James O'Keefe 'Accomplice' Nadia Naffe To Tell All mediaite.com/a/saobr (Column By @tommyxtopher )
—
Mediaite (@mediaite) March 16, 2012
Yesterday Mediaite published this article by Tommy Christopher about Harvard student Nadia Naffe’s falling out with conservative activist James O’Keefe. The article cites tweets alleging that Naffe was “held” in a barn on O’Keefe’s property against her will and was the victim of a “rape plot.” Mediaite re-published this tweet by Ms. Naffe, implying that Andrew Breitbart refused to help her when she was forcibly held in the barn:
Now, your an expert on 'rape plots'? I called you that night I was held in the barn to ask for help @andrewbreitbart @DavidShuster—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) February 26, 2012
Mediaite also re-published this tweet, which was re-tweeted by Ms. Naffe:
@sarahcgoldstein @NadiaNaffe Why is she a piece of shit Sarah? If James drugs you and tries to rape you, you better keep quiet, right??—
(@OccupyRebellion) March 08, 2012
So O’Keefe drugged Naffe and tried to rape her in the barn? Those are some strong allegations, right there.
Just in case the reader still doesn’t get the O’Keefe-as-predator meme, the Mediaite article states that Naffe’s allegations carry “disturbing echoes of the Abbie Boudreau ‘CNN Sex Boat Caper.’”
Current TV anchor David Shuster made similar claims about a “alleged sex assault plan” several weeks ago:
Hey @JamesokeefeIII apologize to @nadianaffe. And @AndrewBreitbart why wont u condemn his alleged sex assault plan? current.com/shows/countdow…—
David Shuster (@DavidShuster) February 27, 2012
In response, O’Keefe sued Shuster for libel. At the time, O’Keefe said, “I welcome criticism and even misguided hatred. But, if they call me a felon, if they call me a rapist, or any other disgusting, libelous, ridiculous thing, I will bring them into a courtroom, I will depose them, I will get access to their e-mails. I don’t care how many golden statues they have, I don’t care how many Emmies, Pulitzers they have. We will bring them to justice.”
Late last year, Naffe filed a harrassment complaint related to the “barn incident” and its aftermath against O’Keefe in a New Jersey criminal court.
In an important post, conservative blogger Patterico observed that the allegations in Naffe’s complaint — even if true — do not support the insinuation by Shuster et al. that O’Keefe was involved in a “rape plot.”
Patterico observes:
we learn from the transcript that the increasingly infamous incident at the “barn” (a makeshift office with a furnished bed, bathroom, and kitchen) was not even the subject of Naffe’s harassment complaint. Instead, she complained essentially that O’Keefe said disparaging things about her after the fact. We learn as we read the transcript that Olbermann and Shuster completely distorted the allegations testified to by Ms. Naffe, twisting the allegations into a virtual rape — when Ms. Naffe did not claim at the time to have been touched, threatened, drugged, or harassed in any way that night…
According to the transcript, we learn that after O’Keefe had left, Naffe decided she wanted to leave, and insisted that O’Keefe return to the barn. She claimed to be feeling sick, which she suspected was from the alcohol she had drunk: “I thought the alcohol had made me sick.” Apparently not suspecting O’Keefe of having done anything wrong, she tried to get him to come back to the barn. He initially refused:
But he refused to come back to the barn. He said that all he cared about was his project. He insisted that I spend the night there and that we take the matter up in the morning. He wanted to go shoot videos the next day….
Maybe not the most gentlemanly behavior, if the allegations are true — but not the behavior of a sex fiend.
There is much more at the link. Please read the whole thing.
The full transcript of Naffe’s testimony is here. Even if every word of Naffe’s testimony is true, there is nothing in it that comes even close to a “rape plot.”
Here’s Patterico again: “In court, Naffe repeatedly told the judge that she was not claiming that what happened at the barn was harassment — much less a ‘rape allegation’ or an ‘alleged sex assault plan.’ The [judge] repeatedly said that he could not find anything in her certification that sounded like harassment, and she confirmed that she had not been threatened or touched…”
Let us be clear: We don’t have a problem with Mediaite covering Naffe’s allegations. We do have a problem with Mediaite’s failure to mention that the allegation of a “rape plot” is inconsistent with the allegations in Naffe’s criminal complaint.
When Patterico saw Tommy Christopher’s article, he was furious; an all-out Twitter war ensued:
@tommyxtopher Free advice: vet @NadiaNaffe a little more thoroughly than you vetted Nikki Reid.—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
@tommyxtopher One final point: it is despicable for you to attack Andrew Breitbart, who can't defend himself. #livebyyourownrulespal—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
@patterico how the hell did I attack AB? That's a vicious lie. Never said anything I didn't say to his face, or he couldn't respond to. …—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
@tommyxtopher Where was AB when this call was made Tommy? My God, I never thought I'd see you sink this low.—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
@tommyxtopher You implied AB was callous about a "rape plot" without telling your readers that Naffe denied being harassed in her testimony.—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
@tommyxtopher Your gleeful repetition of an attack on AB w/o providing context is unforgivable.—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
@patterico you crossed the line there. Do not tweet or otherwise contact me. Unbelievable.—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
@tommyxtopher I crossed the line? You leapt over the line and never looked back. #scumbagmove—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
What do @tommyxtopher and @davidfrum and @mattyglesias and @nadianaffe have in common?—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
You're being too kind. RT @AblativMeatshld: @Patterico They are all lying shitpiles? @tommyxtopher @davidfrum @mattyglesias @NadiaNaffe—
(@Patterico) March 17, 2012
Meanwhile, Naffe says that she (not O’Keefe or Breitbart!) is the one being smeared:
I feel a smear coming @anonops “@Patterico: @tommyxtopher Free advice: vet @NadiaNaffe a little more thoroughly than you vetted Nikki Reid.”—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) March 17, 2012
She claims to possess emails from Andrew Breitbart about what she calls the “barn incident”:
I wasn't going to post Breitbarts emails & texts abt the barn incident, but it almost sounds like @Patterico is daring me to. @tommyxtopher—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) March 17, 2012
Threatening to disclose a dead man’s private emails? Classy.
Update: She’s not done:
The most disengenous part of @patterico's argument is he's now using the memory of his dead friend @AndrewBreitbart to shield O'keefe.—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) March 17, 2012
They're using Brietbart as excuse to cover for O'keefe. @ElectMarcoRubio @patterico @liberty_chick @keitholbermann @tommyxtopher @stranahan—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) March 17, 2012
And Tommy Christopher’s response? Not to apologize to O’Keefe or to Breitbart’s family for leaving out important context in his article, but, rather, to call Patterico “sick”:
@NadiaNaffe Sick.—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
Related: Late last month, Naffe claimed to be in possession of seven years’ of emails from O’Keefe’s gmail account:
About 7yrs worth of his emails. I dare not delete anything now @DavidShuster could subpoena them as evidence. @ElectMarcoRubio—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) February 29, 2012
Update: We asked Tommy Christopher for comment on this article. Here is his repsonse:
@TwitchyTeam It's a lie. Of course. I "imply" nothing about AB, pointed out everything you & Pat. claim I omitted. YOU omitted crucial info—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
@TwitchyTeam For example, that I sought, and secured, comment from @JamesOKeefeIII , who opted to attack Nadia rather than give his side—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
@TwitchyTeam Disgusting that you would accuse me of attacking AB. Piece was zero about him. I didn't send those tweets, reported w context.—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
Christopher denies that he failed to report on the contradiction between Naffe’s criminal complaint (in which she acknowledges that no harassment occurred at the barn) and the subsequent “rape plot” allegations.
@TwitchyTeam Article presents allegations as just that, allegations, which are unclear at this time, but will become clear soon, apparently—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
@TwitchyTeam Not true. Learn to read. Or hire someone who can. bit.ly/ytRwyT—
Tommy Christopher (@tommyxtopher) March 17, 2012
Twitchy stands by its reporting. Readers can read Mediaite’s article here and compare it to Naffe’s testimony here. Judge for yourself.
Update: Turns out we can embed Naffe’s testimony right here:
Update: If Naffe was upset about Andrew Breitbart’s failure to help her escape from O’Keefe’s “rape plot,” she didn’t show any evidence of it in her Twitter communications last fall. The alleged “barn incident” took place on October 2, 2011. Just four days later, Naffe was happily retweeting Breitbart’s tweets:
Go figure: @AndersonCooper & @AC360 at forefront of Pigford journalistic cover-up! Uses huckster 'Dr.' John Boyd to attack whistleblowers.—
(@AndrewBreitbart) October 06, 2011
Why won't @AndersonCooper & @AC360 show the actual discriminated Pigford black farmers: Jimmy Dismuke, Eddie Slaughter, Abraham Carpenter?—
(@AndrewBreitbart) October 06, 2011
Fact. RT @AndrewBreitbart: I just realized something, Dems abuse black people. Use them as props/frontmen to hide liberal corruption.—
Nadia Naffe (@NadiaNaffe) October 06, 2011
She continued to retweet Breitbart throughout October and November 2011:
Racist Fascism on Tape: Lisa Fithian, Organizer Behind #OccupyWallSt, Addresses Activists in Chicago: bit.ly/oy1Lyo #OWS—
(@AndrewBreitbart) October 11, 2011
Simple question, @DylanRatigan: Do you stake NBC News' reputation on women being safe at the #Occupy protests you as a journalist endorse?—
(@AndrewBreitbart) October 19, 2011
I knew you sucked, @jayrosen_nyu! Now we know why! 'We are the 1%' ('the elite')? You actually say/affirm that stuff aloud in J School?—
(@AndrewBreitbart) October 27, 2011
NBC News Star Rallies #OccupyDC To Protest NRA; Calls For Boycott Against Restaurant Chains For ‘Protecting’ Cain: bit.ly/tHpD0j—
(@AndrewBreitbart) November 04, 2011
Those aren't 'civil rights leaders' supporting #OWS. Those are lead bullies & ideological purity enforcers of radicalized DemParty. @Jobrny—
(@AndrewBreitbart) November 06, 2011
I'm gonna stick w my non-violent, non-rapin', cleans-up-after-itself, media-maligned Tea Party. 'The 99%' has shown its stripes. @UncleRUSH—
(@AndrewBreitbart) November 06, 2011
What are you still blabbing about? Still defendin' all the #OWS muderin' & rapin' & poopin' & police provokin'? @EricBoehlert @Flynn1776—
(@AndrewBreitbart) November 18, 2011
Today on @Toure's 'That Broccoli is Racist: What Happens When The Broccoli IS Racist!' Dems again pass over key black for leadership!—
(@AndrewBreitbart) November 28, 2011



















