Clinton: never saw security requests, didn't pick Rice for Sun. shows, said from start ws terrorism ("armed militants"). No mention of video
—
Brit Hume (@brithume) January 23, 2013
One hour in… an Ambassador Rice question.—
Sean Agnew (@seanagnew) January 23, 2013
Clinton asked whether she selected Susan Rice to speak for administration. "I did not," she said.—
lois romano (@loisromano) January 23, 2013
You guys, Hillary had nothing to do with Amb. Susan Rice’s video-blaming spin-tour after the deadly Benghazi terrorist attack. And those talking points that no one wants to accept responsibility for? Shorter Hillary: Wa’n't me.
"I wasn't involved in the talking points process" – Hillary (again, wiping hands clean)—
Sean Agnew (@seanagnew) January 23, 2013
Asked about the post attack story line, Clinton says she was "not focused" on talking points—
Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) January 23, 2013
"I wasn't involved in the talking points process…It was an intelligence product" – Hillary—
Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) January 23, 2013
Hillary says "nobody in the administration" was stuck on talking points—
Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) January 23, 2013
Nobody? Nobody? Did Hillary miss the Sunday talk show circus with Amb. Rice? You know, the one she knows enough about to say she wasn’t involved.
Huge Hillary admission: if SecState didn't approve Susan Rice's participation then her Sunday Show appearances were a political decision.—
Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) January 23, 2013
"I was not focused on talking points" but the @Statedept had rice mention the YouTube video on 5 separate occasions? #BenghaziHearings—
El SOOPer!! (@SooperMexican) January 23, 2013
How ’bout that?
Shields up! Deploy lingo! RT @michellemalkin: "I wasn't involved in the talking points process…It was an intelligence product" – Hillary—
Cuffé (@CuffyMeh) January 23, 2013
Shorter Hillary on Rice's talking points: Obama isn't the only one who knows how to throw someone under the bus.—
DrewM (@DrewMTips) January 23, 2013
Clinton: I wasn't focused on talking points, I was focused on keeping people safe. Except the dead ones.—
Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 23, 2013
While Hillary wasn’t “focused” on talking points, she was willing to defend Rice’s use of them.
…and now Hillary is giving obligatory defense of Susan Rice after appearing to throw her/Obama under the bus 10 minutes ago. #Benghazi—
Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) January 23, 2013
Clinton: Conversations ongoing before and after Rice was on TV. We didn't conclude finally that there were no protests until "days after"—
Hannah Allam (@HannahAllam) January 23, 2013
Besides, Clinton says Rice’s lies don’t matter anyway.
Sec. Clinton got heated w/ Sen. Ron Johnson re: Susan Rice’s Sunday show appearances: "With all due respect, what difference does it make"—
David Ford (@ItsDavidFord) January 23, 2013
Hey, guys, there’s a follow-up question here somewhere.
Hey Senators: If as Hillary just testified she "was NOT operating off intel talking points" why did she blame #Benghazi the Youtube video?—
Rick The RINO (@StrokesofCandor) January 23, 2013
Reminder:
Flashback: Hillary Continues To Blame Video For 'Senseless' Attacks breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2…—
Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) January 23, 2013
Flashback: Clinton Blasts Anti-Islam Vid Blamed for Mideast Unrest: ‘Disgusting and Reprehensible’ theblaze.com/stories/2012/0…—
Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) January 23, 2013
Flashback: Hillary Clinton blames Anti-Islam Film for violence in Mid East youtube.com/watch?v=yqoPnA…—
Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) January 23, 2013
@michellemalkin did you ever see the Benghazi video I did with Heritage? youtube.com/watch?v=uFf0dU…—
Ben Howe (@BenHowe) January 23, 2013
And just some of the answers we’re still waiting on:
No one has asked Hillary (1) why no security; (2) why she lied about a YouTube video; (3) why they trotted out Amb. Rice. Pathetic.—
Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) January 23, 2013




















