Angry lefties spew bile, death wishes in case SCOTUS rules against gay marriage

The Supreme Court has yet to issue a ruling on same-sex marriage, but that’s no reason vicious lefties can’t get preemptively nasty:

Charming. Truly. Feels like there’s something missing, though.

Ah, here we go:

The charge of the Tolerance Brigade!

***

Related:

‘Don’t f*ck this up’: Polite libs encourage SCOTUS to strike down Prop 8

  • Avey Owyns

    “We’re the party of tolerance…” Oh, Liberals stop. You’re too much.

    • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

      It’s amazing they get away with saying that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

        To be fair, they do own the copyright/trademark.

      • http://www.facebook.com/brett.mcmicken Brett McMicken

        the angrier and more desperate they get, the more they will show their true selves.

      • http://www.facebook.com/brett.mcmicken Brett McMicken

        the angrier and more desperate they get, the more they will show their true selves.

      • marylandman

        Conservative policies are so racist, sexist and homophobic that it makes perfect sense why they get away with saying that.

    • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

      It’s amazing they get away with saying that.

    • marylandman

      This is just absurd. You sit here opposing equal rights, and call the OTHER side intolerant. You’re a bigot, plain and simple.

      • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

        Seems other side likes threats and death. Read before you bring your dumb MFing @ss on this site.

        • marylandman

          So because there are a few a-holes on twitter, that makes your opposition to equal rights okay? Keep telling yourself that, bigot. Did your parents protest the Civil Rights Act? Or Loving v. Virginia? Did your grandparents help author Jim Crow laws? I’d say it’s probable.

          • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

            It’s not a few a-holes, its the lefty media and you. A-hole.

          • marylandman

            Nice straw man. I bet it makes it easier to support your bigoted positions when you falsely claim that the entire other side supports death threats. It clearly doesn’t matter to you that you’re flat out WRONG.

            I see you ignored my accurate assumptions about your family history. Keep up the good work, bigot.

          • https://twitter.com/tweetyuo Tangchung

            Mary, I don’t care what you do your bedroom.

          • JINNASH

            There is no evidence that same sex attraction is natural; it is all opinion survey. And yes, you can discriminate based on behavior.

          • marylandman

            It is natural, that’s why homosexuality is observed in thousands of species on our planet. I know that I didn’t choose to be straight. Just as I know that my gay and lesbian friends didn’t choose to be gay. You’re a bigot, you’re just too stupid to know it.

  • Avey Owyns

    “We’re the party of tolerance…” Oh, Liberals stop. You’re too much.

  • The First Lady ; D

    potty mouths!

    • shimauma

      Well, a lot of them do munch on sewage canals as a Saturday night hobby, so that goes without saying.

  • The First Lady ; D

    potty mouths!

  • http://www.facebook.com/joseph.a.white.16 Joseph A White

    Y’all be careful out there. I hear the gays are planning on a bunch of drive by slappings…….

    • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

      Garden variety or flaming?

      • Billie Slash

        Just bitch… (slapping)

    • Clayton Grant

      “It was a run-by fruiting.” – Mrs Doubtfire

      • Michael Rice

        Nah, they are going to fling feces at us while we talk. If we urinate on ourselves I wonder if that will stop them.

      • stellatruman

        ok, that just made me laugh !

    • Miss Clairee

      Ohhhhhh, those sillies! They just need to settle down, have an Apple-tini and go redecorate something! That’ll cool ’em down!

    • Secede

      They going to ” Scratch their silly eyes out “?

    • http://twitter.com/annie_oakley2 annieoakley

      love your sense of humor

    • http://twitter.com/annie_oakley2 annieoakley

      love your sense of humor

  • http://www.facebook.com/joseph.a.white.16 Joseph A White

    Y’all be careful out there. I hear the gays are planning on a bunch of drive by slappings…….

  • nc

    Way to win hearts and minds…

    • SpinMeNot

      Been a bad idea from the start … oh wait, that explains why the liberals spend so much time doing it.

      Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.

      *hat-tip*

  • nc

    Way to win hearts and minds…

  • Kevin Roe

    Liberals use such pleasant vocabulary. Is f**k seriously the only word they know? And I so appreciate their thoughtful, open-minded comments that lead the country to open debate.

    • Billie Slash

      Kevin, what would you expect from a group of people who claim special status because of a sexual preference? The ‘f’ word is their mantra!

    • SpinMeNot

      Well, it is very versatile. They deploy it as a verb, adverb, noun, adjective, participle and conjunction.

      Whoops, I better go put a dollar in the “Grandpa is using bad words” jar … brb.

    • SpinMeNot

      Q: How can you tell a liberal child from a liberal adult?
      A: They use “smurf” instead of f*@!

    • Well Done

      Note the habit the pro-gay crowd have developed of pretending people not in favor of gay marriage either don’t have sex or practice incest. It is obvious they are more intent on offending people than they are on being rational… understandable since the only rational arguments I have seen are those that oppose gay marriage. Arguments that are pro-gay range from the rather moronic position taken by such as Seth McFarlane – that it represents “progress” – to the mewling melodramatic bullshit about how “two people who love each other should be allowed to be together”. What a bunch of wankers.

      • http://twitter.com/annie_oakley2 annieoakley

        their actions are straight out of the activist playbook. so sad that most people do not understand the manipulative techniques. do we think the Sc will be intimidated?

      • http://twitter.com/annie_oakley2 annieoakley

        their actions are straight out of the activist playbook. so sad that most people do not understand the manipulative techniques. do we think the Sc will be intimidated?

      • usmccp

        Who are they to decide who’s love is valid? If adult siblings want to marry, what business is it of theirs? Love is all you need, right?

      • DixieAngel_76

        Left out of their arguments of course, is that no one is stopping them from ‘being together’.

    • stellatruman

      I agree…boring when they can’t engage in a dialogue without profanity

  • Kevin Roe

    Liberals use such pleasant vocabulary. Is f**k seriously the only word they know? And I so appreciate their thoughtful, open-minded comments that lead the country to open debate.

  • Kim

    Gee, how in the world will they carry out all this violent murder that they claim to hate so much? Surely they wouldn’t think of picking up a big scary gun.

    I’m actually getting a kick out of their little temper tantrums.

    • SpinMeNot

      What was that line from the Warner’s Brother’s Bugs Bunny / Elmer Fudd cartoon where Bugs was telling Elmer he was hunting “wabbits” with an elephant gun and maybe he should go hunt elephants. An elephant shows up and says something to the affect of “You do, and I’ll give you such a pinch!”.

      Just sayin’ …

      yeah, I know, I’m a bad person.

  • http://twitter.com/terseobserver DL

    Now if this batch of brilliance would provide their ever-insightful thoughts on constitutional interpretation and judicial review our nation would be better than ever!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

    Hmmm. Scalia asks a valid question that stumped the attorney and, for that, he should die? Somehow, somewhere that might make sense. In a civil society? Not so much.

    • Well Done

      No, Scalia’s question was a salient, and key, point. That is precisely why this preaching twits have their hate on. Gays are NOT civil society. Nor are much of the showbiz crowd; that industry eats people and spits out the bones.

      • beebop1952

        Reason is not their best friend.

  • Jim DeAcutis

    The eloquence of these folk who call the SCOTUS ignorant is inspiring and stunning!

  • http://www.jaredmucha.blogspot.com/ Jared Mucha

    If it was the opposite way around and the right was responding to a controversial issue (not necessarily this one), it would be without cursing and slandering. That shows you the true “Class” of the “tolerant party”

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    “Gay” people are anything but that.

    • Love of Country

      They all sound pretty tough on the Twitter against the SCOTUS …. but when the black folks blocked Prop 8 the gay community was all but completely silent. Somebody (George Soros?) just tells democrats when they can be mad and who they can be mad at …… it’s as scary as it is crazy, no? Same thing with guns. White Fascists made deals with black Fascists (or Reverends) that no democrats would decry gun violence until they had their best chance to blame all of it on the NRA and never even talk about the folks who do 99% of all the killin’s …. unbelievable!

      • RedSoloCup

        They probably will call us racists for pointing that out… the nerve of them.

    • Clayton Grant

      Remember back before the word “gay” was hijacked and merely meant to be carefree?

      • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

        Exactly. You could fire up a fag and it wasn’t queer at all.

        • SpinMeNot

          Or carry a armful faggots back into camp and throw them on the fire without being charged with a hate crime (look it up people …)

          But I tell you, those motorcycles are just too loud ….

    • TocksNedlog

      I disagree. In fact, every single gay person I know is extremely happy!

      The married ones, not so much.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

      Personal acquaintanceship would lead me to conclude that homosexuals are “gay” (in the old fashioned sense of the word), miserable, rude or polite at about the same proportions one would find among straight people. But I guess maybe I should overlook that and defer to you as you no doubt are SUCH an expert on the matter.

    • http://www.facebook.com/luke.givens.963 Luke Givens

      Personal acquaintanceship would lead me to conclude that homosexuals are “gay” (in the old fashioned sense of the word), miserable, rude or polite at about the same proportions one would find among straight people. But I guess maybe I should overlook that and defer to you as you no doubt are SUCH an expert on the matter.

      • $45875941

        Luke, give me one quote of a normal person issuing death threats to Supreme court justices for a decision not in agreement with our views.

        • KayGee

          It is such a tough row running twitchy and reading all these tweets. Let me help break it down for you:
          Step 1. Round up random angry tweets, put them all under the heading “vile libs spew hate”.
          Step 2. Find pro-con tweets that are CLEAN (because we all know there’s never ever been such a thing as a foul mouthed conservative), round them up under the heading “Happy Warriors respond with TRUTH!”
          Step 3. TWITCHY! (profit and comments ensue, hope they don’t get trolled so much that MM and friends have to close the thread).

          • $45875941

            I certainly wouldn’t want your job. You do good job though!

      • $45875941

        Luke, give me one quote of a normal person issuing death threats to Supreme court justices for a decision not in agreement with our views.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lisa.dean.564 Lisa Dean

    Exactly how are they going to “start a posse and kill” Thomas and Scalia? Will they use bats and knives or throw punches and kick them because I’m sure they don’t want any “gun violence”.

    • DixieAngel_76

      Ha ha, maybe they’ll just ‘glitter’ them to death.

    • DixieAngel_76

      Ha ha, maybe they’ll just ‘glitter’ them to death.

  • Kevin

    I’ve got news for these people, my money is on Scalia doesn’t care what Twitter thinks. Live long and prosper my friend.

  • Clayton Grant

    I was expecting something more like; “Oh Antonin! … you thavage brute!”

  • CatHerder

    Not certain, but I’ll bet that death threats against Supreme Court Justices are dimly viewed by the Secret Service. Y’all might want to tone it down.

    On the other hand…

    • SpinMeNot

      Sadly, the other hand is the more likely scenario.

      • CatHerder

        Sadly, I agree. The tension gets ratcheted to the point where DHS and SS ROE are met and people die. I do NOT want to see this happen.

  • http://www.facebook.com/138900508 Patrick Dennehy

    The voters, voted and they didn’t like the results, so they take it to the SC(where it doesn’t belong) and it’s upheld. *HISSY FIT*. You don’t like it, get off your ass and try to garner support in your state through activism; don’t cry about it on twitter and FB.

    • Walknot

      I believe the phrase is: “This is what Democracy looks like!”.

      • Vennoye

        Yeah, MOB rule!!

      • Vennoye

        Yeah, MOB rule!!

    • Walknot

      I believe the phrase is: “This is what Democracy looks like!”.

  • http://apostrophejones.com/ Gloves Donahue, Jr.

    Don’t get near any of theses nutcases.
    Most carry icepicks and the rest will bite you, and you really don’t want to get all those shots.

    • RedSoloCup

      I will remember to put on my Hazmat suit!

    • SpinMeNot

      Wait, “biters” !?! maybe this is how the Zombie Apocalypse starts … liberalism bears a striking resemblance to zombie-ism …

      I know, I know, I’m a bad person ….

      • Jay Stevens

        But so on target.

    • Bristel

      Most carry icepicks? What planet are you from?

      I’m gay and I’ve never in my life seen a gay man carrying an icepick as a weapon. 😛

      • http://www.facebook.com/138900508 Patrick Dennehy

        You know he was talking about the tweeters not gays, right?

        • shimauma

          Tim’s trying to play the victim, so he can justify his claim that his sexually deviant lifestyle choice is being attacked.

          • Bristel

            I’m anything but a victim, I can take anything you spew at me. Your bigotry by name-calling is just pathetic, not victimizing.

          • shimauma

            What name calling, Tim? I say that your lifestyle choice was sexually deviant; that is since the Creator of the Universe designed intimate relations to go one way and you are chosing to deviate from that design for your own self satisfaction, and that you and folks in your mindset try to justify that self serving choice by playing the victim. I didn’t call you a name once. I was completely describing the perversity of your behavior choices which you may chose to remedy once you realize that you are not God and don’t have the authority to screw around with His plan for your life. Not sure how any of that would be considered name calling, unless of course you are grasping at the victim card as usual for people who don’t want to feel guilty about the filthy disgusting dangerous choices you make in your life.

          • Bristel

            God gave us all the authority with the free will he instilled in all of us. It’s up to each of us to make our own choices, not to sit around waiting for those choices to be made for us.

          • shimauma

            That is correct, but I’m not sure how someone’s choice to munch buttholes should over-ride’s God’s design of procreation. I’m not certain how Judgement Day is going to go exactly, but count me as interested in observing how some of these folks who chose sexually deviant lifestyles are planning to justify how they know better than the Creator of the Universe about how they should use or abused their private parts and why they chose to take pride in that twisted behavior choice.

          • Bristel

            I’m anything but a victim, I can take anything you spew at me. Your bigotry by name-calling is just pathetic, not victimizing.

  • RedSoloCup

    Obama’s children!

  • Beesha SaysItMatters

    Nauseating cretins!

  • Zanshi

    #BecauseTolerance! -.-

  • SpinMeNot

    “Gay Rioting in the Streets” .. what is that code for a decorating party?

  • $27789750

    Is the f word the only word they know? Grows old, boring and without discernible impact except on the questionable intelligence and lack of education of the utterer.

  • americanlatina11

    Isn’t there some restrictions on inciting to violence?

    • answer1776

      The Injustice Dept. would never allow this liberal incitement to be stopped. It will be protected under the 1st Amendment.

  • http://twitter.com/Vurtax Mike

    Keyboard Warriors at their finest. I’d like to see them have one real intellectual discussion with anyone on the issue, they’d probably cry and scream in my ear saying their buzzwords like “Tolerance” and “Open-Minded” while calling me everything under the sun until they fell over out of breath and waited for the Obamacare ambulance to show up and give them CPR or something.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Gregg-Beecher/1624376813 Gregg Beecher

    So for all of you who are supposed to be against hate speech and hate crimes, it’s pretty ironic to me that you are being so hateful toward ANYONE who doesn’t agree with you.

  • affenhauer

    Tolerance!

  • Richard Wayne

    So if the USSC finds a new right for gay marriage. How will that work with the free exercise clause? Obamacare and contraception may be forced upon some religious groups. Catholics are already having adoption issues in some states that recognize it. What legal threats will be tried if they don’t marry them?

    • nc

      Whoa, what are you talking about? They keep insisting that SSM doesn’t have ANY impact on anyone else!

      Kagen pointedly asked today exactly what affect SSM would have on society. I imagine her tapping her foot, waiting for an answer. But it is not so easy, because, like breathing, most of us have never given much thought to explaining the fundamentals, and many of us have a hard time “making the case.” But this doesn’t mean it can’t be done. Dennis Prager has been one of the most articulate defenders of traditional marriage ever since this subject first arose.

  • forcryingoutloud

    Pretty limited vocabulary, I must say. They sound like they should be swinging from trees with all their talk of poop-throwing. How is it possible that these apes think they’re superior to us? They sound like fourth graders at a cussing party

  • Voting Female

    aww… the gays are stompy footin’ mad at the ungays.

    Wish I had a dime for every f-bomb the gays drop like gay chicken poop.

    Opposite sex human marriage *is* marriage. There is no way around that and all the gay f-bombing in the world can not change that immutable fact.

    If two co-habituating men or women want the same govt tax breaks & benefits then invent a new word for it… how about gayrriage or lesrriage? Marriage is already taken by the ungay as of since the dawn of civilization.

    • nc

      They’ve been offered “civil unions” but they won’t have it because no matter what they claim, it’s not about tax breaks and benefits.
      That dispute could have been easily resolved.

      • Bristel

        Well to us it sounds like “civil union” is separate but equal, which wasn’t right before, why is it right now?

        • nc

          Then be honest about your agenda and don’t fool people with your “how does my marriage affect yours?” lie.

        • RightThinking1

          Tim,

          Because ‘separate but equal’ access was deemed to be not equal. Let me know when schools segregated into ‘Homosexual’ and ‘Heterosexual’ are found. Ironically, I believe that is actually occurring, at the instigation of homosexuals.

          The attempts to establish an equivalency between Jim Crow laws, based on race, and homosexual ‘marriage’ are deliberately disingenuous. You diminish the discussion, and weaken your image by doing so. Thoughtful people will recognize the fallacy.

          • Bristel

            So you call me out as being disingenuous just to shut down the debate? Also, I think one of my comments was deleted by Twitchy, so I don’t exactly remember what was said. I’ll leave that be though.

          • RightThinking1

            Timothy,

            My point is that homosexuals can never be in a marriage, unless ‘marriage’ is redefined to be something other than what it actually is.

            What about ‘miscegenation, equal rights, etc.’ isn’t also ‘old tired rhetoric’?

            As far as ‘are used today to deny gay people the chance to get married’, I reiterate, they can not and never will be ‘married’. There might be some legal pseudo-status status established, but it will never be marriage. It is a little like a statutory declaration that men are the same as women That might be done, but no rational person would recognize it as true…, it would be a fraud.

            I am not ‘calling you out’ at all. I merely point out that pro-homosexual sexual ‘marriage’ advocates almost always (knowingly) engage specious and obfuscatory arguments in support of their cause.

            So far as Twitchy deleting comments, I think (in the absence of profane or coarsely vulgar comments) that is deplorable, and assuming that yours were not , I hereby register a protest on your behalf. I am sure that it is no consolation, but comments of my own, no different than those above, have been deleted at Huff Po.

          • Bristel

            Well as a regular conservative (yes I am conservative and gay, that’s not an oxymoron) commenter, I find the case of the missing comments deplorable. 😉

          • http://twitter.com/NicholasExeter Nicholas Exeter

            Mine were deleted as well. Twitchy doesn’t seem to like healthy debate.

          • Bristel

            Well as a regular conservative (yes I am conservative and gay, that’s not an oxymoron) commenter, I find the case of the missing comments deplorable. 😉

          • RightThinking1

            Timothy,

            My point is that homosexuals can never be in a marriage, unless ‘marriage’ is redefined to be something other than what it actually is.

            What about ‘miscegenation, equal rights, etc.’ isn’t also ‘old tired rhetoric’?

            As far as ‘are used today to deny gay people the chance to get married’, I reiterate, they can not and never will be ‘married’. There might be some legal pseudo-status status established, but it will never be marriage. It is a little like a statutory declaration that men are the same as women That might be done, but no rational person would recognize it as true…, it would be a fraud.

            I am not ‘calling you out’ at all. I merely point out that pro-homosexual sexual ‘marriage’ advocates almost always (knowingly) engage specious and obfuscatory arguments in support of their cause.

            So far as Twitchy deleting comments, I think (in the absence of profane or coarsely vulgar comments) that is deplorable, and assuming that yours were not , I hereby register a protest on your behalf. I am sure that it is no consolation, but comments of my own, no different than those above, have been deleted at Huff Po.

          • Bristel

            So you call me out as being disingenuous just to shut down the debate? Also, I think one of my comments was deleted by Twitchy, so I don’t exactly remember what was said. I’ll leave that be though.

          • Bristel

            I’m not saying that there will be a segregation, and if what you claim is true about gay people pushing for segregation, I abhor that and I am not a part of that.

            I’m saying that a lot of the old tired rhetoric to prevent miscegenation, equal rights, etc are used today to deny gay people the chance to get married. But lets say that civil unions are in place, that’s still separate.

          • Bristel

            I’m not saying that there will be a segregation, and if what you claim is true about gay people pushing for segregation, I abhor that and I am not a part of that.

            I’m saying that a lot of the old tired rhetoric to prevent miscegenation, equal rights, etc are used today to deny gay people the chance to get married. But lets say that civil unions are in place, that’s still separate.

        • RightThinking1

          Tim,

          Because ‘separate but equal’ access was deemed to be not equal. Let me know when schools segregated into ‘Homosexual’ and ‘Heterosexual’ are found. Ironically, I believe that is actually occurring, at the instigation of homosexuals.

          The attempts to establish an equivalency between Jim Crow laws, based on race, and homosexual ‘marriage’ are deliberately disingenuous. You diminish the discussion, and weaken your image by doing so. Thoughtful people will recognize the fallacy.

        • shimauma

          you’re quibbling over definition when the fact is sexual deviants are out to get justification for their perversion by using language that seems binding. The absolute fact is, people who have intimate relations outside of the Design of the Creator are deviating from the norm, and no language you quibble over is going to justify that.

          • $45875941

            Thank you. My thoughts exactly. When I expressed my views the same way you did, I was excoriated by even those, claiming to be Christians, wanting to rewrite the Bible. Blind Saul Alinski followers.

          • http://twitter.com/NicholasExeter Nicholas Exeter

            I suspect you will find this article horribly offensive, but I intend it to be informative. At the very least, you’ll have a better understanding of the arguments that will be thrown against you for that kind of comment.

            http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/07/0722_040722_gayanimal_2.html

          • shimauma

            I’m not offended at all by that article, I’ve seen several like that and at that point I usually tend to remind everyone that animals also commit cannibalism, pedophilia, necrophilia and eat poop. Does that make it acceptable behavior in society? So the argument that animals are “gay” ie choosing sexually deviant lifestyles is a moot one since their other gross behaviors are just unacceptable, or at least we continue to hope they will remain unacceptable, but who knows. Seems since we are already bending to one sexual deviancy our country may soon make pedophilia, necrophilia and fecalphilia socially acceptable as well. All the ones who want those deviant lifestyle choices have to do is shriek “HATER” and “BIGOT” the way Rv Jesse Jackson screams “Racist” to get what they want

    • JINNASH

      Well said. Also, you will notice that everytime a society accepts same-sex marriage then the next push is to lower the age of consent.

    • JINNASH

      Well said. Also, you will notice that everytime a society accepts same-sex marriage then the next push is to lower the age of consent.

  • Rich Algeni

    But none of them ever remember that the people of California passed Proposition 8 in the first place!

    • nc

      Twice.

  • Michael Rice

    More hate from the left. I saw this under the Letter from Pearl Harbor Vet to Obama that has been floating around facebook for a while
    Stanley A Sorrell Some old biggots just need to DIE allready!!This is NOT a christian Nation, and NEVER has been! Its supose to be for all NOT just some, Untill Everyone in America can marry who they love, Its NOT America!!

  • Michael Rice

    It amazes me….stay out of our bedrooms, but pay for out medical care when we get diseases from what goes on in our bedrooms, etc, etc…
    Let me ask all you “love is love” people this….If I have a 24 year old adult daughter and her and I want to get married…should it be legal? No buts or ifs. It is a simple yes or no question.
    If you say no, you are a hypocritical bigot.

  • HARP2

    Boy…….the tutti -frutties sure talk tough.

  • kim

    Don’t forget your whistles and urine bags. you’ll need something to throw back at them

  • kim

    Calm them down. Bring out the decorating books and fabric swatches

  • TocksNedlog

    “If Prop 8 and DOMA are upheld by SCOTUS, we need to have some gay rioting in the streets. No fucking joke.”
    — What are you gonna do, take a rainbow-colored crap on a cop car?

    • Joel A. Edge

      It would be kinda like a gay pride parade, with slapping and hair pulling.

  • TocksNedlog

    They’re gonna protest in the streets?
    Oh hell, now we’re gonna have to see Kathy Griffin again, BEFORE New Year’s Eve!

  • QBallBrazil

    Wow…I wonder if they are sending some people to Michael Daflos house?

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_government_officials_of_the_United_States#section_2

  • Guest

    – “We’re the party of acceptance and diversity, and if you disagree with us WE’LL KILL YOU!!!” –

  • kerrari1898

    “don’t all the people outside #SCOTUS protesting gay marriage have like a sister/cousin to fuck or something??”
    If they did, shouldn’t they be granted “marriage equality” or something?

  • beebop1952

    What happened to Marriage = LOVE?

  • Joel A. Edge

    Good solid Democrat voters.

  • RightThinking1

    My, what a well mannered group of people. Hard to imagine why anyone regards them as pathological.

  • SheilaK

    Hahaha, the pre hate spews because deep in their fuzzy hearts they KNOW that gay marriage is NOT approved by a majority of Americans, no matter what their skewed polls say

  • SheilaK

    Hahaha, the pre hate spews because deep in their fuzzy hearts they KNOW that gay marriage is NOT approved by a majority of Americans, no matter what their skewed polls say

  • $472942

    I say we send them all to Iran for a little “re-education”…

  • $472942

    I say we send them all to Iran for a little “re-education”…

  • Marcy Cook

    What will the riot with? Feather dusters?

  • Marcy Cook

    What will the riot with? Feather dusters?

  • http://twitter.com/curleymom CurleyMom

    um… Secret Service? Pretty sure there are death threats against some SCOTUS members here…

  • http://twitter.com/curleymom CurleyMom

    um… Secret Service? Pretty sure there are death threats against some SCOTUS members here…

  • JustLikeAnimals

    I think I hear a big whine-tasting party being planned. Shudder…shudder.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    I think I hear a big whine-tasting party being planned. Shudder…shudder.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Sorry, but conspiring to murder SC justices is probably not a good career move. I’ve sent that last one above to my FBI buddies.

  • JustLikeAnimals

    Sorry, but conspiring to murder SC justices is probably not a good career move. I’ve sent that last one above to my FBI buddies.

  • Mapache

    Gay rioting in the streets? Now that IS a joke. I would watch that on PPV.

    • $23639361

      hmmm… wonder what “gay rioting” consists of??? Singing show tunes, dancing around in thongs, and trying to look FABULOUS while waving rainbow flags???

  • Mapache

    Gay rioting in the streets? Now that IS a joke. I would watch that on PPV.

  • Andy Rigo

    These comments once again prove that “gay marriage” has nothing to do with tolerance or equality, it is about forcing society to affirm their behavior.

  • Andy Rigo

    These comments once again prove that “gay marriage” has nothing to do with tolerance or equality, it is about forcing society to affirm their behavior.

  • Guest

    Tolerance demanded but not given…that sub-culture is a one way street.

  • Laura Jensen

    So let me get this straight when it comes to the pro gay marriage lobby…on the one hand you have these internet bullies who are exercising their extensive vocabularies on twitter and on the other you have half naked men dressed up as dancing pink devils protesting at SCOTUS? Call me crazy, but I’m just not sure these are the right representatives to get the message across on something like this if you want to be taken seriously. Of course, I forget, we are talking about low spectrum liberals here. At the end of the day they’ll just end up pooping on cars and raping each other and never actually accomplishing anything outside of their clutter free minds.

    • Elena0412

      Are there any “high-spectrum” liberals?

      • shimauma

        folks like barry hussien will only poop on cars after eating a meal of high grade kobe beef and a salad of arugula

  • kateorjane

    Twitter shows what a bunch of nasty petty little wussies so many on the Left are. Perhaps gays might consider their lack of any class & complete disgusting crudeness might not be the best thing to display when they’re pushing that “treat me fairly” shuffle.

  • SirLancelot70
  • Matt

    What a surprise – the gays on the forefront of this are violent and unhinged. Its not exactly a shock that half the opposition to gay marriage arises from the attitude displayed by the prominent gay marriage advocates. I get tired of being called a bigot because I disagree with gay marriage but do you really think throwing around ad hominems are going to make me change my mind, or dig my heels in.

  • Cal

    You know, when you have folks talking about murdering people they disagree with (even if they don’t mean it seriously), our society is in a really, really bad place.

  • LegalizeShemp

    Thank God we have the “open-minded and tolerance” of the Left for a rational and calm discussion of the issues.

  • JINNASH

    how many times has the left called for riots and/or direct action if they don’t get what they want. Can you imagine if the pro-American, 2nd amendment crowd actually rioted? These people would soil their pants faster than a baby at a chili contest!

    • shimauma

      And then barry hussien and the rest of his geshtapo would call the drones in on that Patriotic crowd.

  • JINNASH

    how many times has the left called for riots and/or direct action if they don’t get what they want. Can you imagine if the pro-American, 2nd amendment crowd actually rioted? These people would soil their pants faster than a baby at a chili contest!

  • Robert Patrick Moscato

    Gay threatening Straights, and we’re the ones being called Homophobes and bigots. “Up is down and down is up.” George Orwell is somewhere screaming “See I told you so!!!”

    • shimauma

      He also said the truth would be considered hate speech. We aren’t allowed to say that sexual deviants should leave righteous institutions like marriage alone because that would be hateful.

  • Robert Patrick Moscato

    Gay threatening Straights, and we’re the ones being called Homophobes and bigots. “Up is down and down is up.” George Orwell is somewhere screaming “See I told you so!!!”

  • KeepTheRepublic

    I love how the left is so tolerant!! hippacritical ass hats. Are they going to shoot us with giltter guns!!

  • KeepTheRepublic

    I love how the left is so tolerant!! hippacritical ass hats. Are they going to shoot us with giltter guns!!

  • Guest

    .

    • $45875941

      Name one death threat from a 2nd amendment supporter, and link to it.

      • Guest

        .

        • $45875941

          What’s the matter moron, can’t site one huh? SQUIRREL!!! You hoplophobes are so predictable. Now, junior, define your big word of the day, ” arsenal.”

          • Guest

            .

    • Guest

      .

  • Dom

    Amazing, and yet us Conservatives are the mean and nasty ones with no heart.

  • stellatruman

    Why can’t they make their point without inciting violence or endless use of the f bomb ?

  • $5474103

    So a handful of nutjobs represent the views of every liberal? Wow, talk about grasping at straws. BTW, I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve heard a right-winger use the threat of violence towards people who don’t agree with them. I guess it’s ok if your a right-winger.

    • http://twitter.com/NicholasExeter Nicholas Exeter

      The moderators are probably going to remove your comment. I posted something along those lines yesterday and it was deleted. But that’s a good point to make. This article definitely targeted the handful of nutjobs and used them to represent every liberal.

  • Charles Hammond Jr

    There can only be two possibilities… two possible forms of government… two possible forms of society… two possible types of existence…

    One of ‘Force’ and one of ‘Liberty’

    The Government, society, and culture of ‘Liberty’ not only allows for free choice but completely and wholly respects it.

    The Government, society, and culture of ‘Force’ will exert it’s will in all things and deny the existence of anything beyond it’s will.

    You can only have one! You can only desire one! The time for choosing is upon us here and now. These hateful people would rather have the latter. Which will you choose? Which will you fight for!?

  • DixieAngel_76

    Love the last one that says “thoughts?”. He should try it sometime. Thinking, I mean.

  • DixieAngel_76

    Love the last one that says “thoughts?”. He should try it sometime. Thinking, I mean.

  • Bill Board

    The one good thing about gays is the simple fact, they won’t breed.

  • http://twitter.com/MoueLaMoue Moue La Moue (D)

    Is ‘Tolerance’ now a code word? I haven’t brushed up on my Lib-Speak lately. So I was just wondering.

  • JINNASH

    The freeloading, hedonistic bums think they have a right to rule. They must be stopped.

  • rickcon

    I think these are tweets are a step in the right direction! God wants us to hate and judge another. I know I try to do my part. Every morning I wake up and I try to write at least 10 angry comments on different blogs and news stories, just to put a little more out there you know.

  • SpinMeNot

    Really? Threats against a Justice of the SCOTUS? I remember a stupid kid back in the 90’s hacking the game DOOM and putting an image of Slick Willy in there. He was convicted of a crime as a I remember … maybe it was just arrested and tried. You damn well bet that if anybody on the right made these sorts of statements about Obama, it would be all over the news.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002109532283 Jillane Kent

    Isn’t the collection of tweets that are responding to the news of the day the very purpose of Twitchy? Personally, I’ve never seen death threats against our President among my conservative friends and acquaintances, but I’ll take your word for it. Just a thought, a) if the content direction is not to your liking, you could always cease frequenting this web site and start your own, dichotomous site. b) did you cry tears of bitter indignation when many a frightening post was made with threats to our former President?

  • Well Done

    joe, you are today’s posting that proves the left can not stay on topic, preferring to allege that “the right is just as bad, anyway, what about” yadda yadda yadda. thanks for playing putz, putz

  • TocksNedlog

    What a stellar moral code you have:
    “Two wrongs make a what-the-fuck-ever, dude!”

  • $27789750

    Touche.

  • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

    He probably has a DVD of the movie they made about killing GWB.

  • Jay Stevens

    of course we haven’t seen presidential death threats. Killing Obama would just give us Sheriff Joe.

  • nc

    Like I said, if that was the true agenda, these issues could be worked out. But the financial part is only one small part of the big picture.

  • RightThinking1

    Nicholas,

    It isn’t that marriage benefits are ‘denied’, it is that marriage is an institution that homosexuals want to redefine. The institution as it exists places no burden whatsoever on homosexuals. The loathsome and near-constant narrative attempting to establish an equivalency between homosexual ‘marriage’ and slavery, or mixed-race marriage ignore that fact.

    In point of fact, homosexuals very much desire to take part in that institution, for a couple of reasons. One is that they they would like to avail themselves of the material benefits, the other (and I believe the overweening reason) is that they seek a stamp of moral approval.

    The problem is, no matter what the law says, or what popular opinion may be, homosexual ‘marriage’ is a fake, a fraud. The only way that a homosexual ‘marriage’ can occur is by re-defining the essence of marriage, which is what homosexuals seem to deny. That such a re-definition will have a significant deleterious societal impact matters seems to matter not a whit.

    In spite of the fact that homosexual relations are manifestly not normal, the public seems willing to establish and recognize domestic partnerships/civil unions which would extend mutual legal benefits to same-sex partners. Homosexuals are unwilling to accept that.

    Please tell us what those ‘Most marriage benefits are denied to civil unions’ are. It certainly isn’t the ability to have children (you can’t), it isn’t the ability to share bloodlines (you can’t), it isn’t the ability to provide children with mothers and fathers (you can’t), it isn’t so that adopted children can have grandparents or cousins (you can’t), etc. In short, the most significant elements of marriage are not there, and can not be, no matter what tortured reasoning may be used.

  • RightThinking1

    Nicholas,

    It isn’t that marriage benefits are ‘denied’, it is that marriage is an institution that homosexuals want to redefine. The institution as it exists places no burden whatsoever on homosexuals. The loathsome and near-constant narrative attempting to establish an equivalency between homosexual ‘marriage’ and slavery, or mixed-race marriage ignore that fact.

    In point of fact, homosexuals very much desire to take part in that institution, for a couple of reasons. One is that they they would like to avail themselves of the material benefits, the other (and I believe the overweening reason) is that they seek a stamp of moral approval.

    The problem is, no matter what the law says, or what popular opinion may be, homosexual ‘marriage’ is a fake, a fraud. The only way that a homosexual ‘marriage’ can occur is by re-defining the essence of marriage, which is what homosexuals seem to deny. That such a re-definition will have a significant deleterious societal impact matters seems to matter not a whit.

    In spite of the fact that homosexual relations are manifestly not normal, the public seems willing to establish and recognize domestic partnerships/civil unions which would extend mutual legal benefits to same-sex partners. Homosexuals are unwilling to accept that.

    Please tell us what those ‘Most marriage benefits are denied to civil unions’ are. It certainly isn’t the ability to have children (you can’t), it isn’t the ability to share bloodlines (you can’t), it isn’t the ability to provide children with mothers and fathers (you can’t), it isn’t so that adopted children can have grandparents or cousins (you can’t), etc. In short, the most significant elements of marriage are not there, and can not be, no matter what tortured reasoning may be used.

  • nc

    Explain then your statement:

    “Well to us it sounds like “civil union” is separate but equal, which wasn’t right before, why is it right now?”

    Where, in this situation, is it wrong?

  • ImASassyBlonde

    And yet, here you are commenting. Does this make you an extreme opinionated poster?

  • Bristel

    Well, my dictionary also says “the mixing of two or more elements”, so your “definition” varies from dictionary to dictionary, person to person. It’s not freedom and equality to go just by your definition.

  • Bristel

    Well, my dictionary also says “the mixing of two or more elements”, so your “definition” varies from dictionary to dictionary, person to person. It’s not freedom and equality to go just by your definition.

  • http://twitter.com/NicholasExeter Nicholas Exeter

    The moderators really do not seem to like my posts. Which is sad, considering that despite the fact that they are written in favor of “the opposite” side, I believe they are fairly level headed. At least, more level than some of the distasteful comments left here by supporters of the articles message.

    There was a joke about homosexuals throwing people into ovens and baking them. I responded with “only with seasoning and a few handfuls of potatoes. Flame on.” It was a joke, just like the original poster. However, my response was removed while the original comment remains.

    I’m not big on politics. I hate to follow them, I hate listening to politicians speak. I hate trying to read through laws with all the thousands of “corrections” and “additions” that are made. I once attempted to look through the bill, I forget what it’s called, that allows the government to permanently detain US citizens on the grounds of suspected terrorism. I couldn’t get past the 1300 changes made to the bill including “change the word ‘and’ to ‘additionally’. That kind of worthless crap is irritating. Therefore, I can’t stand politics.

    But I’m big on changing the way people think, things we believe (I’m not talking about faith). I, despite posting on this particular blog, have no idea what, specifically, the SSM thing going through SCOTUS entails. I’m not sure what it forces other parties into, nor am I sure what it would require we teach in schools. So keep in mind when reading this, we’re talking about the right to Same-sex Marriage. Not the right to force churches to marry the couple against their beliefs. Not the right to call it a marriage (Call it a civil union, for all I care). We’re talking about the legal and economic implications of Same-sex marriage.

    The equal rights movement, or whatever they call is nowadays, isn’t fighting for this particular court case. The entire movement isn’t based on the success of this hearing. They’re looking for general tolerance.

    Now, mentioned that I like to change the way people think. Here’s where I start. I’m definitely one of the homosexuals. And you just told me what “they”, being me, wants to do. I’m not interested in redefining marriage. I’m not a historian, and I haven’t read most of the bible (though I’m rather familiar with Leviticus, for obvious reasons); however, I do know that marriage is largely a religious service with religious implications. That was intentionally vague, since I have no idea what they are. That’s why i don’t care if Same-Sex Marriage is just a Civil Union, so long as the legal and economic rights are the same.

    If a child asks for a cookie and isn’t heard by its parents, it is still denied the cookie, even though neither parent actively denied the treat. So yes, under current laws, there are rights being denied. Perhaps it’s not the government’s fault that insurance companies don’t recognize a Partner in a Civil Union as a spouse, perhaps not. Did you know that a Partner isn’t recognized as a spouse and therefore cannot take medical leave to care for their injured/seriously ill partner since the law treats them as unaffiliated?

    The whole interracial/slavery thing is total bull. True, our nation has a habit of cycling through “rights” movements, but this is entirely different. It’s also different from incest and bestiality. Just taking the time to clear that up, since people seem to equate the homosexuality to those… no idea why.

    Moral approval… Eh, I suppose I’ll give up that one on a whole – since I can’t speak for the whole. However, I will say that I don’t need moral approval. It doesn’t interest me what people think of my sex life. I don’t understand people with foot fetishes, but I won’t stop liking a person because they have one. But you’re somewhat right. Approval, or lack of it, is why we see so many suicidal homosexual teenagers. I suppose the morality issue is something that concerns homosexuals that actually have some kind of religion they follow. I’m agnostic, so it hasn’t been a problem for me. (NOT an Atheist)

    Next paragraph… I kinda already covered this one. Call SSM what you want, just guarantee the same benefits. And next again… Normal is difficult to define. My normal differs from yours. The compounded issues here are nearly impossible to separate, but I’ll mention a few. Normal is largely dictated by society’s opinion of normal. And society is always changing. We don’t know the origins of homosexuality – is it Genetic? is it Nature? Is it Nurture? If it’s genetic, is it a mutation? a disease? If it’s produced from the environment we grow up in, what factors trigger it? People use to believe it was from sexual abuse, I wasn’t abused but still turned out gay. Whose normal do we accept as normal?

    Children… oh loaded topic…. Homosexual couples can arrange to have kids fairly easily. Personally, I don’t want children, but it’s possible. Adoption is a perfectly viable option. If I choose to support a child, I would adopt. We can supply the child with mothers or fathers, but not both. This is true. But how would our adopted kids not have cousins or grandparents? My parents and siblings didn’t die when I came out to them. And they’re still very much a part of my life. Any child I adopted would have a full family to love them. Minus a mother. Also, your use of the word “tortured” is mildly offensive. My reasoning isn’t tortured, it’s simply different from yours.

    All that I’m fighting for here is that you lose the stereotypical thinking. The whole gay agenda thing makes me laugh. I just want to be economically equal. There are different kinds of gays, like all colors of a rainbow (sorry, couldn’t help myself). Please keep in mind, in the future, we aren’t all total flamers to dress in mock-drag and parade around with rainbow flags and an overabundance of glitter. Some of us are your friends and colleagues you just don’t know quite well enough.

  • http://twitter.com/NicholasExeter Nicholas Exeter

    Yep

  • mike_in_kosovo

    “The mixing of two or more elements”

    Please explain how two samples of element “M” results in the “two or more elements” of your definition.