Classy! Meghan McCain joins other sore winners on Prop 8, DOMA rulings: ‘Take that, bitches’

Classy, as always.

Bingo. As Twitchy reported, SCOTUS today struck down the Defense of Marriage Act as unconstitutional. It also punted on Prop 8 and ruled no standing, making same-sex marriage legal in California.

Huh. Funny how the Left was screeching and wailing over SCOTUS just yesterday.

The Left today exposed themselves as the sore winners that they are. Again.

Bingo.

Stay classy.

Related:

SCOTUS punts on Prop 8: Rules no standing; Same-sex marriage legal in Calif.; Updates

SCOTUS circus day: Supreme Court declares DOMA unconstitutional; Hardest hit: Bill Clinton

Twitter watches so you don’t have to: SCOTUS prediction zings media

Meltdown of the day: Melissa Harris-Perry laments loss of citizenship after SCOTUS’ VRA decision

Schadenfreudelicious: MSNBC host ‘physically enraged’ by SCOTUS’ Voting Rights Act decision

Minn. state Rep. Ryan Winkler calls Clarence Thomas an Uncle Tom, claims he didn’t know it was offensive

‘Uncle Tom,’ ‘token’: Justice Thomas dissents pens concurrence; Tolerance brigade hurls racial slurs; Corrected

Top DNC staffers gloat over Obamacare, taunt GOP ‘bitches,’ ‘mother******s’

  • https://twitter.com/Captain_Cy_kun Cy

    So much class and dignity.

    • mike_in_kosovo

      They’re just the epitome of grace and charm!

  • Guest

    Meghan McCain….porcine and irrelevant,
    a chip off the old block.

    • Jerry Camp

      She must be happy since under “DOMA Senate vote”, I see ‘McCain (R-AZ), Yea’…dad must be proud.

  • mickeyco

    One really nice thing: I look at the tweets & comments from this twit & and other youngish women and then I look at my granddaughter. She’s 19 and I don’t think she’s ever saId f**k in her life. She’s a 4.0 student in college; in chorus and band. She lives for the glory of God. She keeps me level enough that I don’t lose all faith in our future.

    • Lotte Lenya

      I hope that there are many more like her – guessing that this display of potty mouth twitterers is just a small segment of self promoting, wannabe relevant morons who have nothing better to do than flaunt their depraved madness.

      • mickeyco

        There are. She goes to a Christian university of about 4,000 and almost all are pretty much like her. Praise Him.

        • Keenan

          Well, if good women do still exist, I shouldn’t give up yet.

          • mickeyco

            No, no. I know quite a few. Keep faithful.

    • Paula A. R. DeAngelis, PhD

      Faith-based families almost universally do better than those who are not so inclined in virtually every respect.

      Good for you!

    • conservativemomma

      A couple of hours ago I received a text from my 18 yr old daughter who is in her first year of college…she just joined the Republican Club on her own. God is faithful and it is exciting to watch Him work. Remember it is easy to shine when there is so much darkness

    • http://amandakmelson.wordpress.com/ GreenEyedGal

      My 18 and almost 17 year old sons are the same way. There are a couple girls at our church like them as well. I have to say, I think they’re the minority though. But as long as there are a few, there’s still hope, right? I think good Christian people need to have more babies! That would mean more hope.

      • mickeyco

        Either that or make sure we influence out kids’ friends who don’t have the right influence at home.

  • http://xristosdomini.wordpress.com/ xristosdomini

    “…After further review, the VRA decision isn’t “really” that big a deal. The Supreme Court should really have more authority to intervene in all state affairs.”– The Left

  • SB

    Who are these bitches they are referring to anyway? Many conservatives are okay with gay civil unions, right?

    • grais

      Their mothers?

  • Andrea Gonzales

    STATES’ RIGHTS BITCHES! (Pardon my language 😉 ) Seriously, though, nothing has changed. People on the left thinking their are rainbows in the sky, flowers blooming, and everyone in the US is singing kumbaya. Nothing has changed. The states’ right to define marriage was once again stated clearly and strongly. Federall, marriage has no definition as it is left up to the states! Prop 8 is thrown out so nothing happened there. Fellow conservatives, celebrate!!! STATES’ RIGHTS IS BACK!! YES!

    • Lisa Dean

      If I could vote that up a million times @andrea_gonzales:disqus I would.

    • ceemack

      Uh, those of us in California might tend to disagree with you.

      Thanks to today’s ruling, one gay federal judge was able to overturn the will of the people of California.

      • Andrea Gonzales

        Prop 8 was a complicated case, and a complex one as well. From what I understand, a piece of legislation was already inacted, it was challenged by a referendum that repealed gay marriage, and it was then taken to the California Supreme Court which deemed it constitutional. There would be many courts that would question the decision of a referendum and the 9th circuit, a liberal circuit, found the ACTION of taking something that was already legalized away as unconstitutional. States have different ways in solving issues such as voting on amendments, legislative action, or state courts. Successes and failures on both sides of the issue. Prop 8 is a complex case so I can see either side failing and I’m disappointed that the Supreme Court did not figure it out so we wouldn’t have judicial activism running amuck.

  • Steve_J

    Why does she want to f*** America?

    • bbroome62

      Must be bi.

      “Can you imagine wanting to fuck everybody you meet?”
      George Carlin – liberal hero

      • Jay Stevens

        More like “libertarian”.

        • Finrod Felagund

          No. Libertarianism is about freedom, and Meghan McCain wouldn’t know freedom if it slapped her upside the head.

  • Stephen L. Hall

    Nothing screams gloating like pointless vulgarities.

  • GrindingMills

    Let’s be realistic, we would have said the same stuff if SCOTUS overturned Obamacare, so I can’t blame them for celebrating. Plus the libertarian in me in kind of excited about it as well. The government has no business inserting themselves into marriage (or anything really).

    • MJUdall

      Proof that most libertarians are idiots which is why you never get anywhere politically. I mean…what’s the point? If a person wants to be liberal they don’t need the libertarian party, they could just vote for the Democrat party. You’re an idiot because you just equaled Obamacare and DOMA as the same kind of law with the same type of intrusions, invasions of privacy and outright governmental tyranny on the individual.

      • GrindingMills

        No, I compared Obamacare and DOMA as significant SCOTUS decisions in the last year that have produced significant reactions.

        My understand of the Court’s decision on DOMA is that the states have the right to decide whether or not they want to allow gay marriage. I personally think this is a state’s rights issue. If, for example, in California and two men or women have the ability to get married, they should have the corresponding federal benefits (joint tax returns, Social Security survivor benefits, ect.) I don’t think this is an unreasonable point of view.

        • MJUdall

          Yeah and that’s about all this gay marriage stuff is about. Its not about love or the right to marry. It’s about the benefits. Bravo TV just celebrated this decision since they will get to begin a whole new industry of gay divorce reality shows. Obamacare decision is not relevant because its clear that Roberts was blackmailed by the Obama administration. Its not the same. There’s a lot more riding on the line in the Obamacare decision than whether or not 1-3% of the population of Nancies and Butches can marry.

          • GrindingMills

            We’ll agree to disagree on the merits of gay marriage, but I want to be clear on my comparison to the Obamacare judgement. It has nothing to do with the decision beyond the fact that both had the ability to create significant reactions from the public.

    • Lotte Lenya

      In that instance, I might say “thank God”, not a stream of vulgar attention seeking blather.

      • GrindingMills

        I agree, but I’m sure there’s more reasoned reactions on Twitter besides the 13 Tweets that Twitchy featured. That’s the one downfall of the format of this site, they can only feature a snapshot of what is really happening on Twitter.

    • Guest

      This decision expands government involvement in marriage and stands against the right of voters to decide what marriage is. Libertarians, if they were true to their ideals, would oppose it.

    • mickeyco

      Big difference, though: Conservatives may gloat- although we get precious little opportunity- but we manage to do it, usually, in a civil manner. Why, some of can go almost a lifetime without tweeting f*k or b*ch

  • FaithColeridge33

    Wouldn’t that bitch be Bill Clinton?

    • Jerry Camp

      And her dad who voted for it…

  • MJUdall

    Hey Meagan, nice mouth. I’m sure you learned that from Daddy.

  • kate_middleton

    So I’ve seen all sorts of people on Facebook basically thinking gay marriage is legal nationwide now since DOMA was struck down. Ummm, negatory.

    I’m fine with DOMA being gone (states rights and all), but it doesn’t make gay marriage the law of the land.

    People are clueless.

    • waltzingmtilda

      Yep, same here. I’ve had too explain it three times today. And I agree with you re: DOMA because I am big on states rights.

      Prop 8 I’m not happy about(again, states rights, and the will of the people and all that), but I do understand the reasoning behind the decision.

      • kate_middleton

        Glad it’s not just my dumb friends getting it wrong. One of mine posted something about how excited they were for next year’s wedding season. (Eyeroll)

        I’m okay with gay marriage personally. But it’s pretty funny seeing people get things so wrong. Or see their hatred for SCOTUS yesterday turn into unadulterated love today.

        • waltzingmtilda

          Also fine with gay marriage. My guess is most of these gloaters (including the head nitwit Meggie Mac) think something happened that did not actually happen.

      • Jerry Camp

        Actually, Prop 8 was passed by the ‘will of the people’. The California Supreme Court overturned that vote.

        • Discontentwliars

          The California Supreme Court up held it, and the District Federal court, and the 9th Circuit court of appeals, District Federal court said it wasn’t. Since the State (Jerry Brown) decided not to defend prop 8 at the supreme court, the people of the state tried to take it up. The supreme court said they people of California don’t have standing, to bring the case to them, (so it’ll apply to the 9th Circuit court also, and is as if they hadn’t ruled). The Federal court ruling only applies to the people in the case (two people), so it doesn’t apply to everyone in California, only those 2 people. The governor of California is just ignoring the laws of the state to uphold the ruling until struck down by a higher court. The higher court said it wouldn’t take it, so it’s back to following the laws of the state, and enforcing Prop 8. Its all just a circus, with the state representatives ignoring those that elected them. The issue isn’t resolved.

          • Jerry Camp

            Wait, 1 man / 1 woman definition of marriage wasn’t voted into law by 52% of Californians by referendum?

          • Discontentwliars

            Prop 8 did pass by Californians. Jerry Brown is just ignoring the initiative. Sorry if it wasn’t clear. Part of the issue we have today with elected officials in several states and US gov.

          • Jerry Camp

            Ok, I got it…another case of minority tyranny, overriding the will of the majority…got it.

    • Andrea Gonzales

      ^ THIS. See that comment? THAT ONE!
      I lol’ed at many of my friends with me. Eating chocolate cake and watching the news like nerds we are. I was such a downer when I told them nothing has changed really. Gay marriage is still illegal in more than half the states. You should’ve seen the looks they gave me. LOL

  • $30423294

    Friends, we knew all along this has nothing to do with marriage.

    It is about something far darker.

    These are not decent people seeking justice. They are seething animals looking for retribution for God-knows-what private grievance they hold against the world.

    • Paula A. R. DeAngelis, PhD

      There is absolutely no prohibition whatsoever that prohibits two unrelated adults of the opposite sex from being married; none. “Gay marriage” is, in fact, simply a special right that the Gay Lobby is beginning to obtain in some states.

      By telling gays that they are entitled to a special right, the SCOTUS has set them apart and made them UNEQUAL.

      I would urge room-mates to marry (even if they’re not intimate romantic partners) to take advantage of the new law in states where they can to reduce your taxes and preserve the ability of your roommate to pay rent (or a mortgage) if they become disable.. I would urge teams of stick-up men to “marry” before they pull their heists so that the police can no longer use the testimony of one against the other. Moving further, I would urge wealthy single people to marry much younger poorer distant single relatives to save their estates from the tax man and preserve wealth within the family, etc.

      Five Leftist on the SCOTUS have destroyed the fundamental building block of Western Civilization, destroyed any meaning to the word “marrage” and taken a giant step in restricting your personal liberty.

      Now, its time for you to take advantage of it. Evey man or woman for themselves.

  • Lisa Dean

    So, who’s the bitches? Clinton and the members of Congress who signed DOMA into law? It’s true – liberals do eat each other and they don’t even get it.

  • JR48

    Stay classy.

  • Male Factor

    Oh please! Gays should have every right to be as miserable and trapped as us Heteros are. Why should they be denied?!?!

    One day, they will harken back to a time when “…I’m leaving you Toby so I can shack up with Bruce!” was a much, much better arrangement.

    • Paula A. R. DeAngelis, PhD

      They already have your rights. Nobody is stopping them from marrying anyone, only from obtaining special rights to “marry” someone of the same sex.

      • Male Factor

        I know. I was being sarcastic.

        Who really cares who marries who? I don’t care if someone is gay. Keep it out of my face. Keep it out of my church.

        It may be legal. It may be sanctioned by the State. It will never be normal.Sorry BITCHES!

    • TocksNedlog

      To whom are you saying “Oh please”?

  • Discontentwliars

    I guess bitches now refers to someone you disagree with now instead of female dogs or angry women. So many words are taking on new meanings now days. So when does prostitution start referring standard business practice, and abortion is the present you give your 12 year old daughter. The standard response to someone that says your married will be “to what?” I don’t know why a person couldn’t marry a dog, cat or horse and pass on their benefits to those they love. So why is polygamy a problem? I would think that people should marry those they love. SS benefits just need to be re-defined to include them. It doesn’t really matter if they are male/female (should I add gay to the description or does it matter?). Why are there laws preventing people that love each other just because of age. If it’s ok for young people to get/use birth control, then they should love and marry as they wish. The next 20 years ought to be really interesting.

    • NachoCheese (D)

      I don’t know why a person couldn’t marry a dog, cat or horse…

      Because a non-human is incapable of entering into a contract (which is all the government concept of marriage really is).

      So why is polygamy a problem?

      Provided all parties have reached the age of majority and not been adjudged mentally incapacitated or deficient, why not?

      Why are there laws preventing people that love each other just because of age.

      A minor is incapable of entering into a contract (which is all the government concept of marriage really is).

      • Discontentwliars

        I don’t know why you’d want to limit this. Of course if an animal makes a mark, and it can be witnessed, there should be an issue for making a contract. We are just animals too, so what makes humans better then a porpoise or horse.
        Same for Minors, if they are old enough to make the decision for birth control, abortion and sex as a minor, then why aren’t they capable of making a contract, since consent to an abortion with a doctor is exactly that. It make no sense to say it isn’t allowed.

  • Jerry Camp

    And here I thought ‘bipartisan’ was something liberals supported…

    Passed the House on July 12, 1996 (Yeas: 342; Nays: 67)
    Passed the Senate on September 10, 1996 (Yeas: 85; Nays: 14)
    Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996

    I’m not sure how much more bipartisan you can get…it was more bipartisan than Bush’s authorization of force in Iraq, as seen below:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:H.J.Res._114_Iraq_Resolution_Votes_October_2002.png

    • Jay Stevens

      And much more bipartisan than Obamacare.

  • Garrett Gripling

    Meghan McCain can finally marry Meghan McCain until Meghan McCain realizes that Meghan McCain can not stand Meghan McCain.

  • Noah

    here all this time, I though the decision to liberals meant freedom. but apparently it was just an opportunity for them to gloat like jackasses.

    • TocksNedlog

      Yeah, like they ever wait for an opportunity.

  • MJUdall

    The left are morons. They act as if marriage between a man and a woman was a concept created last week and the fact that almost every religion on the planet recognizes marriage as ONLY between a man and a woman. And let’s not forget the laws of nature. But not to worry, because I’m sure the 1-3% of loudmouths of the population that are gay will find another crusade to demand that the churches should be forced to recognize them in those religious institutions and marry them. What a world. Somewhere God is pissed.

  • froggy19510

    “Take that, bitches.”
    Look in the mirror when you say that! Pig.

  • Moonbeam

    Wonder if this will get printed in the right wing media ……….

    Internet Catches Texas Senate Altering Timestamp on Abortion Bill Vote

    After a half-day filibuster that was controversially halted by Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, Republicans in the Texas Senate scrambled to quickly pass the equally controversial abortion bill SB5, but were halted themselves by two hours of motions and parliamentary inquiries from Democrats trying to run out the clock on Gov. Rick Perry’s special session.

    In the end, it all came down to a last-minute vote that could barely be heard over the din of cheers from pro-choice activists gathered in the gallery.

    But where did that last minute fall — before or after the bill’s midnight deadline?

    The Associated Press and several other large media outlets initially reported that the bill had passed, taking Lt. Gov. Dewhurst’s word that the vote was taken “just before” 12 AM.

    But Democratic State Senators and the tens of thousands who witnessed the vote live on a YouTube stream were skeptical.

    As well they should have been.

    Screengrabs of the official SB5 results page captured by several wonks clearly show the record vote was called after midnight local time, and was therefore dated 6/26.

    But seconds later the results page was suddenly taken down, and when it returned, the vote’s date had miraculously been altered to make it seem as though it had been cast in time — on 6/25.

    So what happened? Did someone tamper with official state documents? It would seem so, and that’s a crime.

    As Technology Policy Analyst Kathy Gill notes over at The Moderate Vote:

    In my experience (I’ve done web work since 1993 or so), pages like this one are automatically generated from a database file. In other words, a person doesn’t code the page.

    In order to change something like this, someone has to change the database. And things like votes and official times, they’re often (usually?) automatically generated also.

    In other words, changes like this are deliberate.

    Ultimately, Lt. Gov. Dewhurst conceded that the vote was three minutes too late, and SB5 was pronounced dead.

    • Joe W.

      So you approve of mob rule, Zippy?? 400 people usurping the will of 75% of the electorate?? Be careful what you wish for, pal.

    • Finrod Felagund

      Joke’s on you, Governor Perry just authorized another 30-day session of the legislature.

  • CombatDiver

    Why anybody pays any attention to the McCain’s is beyond me.

    • TocksNedlog

      Bewb-notized

  • http://www.laughinginpurgatory.com/ Andrew Hall

    Can’t forget this one.
    Don’t worry, religious bigots, there’s always Saudi Arabia.

    • journogal

      So, we can’t have religious freedoms here, per you saying this, correct? Church must bend to the government? What religion in America has stoned anyone, or beheaded anyone. Tell me, and back it up with credible news links.

      • bicentennialguy

        The pitiful, self-loathing old man can’t back up anything with any facts. Feelings are not facts.

    • Grandma HeadInjury

      Gotta love the bigots from the Religion of Atheism™ . “Don’t agree with me? Move to Saudi Arabia!”

    • mickeyco

      Yeah. They just love gays there.

    • Male Factor

      Less to do with religious bigotry more to do with whether or not a lifestyle choice should be sanctioned by the State

      Ohhh! It’s not a “lifestyle”. You were “born that way”. You say?

      Fine then! Mutant

      I was born biologically programmed to impregnate 10,000 women in my life. Do you hear me crying that I can’t marry 30 different ones and claim tax benefits for all the children I’d create with them.???

  • http://www.laughinginpurgatory.com/ Andrew Hall

    And this one…

    Dear Christian Fundamentalists,

    Suck it.
    It’s now federally approved.

    Signed,
    Me

    • conservativemomma

      Sadly you think you won the big prize.

    • journogal

      Got to love that liberal tolerance. You must lead a very unhappy and empty life to type things like this.

    • TocksNedlog

      WHAT is now “federally approved”? Sucking ‘it’?

      • journogal

        Don’t expect an answer…

    • Grandma HeadInjury

      Wow, not only is your “humor” not funny, but almost plagiaristically derivative. Yawn.

    • bicentennialguy

      If your avatar is you, I would think you would have a hard time even paying someone to suck anything on you.

    • hrdbrgn

      If I looked like you if prob be forced to go gay too.

      Federally approved.
      AMERICAN ENDORSED.

      If finish with “suck it”…but that only encourages you.

    • Male Factor

      It may be legal. It may be sanctioned by the State. It will never be normal.

      Sorry BITCHES!

  • LeftistsStink

    The overthrow of Prop8 still isn’t a victory in the court of public opinion. The will of the people of CA was thwarted yet again by a couple of perverse black robed control freaks.

  • Joe W.

    A sad, sad day in America, but the SCOTUS has ruled, and we will live with
    it. I have predicted this all along, anyway. If one were to read
    scripture and prophecy, you would fully expect this and more degradation
    and moral bankruptcy to be the norm in our failed nation. As the gays
    prance in the streets of San Francisco and every other 21st century
    Sodom & Gomorrah, I will rest in the knowledge that the further into
    the abyss we sink, the closer we come to the coming of Jesus Christ to
    pluck His Church from the wickedness and filth that we live in. While
    the court may give their “blessing”, God has not and neither have
    traditional valued, Christian Americans. Enjoy your “victory”, all you homosexuals. The price you will pay for it is eternal……

  • PatriotRG

    The left and sewage – its their natural habitat. Give me the Taliban as an enemy any day. The Taliban are a medieval horror but they have clear purpose to destroy freedom and replace it with their death cult. The left are venal traitorous an abomination that like any cancer eats away at the fabric of freedom to replace it with….? leftist gutter nothingness

  • Grandma HeadInjury

    So if you took “F**k” and “B*tches” out of the lexicon, I’m guessing most libs wouldn’t be able to tweet?

    Stay classy, libs!

    • journogal

      Gotta love this “new tone” and “tolerance.”

  • TocksNedlog

    Here are some names on the list of ‘bitches’ that voted for DOMA:
    Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Carl Levin, Patrick Leahy, Christopher Dodd, Frank Lautenberg (RIP), Tom Harkin, Tom Daschle, Patty Murray, Max Baucus

  • kateorjane

    So does this mean tubby Meggie can troll the lesbian bars and find someone who will appreciate her girly parts? I have heard lesbians are less picky about how their gf s look.

  • 912er

    Am I the only one confused ?Why is it the ones demanding gay marriage in the western world are the same ones promoting the Muslin Brotherhood in the Middle East who’s desire of Sharia Law demands gays be stoned to death?Can someone please explain that logic to me?

    • Discontentwliars

      Please don’t try to use logic in this discussion. It’s ignored anyway, and people’s head may explode with some excellent superlatives spouting out.

  • Tanker74

    Meghan McCain is definitely her father’s daughter.

    • Finrod Felagund

      And that is certainly not a compliment.

  • An American Veteran

    Just another day in the continuing Cold Civil War.

  • MarcusFenix

    Other than the people with no tact, who basically all said the same identical thing (liberalism = parrot-ism maybe?)….

    Sorry Meghan, I just can’t really take you seriously sometimes, when you treat the people who are in the same political spheres you claim to be in like crap. Go back to your reality show and try to act like Kardashian 2.0 or w/e. Let the adults do the talking again.

  • MEXI-CONS

    Meghan Who? …..

  • notenoughtime

    Typical McCain that never met a microphone or tweet that they could resist.

  • Janice LEE

    These folks were demanding to be treated with dignity. Okay then.

  • Janice LEE

    These folks were demanding to be treated with dignity. Okay then.

  • Michele Pullara Allen

    Such high class responses…..and America is following their lead?? Sad for America.

  • Billie Slash

    Don’t know what the hoopla is all about. Gay marriage is still banned in 38 states, per amendments to state constitutions. It is still a states’ rights issue. Do these fools know that??

    • mickeyco

      Hush. They’re having too much fun. Let ’em be.

  • http://www.nleomf.org/officers/ FlatFoot

    God Bless David Burge. Amen!

  • brewjohn

    “Huh. Funny how the Left was screeching and wailing over SCOTUS just yesterday.”

    And funny how the right were crying like babies after the Obamacare ruling. And were gloating yesterday. It cuts both ways, rednecks.

    • BobVa112

      Rednecks like the Obama phone woman? “Keep Obama IN president, he gave me a phone!” … uneducated inner city losers represent 75% of the democratic party… so I’d back off on the “redneck” comments if I were you. Most of the DNC base is illiterate.

      • RedSoloCup

        boobjohn is proof of that.

    • RedSoloCup

      Bigoted much?

  • Jeremy
  • navalav8r

    The best part of Meghan ran down the crack of her mama’s ass

  • ICOYAR

    So, please tell me where marriage is defined in the Constitution?Of course, libturds think that banning guns outright isn’t a violation of the second amendment, or that government must supress religion as that doesn’t violate the first.

  • BobVa112

    Ironically, the l i b t a r d s do not realize this is a win for State’s rights. This decision makes it all but impossible for the Fed to impose gay marriage on the States. So take that, bitches.

  • Chris Chambers

    Oh my. This person is one of the least conservative Republicans I have smelled in a long time. P-U! Something about acorns and trees…..yeah. That’s it.

  • keefer1958

    I’d like to know who the 3 re-tweeters were!

  • keefer1958

    I tweeted this to her: “Do you kiss your father with that mouth?”

  • Richo

    Bunch of nazi marxist gaystapo envirofascist LIEberal democraps who don’t care about anything besides destroying America! Why can’t they be polite like me?!//1?!?!?!?1/1/1!/

  • $30423294

    You are immoral.

  • Lisa Dean

    You do realize that DOMA was signed into law by Clinton. So suck on that – oh wait, you might need to stand in line for that one.

  • Fire and Adjust!

    I don’t think i saw any “suck on that bitches, you lose” after yesterday’s
    SCOTUS ruling when they ruled on voting issues………….. but we
    sure as hell saw a whole lot of lib whining and crying
    yesterday……………. and you think
    you have the moral, intellectual and maturity high ground?

    I actually think SCOTUS ruling was a good constitutional
    decision………….. and even though I do NOT find ANYTHING admirable
    about the gay lifestyle, I do believe 2 people should be able to marry
    whoever they hell they want to……. but people like you make other
    reasonable people want to rail against your immaturity and detestable nature, usually at the expense of your cause…………..

  • journogal

    Wow…that’s being classy. What an adult and mature argument! You’ve presented your case so well. Curious, what do you personally have against Twitchy, a website. How has it harmed your life, or the people involved with the site, what have they done to you personally? Can you actually make any kind of a sane, mature and rational statement that isn’t a personal slam against a website and the people who run it? Is your life that voided of other things that you have to take it out on a website and people that don’t know you (or care to know you.)
    How sad you must be…

  • VerminMcCann

    There are jerks on the right and jerks on the left. The difference is the lack of non-jerks on the left.

  • Male Factor

    This thread has less to do with the SCOTUS decision than the way you BITCHES behave when validated

  • Noah

    I wonder what this has to do with Rush Limbaugh.
    Are you only capable of calling people names?
    please tell Al Franken that it’s terrible to call Chelsea Clinton a “dog” because he said it also.

  • conservativemomma

    So instead of going out and celebrating this “fantastic” event with friends and family you have decided to run to Twitchy and desperately try to provoke people? That my friend is pathetic.

  • http://redstate.com/ midwestconservative

    Was it classy when Keith Olbermann called Malkin a “bag of meat”?

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    No, you lose. Your kids lose and any kids they might have, if your side doesn’t mandate a one child policy like China. Good luck in your brave new world.

    We’ll be living in Galt’s Gulch.

  • Robot F. Kennedy

    BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!!!

  • journogal

    ? But according to the best secretary state evah, “what difference does it make.”
    Hey, it’s only 4 dead Americans, so what do you care…

  • froggy19510

    That’s ok. I took time to read your post too. Even though You don’t exist.

  • Robot F. Kennedy

    Nevermind the 4400 American soldiers that died in Bushie’s fake war.

  • B. Bending Rodriguez Sr.

    You do know that Obama’s lost many more in AfPak than Bush did, right? Plus all of the civilan deaths? But you don’t count that. What about the hundreds of Mexicans killed by Fast and Furious? But nevermind.

  • journogal

    How do you feel about those Democrats that voted for the war as well, or do they count? How do you feel about many more lives that have been lost under Obama’s Admin in Afghanistan. I know, you don’t care, because it’s Obama and he is going to give you stuff. So what if people loses their life under Obama, you don’t care, as long as you get what you think you deserve and don’t have to icky work for it.

  • Keenan

    Authorized by Congress, how’s that for fake?

  • therantinggeek

    Ah. The “Blame Bush” mantra persists, even after four-plus years since he left office. No surprise there. 😛

  • so what

    yea the war that every liberal clamored that wmd”s existed then the congress gave him 100% TO go to war, you mean that war? the same ones where the wmd in iraq ended up IN Syria? the same ones that a Iraqi air force gen testified to congress that he moved out?

  • http://redstate.com/ midwestconservative

    People don’t die in “fake” wars. Put your tin foil hat back on truther.

  • Finrod Felagund

    Twenty-five million Iraqis now living in freedom think you’re a freaking idiot.

  • Jerry Camp

    Iraq Liberation Act
    The Act declared that it was the Policy of the United States to support “regime change.” The Act was passed 360-38 in the U.S. House of Representatives[4] and by unanimous consent in the Senate.[5] US President Bill Clinton signed the bill into law on October 31, 1998.

    President Clinton stated in February 1998:

    Iraq admitted, among other things, an offensive biological warfare capability, notably, 5,000 gallons of botulinum, which causes botulism; 2,000 gallons of anthrax; 25 biological-filled Scud warheads; and 157 aerial bombs. And I might say UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq has actually greatly understated its production…. Over the past few months, as [the weapons inspectors] have come closer and closer to rooting out Iraq’s remaining nuclear capacity, Saddam has undertaken yet another gambit to thwart their ambitions by imposing debilitating conditions on the inspectors and declaring key sites which have still not been inspected off limits…. It is obvious that there is an attempt here, based on the whole history of this operation since 1991, to protect whatever remains of his capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction, the missiles to deliver them, and the feed stocks necessary to produce them. The UNSCOM inspectors believe that Iraq still has stockpiles of chemical and biological munitions, a small force of Scud-type missiles, and the capacity to restart quickly its production program and build many, many more weapons…. Now, let’s imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he’ll use the arsenal…. President Clinton ~ 1998

  • $30423294

    I’m not saying I don’t appreciate the cogency and nuance of your argument.

    I’m saying you didn’t convince me this was about marriage.

    On the contrary, you seem to have a fetish over my holding of religious beliefs.

    I guess I’m saying you strengthened my statement by offering a case study in what I was saying.

  • journogal

    Who is the fringe? Why shouldn’t all states enjoy the same rights? Come on, tell me; and tell me how does an ID prevent anyone from voting. Why do you think that minorities need to constant help of the government; obviously you think that little of them. By the way, take a look at what you so loving, tolerant and big-tent liberals said to Stacy Dash just because she voiced her opinion.
    What a thick-head, obtuse, bigot you are. You must be so miserable in your life. You want to see fringe, take a good look at yourself.

  • alanstorm

    You have that backwards – not surprising.

  • journogal

    Wow…now tell me again how tolerant liberals are…wow. You are obviously filled with hatred toward people you don’t know and a cable news channel. Seek help.

  • Grandma HeadInjury
  • Joe W.

    Awww…let the little feller gloat….we already know who wins in the end, anyway….and it ain’t the homos…..

  • Joe W.

    Gotta love that liberal tolerance and civility….Assclown.

  • journogal

    Is it possible for liberals to post responses that aren’t personal attacks? Wow…talk about liberal tolerance and new tone.
    Now, be sure to tell everyone about Republicans’ War on Women, okay?

  • bicentennialguy

    Why should she? Is it because she’s Asian? Racist.

  • mickeyco

    Silly momma. Julius doesn’t have any friends. He’s too mean spirited, vulgar, and ignorant.

  • journogal

    The poster is a miserable person with a void in their life, and finds happiness striking at people they don’t know.

  • Keenan

    You’re an illogical buffoon. Try coming back with sentence structure and facts.

  • Joe W.

    I’m the guy that said it was a sad day in America, “dude”, and it is. And I am neither angry or a hater. In fact, I finished my post with the statement to “enjoy your victory”.. Your ultimate reward is depicted in the attached cartoon, however. Don’t forget your sunscreen and bottled water….”Dude”….

  • aegean1

    You sound incredibly uneducated. Please take a few English classes, or go back to sitting at the kids’ table.

  • hrdbrgn

    Actually I look into mirrors and ask “what makes a man actually look forward to a pain in the ass”?
    You should be able to explain it john gill?

  • journogal

    Do you know the founder personally? If not, why do you say things like that? Can she not have a different opinion than yours, and why is that “hate” or “angry” when people do agree with you?

  • conservativemomma

    As God’s people, if we truly love as God has taught us than we should be honest with homosexuals and warn them that their lifestyle is not what God intended for his creation and they will never have peace. I have no doubt that you know this also but somehow cling to the belief that if only everyone would celebrate your lifestyle your life would be peaceful and full of joy. The only trouble is that God has written His Law on your heart and your battle is not against Christians but against your own conscience

  • bicentennialguy

    Disagreement is not hate. Children often times say “So-and-So hates me” when they don’t get their way. You should examine your own allegations.

  • Joe W.

    So says the enraged fairy…

  • therantinggeek

    There are *very* few liberals who can actually have a civil discourse with those of us on the right. Unfortunately, they’re not often found here on Twitchy.

  • Smart Alex

    People dont actually die in movies chucklehead. By the way Fast an Furious 6 wasn’t bad.

  • FrankDrebinLives

    See Bush being a Repub has to get Dems in Congress and the UN’s permission to start a war and it still doesn’t count. Obama being a Dem can start war in Libya and the soon to come war in Syria and it’s OK. See how that works??

  • TheLiberalHero

    Obama didn’t give me my welfare check. I had to work for it. Do you know how long I waited in line?

  • 912er

    That baby should be happy for making it out of the womb alive…not an easy task these days.

  • alanstorm

    Too bad for you that it’s a picture of liberals the other 364.

  • Jeremy

    You shouldn’t show baby pictures of yourself.

  • hrdbrgn

    You know how you can tell this baby is conservative?
    He’s ALIVE !

  • Andrea Gonzales

    Then they would seem hypocritical. The Supreme Court is very cautious, especially after dealing with RvW that overturned every abortion ban in the country and has let to numerous political debates that continue to this day. It’s the state’s responsibility and that has been emphasized in court case after court case when it comes to abortion regulations to the definition of marriage. It was the SOLE reason DOMA was striked down because states, not the federal government, define what marriage means. The government hands out the federal benefits on the basis of what the state’s law on marriage is. So, victory for states’ rights. For prop 8, it is much more narrow because it dealt with the unconstitutionality of taking marriage that had been legislatively enacted into law and then repealed by a referendum known as Prop 8. Arguments in the 9th circuit was that, that action was unconstitutional. The 9th circuit did not extend beyond California marriage and the Supreme Court through it out for reasons that are unknown so far. But one thing that is taken away is that the state has the power to define marriage so gay advocates can’t rely on the federal government now that it has such a limited roll.
    Government definition of marriage–there is none.

  • alanstorm

    Are you really trying to compare the two?

    Besides, you should consider the question instead of dodging it. Do you like the idea of a single judge being able to overturn something YOU support as part of a majority vote?

    Further: The decision was that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, and the AG declined to press the case. So, if your AG declines to support a law that YOU support, that’s OK with you?

  • http://www.freedomreconnection.com CO2 Producer

    Though interracial marriage doesn’t seem to be one of the most pressing issues of our time, if the people did vote to ban it, isn’t that what democracy would look like? Luckily on this day, the people of California can thank Gaia that the U.S. is a constitutional republic.

  • alanstorm

    I wouldn’t be calling names if I were you. According to your statement, you support the right of siblings to marry. You supprt the right of a 50 year old man to marry a 12 year old girl (or vice versa).

    Care to re-phrase and defend your opinion?

  • bicentennialguy

    You better hope you’re right.

  • Rachel

    I’ll be sure to tell that to the bouncer that asks for my ID next time I go to the bar.

  • MarcusFenix

    So, by your logic, if a 20 year old walks into a store to buy beer, and they ask to see his ID, then they have violated his constitutional rights. so that would mean drinking age limits, credit card companies and banks, etc….would all be destroying the constitution by asking for people to prove who they say they are up front.

    Also, you’re going to have to point out the provision in the Constitution you think this is breaking, because…well, I think you’re full of crap. Just like the last thing I posted about with you. :)

  • Lisa Dean

    You can get a state issued id – you need one to pick up prescriptions, cash a check, go to the SS office, pick up a child from school etc. And if they’re not a citizen of the US then they can’t vote that’s only for natural citizens and natural born citizens. If they’re a permanent resident then they may be able to vote on a local and state level. It depends on the state.

  • daeghrefn

    “Asking someone for their ID is a violation of the constitution.”

    Well, except when they want to buy a gun, which is also a constitutional right.

  • stratman51

    I missed that part of the 14th Ammendment.

  • Jay Stevens

    Why?

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    Our country isn’t passing us by, you and your fellow travelers are flushing it down the shyte hole.

  • MarcusFenix

    You know why, right……..

  • Billie Slash

    Bimbos are comedy gold here.

  • KansasGirl

    Only to show she’s no conservative.

  • MarcusFenix

    You do know that DOMA was introduced as H.R. 3396 by Bob Barr in the House of Representatives on May 7, 1996….when Clinton was President and neither Bush Sr. or Jr. were anywhere to be found….and then Clinton signed it into law that September.

    Darn those pesky facts, eh?

  • Lisa Dean

    How did Bush Sr put it into place? It was signed into law in 1996 by Bill Clinton.

  • $1014973

    That will be your little secret.

  • MarcusFenix

    You have to remember that to liberal thought, asking someone to be responsible, and keeping track of important things like identity is an assault on their rights….

    Except when Obama is using the NSA and FBI via PRISM and other means to spy on the entire populace…..then it’s ok.

  • Lisa Dean

    Again, this was a law signed by a Democrat President (Bill Clinton) that got thrown back to the states to regulate. Even Meghan’s Dad signed it, so as I asked earlier, who’s the bitches?

  • mickeyco

    Hate to tell you, Brad, but Prop 8 doesn’t effect my happiness one way or the other.

  • mickeyco

    Hate to tell you, Brad, but Prop 8 doesn’t effect my happiness one way or the other.

  • mickeyco

    Actually, geek, the number is pretty much -0-.

  • mickeyco

    Actually, geek, the number is pretty much -0-.

  • Jeremy

    Yeah I am sure the bouncer will be so understanding.

  • TheOriginalDonald

    So when is Veruca McCain going to star in Peepshow in Las Vegas?

  • LeftistsStink

    Skin color isn’t behavior.
    See Thomas Sowell:
    http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell110508.php3

  • Finrod Felagund

    Trolls never have friends, except maybe for other trolls.