Margaret Thatcher recovering after surgery, vile lefties hope she dies

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is recovering in the hospital after having surgery to remove a bladder growth. Many Twitterers are wishing her well:

But scores of others are hoping for her death:

Shameful and disgusting.

Indeed. We’re praying for a full and speedy recovery. God bless the Iron Lady.



George H.W. Bush hospitalized in Houston; Condition not life-threatening; Update: The hate begins

  • mickeyco

    So nice to know that America isn’t the only nation that’s right on the edge of moral bankruptcy.

    • Joe W.

      Actually, the Brits are right there with us, and leading the way in some areas….

  • Kandeep

    Another example of COEXIST but only if you agree. Pathetic.

  • Infinite_Indeterminism

    Given the level of frustration in those messages, I now hope The Iron Lady makes AT LEAST 110! (Years, that is…)

    Mrs Thatcher, we salute you!

  • Howzah123

    These people are hateful little maggots

  • almarquardt

    It’s because of her and Ronald Reagan that we won the Cold War and need not fear nuclear holocaust.

    I’ll never forget how she defied doctor’s orders to attend Ronald Reagan’s funeral, and even forced herself on the plane carrying the Reagan family back to Ron’s final resting place.

    Iron Lady is the perfect description for her. Not only has she earned my total respect, but we could use more people like her.

    • ozconservative

      Here is some Thatcher awesomeness:

      It’s also interesting to see how the left haven’t changed much in 20 years

      • almarquardt

        Awesome indeed. Thanks for sharing!

  • ozconservative

    Will someone please tell me why I should be respectful when someone on the left dies

    • Blake Waymire

      Usually, I’d say it’s because we’re better than that on the right, but I’m starting to think it’s time to start fighting those morons the same way they fight us.

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      Because we are better than they are and recognise the value of human life, even if it is just some halfwit anti-American.

  • salvagesalvage

    It’s so cute the way that you guys ignore Thatcher’s chumming with Pinochet. Obama spent a few hours in a guy’s living room AND HE’S A TERRORIST! Thatcher gives material support to an actual tyrant AND SHE’S A HERO!

    See it’s these sort of inconsistencies that make you less conservative and more wingnuts.

    • Mike Rogers

      Practical diplomacy. Pinochet wasn’t a nice guy, but he rescued his country from communism and raised living standards for most people, then handed over peacefully to a civilian government.
      Compare with Obama’s support of Muslim dictators.

      • salvagesalvage

        Wasn’t a “nice guy”:

        Wingnuts! Where ignorance and glib walk hand in hand through an empty mind.

        • Mike Rogers

          Compare the millions of deaths under any kind of Socialism, National, or any other kind, with the depredations of Pinochet, as he
          suppressed communism a little too brutally, and you are in a whole different league.

          The problems of Latin America in the late 20th century can partially be traced to the fugitive Nazis and Fascisti who settled there. It is no coincidence that for many years, some of the most active routes of the LuftWaffe (sorry, LuftHansa) were to Brazil, Peru, Argentina, and Chile.
          Communists and leftists would say that you have to break a few eggs
          to make the mythical socialist omelette (which has NEVER been achieved), considering the deaths of millions of bourgeois in the process, unfortunate but necessary. But let a strongman of the right hunt down the communists which have been a pox on his people, and he is the very devil.

          Again, look at the people that Obama cozies up to – constitution busting would be dictators, Islamic tyrants, socialist leaders for life, and tell me he isn’t far, far, worse. (You will, of course, but you’re wrong)

          Have I driven you crazy yet?

        • PennyRobinsonFanClub

          Oh please, tell us about the Red Paradise Allende would have built. Tell us about the kindhearted Che`, who executed thousands for no reason except his cruelty — no, he never pulled the trigger on anyone personally, he was too much a coward. His last recorded words? “Don’t shoot! I’m Che! I’m worth more alive than dead!”

          Ffkk all you leftards. And especially ffkk Sal Allende.

        • lana ward


          • salvagesalvage

            Nah, no such things as gods, they’re stories made up by primitive cultures to explain and give the illusion of control over natural phenomenon. But hey, that’s just facts and logic, you being wingnut won’t get it, I understand.

    • ozconservative

      And Roosevelt and Churchill had an alliance with Stalin to fight Hitler. Sometimes you have to make alliances with people you don’t like in order to protect the world from someone even worse.

      • salvagesalvage

        So Pinochet was massacring families of Hitlers was he? You understand that right? He made men, women and children “disappear” for just being in the same villages of people who might have been commies.

        And the point you’re missing is that Thatcher was Pinochet’s pal!

        • ozconservative

          No-one is saying the guy wasn’t a brutal dictator. It’s just that the reason for the friendship was, aside from the mutual enemy of communism, the support Pinochet gave Britain during the Falklands war.

        • PennyRobinsonFanClub

          God Bless Pinochet. Would to God he had gone to to eradicate every living Commie in the hemisphere, including Goatpounder Castro.

          And Franklin Roosevelt was Josef Stalin’s pal. Ask 20 million Ukrainians about Stalin. Oh wait, you can’t. He killed them.

          • Mike Rogers

            Now you’re talking!
            Where’s that salvage squared guy now?

    • PennyRobinsonFanClub

      Viva Pinochet! Merde a Allende!

      • Mike Rogers

        Anybody have the stats on government caused deaths under Allende?

    • lana ward

      Omuslim is a terrorist and a traitor, and a murderer, and a queer. Great qualities for a “president”

      • salvagesalvage

        Yes! This is some excellent wingnuttery right here, please be sure to tell everyone about it!

  • Mike Rogers

    Let us compare for a moment.
    Conservatives hated everything Ted Kennedy stood for, but wished only the best outcome for him and his family when he became ill.
    Lefties and union thugs still hate Maggie Thatcher, but it’s personal. And yes, you can hear the union voices and thug attitudes in those vile tweets.

  • PennyRobinsonFanClub

    Oh, I’m SURE they’re only being metaphoric and ironic and us dimwit Teebaggerz just don’t understand their sly, subtle humor.

    Well, here’s some sly subtle humor for all you lefties: EAT A GLOCK!

  • Ronald

    Agree or disagree with Thatcher’s policies, fine. But it’s plain wrong to wish someone dead. I hope she recovers well!

  • PennyRobinsonFanClub

    Gee, too bad the Chilean people were an unarmed populace. If they had the benefit of a Second Amendment, they might have resisted tyranny of all kinds. But hey, that’s just NRA crazy talk, right?

  • Mike Rogers

    Ah, the reasoned and nuanced argument of the academic elite 😉

    You’ve been there and studied the culture, of course?
    You’ve flown the Luftwaffe shuttle like I have too, I presume?

    And let us remember where we started: you hate Thatcher because she practiced Realpolitik, but you don’t hate Obama for supporting socialist or islamic tyrants.

  • PennyRobinsonFanClub

    Viva Pinochet!

  • salvagesalvage

    Yes! That’s it, it was “realpolitik” to become best friends with a mass-murderer! That’s exactly what the word means and it’s well known that the allied leadership often visited with Uncle Joe well after the war and didn’t consider him a dangerous enemy!

    And yes! Obama is totally that too, why he re-wrote the last 40 years of American foreign policy. Why you never saw Bush walking hand in hand LITERALLY with the Saudi leadership who are nothing like Islamic socialist tyrants!

    Oh wingnuts, the stupid is always on repeat in the iPod that is your brains.

  • Mike Rogers

    You’re not making much sense, except to say that Obama is just as bad at encouraging depots (worse in my opinion for supporting the likes of Morsi, who will easily exceed anything Mubarak did).
    I did not refer to Islamic socialist tyrants, but to Islamic tyrants and socialist tyrants. There is no common ground in their ideology, except or the repression of the masses, although that is enough for our lefties to make common cause with Islamists.
    FDR longed to be able to employ the despotic methods of Lenin and Mussolini, and even admired Hitler until it became too obvious what kind of monster he was. Obama longs to be able to rule like the communist Chinese, and his acolytes frequently say so.
    And yes, I did see Bush walking hand in hand with the Saudi prince, and didn’t much like it, but it was better than bowing to them.
    Thatcher was a person of firm convictions, and worked first for the freedom and prosperity of her countrymen, and second for the rollback of communist tyranny everywhere. That is why the left hates her to this day.
    I have not yet completely decided whether Obama is a man of no convictions, or of completely alien convictions which should disqualify him from high office in any western nation. After all, he has knowingly (or naively) thrown more Christians to the ‘lions’ than all Roman emperors combined.

  • salvagesalvage

    Yes, yes, you’re a wingnut, I get it, please, you don’t need to blather your arglebargle further. You’ve made it clear that your outrage is as selective as your understanding of history and fact.

  • Mike Rogers

    Like your selective disgust with Thatcher?

    Merry Christmas!

  • salvagesalvage

    No, it’s not selective; Thatcher is disgusting in her domestic policies as well.

    See when I say “your outrage is selective” what I mean is when Obama does something that Bush has done you only get upset when Obama does it. There are cases when Bush did it and wingnuts cheered.

    The vacation thing is a good example, Bush broke records for taking vacation yet Obama can’t take Christmas off without wingnuts howling about how much golf he does and how the taxpayer has to pay for it all.

    It’s this sort of hypocrisy that is a hallmark of wingnuts. What’s interesting is wingnuts think everyone is like that. An example would be when the ACLU takes up the cause of an atheist or Muslim wingnuts will shriek about how the ACLU doesn’t defend Christians. This is of course wrong the ACLU has taken countless cases defending Christian right’s to pray or whatever.

  • Mike Rogers

    Vive la debate!

    Now I KNOW you’re somewhere between useful idiot and wannabe apparatchik. (I say this because you either do not comprehend the end result of
    the kind of leaders and ‘leadership’ you advocate, or expect to be
    one of the elite who profits from the new order.)

    I was THERE when Thatcher was elected, and I can tell you that her domestic policies were fine, and the lot of the man in the street improved immeasurably during her tenure, not the least of which because the unions were no longer able to hold the entire country hostage by refusing to mine coal, or shutting down electricity production every winter.
    Prior to Thatcher, the country had spend almost 40 years oscillating between hardline socialists who tried to nationalise all industry and appease the unions with handouts, and weak ‘conservatives’ who hadn’t got the guts to cut government, stare down the unions, and encourage job growth. Malaise would be a mild expression of the situation when she was elected.
    Thatcher achieved an economic boom, and an “ownership society” in
    ways that Bush could only dream of.
    I can also tell you, viewed both from inside and outside the armed forces, that Thatcher improved the pay and morale of the forces, and the public’s pride in them no end.

    I’m well aware of Bush’s limitations, the creeping loss of constitutional rights under the Patriot Act, and more: I just happen to think that Obama is a full boat socialist, and I’ve done plenty of reading on the topic.

    I find it hard to believe that Bush’s vacations exceeded Obama’s, but if you have the figures, so be it. On the other hand, Bush did not make a habit of sending his wife on separate vacations at the public expense, or flying her separately without regard for cost. Bush did not play golf so frequently, either, much preferring time on his own ranch, and often conducting official business there during so-called vacations.
    You fixated on Pinochet as a bad guy, but Obama is a big fan of Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, and given the chance, would have re-instated
    the constitution-busting Manuel Zelaya in Honduras. He declined to encourage opposition to Ahmedinejad, but happily encouraged the replacement of a secular despot with an Islamist one in Egypt (and Tunisia and Libya). Don’t bother to come back at me with Iraq – I wasn’t impressed by that adventure, either.

    You haven’t told me how much first-hand knowledge you have of the political history of the UK, or of your travels to Latin America, so I’m assuming none.

    I’m guessing that you use the term “WingNut” for everyone who advocates less government spending and meddling, and more individual freedom to work and prosper from our own efforts. The constitution DOES still matter, and I’m not selective in my application of that standard.
    Bet you think Che was a pretty neat character, eh?

  • salvagesalvage

    > but Obama is a big fan of Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro,

    Ha! Ha! Yes! He praises them endlessly so it should be a simple matter for you to provide an example?