone else. If you want to make an omelette, you need to break some eggs. It’s no big deal to kill a baby if it means you get to keep on having fun. Hillary 2016.

  • Wilkins Micawber

    What about my right to choose my own health care?

  • Perplexed

    It is not ‘pro choice’. It is pro abortion. To involve children is abominable. .

  • Moondogg

    I believe in being “Pro Choice”

    You can choose to be responsible and use protection when you have sex. Abortion isn’t birth control, birth control is birth control.

    The powers of life go both ways: creating and destroying. We unanimously condemn people for abusing the power to destroy life when someone commits a murder. Why don’t we condemn the abuse of the power to create life when someone has an “unwanted” pregnancy and gets an abortion?

  • outloud

    Who the hell thought this was a good idea? Shameful – except that the left has no shame. If this law had gone through five years ago those little guys would not be able to be out there waving those contemptible signs, they’d be down the drain somewhere. If you have a differing opinion, fine – go ahead and state your case. But you diminish yourself and your cause by these tactics.

  • eztalk

    Poll: Rick Perry leads Wendy Davis by 14 in Texas — and by six among women, according to PPP poll.
    http://www(dot)publicpolicypolling(dot)com/main/2013/07/davis-popular-but-gubernatorial-bid-a-long-shot.html

  • fredfarkel

    It’s absolutely wrong for either side to bring children into the fray…

  • Katepatate

    Some people shouldn’t have children. Put these kids up for adoption to some parents who will instill some decency in them. They aren’t learning it from the parents they have now.

  • rancher.

    Where is the cps?

  • end liberalism now

    too bad their parents were not aborted

  • Teuton54

    This should be child abuse!!

  • OldHickory21

    This so called “Women’s Rights Protest” was largely astro-turfed. They had an ad on Craigslist recruiting people to “protest” for pay. It’s total BS.

  • awenger

    Maybe the pro-life people need to hold signs with scissors that say stop killing infants.

  • LiberalVoiceOfReason

    Libs often use their kids as poster holding tools for their causes. You see it on the news all the time. What’s new?

  • wdm52

    Where are the child welfare agencies?

  • djbaluta

    Pro-Choice people have NO problems killing babies so don’t be surprised by the tactics they employ, especially using children to promote their own sick agendas. It is one thing trying to talk a mother out of killing her own baby once she makes that decision, but it is pure evil to tell mothers to KILL their babies and then use innocent children to help with that message.
    What you are seeing here is the ultimate human sickness; self-destructive, self-inflicted, self-loathing human beings who hate themselves so much they would use and destroy children no matter what others believe.

  • Manuel Martinez

    tell the children what it means and watch them drop the signs,misinformation is why we are in the problem we are in today.

  • mrbill59

    What they could not get any baby’s to hold the si…….oh ..oh nevermind

  • Joe Corea

    That is really disturbing. It is interesting to note that the photographers were careful not to show the kids faces. We get the idea of what is going on so these children can continue to have privacy. Liberals would never do that for the other side, but we all knew that already.

  • SRussell55

    Using children to support the murder babies by the same group that whines about guns. I think we all agree, democrats are a strange animal. Cant use 17 year olds to work on the family farm but child welfare services allows 4 year olds to work for abortions. Amazing

  • bill1942

    Arrest all of those shrews for violation of Child Labor Laws.

  • obowmasbananarepublic

    Wonder if the parents of these children told them they were trying to torture and kill babies? I can only imagine these babies that look to be four and seven or so would look at mommy in horror!!!

    • djbaluta

      Unfortunately the children have no idea or understanding of how their parents are playing them and using them to promote their sickness. Eventually children do grow up and develop their own belief systems which may be counter to those of their parents. In the mean time they have to roll with the punches and we can only hope and pray they learn the true value of every human life. Heaven knows they won’t be learning it at these rallies with these losers.

      • obowmasbananarepublic

        I agree.
        I know if I took my children to a Tea Party, I would explain to them why we were there and the purpose. Of course my children are smart enough to ask why. I guess that’s why these children are so young, they probably didn’t want to explain it to older children. Young children pretty much do what they’re told.

        • djbaluta

          Everyone deserves an explanation before making any decision to participate in something so major. Think of the harm these parents would do to their own children when they learn what the protesting is truly about.

  • eztalk

    I notice on my Disconnect account that there are 446 requests for information on this site.

    So, is Disqus now tracking comments on this site???

  • VetMike

    Isn’t it nice that these children weren’t aborted so they would be around to carry the signs.

  • vegasdomar

    Worked at Glendale Memorial Hospital E.R. when a Catholic woman came in after using a coat hanger and her Doctor was a devout Catholic. More than one died on the way to E.R. there and County. Used to have girls go to San Luis for abortions, and the suicides, death and permanent damage is pathetic.

    Think it’s funny to self abort? It’s final conclusion can be bloody and very sad.

    • obowmasbananarepublic

      Women aren’t forced to use coat hangers. They can find a baby killer in many many places. Was this woman in her fifth month by the way?

    • djbaluta

      It is very sad and unfortunate what you witnessed but that certainly doesn’t make 40,000,000+ “legal abortions” any less horrific. Ask any medical students who participated in one while interning during their medical training.
      Abortion is not nor should it ever be used for birthcontrol. IMHO. Regards.

    • Arrowood

      Sorry, I don’t believe your story. If you want to use your real name and provide actual documentation of your claims then I will believe you, otherwise I consider you to be a shill. Especially when you cite the religion of both the woman and the doctor. It’s all just a little too much.

      • Earlytrane

        So what’s your point Aristotle?

        • Arrowood

          Perhaps you should look up the word shill in a dictionary and enjoy your mommy’s basement.

    • alanwillingham

      I guess when your mind is made up to intentionally end innocent human life, the lesson to be learned is that your actions may wind up ending your own.

    • suqsid4

      “Think it’s funny to self abort?”

      You seem to be the only one pondering the funny.

  • ocean

    Abortion is a ‘Culture of Death’.

  • ocean

    The Supreme Court of the United States
    ruled a constitutional right to abortion.
    A constitutional right to kill a baby.
    Choice means to “Kill” or “Not to Kill” a baby.
    Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion
    provider in America. Its on your conscience.
    God help you.

    • djbaluta

      At one point in American History SCOTUS ruled SLAVERY TO BE LEGAL. Their final opinion or ruling is the result of the winning majority of 9 people who base their decisions entirely on their own preferences, personal prejudices and professional bias. Seldom do they consider what the founding fathers implemented in the US Constitution. They can try to dress it up with all kinds of legal jargon but in many cases, their logic is either invalid and illogical or just contradictory and rarely has it been in the best interests of the American people.

  • Hank Seiter

    Typical leftards. If they don’t murder them in the womb they’ll use them as tools. They should be arrested for child abuse.

  • comprof

    Despicable! Why are these parenets not arrested for endangering their children? Where is social services?

  • JallopyMacfurry

    Disgusting leftists.

  • coyotewise

    I’m sorry, but murder of innocents is murder of innocents, whether in a back room of some cheesy hotel or in a clean and sanitary (are there any of those) abortion clinic. Anyone caught killing a baby in the womb should be charged with murder.

  • Wild Hog

    Best example of the left’s disregard for children.

  • kjco99

    SO sick & twisted! They have no self-awareness @ all. The optics are startling.

  • Andylit

    When I was but a sprat I worked uniform security at an abortion clinic. The protestors were there every weekend regardless of weather.

    There were always little kids with them, as well as babies in strollers. The worst of it was when it was below zero. The protestors were there, freezing babies and all.

    Both sides of the political aisle use their children in this despicable manner. Both sides should stop, but neither will. They simply do not understand how it undermines their position.

    • Earlytrane

      The pro-abortion mob, a shrieking mass of demons from the pits of Hell, demands an unlimited supply of the blood of unborn children to satisfy their satanic overlords.

    • Earlytrane

      That they would press innocent children into the hellish service of Satan is, well, pretty much par for the course for the Left. These people have a searing hatred of God and of God’s goodness. In fact it is goodness itself that they really hate.

    • alanwillingham

      How touching that you claim concern for the welfare of babies and children out front… while you were standing guard to make certain babies inside could continue to be put to death… and you make the bizarre remark that “They simply do not understand how it undermines their position”…. AMAZING!.

      • Andylit

        I was speaking to both sides of the issue. If I had not included why I was present some 30 plus years ago, you would be left only with the horrible use of the babies for political purposes.

        I suppose it was okay for the babies to get so cold they were turning blue. I wondered then and I wonder even today how many of those babies suffered frostbite, possible illness, perhaps even death. But it was for a good cause, so that makes the abuse OK.

        I despise zealots. I despise them on either side of the debate. Any person who who uses a child for political gain is despicable.

        I have a very different position on abortion now than I did when I was a teen. But my opinion of zealots like you has never changed.

        • alanwillingham

          Pointing out the hypocrisy in your earlier post makes me, in your opinion, a “zealot”… LOL ! Now your explanation that you supported taking the lives of innocent babies as a teen is somehow to be excused, is pitiful…. but please, do rave on ; )

          • Andylit

            Hypocrisy?

            Ah yes. Because I do not conform to your specific brand of pro-life thought I must be a hypocrite. No room for redemption in your tiny little mind. No sir.

            Once tainted, forever condemned. Yeah, I think zealot fits you quite well.

  • Delphinus13

    Isn’t this ironic. People who made the CHOICE to have their children instead of killing them via abortion, are now exploiting or allowing their BORN children to be exploited so that other UNBORN children may be murdered.

  • Delphinus13

    Another irony. Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, a racist eugenicist who advocated for the eradication of certain races. The method? Abort them before they’re born. I guess it’s working because most of the UNBORN children killed via abortion are from minority races.

  • Jim

    There is a reason abortion was made legal. Mitt Romney understood because of the death of a cousin in an illegal abortion, but that was before he ran for office.

    Those who oppose abortion need to find out why what they want was once rejected.

    • suqsid4

      Over 50 million slaughtered. Reason that.

    • JWales

      So you’re saying that it’s better to allow the killing of millions of babies to supposedly save a handful of women that want to kill their babies…pretty sick attitude there Jimbo…I say we come out way ahead if we lose the women that want to kill their babies…so watch out Jimbo, the machine you worship may just decide that you were supposed to be aborted and then it corrects the mistake.

  • President Thug

    Too sweet… One of the kid’s signs said. “It’s OK if Mom want’s to chop me up in little pieces and flush me down the toliet”

  • clbrown

    Anyone who ever finds themself questioning just who our enemies are… and why they have to be “enemies” at all… this sums it up perfectly.

    People who have so little shame, so little decency… who use children (who have no idea what they’re even out there for, except “if I do this I’ll be pleasing an authority figure in my life”) in this fashion… they’re simply evil. Not “misguided.” Not “confused.” Not “showing bad judgment.”

    EVIL.

    Plain and simple.

    And evil… or those who willfully embrace evil… cannot be negotiated with. They may CLAIM to negotiate (as Muslims do, in accordance to the commands of the Koran, supposedly directly from God) only to trick their enemies into making concessions, but they never match those concessions.

    Ronald Reagan learned this during his term as President… he made “compromises” with the other side, but they always took the part he’d offered but refused, later, to give the part they’d promised.

    We need to realize… we can’t “deal” with people like this. They will not stop when they “win this point”… they can’t be satiated. They must be engaged, and defeated. We need to thoroughly discredit them at every term.

    And for those who do this sort of thing… we need to call them what they are. EVIL.

    • Merica

      Or nazi’s like there mindsets seem to follow.

  • RHG

    Absolutely absurd and the height of hypocrisy that the pro abortionists would use their children to push a policy that results in the death of children.

  • Mike Lameyer

    Hey kid your lucky your ass is here.

  • Mike Lameyer

    Hey kid your lucky you are here.

  • Bretfox

    These innocent kids have no clue as to what they are doing. Their parents should be ashamed for using them to promote the killing of children.

    • GiantClam

      Liberals don’t posses a sense of shame. It’s what makes them liberals.

  • Sam Alan

    OMG….Republicans…of all the issues you could sieze on this is bar none the biggest loser of them all. Women HATE you. I mean, they HATE the bacteria that swims around in your intestines simply because it swims around in your intestines and not someone elses. You picked the biggest loser of an issue you could possibly ever in a million years pick. Kiss 2014 goodbye. Sayonara! Adios! Goodbye.

    • jaydirt

      Absolutly right. This issue is just one of the anchors of the republican party. I have no problem voting on some republican issues especially anti obama care, but when they open their mouth about abortion, I just want to launch a smelly arab sandal at their face.

      • JWales

        another child molester…how long have you and Sam been working on it together?

        • jaydirt

          shut up you small minded dolt. I will launch a smelly sandal at you! With a foot that has corns and bunyons on it.

        • jaydirt

          shut up you small minded dolt. I will launch a smelly sandal at you! With a foot that has corns and bunyons on it.

        • jaydirt

          you prove your an idiot by calling me a child molestor when you dont know me. What a stupid thing to accuse someone of.

          • JWales

            Advocating abortion is child molestation at it’s worst…I imagine many people pray for you…or regarding you.

        • jaydirt

          you prove your an idiot by calling me a child molestor when you dont know me. What a stupid thing to accuse someone of.

    • suqsid4

      No one cares about your hatred, Samantha.

    • JWales

      it’s too bad you have such an empty hate filled soul…I hope you can control yourself enough to not commit a heinous act against children

  • alanwillingham

    Taking advantage of children’s desire to kill their little brothers and sisters… Who says Liberals are cruel cold blooded monsters?

  • Len Mullen

    People ought to explain to these children that if their moms had exercised their reproductive rights they would be dead.

  • http://theromancatholicvote.com/ catholicvoter

    This is absolutely disgusting! They are brain washing these kids who barely know their asses from their elbows yet. Liberals care about kids to the extent they can be used to help them. Otherwise, it’s hello abortion, hello to giving the kids back to abusive parents, hello to public school that couldn’t teach a person with a 200 IQ to tie his shoes.

  • Tony2000s

    Did the parents bother to explain to the children that they were killing babies ? Of course not ! Both parents should be in jail for child abuse . They are not fit to raise children !

    • DesertStormVet1

      Or fixed so they can’t breed.

  • La Jacks

    Just like the LEFT and OBOZO used kids for their gun plight.

  • jaydirt

    they are killing mostly black babies. The ones that are going to riot if zimmerman is found innocent. The ones that are robbing and beating white people and stealing their phones downtown chicago. The same ones that have 85% children born without fathers already. The same ones whose neighborhoods you dont dare go into. So here is an idea you crybaby anti abortion idiots. Get ready to adopt black children. I hope you enjoy a city of chicago being born every 8 years. Nice to know you fools think we have the resources to support this in an already tapped out economy with a bumbling idiot for a president.

  • GiantClam

    Leftist have no shame. They use their own children as political pawns to further advance their degenerate agenda. God, I really, really hate them.

  • jltules

    You democrat baby killers have sunk to a new low.

  • OrdinaryAmerican2012

    There are no documented cases of women using a coat hanger to have an abortion.

    It’s a myth that was used to sell abortion.

    If it has ever happened, the lady would have to be absolutely drunk, drugged, and crazy.

    Think about it and use your common sense.

    Would you as a women voluntarily stick a coat hanger inside you like that?

    As a man, imagine sticking the coat hanger up your P__ ___ __ __ like a catheter or up your rear end.

    Would anyone out there ever consider doing such a stupid thing?

    No. No one would.

    • Beverly Owens

      You forget.
      Liberals are stupid.

  • Jus Wundrin

    Sad

  • OrdinaryAmerican2012

    Democrat War on Women and War on Children:

    It’s pretty clear what the Liberals are doing.

    It’s the same old story, just another verse.

    They continue encouraging the teens to destroy themselves and their future
    by having sex with anyone anytime at any age for any reason or no reason at
    all, and then supposedly they can go murder the baby at Planned Parenthood or
    take a pill to fix everything.

    AND NO! It doesn’t “fix” everything.

    STD’s are more rampant than ever.

    Abortions are killing babies and they are killing the mothers.

    These young people who think it’s OK to have sex with 30 different people
    before dropping out of high school damage themselves and others emotionally for
    the rest of their lives.

    They never learn how to have a functional relationship, because the only
    relationship they ever have is sexual.

    They never learn how to communicate with someone they might want to marry or
    have children with.

    They never grow up. We have these 40-year-olds with 20 different kids
    with different last names, and the 40-year-old thinks he’s still 15.

    It’s not just the abortion pill.

    It’s the whole attitude.

    What do we want for our children and for the next generation?

    Do we want them to be life-long dysfunctional children, who are sick
    physically, emotionally, and spiritually – who never finish high school – who never
    get any formal training for a good job – who never have a real life – who just
    go from one dysfunctional relationship to another to another to
    another… Kids get frustrated with Mom’s “boyfriend of
    the month.”

    These kids need REAL fathers and REAL parents who act like grown-ups.

    Let’s choose to give our kids a future.

    Let’s choose to give our kids a good life, long term.

    Let’s choose to give our kids physical health and emotional health.

    This debate over the Abortion Pill is merely a sign of all the big trouble
    going on.

    It’s only the tip of the iceberg, and America’s
    Children are hitting that iceberg hard…and sinking.

  • OrdinaryAmerican2012

    Usually, it is not the “choice” of the mother to murder her own baby.

    It is usually or often somebody else’s idea: a boyfriend, for example.

    How much choice does a young ignorant prostitute have when her pimp is threatening to kill her?

    How much choice does a young ignorant woman, who thinks she’s never been loved by anyone, and the fake boyfriend seems to be her only chance for happiness – if she just agrees to murder her own baby.

    -what kind of choice is THAT – for a young woman who thinks her only life is the worthless scum-bag guy who doesn’t want to pay child support?

    I personally know one woman who was ordered by her husband to have an abortion, because he didn’t want any more responsibility or any more future child support to pay after the divorce.

    See more examples of forced abortions by violent people.

    http://www.mccl.org/document.doc?id=467

    • parker1227

      Its called personal responsibility. Make an excuse for going to the store AND LEAVE.

      Do what it takes to protect your baby if that is what you feel is right.

      The baby is an innocent – no matter who the Father is.

      The sad thing is that most women who abort eventually regret it – but are too proud and afraid to admit it.

      The aborted child is half THEM. In a way they are killing themselves.

  • General Dindu

    Extremist left wing sexual terrorism.

  • The Duke of New York

    The Duke says abortion kills babies and it should be stopped! What did I teach you?
    Say it!

  • The Duke of New York

    The Duke says why wasn’t obuma aborted for having big ears and a liberal ideology?
    What did I teach you? I can’t hear you!

  • $6295081

    I abhor using children as props in adult political issues, whether it is by Libs or Conservatives. I am strongly pro-life but would never think of carrying kids to such a rally.

  • Joe Kleinkamp

    “What’s the hanger for daddy?” “Well sweetie . . .” What kind of sick twisted parent could allow this?

  • http://freerepublic.com GOPcongress

    Actually, the sign is absolutely correct. Pro-choicers (more correctly, anti-lifers) are grisly murderers, and the sign actually impugns them more than supports them. If this were an anti-lifer’s kid, then the parent was absolutely stupid.

    If it were a pro-life group mocking a pro-choice event by using the hanger, then they should not have used the kid, and I detest that parent just as much as if the parent had been an anti-lifer.

  • The Duke of New York

    obama is out of control, NSA is out of control, IRS is out of control,democrats are out of control, now the pigs are out of control. It wasn’t like this under President Bush. Pretty soon “we the people will be out of control” climbing over the White House fence. With our Pits and Rottweilers feasting on liberal meat………..

  • Felipe_Miguel

    It’s okay everybody. I found out that their parents voted for Michelle and Obama. So, this is perfectly normal, and 100% of all Democrats in America support the parents and using these children to promote 24-7 terminations everywhere. So stop fussing, because they clean the stainless steel tanks everyday!

  • Tracy

    Abortion is worse than slavery. Years from now history will show how horrible this stain on our nation is. God please stop this, God please save us, God please forgive us. We are murdering our children.

  • GuessWho

    Ah, Democrat liberals doing what they do best, exploiting people for their disgusting causes. Maybe someone should call CPS.

  • GuessWho

    No worries, if this minor shows up pregnant – Planned Parenthood will provide her an abortion and not ask a single question to as why the minor is pregnant in the first place as they seal their records for “privacy.” They won’t even notify her mother in the state of California, again, citing privacy. My goodness liberals are sick.

  • Wo Fat

    Terrible irony using children to further the cause of killing babies…

  • JWales

    What sick hypocrisy…using kids as political props for the legalization of killing babies…I just wonder how those kids can process their parentstelling them that killing babies is good.

  • Jose Agosto

    Imagine one day the kid says how come the kids have brothers and sisters and I don’t. What is she going to say?

  • Ja Dane

    They are not children until their mother decides that they are children. Perhaps their mother think they are still fetuses holding signs. That is the opinion of an abortionist caught on tape.
    Check it out in youttube. How low can the pro abortion crowd sink?

  • organicroseski2

    If you would ask these little girls if they would want their baby dolls destroyed, they would cry and say, “No!” The parents are ….!

  • Beverly Owens

    Better than pro-choice is pro-active choice.
    That is where you choose to keep your legs closed.
    Problem solved.

  • nhale

    Would it be ironic for these kids to turn to their mother and thank her for not aborting them so they could hold these signs?

  • Kedzie

    As long taxpayer dollars aren’t used for abortion I don’t care how many abortions a female gets. Her uterus can drop out on the sidewalk for all I care. It is her choice and she has to live with it. But exploiting innocent children to promote their cause is despicable.

  • Bathing Suit Area

    These children know for certain that their parents wanted them and chose to have them. Children of anti-abortion folks will never know if their parents wanted them or just got stuck with them.

    • Dragblacker

      I might ask what people who don’t want children are doing having unprotected sex, or sex at all. In fact, when did sexual relations outside of marriage become such a condoned thing in Western culture?

  • Delphinus13

    Since the NAACP is pro abortion, does that mean they’re the National Association for the Abortion of Colored People? Interesting, an article yesterday shows that a black man who has referred to them like this on his website is now being sued in Federal Court by this so-called “civil rights” organization.

  • Kepha Hor

    Hey, I’m the youngest of five. When I was in early adolescent, and older sib tried to get me to wear a “Stop at Two” button. We haven’t spoken since. ngyuk ngyuk

  • Kevlar_Vest

    Actually, this isn’t as bad as those Occupy scum that used their kids to try and block the doors to a Conservative event, even when security was pushing people out of the doors. There’s video of her putting her kids in harms way: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/occupy-dc-protesters-use-toddlers-block-exit-reagan-tribute I’m surprised CPS hasn’t taken her kids away. These leftist scum aren’t fit to breed.

  • Damien Johnson

    ” Living in a society where a woman’s body is owned by the state” You… uh… do you not recognize the irony in what you just said? Do you hear yourself? Are you really this stupid?

  • Chessah

    SB5 is NOT about preventing abortion, it’s about defining a time line of no more than twenty weeks. That’s 5 months gestation…….surely that’s enough time to make your coveted ‘Choice’!!!

  • http://blog.khelek.us Brian Johnson

    You know what’s interesting about women making this “choice”? The ones who get to make it aren’t the ones being dismembered, having their brains sucked out and having their spinal cords snipped. Until that happens spare me the “woman’s body, woman’s choice” BS. It’s the killing of an innocent life.

  • fictitious

    The inevitable switch of the subject to pull on the heart strings. Ah yes…THE choice.

    The choice to find a private location (or not in some cases). The choice to go to first base. The choice to go to second base. The choice to go to third base. The choice to remove your clothes. The choice to engage certain body parts. The choice to do so without protection. The choice to ejaculate without disengaging said body parts.

    Then the ONLY choice that apparently matters..whether or not to terminate the fetus.

    By the way the current proposed legislation limits that choice only after 20 weeks. That’s 5 MONTHS. Surely one could make THE choice within 5 months.Especially considering the amount of time dedicated to the 8 choices mentioned above before being in the situation to make THE choice.

    Are there extenuating circumstances in SOME cases? Yes. Does the 20 week/5 month window account for those circumstances? Yes.

  • Guest

    Because society prevents you from killing your unborn baby does not mean that the state owns you. Liberals want the state to own their kids anyway. Thats why they do their best to destroy families and put the onus on the state to provide for cradle to grave on the backs of taxpayers.

  • Suegirly

    And I’m sure those children will be fine with that. Oh wait, I’ve met MANY teens DEVASTATED to learn their parents killed their siblings.

  • ObamaFail

    According to you and other libs, having children is a punishment and a preexisting condition.

  • MWhite

    Maybe the parent’s mothers should have “exercised their choice” or maybe the same could be said of your own mother. Life Lesson: Don’t project onto others what you’d never be willing to experience yourself.

  • Damien Johnson

    First of all, the bill isn’t controlling women’s bodies, it’s controlling the clinics so the women will be safe. Second of all, the fact that abortion is even legal in the first place, the fact that there aren’t apparent bans on sex-selection abortions, is in it of itself a control of women’s bodies. Third of all, well… pro-choice women, in their demands of free birth control and free abortions, are submitting themselves to control of the state.

  • Chessah

    Irony = SB5 is NOT about preventing abortion, it’s about defining a time line of no more than twenty weeks. That’s 5 months gestation…….surely that’s enough time to make your coveted ‘Choice’!!!

  • Chessah

    Count me in that group. Devastated doesn’t quite match how I felt when discovering that my ‘Mommy Dearest’ successfully home-aborted two potential siblings in the 60’s, with her doctors help! She lamented her failure to abort me with a coat hanger, AFTER her doctor refused to help her with medications any further. All this, during a time abortion was illegal, but quietly accessible.

    ThreeOranges: SB5 is NOT about preventing abortion, it’s about defining a time line of no more than twenty weeks. That’s 5 months gestation…….surely that’s enough time to make your coveted ‘Choice’!!!

  • NoNeedforNamecalling

    From now on when a lib posts a comment awful enough that it might be deleted, can we copy and paste it into our reply or something?

  • trixiewoobeans

    Was the murder of an innocent human involved?

  • trixiewoobeans

    And since we’re talking “devastation”, is the devastation of the murdered child any less valid? Especially considering the means employed to end their lives? Let’s see, suction, burning saline, dismemberment, poison, and of course, severed spinal cord. Any thoughts or concerns about that devastation?

  • ObamaFail

    And I’ve met many libs who support Islam even though they just recently beheaded yet another person. They are morally corrupt scum. Every last one of you should have been aborted. At least your mothers would have done some good. Less morally corrupt, baby killing, terrorist sympathizing scum walking the earth leeching welfare if they had.

  • archerb

    And I’ve met kids devastated because their mommy wouldn’t let them go to the Justin Beiber concert. But that’s a far cry from teaching kids right from wrong and even further from killing their brothers and sisters.

    You’re a moron.

  • MWhite

    Yes…yes it is. At least those people you say were “devastated” by their parents Christianity were alive.

  • ObamaFail

    Liberals don’t care about anything but the arousing (to them) thought of killing a baby after 5 months. The idea of killing a baby that has a heart beat and resembles a baby is invigorating to them. IT makes all pro-abortion zealots want to get pregnant just so they can have an abortion.

  • John Galt

    IT ALL COMES DOWN TO THIS!!!! But, I don’t know. I’m a guy. Ladies, answer this for me.

    When does an unborn child become a CITIZEN of the United States, afforded the protection of the government from Child abuse?

  • Gabriel

    It also shuts down all but 2 clinics in the state the second largest state in the union. Please tell the intentions of the bill.not the parts that make your points right. This a bill by men for woman with the intention of regulating others morality. Imaginary people in the sky are no way to make laws look what that has turned Iran into

  • Dwain Meyer

    You’re lucky your parents didn’t share your “enlightened” view.

  • http://www.FireKarlRove.com/ C. Edmund Wright

    Are you sorry your mama didn’t have an abortion? Even with the hanger? Some others are…..

  • Dr Chambers

    So was election of obama and the Arab spring. How’s that turning out?

  • shotz90s

    Ah yes, a supporter of murder. Nothing like living the day counting on little boys and girls being slaughtered all in the name of “progress”, right? Damn your life must suck ass.

  • RickQPublic

    So why is it my responsible ability to pay for someones choices? So it’s OK for sluts to have no responsibility and everyone else is responsible for their actions? Keep pushing your head higher up into that cavity.

  • Swibbie

    You know, if women could control their own bodies, there would no need for abortion, would there?

  • Guest

    No. It allows you to kill your baby. Stop talking about your fat ass.

  • teasacker

    Are you posing this question to a liberal lady or a real one?

  • julibear

    The benefits of citizenship are afforded to a person AT BIRTH. Not before.

  • dasfdsfasd

    At the moment of conception. This is when life is created and (uh-oh, here it comes)…GOD takes over. I said it!

  • Guest

    When he walks here from Mexico.

  • julibear

    You are sick to make that statement. No one wants to have an abortion and after 20 weeks it is especially wrenching. Post 20 weeks abortion levels are stultifyingly low and it is almost always reserved for a fetus who is developing abnormally. Why put extra pain and suffering on someone who has to go through this? A whole extra 24 hours of waiting, when you know your baby won’t survive anyway. A whole extra, needless sonogram when you’ve already had a few to confirm the diagnosis? Your doctor literally forced by the state to repeat words that have nothing to do with your condition, and clinic workers forced by the state to tell you that adoption is a choice, when the baby inside of you is dying anyway. That is sick and disgusting and you clearly have no compassion for anyone except the fetus. You have no idea what a post-20 week abortion-seeking woman is going through–you simply make your assumptions from your comfortable couch while real women are suffering. Not only that but this bill has nothing to do with the making abortion ‘safer for the woman.’ Total BS. Abortion has a miniscule incidence of error. If there are complications the provider simply needs to send the patient by ambulance to an ER, no hospital privileges are required to do so. Abortion is actually many times safer for the woman than labor and childbirth! So if women are going to be informed by the state about their choice then the state should inform them of the risks of childbirth. Its a sham designed by old men to protect women who do not need or want their ‘protection.’

  • Heartland Patriot

    No, I believe the “DOCTOR NICK” is just being sarcastic, that’s all. And pretty accurate, too. Its what abortion is really all about, making money. Its a volume business…

  • John Galt

    OK That’s one vote for THAT side.

  • Hominid

    Could you cite the pertinent legislation? How about the SCOTUS ruling? No? Are you just running your mouth?

  • zj sky

    wrong julibear – the second life starts inside the body of a US Citizen, that is when it should be afforded full rights under the law

  • John Galt

    All are welcome. This is THE important Constitutional question. Let’s discuss.

  • Byron Dugat

    I was the father of a child that was not expected to make it (Potter’s). That ‘fetus’, wouldn’t you know, turned into a beautiful child that i had the privilege of meeting, if only for an hour or so. Who am I to take that time alive away from him? He died peacefully – not so if he were to have been cut apart and pulled out. His name was Matthias, and we were blessed to have him in our lives.

    No evidence that abortion is safer for women. And of course it is never safe for a baby. People seem to forget that they were once a ‘fetus’ http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/ASMF/asmf12.html

    Just b/c a woman carries a baby, it doesn’t mean that it is not distinct from them. What’s inside her is not her body, though her body cares for it. If you had a baby and left it on its own to survive, it would die as well, as no baby is truly ‘viable’ w/o help from someone, whether connected w/ a cord or not.

    If viability (i.e. sustain life w/o any assistance) is the test for humanity, does that mean people are no longer human when they are put on a respirator, even if they can recover?

    It’s never made sense that someone to me can argue for abortion, saying its only a fetus – after all, aren’t they killing something inside them now b/c they don’t want to take care of a baby later on? Is the difference between a baby and a fetus just where it is located, esp. after viability has been established? Sounds like semantics to me.

    I’m against abortion no matter what the stage. My child changed the lives and hearts of many who saw him, and I thank God for it.

  • Slim Picnic

    “Abortion is actually many times safer for the woman ” I applaud you for ending the sentence correctly with “…for the woman”. But as usual, you forget the second person in this transaction – the one who’s life and liberty is mortally violated. And BTW, you are ignoring the post-abortion emotional issues that the majority women have to deal with for the remainder of their lives. As usual for a lib – you only consider the short term consequences of a policy.

  • Live Long and Suck It

    Julibear, you’re an idiot. Control your body by keeping your legs together.

  • Guest

    Just have your baby and give it up to the “state” you proclaim to hate. It at least will have a chance rather than you “choosing” to dismember it. AND you act like the only time that abortions are performed are when the baby is developing abnormally. How naive.

  • Frank

    Julibear – why not direct your energy at working with helping women take responsibility for their choices. Steering a woman toward abortion as a method of birth control is something that is irresponsible in my book. You are recommending a course of action that will leave them with enormous amounts of emotional baggage. I have dealt with the emotional wreckage for years of women who chose abortions early in life. I have yet to meet one that did not have enormous and unresolved guilt and shame around the decision.

    Where are you in 10 or 15 years for these women? Where are the pro-choice women freely expressing their satisfaction with their decision to have an abortion 10 to 15 years earlier? Is there one?

  • Carl Mayo

    your screen name invalidates every point you make, no matter how good, and gives ammunition to the very people you oppose.

  • John Galt

    But wouldn’t that allow the government to do WHAT?? Imprison the woman till birth. Yikes! That is cruel and unusual AND Unequal as men don’t get pregnant yet.
    I posit that it is when the baby can be removed and kept alive by technical means. But I’m a guy, I have no say?

  • Janet Mathews

    Mr. Dugat, Matthias was blessed to have you as his father, as of course he was a blessing to you and to all of his family. I’m sure you’ll see him again in heaven. You’ll hold him and kiss him and play football or frisbee on a beach where the weather is always perfect. Thanks for your post.

  • $57813486

    Indeed. And let’s just look at the math. If 250,000 women per year died with their coat-hangers in a back alley, we would still see the mortality rate drop by 50%.

    I don’t think there will be that many.

  • Curious

    When society teaches them its better to have money then a child what do you expect? No i don’t agree with abortion but unless we get society to change what it says is important it will never change.

    We cheapen life but praise the living, “you’ll never accomplish anything having a child that young”. You hear that a lot, but what exactly could anyone accomplish that is more important than life? The only thing it tells the mother is “that child will keep you from making money” and we have turned the point of Living into making money instead of it being the betterment of life.

    The world is dog eat dog and it seems a lot want to keep it that way and just stand on the soapbox when one of the dogs eats its own instead of taking down another dog to climb the wealth ladder. Make life the most important thing and the rest will work itself out.

  • $57813486

    Well said. Earning and spending is not the purpose of life, though having a rational free market is beneficial for everyone.

  • $57813486

    Men constitute the largest, most potent bulwark to despotism. Married men of faith constitute an existential threat to all tyrants. We will willingly and energetically risk death, while capably and innovatively defeating the tyrant.

    What does liberalism seek? Feminized males, no marriage, the suppression of our traditional religions.

    Do the math.

  • Curious

    I’m not doing this right/left liberal/conservative dance. The only thing Right and Left get you is marching to the beat of whatever tune politics are playing that year.

    As for religion, many a young lady has been shamed into abortions because she was unwed. Religious mothers/fathers driving them to the clinic and even paying for it. All so they can save face with their “religious” friends. They are more worried about the judgement of their peers than the judgement of God.

  • $57813486

    Abortion is simply a modern medical technique. Infanticide remains infanticide, despite the technique you employ to kill the infant.

    The liberal wants to pretend that infanticide is no longer a barbaric practice, based solely on the technique employed. The liberal perverts every good technology to wickedness and evil.

    “Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal.” — Albert Einstein

  • $57813486

    “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.
    .
    But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
    .
    He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” — Marcus Tullius Cicero

  • coldything

    I’m sure you realize that if they could get away with it Gosnell would be a GOD to them

  • Jim

    That’s why “PRO-CHOICE” don’t want pictures or want to hear about Kermit Gosnell. THEY would have to face the REALITY of their lies.

  • Curious

    If the purpose of Life was Life then a free market is fine, But it is not. It has been twisted to do nothing but generate and protect money. I mean truly, they limit how many doctors can graduate each year, thus creating a protected profession,what part of that falls into free market?

    Corporations have million dollar bribers errr lobbyist influencing every aspect of our policy, where is that in the free market principles? Can your every day Joe just walk up to the hill and get an audience? I think not.

    A lot of cities have laws that are directly against the free market. Like forbidding someone from opening a hot dog cart within X feet of a restaurant for fears it may hurt their business.

    The free market was what America was built on but it has been chipped away at from the day we adopted it.

  • $57813486

    And perhaps their big brother, or little sister…

  • $57813486

    Free clue: If I demand that my neighbor maintain his own vehicle, I am not expressing an uncaring attitude towards vehicles. I take care of mine, he takes care of his, just as in every adult situation.

    There is no moral obligation for me to provide for the children of strangers. Failing to thus provide, constitutes no defect on my part. Insisting that I am obligated to subsidize the foolishness of others, is evil.

    Your entire premise is specious, and fallacious, and constitutes the “morality” of the thief.

  • msb204

    I understand what your saying, but being that I am not a politician and care more about the truth, pandering really does not appeal to me.

  • mikemazzla

    NO I think the point is the right are all about life and all, which in a way I understand…but the right is also not the most philanthropic when it comes to things like welfare etc. Like they almost get annoyed by it or think its a handout. so on one hand you are saying have that kid no matter what..but we wont help you when you do because you need to be self sufficient.

    Listen I’m trying to be fair here. No one is saying hey abortion is great and we want one. No one realistically uses it as birth control. It just happens. You know sometimes people have sex just for fun and stuff happens. That’s life.
    Sometimes it just isnt the right time to have a kid. It wast for me when I was in college but it was when I was married and ready to support it. Thats the way I look at it

  • mikemazzla

    The funny thing I guarantee you there are a ton of people out there that outwardly are pro life that have had abortion. Ive seen it. Same is anti gay folks that secretly have gay hookups or all of a sudden see the light when they have a gay family member. Same thing.. just a bit hypocritical. The left at least says hey..your call.. if you are against abortion then don’t have one..but don’t tell me I cant. if you are anti gay for whatever reason you know what don’t have a gay relationship.. but dont tell someone else they cant either.

  • $57813486

    Welfare is government coercion. “Coercive Charity” is a blatantly obvious contradiction. “Coercive Charity” is what every bank robber is engaged in.

    You are not trying to be fair, or you would not be feigning ignorance of Conservative positions that are well explained, widely promulgated, and not in dispute.

    We don’t make … and have never made … any secret about our aims and our reasoning. And yet, you liberals invariably distort even the most well-known Conservative positions routinely.

  • Guest

    So its ALL about you,who cares if anyone else dies,just so you get what you want,and don’t have to deal with poor choices, a liberal mindset ALL the way.

  • NoNeedforNamecalling

    Beheading a PRIEST, at that.

  • mikemazzla

    LOLOL oh man that is priceless. So the only people who should have sex are those that want a family? Let me tell you something kiddo.. some of us do it just because it feels awesome. There are times to have sex for fun and times when you want to have a kid.

    You like using the word murder to make it seem so serious. But I hate to break it to you but without abortion rights there will still be abortions.

    Talk to people who are seniors and ask them before abortion rights what was going on. My grandmother told me that women would just go out and have them anyway… keep sticking your head in the sand though

  • mikemazzla

    Biblical definition LOLOL OH man that is priceless. There is no God nut case.

    Oh by the way.. nature made our bodies ready to have sex at puberty..you know like around 13 give or take.. thats why kids masturbate at that afe.. because they are ready physically for sex. Thats thr reason not your phony BS book.

    Thanks for the laugh though

  • mikemazzla

    LOL not for anything but I trust the church with money just as little as I do the govt.

  • mikemazzla

    I think you are 100% wrong about women and their decision on having an abortion. Most are fine with it and know it was the correct decision. I knew plenty of women in college who had one and know it was right. Is it ideal no.. is it right for most yes.

    And for the record i’ve been to planned parent hood. They have information on abortion, adoption, keeping the child etc etc. It is less expensive for them to not do an abortion.. but that is what most women want if they are there.

  • Fred hgggg

    depends on the child and it depends on how you word the issue.

    Listen to archie, he clearly has wisdom on you. Children are more mailable than warm gold. They believe anything you tell them and would believe the color blue is actually green if their parents said so. This belief that humans naturally know whats wrong or not is a fallacy. Its Nature vs Nurture and Nurture, once again wins.

  • shotz90s

    If someone rams a car carrying pregnant woman, they can be charged with manslaughter. This would insinuate that it is a HUMAN. If the same woman chooses to kill this fetus, it is OK? How can it be both ways? Hence, abortion is murder and unfortunately for you, you seem quit fine with the continued killing.

  • John Robinson

    ….and posts like yours hardly help your case, never mind anyone else’s. Do you really think it changes anyone’s minds or makes a point? No, it just destroys the credibility of everyone on your side. You couldn’t be hurting our case more – which may be the point. Once wonders if you’re not just a leftist troll, acting out your cliches.

  • mikemazzla

    LOL why in the world would I say god doesn’t exist if I thought he does LOL How does that benefit me in any way? Frankly I would love it if there was a god..Id be all over it and would think it was cool. I’m just freaking educated to know he/she doesn’t. It is not even a question. You know it, I know it..you are just a scared rabbit and afraid to admit it for whatever reason.

    Biologically humans are made to have sex at puberty. Just 100 years ago when people lived shorter lives and married younger they had sex at young ages. My mom and my grandmother both married at 17. I can assure you they were having sex before that lol. you are either 100 years old or so way out there if you do not think a 19 year old is having sex.

  • mikemazzla

    Planned Parent is on for profit. The avg cost of an abortion is only about $500. If you think that an outlet that performs 300,000 a year and yet only charges $500 is somehow making money you do not know much about finances.
    It costs PP less to not do an abortion and just council

    I know quite a few people who have had abortions while in college, some personally, they may regret that they got pregnant but no one regrets the decision to abort. That’s one noy those rt wing fallacies. they find a few who may have and act like that is the norm. It isnt

    Your last statement pretty much surmises what the ultimate goal is.. so stop hiding behind all the other nonsense

  • Fred hgggg

    The question itself is ambiguous.

    A pro-life would tell their children: “youre killing a baby inside of its mother”
    a pro-choice would say: “its not a baby/human yet”

    The whole debate about abortion, on both sides, comes down to where they draw the line of human and cluster of cells. Some say at conception, some say several months in the cycle, others say its when it exists the vagina; and can then go even further (1 month? 2 months? 3 months? etc.

    i doubt youd find any sane person who thinks its ok to murder children. However, pro-choice dont see them as children, but rather a cluster of cells growing and forming a human eventually. until society is able to define when semen and haploid become “human” this debate will not end.

    Nature vs Nurture

  • trixiewoobeans

    Still waiting for an answer, Oranges.

  • J. Moore

    Thank you for saving me the trouble. I wouldn’t even stoop to argue with this arrogant, pompous, blow-hard.

  • Sono 4 anni, che faccio, lasci

    Go fvck yourself.

  • Guest

    People are really sick and tired of watching a bunch of N!ggers acting like, well, a bunch N!ggers.

  • shotz90s

    Common sense would say that killing something with a heartbeat and is human, is murder. I also don’t condone state sponsored executions either but in some states they are legal. Again, how can someone be able to get an abortion, yet in the same state someone be charged with manslaughter for killing an unborn child in a car wreck?

  • Fred hgggg

    No, im talking about how the question your asking is biased and a loaded question in terms of this abortion debate. What youre doing is trying bait me with your strawman; You want me to say either yes or no. Saying yes would label one as an inhumane monster, saying no would forfeit ones position on the stance. Hence it being a loaded/biased/poorly framed question as i stated originally and then elaborated.

    I already addressed your question, quiet clearly:

    “i doubt youd find any sane person who thinks its ok to murder children. However, pro-choice dont see them as children, but rather a cluster of cells growing and forming a human eventually.”

    If that single question is the basis of your judgement on the issue, then have no more to say to you and bid you adieu

  • John E. Conway

    Really? You are the one who would rather force someone to care for a child they cannot. You are the one would would rather a rape victim have to care carry his child, who can then get visitation rights. You are the one who are forcing your own religious and moral convictions upon everyone else. It is pro choice, not pro abortion. We believe in the option, We believe it is a woman’s place, not government’s, to decide. We believe religion has no place in government. IN my eyes, all people are equal and deserve equal treatment, be it the man on the street starving, or the millionaire in his luxury car, they deserve to be treated the same in all situations. But people like you do not believe that, and treat them differently, turning away from and avoiding the man on the street, and cow-towing to the desires of the millionaire.