Rarely in history has so much been spent by the very wealthy seeking intellectual and moral justification for their indefensible wealth.
—
Robert Reich (@RBReich) February 04, 2013@RBReich Indefensible wealth???—
Timothy Connolly CFA (@SconsetCapital) February 04, 2013
Yes, indefensible wealth. We’re pretty sure we don’t have it, and we’re certain if you asked him, former Labor Secretary Robert Reich would say he doesn’t have it either. His old boss might, but we’d need a little more information to know for sure.
.@RBReich Define "indefensible wealth." What is the dollar figure that marks indefensible wealth and why is one dollar less defensible?—
Rob Douglas (@RobDouglas3) February 04, 2013
@RBReich By what moral code do you claim the ability to judge another's wealth as indefensible? Also, what was your gross income in 2012?—
Brent Mayberry (@brentito) February 04, 2013
@pearlypiper @rbreich Please define indefensible wealth? What's the number? How much should we be allowed to earn?—
30 Round Mag (@ShaneWright22) February 04, 2013
.@RBReich @mleewelch So where do I
go to get this indefensible wealth? The Fed? Obama? Congress? Oh, that's right, I'm small enough to fail—
(@Libagno) February 05, 2013
@RBReich and just what is indefensible wealth? Unless they made it robbing banks there is nothing to defend.—
Bruce Venable (@BruceVenable) February 05, 2013
Dear @RBReich & other communists: In a free society, private wealth should not have to be "defended". twitter.com/RBReich/status…—
Matthew DesOrmeaux (@cynicusprime) February 05, 2013
How much do they pay Reich to teach this stuff at Berkeley? That might be where the “indefensible” bit comes in.
