Ann Coulter thinks Mitt Romney was superior to Ronald Reagan, and she is embarrassing herself fb.me/1o5hfdBpd—
Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) November 22, 2012
Really Ann? You mean Romney’s one debate bests Reagan’s decades of advocacy for conservatism, his battles with the Republican establishment, and his building a conservative movement? Fact is Romney has done nothing for conservatism. I repeat, nothing. No leadership. No grassroots efforts. No major policy initiatives. Nothing. Reagan won two landslides. Romney won nothing. Cherry-picking facts Ann, in some strange cult-like obsession, fools no one. Same with your cheerleading for Chris Christie.
Levin’s post was prompted by Coulter’s column, “Romney was not the problem.”
Exit question: Could Ronald Reagan win the presidency if he were running today?