My decision about the Michele Malkin Thingy that slimed me last week was to ignore it, fwiw -- and everyone else did too
—
Joan Walsh (@joanwalsh) April 30, 2012Isn’t she just precious? She’s totally ignoring it, which is why she’s still talking about it four days later.
Good thing you're not still talking about it RT @joanwalsh My decision about the Malkin Thingy that slimed me last week was to ignore it—
Orwell Force (@OrwellForce) April 30, 2012
The truth smarts, doesn’t it, Joan? No wonder you aren’t a fan of it. How dare we “slime” you with facts?!
We’re pretty sure one of the reasons that she’s still whining about it four days later is because, no, people did not ignore it. See, people are funny that way. They like being informed of facts. Like the fact that you, Joan, almost single-handedly destroyed the Left’s attempt at faux outrage over Monica Crowley. Kudos, ma’am!
Trying to save face with your fellow travelers now, huh? Only the severely intelligence-deficient will buy it, toots. Like these classy folks.
@joanwalsh I missed it but I don't usually read one trick ponies who are intellectually dishonest, limited in their scope & grasp of issues—
Donald Flad Jr (@DonaldFladjr) April 30, 2012
@joanwalsh I haven't even heard Michele Malkin's name in some time. I assumed she moved into Glen Beck's basement.—
Dave Zirin (@EdgeofSports) April 30, 2012
@joanwalsh responding to Michele Malkin is like trying to teach a Gerbil Faust. a waste of time for you both.—
Jon Hartmann (@jonhartmannjazz) April 30, 2012
Yuk, yuk, yuk! How clever. And by clever, we mean super lame and tired.
Here’s a tip: reminding them of your idiocy by pitifully whining and further drawing attention to your dumbassery is not the way to do that. You’re welcome!
