It takes special kind of person to look at carnage caused by guns, much of it against children, and conclude that nothing should be done
—
Markos Moulitsas (@markos) January 31, 2013And it takes a very sick person to spew garbage like that.
So conservative counter appears to be "guns killing children is okay because abortion exists." Does that cover it?—
Markos Moulitsas (@markos) January 31, 2013
Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug).—
Markos Moulitsas (@markos) January 31, 2013
Fellow lefty ghouls were right there with him:
@markos if we take guns away from the good children, only the bad guns will have children—
Jon Hartmann (@jonhartmannjazz) January 31, 2013
So, noting yet another incident of gun violence and that we're unable to have a reasonable conversation about fixing it = bad, apparently.—
(@socratic) January 31, 2013
@markos Only the unborn count. I thought everyone knew this.—
The Lucky Girl (@the_lucky_girl) January 31, 2013
Pro-Birth: don't care once ur out of womb "@markos Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug)."—
John Patrick Gatta (@johnpgatta) January 31, 2013
@markos For RWNJs, once child is born, they don't give a shit.—
Buckaroo Banzai (@buckaroo1260) January 31, 2013
@markos Now that's GOP logic at its best! SMH. Dead is dead. Prebirth or a few years into life. Scalpel or gun. Who's counting? Love 'em—
Bryn Robinson (@bacygirl) January 31, 2013
Just disgusting. Being pro-life means caring about the welfare of all children. Markos is always in dire need of a trip to the woodshed, and conservatives gave it to him:
When did killing children become legal? RT @markos: Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug).—
Ben Howe (@BenHowe) January 31, 2013
Not one "con" is saying that, dickhead. RT @markos Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug).—
RB (@RBPundit) January 31, 2013
@markos Not even close. Not even a little close. Completely wrong, actually. Thanks for playing.—
Jason 'Zeus' Brown (@The_Mighty_Zeus) January 31, 2013
Killing kids is legal? Who knew?! RT @markos: Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug).—
Heather (@hboulware) January 31, 2013
Well @markos, nobody has ever said that. But you just admitted that abortion murders the unborn. And that's ok because…?—
Landon (@OrwellForce) January 31, 2013
Moron –> RT @markos: So conservative counter appears to be "guns killing children is okay because abortion exists." Does that cover it?—
Brian Griffiths (@BrianGriffiths) January 31, 2013
@markos just tell #NRA we need to pass gun control laws to protect fetuses in their 30th trimester. #prolife #abortion—
Captain Steve Rogers (@CaptainSRogers) January 31, 2013
@markos How does fighting against legislation that statistically results in more violent crime amount to apathy regarding child murder?—
Jason 'Zeus' Brown (@The_Mighty_Zeus) January 31, 2013
This purports to be an actual thought: RT @markos: Shorter cons: killing of unborn is unconscionable. killing of born, eh, freedom (shrug).—
Miké (@ThePantau) January 31, 2013
.@markos The death of children any way is an abomination. The question is the left's moral authority on guns when they view life cavalierly.—
Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) January 31, 2013
So @Markos wants a consistent position on abortion & killing children. That means he's either against abortion or for child murder.—
Ben Howe (@BenHowe) January 31, 2013
Markos is a special brand of imbecility.—
Brady Cremeens (@brady_cremeens) January 31, 2013
And a morally bankrupt cretin.