eric holder = john woo.. no joke more on this soon..
—
John Cusack (@johncusack) April 03, 2012can anyone say john woo? motherjones.com/mojo/2012/03/c…—
John Cusack (@johncusack) April 03, 2012
The Holder Justice Department, featuring … Chow Yun-Fat? Not exactly. Cusack meant to compare Holder to Bush administration DOJ official John Yoo.
@johncusack Woo's on first?—
MonkeyMan (@Boudreauxabides) April 04, 2012
@johncusack do you mean John Yoo?—
Jacqueline Frances (@HeyJacquiDey) April 04, 2012
@johncusack Isn't John Woo the famous movie director? Do you mean John Yoo?—
Sean Stone (@sstone5173) April 04, 2012
“@johncusack: eric holder = john woo.. no joke more on this soon..”
OMG FACE/OFF IS REAL—
t.a.m.s.y. (@surprisinger) April 03, 2012
Cusack is known for taking ample creative license with spelling and grammar, but this time he actually admitted to his error:
Yes! Sorry – the lawyer who authorized torture for bush – RT @sstone5173 Isn't John Woo the famous movie director? Do you mean John Yoo?—
John Cusack (@johncusack) April 04, 2012
No worries, John. We knew it had something to do with the Bush/Cheney cabal. It always does.