Rick Santorum tweets about Chick-fil-A; Left responds with sexual slurs, gay-baiting

As tolerance tyrants attempt to block Chick-fil-A franchises in Chicago and Boston, former GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum tweeted his support for eating “mor chikin.”

Santorum and  Chick-fil-A have come under fire from the Left for supporting traditional marriage — the same position our first gay president held just a few months ago. While President Obama has escaped most of the Left’s outrage, the tolerance bullies immediately suspended their No H8 campaign to assail Santorum and his children with sexual slurs, accusations of bigotry and the always popular “You’re gay!”

“Best replies”? Sure, if you think gay-baiting Santorum and his kids and implying their relationship is incestuous is the way to sway people to your viewpoint. The responses to Santorum’s tweets were utterly vile.

https://twitter.com/nascar_jesus/status/228327177664479233

https://twitter.com/Cajun_Manor/status/228305543314423811

Despicable.

Several Twitter users hoped Santorum and his family would get sick or die.

https://twitter.com/SilenceeeSnake/statuses/228359242376171521

And one classy Twitterer — Simon Helberg of “The Big Bang Theory” — thought this was a good opportunity to bust out an Aurora joke.

Reminder: Chick-fil-A donated free meals to Aurora police working the shooting case.

Yesterday Rahm Emanuel said that “Chick-fil-A values are not Chicago values.” Do Chicago values include harassing a good man and his family for eating chicken and milkshakes together?

  • Junie3

    These people are so vile, sometimes I’m embarrassed to live in America.

    • http://twitter.com/thetugboatphil TugboatPhil

      And their mindless reactions are so predictable too.

      • Elaine

        Do they ever listen to themselves? They are so mean and nasty. It’s pathetic. So much hate because someone does NOT agree with them.

        • Hello Jerry (D)

          They are just as bad as Obambi.

    • Bill Steward

      I’m embarrassed that THEY live in America… Talking about kids that way or anyone should really get you called-out by your own party… Unfortunately, most is done anonymously through a computer…

      • http://twitter.com/TroyGates TroyGates

        Twitter is pushing for people to use their real name. Eventually Twitter won’t be anonymous, but could take years.

  • EJParsons

    When a Republican brings out that much leftie hatred, he must be doing something right. Go Rick! And Go Chic-fil-A! I’ll be joining the August 1 eat in and dipping some chikin’ in the Polynesian sauce.

  • dmont

    Apparently, Chicago values include murder, mayhem and political menacing. So, no Chik-fil-A doesn’t share Chicago values.

  • ozconservative

    In future, I’m calling this “Santorums Law”. It states that if you’re a prominent conservative, and you aren’t getting vile racist, sexist, homphobic slurs from libturds, then you’re not trying hard enough.

    • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

      That sounds familiar:

      “Blessed are you when people hate you and when they exclude you and revile you and spurn your name as evil, on account of the Son of Man!”
      — Luke 6:22

      “The world cannot hate you, but it hates me because I testify about it that its works are evil.”
      — John 7:7

      Way to go Rick!

      • Nikita Blue

        Yeah you’re right. That’s probably why everyone hates Hitler. Because he loved Jesus. LMFAO the ignorance on this site cracks me up. I love it.

        • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

          The point is being hated because of saying something that is right. Hitler was hated because he was evil (which, in case you missed it, is not right). Not surprised that someone on the left is having trouble with that right/wrong thing.

          • Nikita Blue

            Santorum is hated because of saying something that is WRONG. He is hated for his own hatred toward a group of innocent people. Not surprised at your dismissive generalization of “left” people either.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            duplicate post removed by author

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            So you’re claiming that it’s wrong to point out that homosexuality is abnormal, runs counter to physiology and that it’s practitioners suffer an STD rate more than 40 times higher than everyone else, leading to an (average) 20 year shorter life?

          • Nikita Blue

            Number one, homosexual behavior is found EVERYWHERE in nature, from dolphins to dogs to monkeys to goats… yeah, *everything.* So your little “physiologically abnormal” argument is just silly and antiquated. And I’d also like to know where your statistics come from… because obviously, straight people don’t do anal. Oh… wait… LMAO

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            A) Abnormal: Even if we accepted the overblown number of 10% homosexuals (the real number is somewhere in the neighborhood of 2%), that is still not “normal”.

            B) Physiology: You should already be intimately familiar with this one. Only one man and one woman can create a child. Period.

            C) Disease Rates: Source: CDC

            http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/Newsroom/msmpressrelease.html

            D) Shortened Lifespan: Two studies, one done by pro-gay researchers:

            http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2005/jun/05060606

          • Nikita Blue

            A) Abnormal: So are you saying that left-handed people are abnormal because they are only 10% of the population? http://www.livescience.com/19968-study-reveals-lefties-rare.html
            B) Physiology: Many male-female couples won’t be having children, either because one of them is infertile or because they just DON’T WANT TO.
            C) Disease Rates: I fail to see how this applies to the validity of marriage, unless you’re trying to say that people with diseases shouldn’t get married… also, this: “Additionally, factors such as homophobia and stigma can prevent MSM from seeking prevention, testing, and treatment services.”
            D) Shortened Lifespan: First off, the “pro-gay” study is outdated; it’s from 1997… find another one for Pete’s sake… and for two, this: “Dr. Paul Cameron, the President of the Family Research Institute and the
            scientist who headed the study, indicated that he was not at all
            surprised by the findings. Rather he said that it only served as further
            confirmation for what had long been known and other studies have
            already shown.” Any “scientist” who goes into a study with preconceived notions and bias about the outcome is bound to come to erroneous conclusions…
            And let’s pretend there *were* a thousand recent studies which proved that gay people have a shortened life-span… I don’t exactly see your point.
            Eating meat also shortens a person’s life-span… does this mean they should also be banned from marrying?? And those stats on the article on your little super-duper christianity site are ridiculous, considering that in my community alone, there are tons of old gay dudes. If the *average* age for gay men to live to was 20, it would be statistically impossible to have so many older gentlemen in one spot. In fact, I don’t even know a gay dude younger than 20. They’re not allowed in the bars 😀

            So please clarify your point. Let’s pretend you’re right about the last two… those things mean they can’t marry…? or was there some other point to this slanderous cr@p??

          • QuadGMoto

            Sigh. So much for intellectual honesty from you. What did I really expect?

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            And in case you missed the statistics the first time, here are some more:

            http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502263/posts

            http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=255614

            http://www.marriageresourcesforclergy.com/site/Articles/articles011.htm

            BTW, the FDA does not permit blood donations from anyone who has engaged in homosexual activity, for very, very good reasons:

            http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/QuestionsaboutBlood/ucm108186.htm

            Still think homosexuality is “just as good” as historic marriage?

          • Nikita Blue

            LMAO dude, really? “Studies” done by the Catholic Apologetics International? The next one done by CATHOLIC Medical Association? And then one on a website that is literally specifically for “clergy” that basically proves that people who have no option to get married don’t feel all that committed to one another? Wow, that one was a shocker LOL. Yer sillyyyy.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            Your response is called a Genetic Fallacy. It is illogical. And totally expected.

          • Nikita Blue

            No, a genetic fallacy would be more like, “Gays have always been associated with disease throughout history. Gay marriage would obviously bring disease!” Genetic fallacy is about taking the historical origins or past history of something and using it out of context to slander something. Or it can be when you misuse the etymology of a word to play semantics. You’re welcome.

          • QuadGMoto

            “The genetic fallacy is a fallacy of irrelevance where a conclusion is suggested based solely on something or someone’s origin rather than its current meaning or context. This overlooks any difference to be found in the present situation, typically transferring the positive or negative esteem from the earlier context.

            The fallacy therefore fails to assess the claim on its merit.”

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy

            Might I suggest learning what logic is?

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            Here’s a description which is a little more clear:

            A Genetic Fallacy is a line of “reasoning” in which a perceived defect in the origin of a claim or thing is taken to be evidence that discredits the claim or thing itself. It is also a line of reasoning in which the origin of a claim or thing is taken to be evidence for the claim or thing. This sort of “reasoning” has the following form:

            1. The origin of a claim or thing is presented.
            2. The claim is true(or false) or the thing is supported (or discredited).

            http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/genetic-fallacy.html

            In other words, claiming that the study results are invalid because a “catholic” site referred to the study (not “done by”) is a logical fallacy because the source mentioning that study has absolutely nothing to do with the validity of that study. A study is only valid/invalid if the methodology of the study is valid or invalid.

          • Nikita Blue

            First of all, you’re simply regurgitating exactly what I said but you had to get a quote off a site so you could be sure; second of all, my argument was obviously NOT a genetic fallacy and you know it and third of all, the study was done BY the Catholic Medical Association. Read your own stuff dude.

          • http://www.facebook.com/gary.dewyn Gary Dewyn

            Typically when animals commit homosexual acts it is usually not consummated with actual…well, let me keep this family-friendly, but you probably get the gist. Instead it is done to “discipline” a member of the pack or group as to who is the Alpha and who is the Beta.

          • QuadGMoto

            BTW, thanks for admitting that your side actively hates.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000907837716 Charmaine Carter

            Yes we hate. Unlike Christians we don’t hide like cowards behind God’s name to do our hating . We do it in our own name.

          • Nikita Blue

            Yes, agreed. I hate psychopaths, homophobes, racists and any individual who poisons society with blind prejudice and malevolent group-think.

        • SDN

          Except that Hitler by his own admission wasn’t Christian. #FAIL

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            You’re right. I missed that in her comment.

            Martin Borman persuaded Hitler to allow him to record Hitler’s private conversations for posterity. The result was the book Hitler’s Table Talk, where Hitler’s true ideas, the things he said in private, were recorded for all to see. Here is what he truly thought about Christianity:

            “The heaviest blow which ever struck humanity was Christianity; Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew.” (the night of July 11-12, 1941)

            “Christianity is an invention of sick brains: One could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A negro with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in Transubstantiation.” (Dec. 13, 1941)

            “I shall never come personally to terms with the Christian lie. … Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.” (Feb. 29, 1942)

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000907837716 Charmaine Carter

            “I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord..” Hitler ( Mein Kampf )

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000907837716 Charmaine Carter

            Everything Hitler did he did in God’s name. He was a professed christian.

          • SDN

            No, he was doing what all good leftists do: lying to his audience of dupes. Borman was a fellow traveller, so he could be honest with him. Gee, how many times has Obama been bitten by an open mike?

            “I’ll have more freedom after the election.”

          • Nikita Blue

            Or maaaybe claiming to be working for God is what all RIGHT-wingers do. Think, man. Think hard.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            First step in working for anyone: Make sure you accurately understand what they want.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            Wow. Talk about ignoring evidence you don’t like!

            Nearly every action Hitler took violated the Bible’s teachings. He slaughtered those who were careful to obey the Bible’s teachings. (Does the name Dietrich Bonhoeffer mean anything to you?) He professed in private that he wanted to destroy christianity along with the Jews, then acted on that desire in public.

            But your only “proof” is statements he made while he was telling a bunch of other lies in public to get people to go along with him?

            There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Thanks for illustrating that saying so vividly.

          • Nikita Blue

            *My* point was that Hitler was hated by left wingers. And was evil. Not good. He was wrong. Not right. He did so incurring the name of God publicly, whether or not he meant it. He discriminated against large groups of people without knowing them personally and he ignored their rights. I’m just saying that sounds a LOT like some people I’ve seen. Yeah, the ones on YOUR side.

          • QuadGMoto

            Scroll back up and read the tweets. Compare the tone of my side with the tone of your side. Which sounds more like Hitler?

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto
          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto
  • Paul Wafflez Wafula

    Wow, I’m simply amazed at these type of responses. The most amazing thing about it all is that so many of these people THEMSELVES know that they look down on gay people. If they didn’t why are they calling Santorum gay? They’re using the word gay as an insult. Doesn’t that just show you what type of people we’re dealing with here?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZWKBMKRC4WW675Q6WXMOUWHCA NCR Elite

      All of these supposedly pro-gay agenda people vote otherwise when they’re behind the curtain in the voting booth. It’s been shown time and time again. If the people decide they want to sponsor samesex marriage then we’ll vote for it, until then can the insults.

  • Linda White Besink

    What always stuns me is, people who supposedly support the entire gay agenda also consider it the worst thing they can say to someone is to call them gay. There’s a disconnect as wide as the Grand Canyon there.

    • yhxqqsn

      Exactly. It’s offensive to be called gay. But being gay is what we should all strive for.

    • disqus_LASIg6epmj

      I never understood that thinking either.

    • Nikita Blue

      No, genius; it’s the negative context in which the word “gay” is used as an insult. You’re ability to be stunned is merely a result of your inability to use your brain cells or empathy.

      • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

        Methinks you didn’t understand his point: People who claim homosexuality is okay are accusing someone else of being homosexual as an insult. That’s rank hypocrisy.

        • Nikita Blue

          No, they are saying it to *him* because *he* thinks it’s an insult. We all know it’s *not* an insult in reality.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            It’s the most insulting thing they can think of.

          • Nikita Blue

            @QuadGMoto: No, it’s sarcasm on their part and they know that, to him, it’s the worst thing *he* can think of. He’s a homophobe. He hates gay people. And that is why they hate him. Not because he “loves Jesus.” And *because* of the fact that he hates gay people, they call him gay. To piss him off. C’mon, use your brain.

          • LogicalAnswer

            Classy.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            Rick doesn’t actually hate gay people. Neither do most people who oppose homosexual behavior. Truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZWKBMKRC4WW675Q6WXMOUWHCA NCR Elite

            When did he ever say he hates gay people? He supports the traditional definition of marriage, which has remained for 2,000 years (or longer). You’ve been brainwashed to believe that opposition to taxpayer sponsored same-sex marriage is homophobic and/or anti-gay. Gay marriage is not banned or illegal –if two gay people want to get married they can –no cops are going to chase them down and arrest them or break up the ceremony –and they don’t need government validation for their love for one another.

            Many people oppose same sex marriage because the instution of marriage is the cornerstone of a civil society, why would you tamper with that? –simply because it ‘sounds good’? Instead of doing what sounds good let’s keep doing what has been working for thousands of years. One mother, one father, and lots of healthy children :-)

            BTW these “gay activists” are only hurting themselves and their cause by their nastiness and disgusting behavior.

          • Nikita Blue

            So how do single mothers fit in with your little theory? One mother and one father *hasn’t* been working for thousands of years, neither has it yielded lots of “healthy” children just based on the presence of a male and a female in the home.
            The problem isn’t the all-mighty “disapproval” of homosexual behavior by the Christians… it is the mistreatment of the gay community and the exclusion of their legal rights as human beings who love one another. You’d probably have been one of those people who’d have made the argument against interracial marriages, claiming that same-race couples have been the “cornerstone of a civil society” and the rest of the ridiculous rhetoric you’ve spewed here. It was wrong then, it is wrong now. You guys have merely chosen a different group to focus your hatred — oops, of course I meant “disapproval” — on.
            For the record, *Christians* have been doing nothing but hurting *their* cause with their nastiness and disgusting behavior. Christians even stoop so low as to demonstrate at FUNERALS.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            So much fail, so little time. Let’s start here:

            “Christians even stoop so low as to demonstrate at FUNERALS.”

            Westboro Baptist Church acts contrary to Biblical teachings. See here (plus my comments there) for starters:

            http://twitchy.com/2012/07/23/odious-westboro-planned-to-picket-prayer-vigil-for-aurora-victims-posts-fake-photos-pretending-they-were-there/

            IMHO, they are a cult.

          • Nikita Blue

            Wait… are you saying that all Christians aren’t the same? LMAO!! #FAIL

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            Are you really that blind? Really?!? #FAIL

          • Nikita Blue

            So how do single mothers fit in with your little theory? One mother and one father *hasn’t* been working for thousands of years, neither has it yielded lots of “healthy” children just based on the presence of a male and a female in the home.
            The problem isn’t the all-mighty “disapproval” of homosexual behavior by the Christians… it is the mistreatment of the gay community and the exclusion of their legal rights as human beings who love one another. You’d probably have been one of those people who’d have made the argument against interracial marriages, claiming that same-race couples have been the “cornerstone of a civil society” and the rest of the ridiculous rhetoric you’ve spewed here. It was wrong then, it is wrong now. You guys have merely chosen a different group to focus your hatred — oops, of course I meant “disapproval” — on.
            For the record, *Christians* have been doing nothing but hurting *their* cause with their nastiness and disgusting behavior. Christians even stoop so low as to demonstrate at FUNERALS.

          • bret robertson

            ok Nikita its clear you know nothing about Christians except for what the media morons tell you the bible does say homosexuality is a sin how ever to hate any human being is as well so if you have ever heard Santorum say he hates Homosexual people he has sinned. and on another note you are aware the words gay and fag are hijacked words rights? they do not mean what the homosexual community says they mean? its true gay is an old word originating in the 12th century meaning
            “joyful”, “carefree”, “full of mirth”, or “bright and showy
            and fag was originally used by the English to mean cigarrete

          • Nikita Blue

            Stop being a child. A word’s meaning is reflected by the speaker’s intent.

          • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

            deleted by author

          • bret robertson

            is that the best you got quit being a child? typical name calling from a leftist when some one points out facts , oh wait are YOU Judging me based on my pic ?

          • Nikita Blue

            Stop being a child. A word’s meaning is reflected by the speaker’s intent.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZWKBMKRC4WW675Q6WXMOUWHCA NCR Elite

        “you’re”? oh the irony, genius.
        Is gay a slur or not? Context schmontex.

        • Nikita Blue

          No, “gay” is not a slur. I agree. I don’t know why you guys think it is.

        • Nikita Blue

          No, “gay” is not a slur. I agree. I don’t know why you guys think it is.

  • lillymckim

    Bill Mahers children on twitter TUI!

  • Grumpa Grumpus

    !-Homosexual_vs_People
    I’m taking screen-shots & printing out these wonderful comments homosexuals are so thoughtfully providing.

    The next time a homosexual regales me with his faux stories of oppression I’m going to gift him copies of the screenshots! They are determined to prove that those who feel they should be persecuted are correct.

    And I know people will start whining about the unfairness of holding a whole category responsible for the actions of a few… Some problems with that position:

    1) They do the very same, but they’re attacking children.

    2) The percentage of the population who commits this behavior is approximately 7%, but definitely not greater than 10%. The percentage raising hell is of the group seems quite large. I’m under no obligation to accept a lifestyle that’s consistently irate. Nor am I required to accept a lifestyle that sets out to purposely be a constant irritation! So I won’t! Sorry, folks, you’ve pushed me too far and now — instead of seeking an equitable solution and assuming error on both sides — I assume the fault is the homosexual’s. First, last, and always. They’ve shown eagerness to commit antisocial acts. They loudly proclaim they derive pride and satisfaction from hurting others, especially children! I’m done. I’m tired of catering to people who get jollies from hurting innocent kids!

    3) Next you’ll hear: “don’t blame us! It’s just a tiny percent of bad actors!”
    Really? You couldn’t prove it by me!
    Also, let me relate a little history:
    Racism (by White racists) was always believed and practiced by a small number of whites. It was almost stamped out. Slavery of blacks in Western Civilization was stamped out because the majority of whites pressured the bigots/slavers to stop! Slavery was on its way out before the Civil War!

    That war was the domino-fall result
    of a chain of events that represented the slaver’s failing last-gasp attempt to prolong a failing institution.

    But make no mistake. Slavery was dead on its feet. It was suffocated by the majority who disapproved of it! This was done through constant, loud, well-publushed, high profile shaming! Without the constant withering expressions of disapproval by the majority of whites slavery would still be here.

    So, we can deduce from the clicking of the crickets, that the majority of homosexuals approve of the antisocial actions of the so-called minority of their number.

    I think homosexuals should have no rights. They’ve shown repeatedly by their actions that they cannot conduct themselves within the limits of civil society. Antisocial actions prove the necessity to limit their scope of action.

    They have become more and more comfortable displaying their love for attacking children. As we’ve shown an increased willingness for discussion and accommodation they have shown an increased zeal and ever increasing relish to humiliate, demean, scar and destroy innocent children. I fear the next step. Beating to death the children of those who disagree with you? Why not? When they cease to jolly-on from the emotional frenzy of slashing children psychologically, the next step is the physical. I am confident that in another decade that’s what you’ll see. The parallel of this is the black flash gangs and the “knockout game”.

    You say I’m being silly, but think back a few years. Did you ever thing such public filth would ever be aimed at innocent children?

    They also think they’ve set up the perfect “when did you stop beating your wife?” scenario. If you object to them, or display normal caution and comon sense you are “homophobic, afraid b/c you’re a latent homosexual”. In otherwords, if you object to rape you are a closet rapist; child molestation: a latent child molester; murder: a wannabe murderer. In short, if you do not approve you are phobic via latency!

    So, in effect — because people take their measure of others from themselves and always claim you don’t know about something until you’ve done it yourself, they must, of necessity, be child molesters and approve of all these things!

    How else do you explain their facility and detail in the child molestation tweets? Because they they’ve molested children of course! And, since they haven’t written approvingly of, murder, rape, rapine they’re closet practitioners or committed these acts in their past and were afraid because they liked it, at the very least, latent rapists, murderers, and hertosexuals!

    I’ll tell you what. I’ll make it easy for the homosexuals who want to demonize me:

    I once did — and still strive to — apply the Biblical standard: we are all sinners, all do things which Our Heaven Father disapproves of. He & His Son commands us, his children, to forgive all, and to love each other because we are all related. We are all His children. He has also commanded us to hate sin, because eventually it will make us unhappy. In the past I’ve strived to “hate the sin but love the sinner”. I still do.

    BUT, I am not required to put my Grandchildren and Great-Grandchildren at the mercy of psychotic hateful people. I won’t. You have lost my goodwill.

    I am homophobic. I’m also homicidal maniac-phobic, child molester-phobic, rapist-phobi, and cyanide-o-phobic — for the exact same reasons. They have, over time and through observation proven that I should fear them.

    I am very afraid of you. You have given me a very good reason to be. Your actions are deranged and unhinged. Your words and deeds are antisocial and aimed at innocents. You can hem & haw, but look at them!

    No more concessions. No more leeway. No more goodwill or benefit of the doubt! You yourselves have shown through actions that you are too dangerous to allow greater acceptance!

    From this moment on I will speak against any and all that you desire, until you desist and retreat from harming innocent children. You see them as dispensable pawns, throwaways. Don’t lie. Your actions speak so eloquently on this point! I don’t see children as trash, to be used, torn-up, and thrown away.

    That is why I am a homophobe. My words will stand between you and my posterity. Should it be required of me, when your derangement drives you to physical attacks — when the psychological high from verbal abuse becomes insufficient — my body will stand between you and your goals, also.

    • HuntsWithThimbles

      How many gay children have been beaten or driven to suicide by homophobes? Compare that to the “danger” you claim comes from gays.

  • Voting Female

    They hug RINOs like Justice Roberts. Their actions signal who to vote for in primary elections and it ain’t RINOs.

  • Im_Rick_James

    In honor of the “tolerance” of the left, I shall eat Chik-Fil-A for lunch today. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, commies :-)

    • Hello Jerry (D)

      More like crack pipe.

  • LightSabre

    I don’t know why, but it always amazes me how full of hatred the lib’s tweets are when it comes to talking about conservatives. And, BTW, I don’t ordinarily eat at Chick-fil-a, but I did yesterday, just to give some business to an organization that stands for Christian beliefs and values.

    • Elaine

      They are not just Christian beliefs and values. Many people think marriage should be ENCOURAGED, not redefined.

  • SuperstionQueen

    Wow. These people are beyond vile.

  • Stacey

    I can’t even read these. Horrible ..and I am the daughter of a Sailor.

  • Cruz2016!!!

    Is twitter down and having problems? Because I just tweeted in support for Chick-fil-A and now all of a sudden I can no longer get on Twitter. Not sure if my account was suspended yet because I can’t get on to see. If it was, I hope all conservatives report on this!

    • http://twitter.com/TroyGates TroyGates

      Twitter is having problems today, they are blaming the Olympics increasing the volume of tweets per sec.

      • Cruz2016!!!

        Thank you Troy. I just couldn’t put anything past liberals and how they had so many conservatives banned from twitter for no reason.

  • Amy

    I continue to be completely appalled & shocked by the vileness and capacity for evil that the so called tolerant liberals bring to the conversation via Twitter. It’s actually depressing to think that so many people can be so completely void of just common decency.

  • avgjoepolitico

    No! No! Please don’t tease the Gay-BLTs; they have the right to live a life that is free from harrasment, just like everyone else! Apparently that only applies to them; for if someone scrutinizes the lifestyle of the Gay-BLTs, that person is not afforded the same rights! Where I went to school, that is reverse racism; or sexism if you like. Keep stirring up discontent; but don’t wonder why when you see the news reports that a member of the Gay-BLTs has been harrassed. Heterosexual people have the rght to free speech too. Just cuz your a Gay-BLT doesn’t mean you have cornered the market on civil rights.

  • Tanker74

    It always amazes me when ignorant heterophobes make homosexual slurs against those they hate. That must mean they’re also homophobes. These people are obviously dealing with suppressed heterosexual tendencies and an in-the-closet understanding of natural law.

  • Robert Patrick Moscato

    I am hundres of miles from a Chik-fil-A, so I think I’m gonna buy some waffle fries and make a chicken sandwhich for lunch this comming Wednesday. Being anti-hetosexual really is becomming of the the above twittwer comments wouldn’t you say??

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000406122913 Tim Johns

    Both Emanuel and the other bozo in Boston need to write up a list.A list of all the subject matter that they feel cannot be uttered in public so that anyone who is thinking of building a business in either city can figure it into their business plan so they don’t waste their time and money building it up just to be denied a license.

    /sarc

    Free speech, free market, HAH, they had you fooled.

  • http://quadgmoto.myopenid.com/ QuadGMoto

    Even if homosexuality itself was morally neutral (it’s not), the overflowing bile, over-the-top hatred and aggresively vile slander pouring out of that worldview should be plenty to condemn them to the ash heap of history’s most idiotic ideas.

  • BeeKaaay

    Leftwingwackos are horrible and evil.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_6YUCIZHBJKXVHQSSNVH4GGG3HQ Charles

    When it comes to hate and intolerance, no one is better at it than your rabid left winger. My view is that these people are such deep down racists, bigots and haters that they project this onto everyone else. To deal with their internal guilt about these feelings, they fall all over themselves to prove that they are in control of suppressing their racist/bigoted beliefs. These tweets are truly disgusting and demonstrate how mentally warped many of these people are.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000907837716 Charmaine Carter

      sounds like projection

  • Hello Jerry (D)

    The “peaceful tolerant left” showing their true colors.

  • Guest

    I’ve never eaten at a Chik-fil-A before, but that’s about to change.
    And I too am amazed that the Left is so ignorant that they are reduced to name-calling as a defensive stance.

  • mrbill59

    So much hate from the “Tolerant” left

  • Hello Jerry (D)

    Keyboard Rambos wouldn’t dare say the shit they spew outside the
    confines of their basement/echo chamber without getting a busted nose,
    or worse.

    Over/under on what % of the Twatter Twits have accounts at HuffPo, Daily Kos or Democratic Underground?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WZWKBMKRC4WW675Q6WXMOUWHCA NCR Elite

    I’m glad I’m on the side of the political spectrum that isn’t totally raunchy and disgusting

  • LogicalAnswer

    These are the reasons people hate gays. Not because they’re gay, but because they are self-righteous, hateful, intolerant, filthy-mouth, perverted, assholes who think they deserve special treatment. They think they should be allowed to say whatever they want, do whatever they want, and be perverts when and wherever they want with no repercussions. Well guess what, nobody gets that! Why should you?! Stop being such a whiney bunch of bitches and go eat at Hardee’s if Chik-Fil-A pisses you off. I’m sick of hearing about it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kandy.florentine Kandy Florentine

    Isn’t it so “funny” that liberals–who are supposed to be accepting of everyone & everything–are the worst ones at using vile language when someone doesn’t agree with them???

  • irisham

    Everyone who already goes to chic fi A double your purchase, anyone who hasn’t tried it, you’ll love it!

  • http://twitter.com/defectiveweebil Carla

    WOW……………..I can not believe how much hate and stupid comments against Rick Santorum and his kids……………..we have surely come far, America…………………it’s discusting………………….I would love to support Chick fil A if there was one around. Traditional values are our right as well. Praying for you……………………….