Shameful: Oliver Willis, libs make light of deaths of four Americans with #GOPBenghaziQuestions; Update: Greg Gutfeld slams Willis

Asking questions and fighting for justice? Totally mock-worthy, according to Media Matters’ Oliver Willis and his fellow travelers.

Good one? What happened in Benghazi is just so hilarious, huh? Horrifying; How do you people sleep at night?

Absolutely shameful. Take a gander at how they are making light of the killing of four Americans.

Of course. Asking about Benghazi is raaaaaacist.

Appalling. Beneath contempt, Mr. Willis and buddies. People died.

When one is morally bankrupt, yes. This is one of the largest problems we face; how do you debate things with an opponent who has no moral compass?

Other Twitter users swiftly call out the shameful and disgusting behavior of Oliver Willis and his fellow travelers.

How long, indeed? Americans won’t let them. We want answers, and we don’t find the deaths of four Americans to be the butt of jokes. Those who aren’t morally bankrupt continue to seek the truth, and to seek justice for the murdered Americans.

Questions? You’re damn right we have questions. And we will continue to ask them until justice is served. Four dead Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, deserve no less.


Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld rightly gives the ghoulish Willis the business.

Spot on, Mr. Gutfeld.


Senator McCaskill: Benghazi? I’m sorry for meany pants GOP questions for Panetta

Voting present! Panetta and Dempsey on Benghazi: We didn’t tell Obama or Hillary nuttin’

Sharyl Attkisson has one more question about Benghazi

YouTube video finally comes up in Hillary’s Benghazi testimony; Clinton continues to blame

CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson after Hillary’s disgraceful Benghazi testimony: ‘It makes a difference’

Boom: CBS’ Sharyl Attkisson tears into Obama Admin over Benghazigate

Benghazi? Whatever! There was just some ‘sloppiness’ there, says Obama [Video]

Cable sent to Hillary Clinton warned Benghazi consulate couldn’t withstand attack; Citizens demand answers; Updated: Video added

Media Matters’ Eric Boehlert blasts John McCain’s ‘disgraceful Benghazi campaign’

Awesome pic: Citizen takes fight for truth about Benghazi out on the road

Under the bus: Benghazi report ‘devastating,’ resignations roll in; Will media continue to ignore?

  • Maxx

    Last time I checked, no donkeys or elephants were in those caskets returning from Benghazi. They were Americans.

    The fourth estate has failed us. Simple as that. They’re more interested in documenting a Poland Springs water bottle grab. Where is our next Cronkite? Who is our next Russert?

    • L.N. Smithee

      Unfortunately, we know the answer to the question “Who is our next Russert?” and the sad answer is MSNBC’s Luke Russert, who is to his legendary journalist father what Maury Povich is to his legendary journalist father.

    • BlueGood

      America we have a problem…..

      Do you recall when 4 Canadians were killed by “Friendly fire” in Afghanistan?…

      The backlash was long lasting, books written, hand-wringing & regret & sorrow all over North America…

      But when 4 of your OWN CITIZENS are brutally MURDERED…’s deemed “Funny”….irrelevant….and seemingly the Left & LSM does NOT give a schit…

      In 10 short years the irresponsible have taken over….

      Sad to witness my Conservative friends….Keep at those Prycks!

      • TheAZCowBoy

        The Benghazi CIA rats (Pretending to be a US Consulate) who were planning the covert smuggling of ‘more’ Libyan ‘killers’ and heavy weapons into Syria to help make the ME safer for Jewish terror and US imperialism got ‘what they had coming’ after the murder of Gaddafi (The most benevolent leader on the African continent to his African brothers). The UNITED SNAKES (US/Israel/NATO) have greater ‘adventures’ ahead, Pilgrim. Any questions?

        • BlueGood

          Just one….”How many cubic meters of Unicorn Farts must you inhale to get as delusional as your above post suggest”???

        • Loren E. Heal

          The hatred of Jews is strong in you.

    • 3seven77

      Ahem. Neither Cronkite nor Russert was a real journalist. The fourth estate “failing us” started with them.

  • William_Teach

    I’m not sure why anyone would be surprised, libs have been dismissing the deaths ever since they occurred in order to protect Obama, and worse, have been mocking them. Every post I’ve written at Right Wing News in Benghazi has included calling it a “big fat nothingburger”.

    But, we all know the way that unhinged people like Willis would tract if this happened while Bush was president.

    • TheAZCowBoy

      Re: Benghazi….
      The CIA got caught ‘with its pants around their knees as they planned more ‘dirty tricks’ on Assad from their so-called ‘US Consulate.’ You don’t think the US is ‘truly’ the ‘nice guy’ in these UNITED SNAKES (US/NATO) assaults on tiny nations with great carbon and mineral resources to steal, do ya, Pilgrim? Remember, ‘you live by the sword – You die by the sword.’
      As for you ‘Tugboat’ you seem to reject the idea that the US military was too far to offer assistence to rat-boy Stevens. Now go stand in the corner because you just can’t say “Beam me up, Scotty’ and be there instantaneously – YET!
      As for Americans traveling (safely) over-seas after all the murder, mayhem and genocide the Great Satan committs world-wide; There’s always the possibility of doing ‘Aliyah’ in the US’ Jewish ‘armed-to-the-gills’ hemmorhoid – apartheidnik Israel, jajajaja.

      • LightSabre

        I see we have a member of CAIR commenting here.

  • JCRocks

    Media and Progs are all about protecting President Obama no matter what. Mocking and ridicule is the only strategy of those who have no credibility of their own and cannot stand on the (lack-of) strength of their own arguments. O.Willis’ tweets exemplify this weakness of character and weakness of argument.

  • sqeptiq

    Twitchy and Senate Republicans love that the four Americans died because you and they think it provides a club to beat Obama and Democrats with, as the tasteless bloody Obama flag graphic in your article makes clear.


      Obama had plenty to be beaten with before. He’s a horrible excuse for a president. You can try to defend him all you want, that will always be true.

      • Ardell Simon

        Obama never did answer questions on Fast & Furious and the death of border guard, I wouldn’t hold my breath trying to get answers on Benghazi! They’ll blame it on Bush somehow!

    • Michelle

      Are you aware that’s a flag graphic released by Obama’s own campaign, in fact had it for sale as posters, just days after four Americans were killed in Benghazi and we all saw the photos of the bloody finger smears on the wall? Where do you think the graphic came from?

      • TugboatPhil

        Thank you for pointing that out!

    • Noah Lee

      yup we sure do love those deaths /s

    • CR

      Ironic statement when one could argue that the entire democratic party & the state-run media “love” the fact that 26 Americans died because it provides a way to push destruction of 2nd Amendment rights.

    • Jefferson Tea Party

      Remember the daily war-dead count, when Bush was President? 3 times as many have died under Obama, but the count stopped. Amazing, innit?

    • lainer51

      Media Matters and Demcraps love that the four Americans died because, well, because that is what they love!

      • Verreck

        And you love that over 3,000 Americans were killed because of Jr. Bush’s and the rest of the unindicted administration was neglectful and ignored the warnings.

        • Noah Lee

          aaaannnndddd again. considering how much dems balked at the measures put in place after 9/11 to prevent it from happening again, what makes you think they would’ve approved those measures before 9/11?

        • Noah Lee

          “And you love that over 3,000 Americans were killed because of Jr. Bush’s and the rest of the unindicted administration was neglectful and ignored the warnings.”

          that’s the exact moment you went off the rails, debs.

    • wwbdinct

      It’s not tasteless it’s a fact – Obama has blood on his hands. Lots of it. You can take that O flag and wipe your ass with it.

    • TugboatPhil

      President Obama and Senate Democrats love beating with words, law-abiding American citizens who have committed no crimes, but merely disagree with them.

    • L.N. Smithee

      Nobody “thinks” the Benghazi incident “provides a club to beat Obama and Democrats with,” Obama & Dems KNOW it does. That’s why with a month and a half before the election, the BHOres did what they’ve done since Obama began running for President: Hunkered down, covered up, given half-assed answers to serious questions, and accused those demanding full disclosure of racism. And it’s also why Obama LIED LIED LIED in the 2nd debate about having called the Benghazi incident “terrorism” the morning of September 12, 2012 when the truth is that he specifically told Steve Kroft the evening of September 12, 2012 that it was too soon to know if it was terrorism.

      I agree the bloody Obama flag graphic is of questionable taste. Having said that, the flag itself — which fittingly replaced the stars representing the states with Obama’s personal logo — was in bad taste. The continued obfuscation surrounding the incident gives the Obamastation ownership of it among people who are too smart to believe their bluster about their transparency. So while I wouldn’t have created that illustration myself, I can understand why someone did.

    • KansasGirl

      sqeptiq, why did O not protect these Americans?

    • Noah Lee

      yup we sho do loves those deaths. you’re a special creature, sqeptiq.

  • Luke Givens

    So where were any of you clutching your pearls during any of the embassy/consulate attacks that occurred under Bush? Yeah didn’t think so.

    • Noah Lee

      don’t recall bush lying about the circumstances regarding those attacks. nice try, thank you (don’t) come again.

      • Verreck

        But he was lying like a rug when it came to invading Iraq which got how many American soldiers killed?

        • Catchance

          PGAD, you credulous tool. In the first place, EVERYONE believed that Saddam had WMDs… and Congress VOTED for the war (unlike Obama’s run into Libya). Do you think all those liberals in Congress listened to Bush? Of course not… they hated him then as much as now. Saddam had welcomed Al Qaeda into Iraq. In addition, we got rid of a terrible dictator who had killed hundreds of thousands of his own people.

          Second, Saddam’s own general told us that there were WMDs (chemical warfare) that had been kept in caves in Al Qa qa, and that as soon as they knew that the U.N. was coming they had them shipped out to Syria. For people who pay attention it is generally accepted now that the chemical weapons Syria has and is planning on using came from Iraq.

          • Verreck

            Yes Liberals listened to Bush because unlike you and this present bunch of obstructionists in congress who would rather see this country fail than have Obama succeed at anything, Democrats have a strong sense of patriotism and love for our country.
            You see, when we were attacked on 9/11 despite warnings given to Bush, Democrats rallied around Republicans and gave Bush every tool he requested including swallowing all our disgust and signing the Patriot Act despite our misgivings.

            We also didn’t play politics with dead Americans like you are doing. We waited over a year and well after Bush let bin Laden get away before we had any investigations into why Bush didn’t think it important to protect American lives at home and didn’t blame him till we understood he was warned about it.

          • Catchance

            Wow. Just take everything you’ve said, turn it 180 degrees around, and it’ll be correct. You really have been drinking the Kool-Aid too long.

          • Verreck

            Ahhh. The ol’ ‘nu-uh’ defense.

            So what is 180 degrees of “bin Laden determined to strike in U.S.” given to Bush one month before 9/11 attacks and his response of “All right, you’ve covered your ass now.”?

            So what is 180 degrees of The first bill proposed was the Combating Terrorism Act of 2001, which was introduced by Republican Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Jon Kyl (R-AZ) with Democratic Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on September 13. Meanwhile, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, along with Democratic Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Arlen Specter (R-PA), had been working with John Ashcroft on a draft bill, called the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001?

            So what is 180 degrees of “Donald Rumsfeld had the chance when he was US defence secretary in December 2001 to make sure Osama bin Laden was killed or captured, but let him slip through his hands, a Senate report has found.” ?

            So what is 180 degrees of ‘my number one priority is making sure president Obama’s a one-term president.’ ?

            So what is 180 degrees of filibusters by Democrats under Bush…
            107th Congress 71
            108th Congress 62
            109th Congress 68

            By Republicans under Obama…
            111th Congress 137
            112th Congress 104

            So what is 180 degrees of the 9/11 Commission, which was set up on November 27, 2002 but according to Wall Street Journal, July 8, 2003

            White House Hurdles Delay 9/11 Commission Investigation more than a year and a half after 9/11

            Yeah, I’m the one drinking the Kool-aid…Please.

          • Catchance

            Okay, let’s take these one at a time:
            1. The so-called “warning” in the PDB in August of 2001 was no more than the usual historical review, according to Condoleeza Rice. Given the failing of the FBI and CIA to share information (thanks to the wall put up by Jamie Gorelick who was also on the 9/11 Commission… talk about a conflict of interest) and the vague statements themselves, there was no way 9/11 could have been prevented. Unless you start pointing fingers as to why these people were still in the U.S.

            2. I don’t get your point here, unless it’s that anti-terrorism was bi-partisan.

            3. You really should stop reading only blogs like Daily Kos… or at least read others as well. The reason Rumsfeld would not approve the CIA’s request in 2007 was because of the mission itself, which had ballooned from a few people to hundreds, had become too cumbersome. You may think that’s not a good enough reason, but most covert ops people understand. The mission in 2011 which killed OBL only had a small group involved, and they wouldn’t even ask Obama until it was right on the brink, because he had already chickened out several times before. In addition, because Obama couldn’t keep his big mouth shut, and had to brag about how we got him, at this moment the Pakistani doctor who helped them locate OBL, is sitting in a jail cell, rotting.

            4. You have got to be kidding. After 8 years of listening to people calling Bush “Hitler”, of their wishing out loud that he would die, of their actually making a movie showing him being assassinated, you’ve got the gall to complain about McConnell saying that making sure Obama was a one-term president was his no.1 goal?

            5. Has it not occurred to you that filibusters occur the most when the minority party has a majority president? Both sides do this, and what I find odd is that you didn’t mention the 110th Congress… 2007-2008, when the most filibusters were recorded. Each side complains when the other is doing it, calling the other side ‘obstructionist’. The whole point of a filibuster is to slow down the other side until cloture can be gotten. It’s meant as a cooling down time, to give them time to think.

            6. The 9/11 Commission was set up in November of 2002, but both Kissinger and George Mitchell stepped down. By the spring of 2003 they were all in place, but said they needed more money. In March Bush provided another $9 Million. By the time the report was finished they had come to the conclusion that it was a combination of the CIA and FBI permitting the attacks to occur, that had they acted more aggressively they could have been prevented. (See No. 1 above.) Jamie Gorelick, btw, was Deputy Attorney General during Clinton’s administration.

          • Verreck

            You are such a pathetic fraud it’s laughable with your unsubstantiated accusations against Obama while at the same time you pitifully apologize for Bush’s failure. Your shallow understanding of the Aug, 6th ‘historic review’ sounds nice until you put it in context. The CIA first warned Bush on May 1 in a report of “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation, and again on June 22, the daily brief reported that al Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible. After several more warnings, Bush finally asked for a broader analysis on Al Qaeda, its aspirations and its history. In response, the C.I.A. set to work on the Aug. 6 brief. Again, your shallow understanding and attempt at revising history is glaringly visible when you blame Jamie Gorelick for a policy that had been in place since the 70’s.

          • Catchance

            Oh, dear… someone has her panties in a twist.

            Sorry, sweetie, but Jamie Gorelick had established a pre-Patriot Act “wall” that prevented the foreign intelligence and investigative communities from collaborating.

            From Directorblue blogspot: “Her 1995 memo, entitled “Instructions on Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations”, stated explicitly that they would ‘go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.'”




            The result: shortly before 9/11, Gorelick’s wall “specifically impeded the investigation into Zacarias Moussaoui”, the so-called “20th hijacker.”

            And yet, Jamie Gorelick was on the 9/11 Commission, something that our wonderful mainstream press should have brought to the forefront. Instead… nothing.

            The CIA warned President Bush often that there was chatter and an attack was planned… but there was absolutely NO indication of where or how or when, just that it was imminent. If all you read is left-wing publications you’re never going to get all of the truth. Why don’t we ask why the New York Times felt it was necessary to publish on their front page how we were tracking money to Al Qaeda?

            You can point fingers at President Bush all you want, but you cannot duck the fact that President Obama was told by Chris Stevens several times that an attack was being planned at the consulate, that there were talks that it would be on 9/11, that they desperately needed more security and plead with him to keep the plane there to get them out if needed. You can complain about Bush, but he NEVER referred to the deaths of Americans as a “bump in the road”. He never had someone go around telling everyone that it was all due to a video. He never went off to party in Vegas.

          • LN_Smithee

            One more thing that lefties love to gloss over about the 9/11 Commission is that former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger stole and destroyed classified documents from the National Archives in his role as the Clinton Administration’s representative to the panel. Facing the possibility that this might implicate Slick Willie shared more blame than previously thought, the MSM refused to question Bill Clinton when he laughed off Berger’s federal crime as typical behavior by an absent-minded old pal.


          • Noah Lee

            i’m absolutely sure, debs, that the senate would’ve allowed pres. bush to have all muslm males in the country taking flying lessons rounded up and held w/o due process, based on a pdb.

        • Noah Lee

          hhhhhmmmmm you do realize that the Senate did vote on that action. and it was also policy of the previous admin for regime change. Facccctttttsssss arrrrrrrreeeee hhhhhaaaaaarrrrrrdddddd, aren’t they?

    • Catchance

      None of them had begged for more security; none of them had plead for an airplane to remain; none of them had warned the administration that they were going to be attacked; none of them had ex-SEALS living within 2 miles who were told to ‘stand down’ instead of helping; none of them had fighter jets available within a half hour but were never told to go; none of them were also running guns into Syria. The real problem is that the media has kept the details hushed up to protect Obama, so most (of the low-information voters) really don’t know all that happened, and they believe these cretinous sub-human reporters who mock about the questioning of this “transparent” administration’s cover-up. And for you to be saying that we’re ‘clutching our pearls’ over the violent deaths of these 4 men, one of whom was raped and dragged through the streets, while you sit there, all smug and self-righteous, shows the real lack of regard you have for ‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’. And President Bush never referred to anyone who was killed on his watch as “a bump in the road”. You are pond scum.

      • Verreck

        Low-information voters = not believing in the made up sh*t you hear on fox, etc.

    • lainer51

      I don’t clutch pearls because I don’t wear Mom Jeans and sissy-boy bike helmets…

      • Verreck

        Probably because you are so fat the only thing you can wear is sweat pants and you don’t need a bike helmet because your epilepsy helmet for brain injuries works just as good.

        • Noah Lee

          awwwww. you got called out. your points were shot down w/o prejudice. now, that’s the best retort ou have. GFYS debs.

    • TugboatPhil

      Luke, the things YOU were pearl-clutching over during the Bush years were pictures of Al Qaeda prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Remember what “torture” that was for those murdering scum?

  • Love of Country

    The DNC Benghazi Cover-up Timeline ….

    1) Tell the GOP and the state run media (as if they need to be told) that to talk about the events in Benghazi would be too political before the election (translation – we’re 100% culpable).

    2) Run out the clock …. duck questions from Fox, duck reporters, claim amnesia – do whatever you have to do to not talk about this for 6 weeks.

    3) After 6 weeks have passed, go in front of the media (any media) and ask them “What difference does it make at this point?” and say “It’s utterly disgraceful and highly political for you to draw this on and on …. what are you … a racist?”.×400

    ╔╦╗╔╦╗╔═╗╔═╔═╗╔═╗╦─╦──╔═╗╦═╗╔═╗╔╦╗╔═╗ ─║─║║║╠═╝╠═╠═╣║──╠═╣──║─║╠═╣╠═╣║║║╠═╣ ╚╩╝╩─╩╩──╚═╩─╩╚═╝╩─╩──╚═╝╩═╝╩─╩╩─╩╩─╩

  • $23629333

    “What you talkin’ ’bout Willis?”

  • oneword

    Evidently Oliver Willis doesn’t care that 4 Americans died that day, nor does the President & Sec. Clinton.

    • Michelle

      What difference does it make?!?!

  • TugboatPhil

    What is lost on these No Brain Voters is the excuse about not sending any military assistance. We have been at WAR in several countries for over a decade. If there is one part of the federal government that has gotten pretty well worked out, it’s MOVING MILITARY ASSETS!!

    We had more than ample resources within 30 minutes, an hour and any time after that.

    You know who will pay a price for our inaction in Benghazi? Every American that travels abroad for the next couple of decades. We will soon see a repeat of the 80s when unchecked Islamism made travel a deadly consequence for many Americans and people of the host countries.

  • Jefferson Tea Party

    Mr pResident, if one of the Benghazi dead looked like Trayvon, would you THEN address it?

    • LightSabre

      Only if he could get some political mileage out of it.

      • Jefferson Tea Party


  • $35072932

    The gun grabbers love to demonize innocent people who had nothing to do certain events with smears about ‘blood on their hands’ and yet they turn blind eye to actions or inaction’s by the Dear Liar that have resulted in multiple deaths.

    Obama had his Guns for Gangsters operation with 300+ people killed

    The Dear Liar was absent from duty the night of the Benghazi attack with 4 more deaths.

    Obama is the one with blood on his hands.

    • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

      I forget… who are the ‘gun grabbers’ again? Liberals? Okay, I was confused, because I assumed ‘gun grabbers’ would be we conservatives reaching to grab our guns if they tried to take them…

  • Sean O

    Odd that the fat b*stard would be so brave to tweet crap like that. He’s blocked a huge number of Conservatives who are unable to read his tweets!

  • rivers

    What kind of defect makes one become a cult member? Is it perceived defieciency in oneself? I really wonder, because I just don’t understand how or why these people will defend ANYTHING Obama does no matter how stupid they make themselves look. On the other hand I now have less disbelief that the kool-aid drinkers in Jonestown were willing suicides.

  • Steve_J

    Willis has apparently never seen Gallagher’s act. It’s pretty damn insightful.

  • Randi Starr

    Okay I read the etards(Willis)comments..and can safely say he doesn’t qualify for human therefore not even qualified as an organ donor. So, it truly serves no purpose.

  • Tantalus XVI

    “Greg Gutfeld is racist” coming in 5..4..3..2..1..

    I’d seriously punch that fat sack in the face with a small automobile. At this point dude, just be black and be quiet, voting for Obama a 2nd time proves how irrelevant you are, seriously you’ve done enough. I hear Walmart has a two for one sale on house slippers, you know you ruined your current pair by walking on the backs of them and checking your mail in them, #concreteandrubberbackingbad #killyourself #dumberthanToure

  • $24414377

    The hacks at MMFA need to change their name. Something along the lines of Media Matters for Certain Americans….Media Matters for America except those who Threaten our Little Barky Kardashian is just too long for a business card.

  • $24414377

    So, Luke or septiq, can either of you name the attacks of embassies under Bush in which the ambassador was left to die after warning of terrorist activity and the need for more security?

    Can either of you moonbats name any video makers imprisoned by Bush?

    • TheAZCowBoy

      Hell, we can’t even identify all the CIA torturers and war criminals after senior CIA war criminal and torture supervisor Jose Rodriquez (60-Minutes 01/2013) sez the CIA destroyed all the tapes on Bushs orders c/o the CIA ghouls and war criminals.

  • $24414377

    If only Stevens had asked for free birth control along with his request for additional security perhaps he could have gotten Barky Kardashian on the phone.

  • AMERICAN Kafir™(KAdams)

    Wowow… @owillis: whatta douche! Is that a beard, or did your cat curl up and die on your face?

  • linnicy

    Libs glorify in a culture of death: our Americans, babies aborted, drones over Americans.But thieir savior Obama skips the truth ALWAYS. This they love.

  • TheAZCowBoy

    The CIA base (DBA: US Consulate) at Benghazi was taken out as it planned the arming of Libyan ‘rebel’s’ and sending heavy wepons to Syria. “Great INTELL Gaddafi’s ‘rebel’s have, huh folks? Lying again, huh Hillary?

  • notenoughtime

    Amen, Greg Gutfeld!

  • ember

    If a conservative had mocked 4 deaths there would have been hell to pay.

  • Guest

    I love Greg Gutfeld.