Charlie Daniels challenges Piers Morgan; See how you feel about guns after 30 days in the woods

Boom! Singer and Grand Ole Opry member Charlie Daniels has an idea for Piers “Musket” Morgan. Try living in the woods for thirty┬ádays with nothing but a bag of rocks and a knife. Twitter users, sick and tired of Piers Morgan and his sanctimony and ignorance, are loving the idea.

Heh.  Seriously. What would he do outside of his cozy and swanky elitist bubble?

But, this Twitter user sees a problem with the plan.


Daniels then throws a zinger at President Obama.

Either guns or President Bush, natch.

Will Piers respond? Stay tuned!

  • jacamina

    Piers won’t respond… won’t be able to comprehend the question/comment.

  • CatHerder

    With a decent knife and time you can make all sorts of useful survival tools. Think I’d ditch the rocks, though.

    • Ben Bollman

      You can make tools with a knife but none as effective and easy as a gun.

  • Tangchung

    Better yet, send Piers to the south side Chicago wearing his tailored suit and Rolex.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      The South Side of Chicago? That’s the baddest part of town.

      • Tangchung

        Said bad bad Leroy Brown.

        • Catchance

          Well, he was the baddest man in the whole d**n town.

          • ForTheRepublic

            Badder than old King Kong?

          • Catchance

            Oh, much worse. He was meaner than a junkyard dog.

            (I think we’ve played this one out, unless you want to talk about Doris.)

    • garygramscom

      Better still, see how he feels about no guns after he goes back to England for good.

  • Txgirlinnh

    Great idea as long as the woods are in a distant country, far far away. Then we could all sit back and let natural selection run it’s course.

  • frediano

    Better yet, transfer Piers into the LA Riots, and ask how he feels about standing there with his single shot bolt action .410 after calling 911 and getting a busy signal.

    He’d want a 100 round mag, not one of those wimpy 30 round mags.

  • touchdown tony

    I like it !

  • $23629333

    Why would someone “in the woods” have a “bag of rocks”?

    • Joe W.

      Self defense.

      • Jack Deth

        Piers might need a wok to throw at a wabbit.

        • Joe W.

          Piers would be in deep doo doo if he threw rocks like Barky throws a baseball….

      • $23629333

        Let’s imagine those “woods” are in Montana, where someone might encounter a bear,* a moose, a mountain lion and or wolves. Presumably, I’m supposed to throw the rocks in my bag at the approaching critter(s**). If my rocks are big enough to be a deterrent, the critter(s) may have to be too close for comfort for me to toss one of my rocks far enough and with enough accuracy. My first impulse would be to drop the bag of rocks and run – towards the closest tree big enough to climb out of harm’s way.

        Of course, two legged critters – like the two guys in “Deliverance” – would pose a very different threat, and with their weapons, one very difficult to outrun or deter with rocks.

        (* grizzly or black)

        (** assuming it is a pack of wolves)

        • Joe W.

          Maybe he could take the elastic out of his BVDs and fashion a sling with which to chuck the rocks. Then again, I don’t get the sense that our Piers is very resourceful…..

    • Jack Deth

      To have some things to bang together to create a spark for a fire.

      Of course, at least one of those rocks would have to be a form of much harder mineral quarts called “flint” to create a spark. Though, I’d gladly watch Piers bang rocks together. Without a bundle of twigs, dry grass and leaves for the sparks to land on. And with proper application of exhalations create smoke, embers and then. Fire.

    • ember

      Those are his brains. He’s got to have something to carry them in.

  • Maxx

    The closest Piers Morgan will ever get to “the woods” is off dogleg number three.

  • TocksNedlog

    Charlie’s challenge speaks directly to the inanity of Musket’s argument: the pie-in-the-sky, “Imagine all the people living life in peace,” completely unrealistic, liberal Utopianist view of humanity; a view that is breathtaking in the absolute cynicism of its proposed method of implementation.
    He BELIEVES that gun-owners have a base need for aggression, rather than a desire for protection. This belief is a major component of why he doesn’t care that 99.5% of all legal gun owners will never use their gun to commit a crime.
    He BELIEVES, as do all liberals, in a secular vision of “Original Sin” — except that in their version the sinner is unredeemable by means of choosing to live under a common code of moral ethics; therefore, his/her conduct must be controlled from on high, by means of government authority.
    And how does government authority ultimately operate? That’s right, by Rule of Law, enforced — metaphorically, if not literally — at the end of a gun barrel.
    Piers Morgan is ALL FOR guns . . . as long as they are in the hands of the Feds.

  • frediano

    How unortunate it must be for some that any move towards national socialism in America must be labeled national socialism?

  • peteee363

    and piers, don’t you dare purchase assault rocks, only regular ones for you. and we better make sure you are given a butter knife, you wouldn’t want to accidentally kill or mame any small animals.

    • ceemack

      Amen! Make sure the bag can’t hold more than 10 rocks.

  • Celestial Time

    Limousine Liberals like Piers shouldn’t even be trusted with a knife or a bag of rocks.

  • Roto

    And Piers is wondering, “How do they cook rocks?!?!”

  • dmacleo

    send him LA when the dorner riots start and make sure he publicly lets everyone know dorner liked him.
    he’ll be safe then right????
    cops will keep him protected I am sure..

  • notenoughtime

    Piers wouldn’t make it through one night in the woods.

  • Billy boy

    Better yet. Throw Piers into a bear pit and watch him get chewed to death. That sounds like fun.

  • JohnnyN2O

    Better chance in the wilderness then Washington Park,

  • Lady_Clare

    Problem is, Piers and the other liberals already think that hunting is the only legitimate use for a gun. He’d say he needed it then. But he’d say that most people aren’t out there trying to kill Bambi to stay alive, too. As much as I like taking pot shots (pardon the pun) at Piers, guns for hunting use doesn’t prove his point wrong.

  • SideshowJon36

    Forget the woods. How about pre-Giuliani NYC, SE Washington DC, or Rahm’s Chicago?

  • 2013_garvey

    Can all conservatives go live in the woods?

    • ForTheRepublic

      Yes, we can. We have th intelligence, where-with-all, and tools (including guns and ammunition) to survive. Your snark needs work.

  • al hunt

    I wanted to throw a rabid racoon at him and see how long befor he starts sounding like troy landry……….SHOOT EM SHOOT EM SHOOOOOOOT EM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • lillymckim

    It brings to mind a Hank Williams Jr song…